14
Student Learning Objectives and Maryland’s Reform Vision

SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This slide show provides an overview of Maryland's Vision for School Reform and the way in which SLOs fit into the overall vision.

Citation preview

Page 1: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Student Learning Objectives and Maryland’s Reform Vision

Page 2: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Maryland’s Vision for Education Reform

Revise the PreK-12 Maryland State

Curriculum

Redesign Teacher & Principal

Preparation, Development, Retention, and Evaluation

Build a Statewide Technology

Infrastructure

Implement the Breakthrough Center

Approach

WORLD CLASS STUDENTS

2

Page 3: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Maryland’s Vision for Education Reform

Revise the PreK-12 Maryland State

Curriculum

Redesign Teacher & Principal

Preparation, Development, Retention, and Evaluation

Build a Statewide Technology

Infrastructure

Implement the Breakthrough Center

Approach

WORLD CLASS STUDENTS

3

Page 4: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation

12.5 %

Instruction

12.5 %

Classroom Environment

12.5 %

Professional Responsibilities

12.5 %

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and

• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolTeacher

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

or

9/27/12

or or

Page 5: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation

12.5 %

Instruction

12.5 %

Classroom Environment

12.5 %

Professional Responsibilities

12.5 %

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and

• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolTeacher

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

or

9/27/12

or or

Page 6: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation

12.5 %

Instruction

12.5 %

Classroom Environment

12.5 %

Professional Responsibilities

12.5 %

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and

• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolTeacher

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

or

9/27/12

or or

Page 7: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Teacher Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation

12.5 %

Instruction

12.5 %

Classroom Environment

12.5 %

Professional Responsibilities

12.5 %

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10% - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10% - Math MSA (Class)and

• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Mathematics Teachers:• 20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 10% - School Performance Index

and• 20% - Student Learning Objectives

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolTeacher

• 15% - School Performance Index

and• 35% - Student Learning Objectives

50 % Qualitative Measures4 Domains Each 12.5%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

or

9/27/12

or or

Page 8: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Local Teacher Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth

Planning andPreparation Instruction

Classroom Environment

Professional Responsibilities

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Two Content Areas

• 10 % - Reading MSA (Class)and

• 10 % - Math MSA (Class)and

• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Elementary/Middle School Teacher One Content Area

English/Language Arts Teachers:• 20% - Reading MSA (Class)

and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Mathematics Teachers:•20% - Math MSA (Class)

and• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

Elementary/Middle School Teacher

Non-Tested Subject

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

High SchoolTeacher

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE

or

Additional Domains Based on Local Priorities

50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

9/27/12

or or

Page 9: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

•10% - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10% - Math MSA (School)and

• 10% - School Performance Indexand

•20% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolPrincipals

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)

• School Operations and Budget• Effective Communication• Influencing the School Community• Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics

or

9/27/12

or

Page 10: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

•10% - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10% - Math MSA (School)and

• 10% - School Performance Indexand

•20% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolPrincipals

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)

• School Operations and Budget• Effective Communication• Influencing the School Community• Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics

or

9/27/12

or

Page 11: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

•10% - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10% - Math MSA (School)and

• 10% - School Performance Indexand

•20% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolPrincipals

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)

• School Operations and Budget• Effective Communication• Influencing the School Community• Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics

or

9/27/12

or

Page 12: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

State Principal Evaluation ModelProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

•10% - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10% - Math MSA (School)and

• 10% - School Performance Indexand

•20% - Student Learning Objectives

High SchoolPrincipals

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

•15% - School Performance Indexand

•35% - Student Learning Objectives

50% Qualitative Measures12 Domains Each 2-10%

50% Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

Interstate School Leaders and Licensure Consortium (4)

• School Operations and Budget• Effective Communication• Influencing the School Community• Integrity, Fairness, and Ethics

or

9/27/12

or

Page 13: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Local Principal Evaluation ModelsProfessional Practice Student Growth

Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework (8)• School Vision• School Culture • Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment• Observation/Evaluation of Teachers • Integration of Appropriate Assessments • Use of Technology and Data • Professional Development • Stakeholder Engagement

Elementary/Middle School Principals

• 10 % - Reading MSA (School)and

• 10 % - Math MSA (School)and

• 30% - LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE

High SchoolPrincipals

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

Other Principals (e.g., Special Center, PreK-2)

LEA proposed objective measures of student growth and learning linked to state and/or local goals and approved by MSDE; no single measure to exceed 35%

Additional Domains Based on Local

Priorities

50 % Qualitative MeasuresDomain percentages proposed by LEA and approved by MSDE

50 % Quantitative MeasuresAs defined below

or

9/27/12

or

Page 14: SLOs and Maryland Reform Vision

Maryland Teacher and Principal Evaluation System

Teacher/Principal Evaluation

Identified Areas of Recognition and Growth for

Teacher or Principal

High Quality Professional

Development

More Effective Teaching and Leadership

Increased Student

Achievement

14

WORLDCLASS

STUDENTS