Upload
ml-bapna
View
192
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Higher Education Consulting Firm
Citation preview
www.universityͲ21.com 1
PARADOXES OF HIGHER EDUCATION SURVEY
www.universityͲ21.com 2
� INDIA ECONOMY� CORRELATIONS TO GDP
� EDUCATION� COMPETITIVENESS� INNOVATION
� PARADOXES SURVEY� CHALLENGES
� DEMOGRAPHIC DIVIDEND� HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLMENT� 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION
� IDEAS� BLENDED EDUCATIONͲ SCALE� SOCIAL INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATIONͲ21ST CENTURY� MANAGEMENT
� UNIVERSITY-21
HIGHER EDUCATION LANDSCAPE
www.universityͲ21.com 3
www.universityͲ21.com
CONTEXT: GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS AND GDP
4
9Rankings on the ease of doing business 134/189 9Rankings on Starting a new business rank 166/1839Global Competitiveness Index 2011-2012 ranking 60/1449GII 66/144
9India䇻s population is 1.2 Billion99GDP is $ 1.8 Trillion9GDP per capita is $14009GDP per capita (PPP Adjusted) is $38009400 Million people live below $2 a day
www.universityͲ21.com5
Innovation�and�patent�landscape
www.universityͲ21.com 6
1. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATIONALINSTITUTIONS AND UNIVERSITIES:
Over the past decade, a team from Harvard Business School, London School ofEconomics, McKinsey & Company, and Stanford has systematically surveyed globalmanagement. They measured management practices across operational management,monitoring, targets, and people management and generated an overall management score,surveying over 10,000 firms including educational institutions and in 20 countriesincluding India. This research created the first global database of management practices.
GDP and management scores have positivecorrelationi.
i https://www.google.co.in/#q=nick+bloom+stanford+PPT+GDP+relation+to+management
www.universityͲ21.com
SURVEY OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY
7
• The Objective of the survey was to understand the impediments for growth of universities and higher educational institutions and to understand if there is real need for management consultants like University-21.
• The representative sample composition of universities and institutes:• Central, state, private and deemed Universities.• All twenty-nine states and union territories were covered.• Engineering colleges with enrolment level more than 1000 students.• Management colleges with enrolment level more than 100 students.• We randomly selected sample universities/institutions and sent online
‘Paradoxes of Higher Education’ survey link along with a cover letter with one week deadline.
• 67 out of 150 universities and colleges responded from 24 states.
www.universityͲ21.com
24/29 STATES REPRESENTED BY 67 UNIVERSITIES AND HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
8
METHODOLOGY
www.universityͲ21.com
SURVEY QUESTIONER
9
Q1. What is the size of your institute/university?Q2. By what percentage do you expect student enrolment to grow in your institute/university in the coming academic year?Q3. Do you believe that having students and faculty exchange program with reputed foreign universities can become a game changer and improve ranking of your institute/university?Q4. Do you believe that your faculty and staff are engaged and motivated up to yourexpectations?Q5. Overall, I am very satisfied with the way my institute performed (is performing) currently.Q6. What percentage of your students got placed last year before passing out from your institute/university?Q7. What are the top three pain points that your institute is facing?Q8. What is your current annual revenue?Q9. What's holding you back from reaching your growth aspirations?Q10. Are you ready to invest in a consulting program that will help you improve enrolment, placement and ROI on a predictable and consistent basis?
www.universityͲ21.com 10
42%
16%
17%
11%
2%
13%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Less than 1,000 students
1,000 Ͳ 1,999 Students
2,000 Ͳ 3,999 students
4,000 Ͳ 6,999 students
7,000 Ͳ 10,000 students
More than 10,000 students
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
SIZE
OF UNIVER
SITY
/INSTITUTE
www.universityͲ21.com 11
33%
33%
13%
6%
6%
9%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Less than 10%
10Ͳ20%
20Ͳ30%
30Ͳ50%
50Ͳ70%
Above 70%
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
YOY EN
ROLM
ENT GR
OWTH
RAT
E
www.universityͲ21.com 12
9%
2%
17%
25%
48%
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither Agree nor Disagree
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% FACU
LTY , S
TUDEN
T EXC
HANGE P
ROGR
AM
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
www.universityͲ21.com 13
5%
11%
32%
38%
14%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither Agree nor Disagree
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
FACU
LTY EN
GAG
EMEN
T LEV
EL
www.universityͲ21.com
OVERALL PERFORMANCE SATISFACTION SCORE
14
8%
13%
25%
38%
17%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither Agree nor Disagree
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E S
ATIS
FAC
TIO
N
SCO
RE
www.universityͲ21.com
PAIN POINTS AND HOLD BACK
15
www.universityͲ21.com 16
11%
11%
8%
6%
25%
38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Do not know
10Ͳ20%
20Ͳ30%
30Ͳ50%
50Ͳ75%
Above 75%
RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
PLAC
EMEN
T
www.universityͲ21.com 17
1. Our�present�students�enrolment�ratio�in�higher�education�is�just�about�18�percent�targeted�to�increase�that�figure�to�30%,�requiring�another�800�universities�and�40,000�colleges�in�the�next�10�years.�Basically�huge�demand�exists.�But,�42%�of�the�institutes�have�enrolment�less�then�1000�and�another�16%�have�below�2000.�Also�66%�institutes�expect�enrolment�growth�less�than�20%.�Clear�DemandͲSupply�Disequilibrium.
Conclusion:�Institutes�need�to�rethink�their�growth�strategy.2. National�employability�test,�industry,�NASSCOM�have�repeatedly�echoed�that�only�20Ͳ
25%�of�the�graduating�students�are�employable,�the�placement�are�below�satisfactory�levels,�yet�the�heads�of�institutions�seem�to�be�satisfied�with�their�performances?
Conclusion:�There�is�clear�need�for�improved�industry�academia�interaction�and�the��need�to�have�performance�management.3. 100%�respondents�said�that�they�Lack�Quality�Faculty,�they�echo�that�faculty�capability�
improvement�is�their�number�one�pain�point,�yet�the�respondents�write�that�they�are�satisfied�with�faculty�engagement.
Conclusion:�Serious�need�to�assess�relationship�between�21st century�skills�needed�in�he�classroom,�student�aspirations,�quality�of�leadership�bandwidth,�understanding�of�the�shared�vision�by�entire�faculty�and�administrative�staff�at�the�institutes
TAKE�AWAY
UniversityͲ21�team��can�work�with�your�team�to�see�opportunities�which�others�miss.
www.universityͲ21.com
PEOPLE AT UNIVERSITY-21
18
Harjiv Singh,�Founder�&�CEO�SalwanMedia,�Gutenberg�Communications,
BrainGain Magazine
Dr.�Sethuraman (Panch),�Panchanathan,
Senior�Vice�President,Arizona�State�University
Prof.Fernando Reimers,�Harvard�University
Mahendra�BapnaHarvard�Advanced�Leadership�Fellow,
Former�CEO�of�Tata�Enterprises
Hon.�Jerry�MacArthur�Hultin,�Senior�Presidential�Fellow,�New�York�University
www.universityͲ21.com
VISION
UNIVERSITY-21 OFFERS VARIETY OF SERVICES TO HIGHER EDUCATION ANDVOCATIONAL EDUCATION INSTITUTES, BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC; IN THE AREAS OFORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGY; FACULTY AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT; MARKETING AND BRANDING; INDUSTRY NETWORK AND PARTNERSHIPSDEVELOPMENT; STUDENT AND ALUMNI AFFAIRS; STUDENT AND FACULTY EXCHANGEPROGRAMS; DUE-DILIGENCE WITH JV PARTNERS; FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING; ENROLMENT, RETENTION, CURRICULA AND PEDAGOGY DEVELOPMENT; PROCUREMENTAND OUTSOURCING; IT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPING INNOVATION ANDEXCELLENCE CENTERS. EACH IS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE OVERALL PERFORMANCE OFOUR CLIENTS.
19
WHAT WE OFFER
TO BE THE MOST TRUSTED AND RESPECTED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMIN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR, RECOGNIZED BY OUR CLIENTS ANDCLIENTS CUSTOMERS IN INDIA AND THE MIDDLE EAST FOR DELIVERING
EXCELLENCE.
www.universityͲ21.com
Thank you
20