29
Practitioner Research Professional Inquiry Planning Tools/Methods aula Nottingham Updated 30/3/17

Tools methods and analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tools methods and analysis

Practitioner Research Professional Inquiry Planning

Tools/Methods

Paula Nottingham Updated 30/3/17

Page 2: Tools methods and analysis

Reflective Journal

As well as making notes abut your personal learning progress on the course, the personal journal can be used to reflect on your own work and experience.

You can relate your inquiry to informal conversations that you have as a part of your professional practice, the experience you have had undertaking your professional role s an insider-researcher (Costley et al.). This use of the journal is noted in your ethical permissions.

Inquiry ToolsReflective Journal

Documents Observations

SurveysInterviews

Focus Groups

Page 3: Tools methods and analysis

DocumentsInquiry ToolsObservations

SurveysInterviews

Focus GroupsDocuments

Reflective Journal These include papers or digital materials that would be like talking to someone about your area of interest – in Part 5 you looked at ethical documents from you work for example – these might also include policy documents or web research about your topic that are ‘artefacts’ that do not ‘critique’ but represent points of view or practice.

Page 4: Tools methods and analysis

ObservationsObservations can be a rich source of information and look at events and behaviour.

http://www.olingergroup.com/services/methods/ethnographies/

Inquiry ToolsReflective Journal

Documents Observations

SurveysInterviews

Focus Groups

Page 5: Tools methods and analysis

ObservationsThe observation method involves the researcher in watching, recording and analysing events of interest.  Events may be recorded, by the researcher - data may be structured more openly or using a predetermined framework using a observation grid to examine the number of times that behaviour occurs or to record specific responses or interventions.

The observer may also be a participant in the events being studied… this participant observation about your experience can be recorded in your journal and you can use reflection about this experience as a part of your inquiry. This is linked to the ideas of action research.

Page 6: Tools methods and analysis

Observations

Data is often both qualitative (how and why) and quantitative (how much and when). You can prepare a ‘coding framework’ or grid that ensures data is collected within agreed boundaries of subjectivity-objectivity.

Interactions with interviewees are noted in the analysis AND describe how you carried out the observation – include the insider-researcher perspective.

You can practice developing your analytical skills by observing meetings (or similar events) in the workplace (Bell, 2005).

Page 7: Tools methods and analysis

Analysing Observations

The data is gathered and displayed as descriptions and quotes, you can use diagrams, charts or photographs to show relationships/

Record what has happened sensitively and appropriately to issues of ethics, permission and confidentiality.

You need to report an understanding of the context for the event or meeting that was observed in order to draw conclusions from the data.

Page 8: Tools methods and analysis

Surveys

news.bbc.co.uk

The main advantage of the survey approach is the ability to gather data from wide range of representative respondents.

Inquiry ToolsReflective Journal

Documents Observations

SurveysInterviews

Focus Groups

Page 9: Tools methods and analysis

Surveys

Surveys are associated with asking groups of people questions about who they are or what they ‘think’ using their attitudes to issues.

Surveys can be both quantitative (counting up the responses and giving percentages of the responses) and qualitative (leaving space for participants to make comments).

The survey approach can use a representative sample of the population of interest. BAPP Arts survey are generally small-scale (so they are indicative but not considered statistically sound) but the national census and large-scale MORI polls are examples of large probability surveys – some of which you can use as datasets..

Page 10: Tools methods and analysis

Surveys

The aim is to devise precise written questions for answer by a predetermined group or sample. If closed questions are used, the questionnaire can provide a means of gathering data from a wide range of respondents in a comparatively short space of time.

Low response rates are often problematic as they can affect the validity and reliability of your data.

Questions need careful definition as does their positioning and layout in the printed questionnaire. These questions can be factual in nature, finding out basic information for comparison and correlation, or using attitudinal scale that was popularised by Likert (Bell, 2005) that allow for a greater range of response than yes or no answers.

“Attitudes can … be ascertained by presenting a list of declarative statements and asking respondents to rate them in terms of agreement or disagreement” (Black, 1999, p.227).

Page 11: Tools methods and analysis

Analysing the data

The framework for data analysis of replies determined in advance.

Coding your questionnaire: There are five steps involved in the coding process (Survey Monkey can export this data): 1. Develop the coding frame for both pre-coded (closed) and open questions.2. Create a codebook and coding instructions.3. Code the questionnaires.4. Transfer the values to a computer (as in an Excel spreadsheet).5. Check and clean the data (you can make simple graphs with the data).

Interpretation involves identifying significant results, trends, patterns, similarities and differences and offering an explanation for them. This can be expressed in the form of numbers or words in your findings…

Page 12: Tools methods and analysis

(http://www.life-in-toronto.com/free-job-interview-tips.html)

InterviewsInquiry Tools

Reflective JournalDocuments

ObservationsSurveys

Interviews Focus Groups

Page 13: Tools methods and analysis

Interview- what is it?

It is a qualitative method where you collect what people say (from your sample) in order to use it as evidence. Its advantage is that you “can follow up on ideas, probe responses and investigate motives and feelings” (Bell, 2005, p.157). You can ask the why questions…

It is an occasion to gather information ‘for the record’, with a specific agenda set out by the researcher, it is not just a conversation (Denscombe,2007).

When it is processed, the evidence from the interview will provide data for your research.

Page 14: Tools methods and analysis

Sampling – choosing who to interview

There are a number of different ways to design a sampling frame and this will depend on your approach and access. Match your methods to your research problem and work-based learning project

Purposive - choosing people who can answer the questions using defined criteria like expertise or their being in certain roles within the workplace (qualitative)Representative - selection of the sample population (quantitative and mixed - i.e. the interviews might follow a survey) more ‘scientific’ - using a version of probability or non-probability sampling

Page 15: Tools methods and analysis

Types of Interview

Structured - closed questions to illicit information that can be turned into data, like a social survey in person or for targeted information, uses identical questions that can be standardised

Semi-structured - broad topic questions but with some built in flexibility, usually some standardisation

Open – usually around a general topic but where you allow the participant to introduce subjects and/or narratives more freely.

Page 16: Tools methods and analysis

Developing questions and trying them out

Interview Questions - ask what you would like to know about for your project. Think this process through.

Piloting the process - draft the questions and their sequence. Try this out with a willing participant who can offer you suggestions for any changes - you can also talk about this stage with your Academic Advisor. Change your interview process as needed.

How does this differ from professional networking? How is it similar?

Page 17: Tools methods and analysis

Interview Preparations

Consent Forms - the ‘researcher’ needs to ensure informed consent from the participants – more in the campus session on ethics

Access and/or Gatekeeper Permission – you may need to write or email the Manager telling them what you are doing and receive the ok to interview people

You may need a letter from Middlesex University to formalise your agreement with the workplace, especially if confidentiality agreements are required.

Page 18: Tools methods and analysis

Protocols - arranging the meeting

Send an information sheet, interview questions and consent form prior to the meeting if possible. Tell the participant what they will need to do to prepare and how much time you will need. Make clear your needs…

Allow time to contact people to agree to interview, for example, to work with children you might need a CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) check.

Most people at work are busy and scheduling is required, other interviews might take place outside of work because of confidentiality or preference. You may have to do interviews over the phone or Skype.

Page 19: Tools methods and analysis

Notes and taping

Gain permission to record the audio visual – use 2 devices to ensure you get the interview - digital devices mean that you can store the information but be careful about the storage and confidentiality

You may want to take a few notes to highlight certain responses - have sheets prepared and maybe a clipboard. This may not be possible in an ‘ethnographic’ situation i.e. an evening performance venue.

Page 20: Tools methods and analysis

Doing the interviewBe punctual and have all handouts ready (Consent form, questionnaires, etc.).

Arrange the surroundings, i.e. the seating and recording devices, so that the participant is comfortable.

It is important that the participant is supported in the process and that you also engage with them in a professional manner BUT that you come away from the interview with the evidence that you need for your inquiry

Page 21: Tools methods and analysis

Asking the questions

Keeping a neutral tone and ‘chairing the process’ to keep it on time, stopping if necessary or asked to stop.

Taping also means the recording of your voice, so you want to keep your talking down to a minimum. Don’t ask leading questions - this is harder than it sounds - BUT try to ask clarification questions to bring out interesting points, that is why you are there.

In a semi-structured or open interview or focus group - there will be extra information that you may need to sift out, but try not to cut off the flow of the speaker.

Page 22: Tools methods and analysis

Managing data from interviews

• Generally the interview data is transcribed into written findings.• Quotes should be written as they are spoken, and you can add in

non-verbal responses to the text. • Generally, this data is kept in a secure place that you describe in

your writing up, and is only viewed by the original researcher although in some cases academic advisors may need to check this process.

• In this case, transcriptions and tapes should be kept until the end of the programme.

Page 23: Tools methods and analysis

Analysing interviews

The analysis of data collected from interviews can be complex. It has been collected within a certain context or a variety of different ones and must be analysed with that in mind. Use research sources to help you decide your approach…

Quotes can be selected because they typify the data (common responses) or there might be some statements that are significant though only said once (significant).

Page 24: Tools methods and analysis

Analysing interviews

The qualitative researcher can categorise (code) data that has emerged into themes, and the data may include the researchers own ideas, impressions and interpretations that are observed. The data is organised so that comparisons, contrasts and evaluations can be made with the aim of finding the meaning of the evidence presented.

Content analysis can also looks at how often words and phrases are used to explain meaning by a systematic review of the data that could be subjected to statistical significance testing, e.g. categorising the positive and negative statements in a transcript of the interview or related documents (like government policy papers).

Page 25: Tools methods and analysis

Focus Groups

Your choice of setting, public or private, depends on the situation.

http://guides.library.duke.edu/content.php?pid=466734&sid=3820865

Inquiry ToolsReflective Journal

Documents Observations

SurveysInterviews

Focus Groups

Page 26: Tools methods and analysis

Focus Groups

Focus groups are similar to group interviews but they have a different dynamics because of the interaction between the participants.

“Focus groups are more likely to include members who either have similar characteristics or experience… or are known to have a professional concern about and knowledge of the issues involved.” (Bell, 2005, p. 162).

Page 27: Tools methods and analysis

Focus Groups

Focus groups can also be hard to manage so the role of the moderator or facilitator (yourself) is an important one to make sure to provide the ‘trigger’ topic or questions and to channel the discussion to elicit the data needed for the research (Denscombe, 2007, p. 179).

With focus groups you may want to have everyone identify themselves first so that you can identify their voice - these are more difficult to transcribe.

Page 28: Tools methods and analysis

Focus Groups - the setting

Researcher

Gatekeeper

Recording devices

Actual seating arrangement for a recent focus group in which Paula took part.

Page 29: Tools methods and analysis

Actions for after the interview or focus group

Transcription should be verbatim – including pauses, nonverbal responses, repetitions in order to analyse the data after the interview

If you are transcribing yourself, leave enough time (rule of thumb is 1 hour = 8 hours of transcription) OR transcribe only the quotes you need.

You can pay someone to do this but need to insure confidentiality and anonymity – i.e. use pseudonyms or name substitutes like Respondent 1, Actor 1, Actor 2 etc. or describe them by their role.