29
Valida&on of AvatarBased Anima&ons for the Development of a Nursing Simula&on

Validation of Avatar-Based Animations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Valida&on  of  Avatar-­‐Based  Anima&ons    for  the  Development  of  a  Nursing  

Simula&on  

Authors  Enilda  Romero-­‐Hall,  Ph.D.  (@RomeroEnilda)  Assistant  Professor  The  University  of  Tampa    Ginger  S.  Watson,  Ph.D.  Associate  Professor    Old  Dominion  University    Yiannis  Papelis,  Ph.D.  Research  Professor  Virginia  Modeling,  Analysis  and  Simula@on  Center    

Introduc&on  

A  valida@on  study  was  conducted  to  corroborate  the  pain  rendering  of  animated  agents  in  a  3D  simula@on  focusing  on  pain  management.      Pain  Rendering  =  Emo&on  Intensity    •  body  movement  •  verbal  communica@on  •  behaviors  

Visual  Analog  Scale  

Pain  in  Pa&ents  

Low  Emo@on  Intensity    -­‐  Pain  Score  3      

The  behaviors:    -­‐  neutral  expression  -­‐  able  to  talk  normally        

Pain  in  Pa&ents  

Moderate  Emo@on  Intensity    -­‐  Pain  Score  6      

The  behaviors:    -­‐  protec&ve  of  affected  area  -­‐  less  movement  -­‐  complaining  of  pain.      

Pain  in  Pa&ents  

High  Emo@on  Intensity  -­‐  Pain  Score  9      

The  behaviors:    -­‐  restless  unseRled  -­‐  complains  about  lots  of  pain  -­‐  cries  inconsolably.    

Forma&ve  Evalua&on  Research  

The  valida@on  study  was  part  of  a  forma@ve  evalua@on  to  assess  the  effec@veness  of  the  scenarios  prior  to  the  use  of  the  nursing  simula@on.      Since  the  simula@on  was  available  through  web-­‐based  3D  soMware,  the  valida@on  process  was  conducted  using  the  Internet.  

METHODS  

Par&cipants  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

20%  

80%  

Gender  

Males  

Females  

Par&cipants  

10%  

10%  

50%  

30%  

Age  Groups  

Age  (25  -­‐  34)  

Age  (35  -­‐  44)  

Age  (45  -­‐  54)  

Age  (55  -­‐  64)  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

Par&cipants  

70%  

30%  

Status  

Full-­‐Time  

Part-­‐Time  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

Par&cipants  

30%  

50%  

10%  

10%  

Rank  

Registered  Nurse  

Advance  Prac@ce  Nurse  

Pain  Consultant  

Graduate  Nursing  Student  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

Par&cipants  

90%  

10%  

Years  of  Clinical  Experience  

Years  (3  or  more)  

Years  (1to  2)  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

Par&cipants  

90%  

10%  

Experience  with  Pain  Assessment  and  Management    

Experts  

Novice  

Total  of  10  nursing  professionals  

Materials  

Nine  simulated  pa@ent  anima@ons  with  different  pain  intensity  levels  were  presented  through  a  web-­‐based  interface.  

Instruments  

A  visual  analog  scale  was  used  to  rate  the  pain  level  portrayed  by  the  animated  agent  in  each  anima@on  and  to  explain  the  observed  cues  that  lead  to  this  ra@ng.  

Procedure  The  email  included:    •  detailed  instruc@ons  •  a  link  to  the  anima@ons  •  a  link  to  the  visual  analog  scale  (VAS)  instrument    Par@cipants  were  asked  to:  •  Read  the  instruc@ons  provided  in  the  email  •  Interact  with  the  nine  simulated  pa@ent  anima@ons    •  Select  the  VAS  ra@ng  the  observed  pain    •  Answer  the  open-­‐ended  ques@on    

Procedure  

Web  Interface:  Nursing  Scenario  Valida@on  

Results  

The  ra@ngs  for  each  anima@on  were  evaluated  using  the  average  ra@ng  across  all  responses.    

Results  

Scene1   6.30  

Scene2  5.60  

Scene3   6.00  

Three  videos  with  an  animated  agent  portraying  a  pain  level  equal  to  3  (VAS)  

Average  for  the  Videos  =  5.97  

Results  

Scene4   4.71  

Scene5  5.33  

Scene6   6.33  

Three  videos  with  an  animated  agent  portraying  a  pain  level  equal  to  6  (VAS)  

Average  for  the  Videos  =  5.45  

Results  

Scene7   6.13  

Scene8  6.13  

Scene9   5.89  

Three  videos  with  an  animated  agent  portraying  a  pain  level  equal  to  9  (VAS)  

Average  for  the  Videos  =  6.05  

Results  

Videos:  •  None  were  given  very  low  or  high  pain  level  ra@ng  

•  In  their  majority  were  rated  as  moderate  pain  level    

 The  comments  provided  by  the  par@cipants  shed  light  on  the  results  for  each  video  anima@on  

Comments  (Pain  Level  3)  

“If  this  was  a  non-­‐verbal/non-­‐English  speaking  pa@ent  and  you  were  looking  for  facial  cues-­‐  I  would  need  to  see  facial  grimace.”    “Very  short  scene!  only  6  seconds!”    “Very  difficult  to  say.  He  is  clearly  uncomfortable.  I  would  need  to  ask  the  pa&ent  a  few  more  ques&ons.”  

Comments  (Pain  Level  6)  

“Unable  to  assess-­‐  ‘no  not  really’  means  what?  Is  it  an  answer  to  a  ques&on?”    “Too  short  scene,  it  is  not  realis&c.  For  pain  observa@on  you  do  have  more  than  6  seconds!  I  rated  a  7  but  I  should  not  know  why”      

Comments  (Pain  Level  9)  

“Frustra&on  expressed  but  he  s@ll  has  guarding  body  movements”    “Looking  for  service  -­‐  But  difficult  to  assess  pain”    “Again  a  too  short  scene,  not  as  in  prac&ce!”  

Discussion  

Modifica@ons  and  improvements  were  made  to  the  nursing  simula@on  based  on  the  input  from  the  nursing  professionals.  

QUESTIONS  OR  COMMENTS  Email:  [email protected]  TwiRer:  @RomeroEnilda