Upload
emilydanvers
View
116
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Troubling the
concept: students’
experiences of
critical thinking in
higher education
Emily Danvers
Centre for Higher Education and Equity
Research (CHEER)
University of Sussex, UK
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/education/cheer
The research in progress
• 2nd year of ESRC funded PhD• Interviews with 15 students at the beginning (Oct) and end (May) of
their 1st year at university. • 2 cohorts - an academic and a professional social science course at a
University in the South of England. Participant(ish) observation of both
cohorts in a compulsory module.• Following around the concept, interrogating what it makes possible/not
possible using Ahmed’s work on sociability and affect (2010) and
Berlant’s (2005) work on (un)happy futures.
Critical thinking as…
‘Part of the furniture’ in Higher Education.
Conceptualised in a number of ways:
• A mechanised skill for employability
akin to problem solving• A cognitive product of ordered, logical
thinking• An individual process of self-reflection • The force behind social transformation
…As a tacit social practice (Anderson,
1997 as a normative practice (Bailin et.
al, 1999).
Emerging themes 1/2
Negotiating an affective tightrope
• Critical thinking associated with freedom, peace & empowerment but
also as a burden, overcomplicating things and killing joy.• Affective load over decision making and over speaking/not speaking
self-regulated by happiness/unhappiness discourses (Ahmed, 2010;
Ngai, 2005; Berlant, 2011) e.g. ‘you have to not let it consume you’. • Tension between sociability and social responsibility. Criticality posed in
opposition to ‘oh let's go with the flow, it'll be fine’.
Emerging themes – 2/2
Ontological repositioning or instrumentalism?
• Critical thinking as transformational ‘a film over the brain’ but also as
something disembodied ‘when I have my critical hat on’.• Critical thinking as a mark of social/moral distinction ‘[Critical thinking allows
me to] make myself look better because I know how to speak’ and ‘that’s
where some people might stop’. A process of noise becoming voice (Biesta,
2010).• Critical thinking as a purification ritual of self-improvement – is this the neo-
liberal self-project at work? Is this instrumentalism a consequence of the
marketisation of higher education? • Critical thinking constantly presented as inactive and insular - ‘sitting down
and thinking critically’ – where does this leave spaces for social resistance?
(Giroux, 2011)
Initial Conclusions
Critical thinking…
• Is not a straightforward ‘doing’ – it is a continually negotiated performance – between words, spaces and bodies
• Is anything but ‘rational’ – brimming with affect, with students walking an affective tightrope between sociability and critique
• Is not dead! These first-year students are incredibly hopeful about it’s transformational potential but what does it mean to desire critical thinking?
• Seems to be enacted through structures of difference though less obviously than I’d originally thought e.g. ‘people’s background might affect their ability to think critically’ but this requires further analysis
• Has, in places, taken on a highly instrumentalised form. Potentially this could be connected to shifting neo-liberal trends in higher education system that demand a certain kind of performativity
References
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham [N.C]: Duke
University Press.• Atkinson, D. (1997). A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL.
TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71-94.• Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. & Daniels, L. (1999). Conceptualising
Critical Thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3): 285-302. • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham [N.C]: Duke University
Press.• Giroux, H. (2011). Occupy Colleges Now: Students as the New Public
Intellectuals. Truthout November 21, 2011• Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly Feelings. Cambridge[M.A]: Harvard University
Press.