16
AERA Annual Conference, April 2016 Washington, DC The Tensions and Conundrums of Public Scholarship (enacted on Social Media) George Veletsianos Canada Research Chair in Innovative Learning & Technology Associate Professor Royal Roads University

The tensions and conundrums of public scholarship

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AERA Annual Conference, April 2016 Washington, DC

The Tensions and Conundrums of Public Scholarship (enacted on Social Media)

George Veletsianos Canada Research Chair in Innovative Learning & Technology

Associate Professor Royal Roads University

Scholars are exhorted to go online

Significant actors to consider that foster this encouragement? •  Institutions •  Popular literature

“Go online” for what purposes?

Scholars are exhorted to go online

Time and time again…

Time and time again…

To navigate these waters…

We need counter-narratives and rich descriptions of the complicated relationships that scholars have with social media.

Some tensions are reported in the literature

1.  Time and competing demands re valued artifacts (“I should be writing”)

2.  Lack of recognition

Methods

Part of a larger project. 16 interviews + digital artifacts (e.g., blog posts) Scholars at different levels of their career (doctoral student à professor) The majority: in education or educational technology Open coding & constant comparative analysis

Results

3 themes

1. Imagined Audience Mismatch

Many scholars imagine their audiences as communities rather than venues for attracting professional attention. Scholars’ conceptualizations of their audiences differ from those of their universities.

2. Facing unanticipated audiences

Scholars often imagine their audiences as more limited and less diverse than they are in reality à eg students, colleagues, family, peers Unanticipated audiences may cause conflict

3. The conundrum of participation

Context collapse à fragmented identities à How much of myself to share in different spaces? FB: more personal space (BUT, this is changing) Twitter: more professional (related: The fragmented educator. Kimmons & Veletsianos, 2014)

Implications

Scholars’ participation is selective and purposeful The institutional responsibilities Tensions and challenges seem to be (mostly) relational

More on this?

I’d love your feedback!

This presentation: www.slideshare.com/veletsianos

Publications: www.veletsianos.com/publications

Contact: veletsianos at gmail/Twitter

Thank you

Tension https://flic.kr/p/ao4QVW

Photos