We now begin our discussion of the theory of how the macroeconomy works. We know how to calculate gross domestic product (GDP), but what factors determine it? We know how to define and measure inflation and unemployment, but what circumstances cause inflation and unemployment? What, if anything, can government do to reduce unemployment and inflation? Analyzing the various components of the macroeconomy is a complex undertaking. The level of GDP, the overall price level, and the level of employment — three chief concerns of macroeconomists — are influenced by events in three broadly defined “markets”: ■ Goods-and-services markets ■ Financial (money) markets ■ Labor markets We will explore each market, as well as the links between them, in our discussion of macroeconomic theory. Figure 19.1 presents the plan of the next seven chapters, which form the core of macroeconomic theory. In Chapters 19 and 20, we describe the market for goods and services, often called the goods market. In Chapter 19, we explain several basic concepts and show how the equilibrium level of national income is determined in a simple economy with no government and no imports or exports. In Chapter 20, we provide a more complete picture of the economy by adding government purchases, taxes, and net exports to the analysis. In Chapters 21 and 22, we focus on the money market. Chapter 21 introduces the money market and the banking system and discusses the way the U.S. central bank (the Federal Reserve) controls the money supply. Chapter 22 analyzes the demand for money and the way interest rates are determined. Chapter 23 then examines the relationship between the goods market and the money market. Chapter 24 explores the aggregate demand and supply curves first mentioned in Chapter 16. Chapter 24 also analyzes how the overall price level is Aggregate Output and Aggregate Income (Y) Income, Consumption, and Saving (Y, C, and S) Explaining Spending Behavior Planned Investment (I ) Planned Aggregate Expenditure (AE) Equilibrium Aggregate Output (Income) The Saving/Investment Approach to Equilibrium Adjustment to Equilibrium The Multiplier The Multiplier Equation The Size of the Multiplier in the Real World The Multiplier in Action: Recovering from the Great Depression Looking Ahead Appendix: Deriving the Multiplier Algebraically 19 AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE AND EQUILIBRIUM OUTPUT PART 5 ◗ The Goods and Money Markets 431 The Market for Goods and Services Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply • Planned aggregate expenditure Consumption (C) Planned investment (I) Government (G) Net exports (EX-IM) • Aggregate output (income) (Y) • Equilibrium output (income) (Y*) • Aggregate demand curve • Aggregate supply curve • Equilibrium price level (P*) Connections between the goods market and the money market r* Y* The Money Market • The supply of money • The demand for money • Equilibrium interest rate (r*) The Labor Market • The supply of labor • The demand for labor • Employment and unemployment CHAPTERS 19–20 CHAPTERS 21–22 CHAPTER 23 CHAPTER 24 CHAPTER 25 P Y P Y FIGURE 19.1 The Core of Macroeconomic Theory determined, as well as the relationship between output and the price level. Finally, Chapter 25 discusses the supply of and demand for labor and the functioning of the labor market in the macroeconomy. This material is essential to an understanding of employment and unemployment. Before we begin our discussion of aggregate output and aggregate income, we need to stress that production, consumption, and other activities that we will be discussing in the following chapters are ongoing activities. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think about these activities as if they took place in a series of production periods. A period might be a month long or perhaps 3 months long. During each period, some output is produced, income is generated, and spending takes place. At the end of each period we can examine the results. Was everything that was produced in the economy sold? What percentage of income was spent? What percentage was saved? Is output (income) likely to rise or fall in the next period? AGGREGATE OUTPUT

AND AGGREGATE INCOME (Y ) Each period, firms produce some aggregate quantity of goods and services, which we refer to as aggregate output (Y ). In Chapter 17, we introduced real gross domestic product as a measure of the quantity of output produced in the economy, Y. Output includes the production of services, consumer goods, and investment goods. It is important to think of these as components of “real” output. We have already seen that GDP (Y ) can be calculated in terms of either income or expenditures. Because every dollar of expenditure is received by someone as income, we can compute total GDP (Y ) either by adding up the total spent on all final goods during a period or by adding up all the income—wages, rents, interest, and profits—received by all the factors of production. We will use the variable Y to refer to both aggregate output and aggregate income because they are the same seen from two different points of view. When output increases, additional income is generated. More workers may be hired and paid; workers may put in, and be paid for, more hours; and owners may earn more profits. When output is cut, income falls, workers may be laid off or work fewer hours (and be paid less), and profits may fall. aggregate output The total quantity of goods and services produced (or supplied) in an economy in a given period. aggregate income The total income received by all factors of production in a given period. 432 Chapter 19 433 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output FIGURE 19.2 Saving Aggregate Income Consumption All income is either spent on consumption or saved in an economy in which there are no taxes. Thus, S Y C. In any given period, there is an exact equality between aggregate output (production) and aggregate income. You should be reminded of this fact whenever you encounter the combined term aggregate output (income). aggregate output (income) (Y) A combined term used to remind you of the exact equality between aggregate output and aggregate income. Aggregate output can also be considered the aggregate quantity supplied, because it is the amount that firms are supplying (producing) during the period. In the discussions that follow, we use the phrase aggregate output (income), instead of aggregate quantity supplied, but keep in mind that the two are equivalent. Also remember that “aggregate output” means “real GDP.” Think in Real Terms From the outset you must think in “real terms.” For example, when we talk about output (Y ), we mean real output, not nominal output. Although we discussed in Chapter 17 that the calculation of real GDP is complicated, you can ignore these complications in the following analysis. To help make things easier to read, we will frequently use dollar values for Y, but do not confuse Y with nominal output. The main point is to think of Y as being in real terms—the quantities of goods and services produced, not the dollars circulating in the economy. INCOME, CONSUMPTION, AND SAVING (Y, C, AND S) Each period (a month or 3 months) households receive some aggregate amount of income (Y ). We begin our analysis in a simple world with no government and a “closed” economy, that is, no imports and no exports. In such a world, a household can do two, and only two, things with its income: It can buy goods and services—that is, it can consume —or it can save. This is shown in Figure 19.2. The part of its income that a household does not consume in a given period is called saving. Total household saving in the economy (S) is by definition equal to income minus consumption (C): S Y C saving income consumption saving (S) The part of its income that a household does not consume in a given period. Distinguished from savings, which is the current stock of accumulated saving. The triple equal sign means this is an identity, or something that is always true. You will encounter several identities in this chapter, which you should commit to memory. Remember that saving does not refer to the total savings accumulated over time. Saving (without the final s) refers to the portion of a single period’s income that is not spent in that period. Saving (S) is the amount added to accumulated savings in any given period. Saving is a flow

variable; savings is a stock variable. (Review Chapter 3 if you are unsure of the difference between stock and flow variables.) identity Something that is always true. Firms Households Consumption (C) Saving (S) Aggregate income (Y) 434 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets EXPLAINING SPENDING BEHAVIOR So far, we have said nothing about behavior. We have not described the consumption and saving behavior of households, and we have not speculated about how much aggregate output firms will decide to produce in a given period. Instead, we have only a framework and a set of definitions to work with. Macroeconomics, you will recall, is the study of behavior. To understand the functioning of the macroeconomy, we must understand the behavior of households and firms. In our simple economy in which there is no government, there are two types of spending behavior: spending by households, or consumption, and spending by firms, or investment. Household Consumption and Saving How do households decide how much to consume? In any given period, the amount of aggregate consumption in the economy depends on a number of factors. Some determinants of aggregate consumption include: 1. Household income 2. Household wealth 3. Interest rates 4. Households’ expectations about the future These four factors work together to determine the spending and saving behavior of households, both for individual ones and for the aggregate. This is no surprise. Households with higher income and higher wealth are likely to spend more than households with less income and less wealth. Lower interest rates reduce the cost of borrowing, so lower interest rates are likely to stimulate spending. (Higher interest rates increase the cost of borrowing and are likely to decrease spending.) Finally, positive expectations about the future are likely to increase current spending, while uncertainty about the future is likely to decrease current spending. While all these factors are important, we will concentrate for now on the relationship between income and consumption.1 In The General Theory, Keynes argued that the amount of consumption undertaken by a household is directly related to its income: The higher your income is, the higher your consumption is likely to be. People with more income tend to consume more than people with less income. 1The assumption that consumption is dependent solely on income is, of course, overly simplistic. Nonetheless, many important insights about how the economy works can be obtained through this simplification. In Chapter 27, we relax this assumption and consider the behavior of households and firms in the macroeconomy in more detail. The relationship between consumption and income is called a consumption function. Figure 19.3 shows a hypothetical consumption function for an individual household. The curve is labeled c(y), which is read “c as a function of y,” or “consumption as a function of income.” There are several things you should notice about the curve. First, it has a positive slope. In other words, as y increases, so does c. Second, the curve intersects the c-axis above zero. This means that even at an income of zero, consumption is positive. Even if a household found itself with a zero income, it still must consume to survive. It would borrow or live off its savings, but its consumption could not be zero. Keep in mind that Figure 19.3 shows the relationship between consumption and income for an individual household, but also remember that macroeconomics is concerned with aggregate consumption. Specifically, macroeconomists want to know how aggregate consumption (the total consumption of all households) is likely to respond to changes in aggregate income. If all individual households increase their consumption as income increases, and we assume that they do, it is reasonable to assume that a positive relationship exists between aggregate consumption (C) and aggregate income (Y ). For simplicity, assume that points of aggregate consumption, when plotted against aggregate income, lie along a straight line, as in Figure 19.4. Because the aggregate consumption function is a straight line, we can write the following equation to describe it:

C a bY consumption function The relationship between consumption and income. Chapter 19 435 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output c(y) Household income (y) Household consumption (c) 0 FIGURE 19.3 A Consumption Function for a Household A consumption function for an individual household shows the level of consumption at each level of household income. FIGURE 19.4 An Aggregate Consumption Function The consumption function shows the level of consumption at every level of income. The upward slope indicates that higher levels of income lead to higher levels of consumption spending. C = a + bY C Y C Y Slope = Aggregate income (Y) Aggregate consumption (C) 0 = b a 2The Greek letter (delta) means “change in.” For example, Y (read “delta Y”) means the “change in income.” If income (Y ) in 2001 is $100 and income in 2002 is $110, then Y for this period is $110 $100 $10. For a review of the concept of slope, see Appendix, Chapter 1. Y is aggregate output (income), C is aggregate consumption, and a is the point at which the consumption function intersects the C-axis—a constant. The letter b is the slope of the line, in this case C/Y [because consumption (C) is measured on the vertical axis, and income (Y ) is measured on the horizontal axis].2 Every time income increases (say by Y ), consumption increases by b times Y. Thus, C b Y and C/Y b. Suppose, for example, that the slope of the line in Figure 19.4 is .75 (that is, b .75). An increase in income (Y ) of $100 would then increase consumption by bY .75 $100, or $75. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the fraction of a change in income that is consumed. In the consumption function here, b is the MPC. An MPC of .75 means consumption changes by .75 of the change in income. The slope of the consumption function is the MPC. marginal propensity to consume slope of consumption function C Y marginal propensity to consume (MPC) That fraction of a change in income that is consumed, or spent. There are only two places income can go: consumption or saving. If $.75 of a $1.00 increase in income goes to consumption, $.25 must go to saving. If income decreases by 436 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets marginal propensity to save (MPS) That fraction of a change in income that is saved. From the numbers in Figure 19.5, we can easily derive the saving schedule that is shown. At an income of $200 billion, consumption is $250 billion; saving is thus a negative $50 billion (S Y C $200 billion $250 billion $50 billion). At an aggregate income of $400 billion, consumption is exactly $400 billion, and saving is zero. At $800 billion in income, saving is a positive $100 billion. These numbers are graphed as a saving function in Figure 19.6. The 45° line—the solid black line in the top graph—provides a convenient way of comparing C and Y. (All the points along a 45° line are points at which the value on the horizontal axis equals the value on the vertical axis. Thus, the 45° line in Figure 19.6 represents all the points at which aggregate income equals aggregate consumption.) Where the consumption function is above the 45° line, consumption exceeds income, and saving is negative. Where the consumption function crosses the 45° line, consumption is equal to income, and saving is zero. Where the consumption function is below the 45° line, consumption is less than income, and saving is positive. Note that the slope of the saving function is S/Y, which is equal to the marginal propensity to save (MPS). The consumption function and the saving function are mirror images of one another. No information appears in one that does not also appear in the other. These functions tell us how households in the aggregate will divide income between consumption spending and saving at every possible income level. In other words, they embody aggregate household behavior. $1.00, consumption will decrease by $.75 and saving will decrease by $.25. The marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the fraction of a change in income that is saved: S/Y, where S is the change in saving. Because everything not consumed is saved, the MPC and the MPS must add up to one. MPC MPS 1 Because the MPC and the MPS are important concepts, it may help to

review their definitions. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the fraction of an increase in income that is consumed (or the fraction of a decrease in income that comes out of consumption). The marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the fraction of an increase in income that is saved (or the fraction of a decrease in income that comes out of saving). Because C is aggregate consumption and Y is aggregate income, it follows that the MPC is society’s marginal propensity to consume out of national income and that the MPS is society’s marginal propensity to save out of national income. Numerical Example The numerical examples used in the rest of this chapter are based on the following consumption function: a b This equation is simply an extension of the generic C a bY consumption function we have been discussing. At a national income of zero, consumption is $100 billion (a). As income rises, so does consumption. We will assume that for every $100 billion increase in income (Y ), consumption rises by $75 billion (C). This means that the slope of the consumption function (b) is equal to C/Y, or $75 billion/$100 billion .75. The marginal propensity to consume out of national income is therefore .75; the marginal propensity to save is .25. Some numbers derived from this consumption function are listed and graphed in Figure 19.5. Now consider saving. We already know income equals consumption plus saving. Once we know how much consumption will result from a given level of income, we know how much saving there will be. Recall that saving is everything that is not consumed. S Y C Y C S, C 100 .75Y Chapter 19 437 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output AGGREGATE INCOME, Y AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION, C (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS) (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 0 100 80 160 100 175 200 250 400 400 600 550 800 700 1,000 850 Aggregate consumption , C (billions of dollars) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Y = 100 Aggregate income, Y (billions of dollars) C = 75 C = 100 + .75Y C Y Slope = = 75 100 = .75 PLANNED INVESTMENT (I ) Consumption, as we have seen, is the spending by households on goods and services, but what kind of spending do firms engage in? The answer is investment. What Is Investment? Let us begin with a brief review of terms and concepts. In everyday language, we use investment to refer to what we do with our savings: “I invested in a mutual fund and some AOL stock.” In the language of economics, however, investment always refers to the creation of capital stock. To an economist, an investment is something produced that is used to create value in the future. You must not confuse the two uses of the term. When a firm builds a new plant or adds new machinery to its current stock, it is investing. A restaurant owner who buys tables, chairs, cooking equipment, and silverware is investing. When a college builds a new sports center, it is investing. From now on, we use investment only to refer to purchases by firms of new buildings and equipment and inventories, all of which add to firms’ capital stocks. Recall that inventories are part of the capital stock. When firms add to their inventories, they are investing—they are buying something that creates value in the future. Most of the capital stock of a clothing store consists of its inventories of unsold clothes in its warehouses and on its racks and display shelves. The service provided by a grocery or department store is the convenience of having a large variety of commodities in inventory available for purchase at a single location. investment Purchases by firms of new buildings and equipment and additions to inventories, all of which add to firms’ capital stock. FIGURE 19.5 An Aggregate Consumption Function Derived from the Equation C 100 .75Y In this simple consumption function, consumption is $100 billion at an income of zero. As income rises, so does consumption. For every $100 billion increase in income, consumption rises by $75 billion. The slope of the line is .75. 438 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets Y C S AGGREGATE AGGREGATE AGGREGATE INCOME CONSUMPTION SAVING (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS) (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS) (BILLIONS OF

DOLLARS) 0 100 100 80 160 80 100 175 75 200 250 50 400 400 0 600 550 50 800 700 100 1,000 850 150 Aggregate consumption, C (billions of dollars) C = 100 + .75Y Aggregate income, Y (billions of dollars) Aggregate income, Y (billions of dollars) gg g g, (billions of dollars) 200 400 800 +100 +50 0 –50 –100 S Y – C 800 700 400 250 200 400 800 Y 200 0 45º FIGURE 19.6 Deriving a Saving Function from a Consumption Function Because S Y C, it is easy to derive a saving function from a consumption function. A 45° line drawn from the origin can be used as a convenient tool to compare consumption and income graphically. At Y 200, consumption is 250. The 45° line shows us that consumption is larger than income by 50. Thus S Y C 50. At Y 800, consumption is less than income by 100. Thus, S 100 when Y 800. Chapter 19 439 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output Manufacturing firms generally have two kinds of inventories: inputs and final products. General Motors (GM) has stocks of tires, rolled steel, engine blocks, valve covers, and thousands of other things in inventory, all waiting to be used in producing new cars. In addition, GM has an inventory of finished automobiles awaiting shipment. Investment is a flow variable—it represents additions to capital stock in a specific period. A firm’s decision on how much to invest each period is determined by many factors. For now, we will focus simply on the effects that given investment levels have on the rest of the economy. Actual versus Planned Investment One of the most important insights of macroeconomics is deceptively simple: A firm may not always end up investing the exact amount that it planned to. The reason is that a firm does not have complete control over its investment decision; some parts of that decision are made by other actors in the economy. (This is not true of consumption, however. Because we assume households have complete control over their consumption, planned consumption is always equal to actual consumption.) Generally, firms can choose how much new plant and equipment they wish to purchase in any given period. If GM wants to buy a new robot to stamp fenders or McDonald’s decides to buy an extra french fry machine, it can usually do so without difficulty. There is, however, another component of investment over which firms have less control—inventory investment. Suppose GM expects to sell 1 million cars this quarter and has inventories at a level it considers proper. If the company produces and sells 1 million cars, it will keep its inventories just where they are now (at the desired level). Now suppose GM produces 1 million cars, but due to a sudden shift of consumer interest it sells only 900,000 cars. By definition, GM’s inventories of cars must go up by 100,000 cars. The firm’s change in inventory is equal to production minus sales. The point here is: One component of investment—inventory change—is partly determined by how much households decide to buy, which is not under the complete control of firms. If households do not buy as much as firms expect them to, inventories will be higher than expected, and firms will have made an inventory investment that they did not plan to make. change in inventory Production minus sales. desired, or planned, investment Those additions to capital stock and inventory that are planned by firms. actual investment The actual amount of investment that takes place; it includes items such as unplanned changes in inventories. I = 25 60 50 40 30 20 10 Planned investment, I (billions of dollars) Aggregate income, Y (billions of dollars) FIGURE 19.7 The Planned Investment Function For the time being, we will assume that planned investment is fixed. It does not change when income changes, so its graph is just a horizontal line. Because involuntary inventory adjustments are neither desired nor planned, we need to distinguish between actual investment and desired, or planned, investment. We will use I to refer to desired or planned investment only. In other words, I will refer to planned purchases of plant and equipment and planned inventory changes. Actual investment, in contrast, is the actual amount of investment that takes place. If actual inventory investment turns out to be higher than

firms planned, then actual investment is greater than I, planned investment. For the purposes of this chapter, we will take the amount of investment that firms together plan to make each period (I) as fixed at some given level. We assume this level does not vary with income. In the example that follows, we will assume that I $25 billion, regardless of income. As Figure 19.7 shows, this means the planned investment function is a horizontal line. 440 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets PLANNED AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE (AE) We define total planned aggregate expenditure (AE) in the economy to be consumption (C) plus planned investment (I):3 AE C I planned aggregate expenditure consumption planned investment planned aggregate expenditure (AE) The total amount the economy plans to spend in a given period. Equal to consumption plus planned investment: AE C + I. AE is the total amount that the economy plans to spend in a given period. We will now use the concept of planned aggregate expenditure to discuss the economy’s equilibrium level of output. EQUILIBRIUM AGGREGATE OUTPUT (INCOME) Thus far, we have described the behavior of firms and households. We now discuss the nature of equilibrium and explain how the economy achieves equilibrium. A number of definitions of equilibrium are used in economics. They all refer to the idea that at equilibrium, there is no tendency for change. In microeconomics, equilibrium is said to exist in a particular market (e.g., the market for bananas) at the price for which the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied. At this point, both suppliers and demanders are satisfied. The equilibrium price of a good is the price at which suppliers want to furnish the amount that demanders want to buy. In macroeconomics, we define equilibrium in the goods market as that point at which planned aggregate expenditure is equal to aggregate output. equilibrium: Y AE, or Y C I planned aggregate expenditure AE C I aggregate output Y This definition of equilibrium can hold if, and only if, planned investment and actual investment are equal. (Remember, we are assuming there is no unplanned consumption.) To understand why, consider Y not equal to AE. First, suppose aggregate output is greater than planned aggregate expenditure: When output is greater than planned spending, there is unplanned inventory investment. Firms planned to sell more of their goods than they sold, and the difference shows up as an unplanned increase in inventories. Next, suppose planned aggregate expenditure is greater than aggregate output: When planned spending exceeds output, firms have sold more than they planned to. Inventory investment is smaller than planned. Planned and actual investment are not equal. Only when output is exactly matched by planned spending will there be no unplanned inventory investment. Equilibrium in the goods market is achieved only when aggregate output (Y ) and planned aggregate expenditure (C I) are equal, or when actual and planned investment are equal. planned aggregate expenditure aggregate output C I Y aggregate output planned aggregate expenditure Y C I Table 19.1 derives a planned aggregate expenditure schedule and shows the point of equilibrium for our numerical example. (Remember, all our calculations are based on 3In practice, planned aggregate expenditure also includes government spending (G) and net exports (EX IM ): In this chapter we are assuming that G and (EX IM ) are zero. This assumption is relaxed in the next chapter. AE C I G (EX IM). equilibrium Occurs when there is no tendency for change. In the macroeconomic goods market, equilibrium occurs when planned aggregate expenditure is equal to aggregate output. TABLE 19.1 Deriving the Planned Aggregate Expenditure Schedule and Finding Equilibrium (All Figures in Billions of Dollars) The Figures in Column 2 Are Based on the Equation C 100 .75Y. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) PLANNED UNPLANNED AGGREGATE AGGREGATE INVENTORY OUTPUT AGGREGATE PLANNED EXPENDITURE (AE) CHANGE EQUILIBRIUM? (INCOME) (Y) CONSUMPTION (C) INVESTMENT (I) C I Y (C I) (Y AE?) 100 175 25 200 100 No 200 250 25

275 75 No 400 400 25 425 25 No 500 475 25 500 0 Yes 600 550 25 575 25 No 800 700 25 725 75 No 1,000 850 25 875 125 No C 100 .75Y.) To determine planned aggregate expenditure, we add consumption spending (C) to planned investment spending (I) at every level of income. Glancing down columns 1 and 4, we see one, and only one, level at which aggregate output and planned aggregate expenditure are equal: Y 500. Figure 19.8 illustrates the same equilibrium graphically. Figure 19.8(a) adds planned investment, constant at $25 billion, to consumption at every level of income. Because FIGURE 19.8 Equilibrium Aggregate Output Equilibrium occurs when planned aggregate expenditure and aggregate output are equal. Planned aggregate expenditure is the sum of consumption spending and planned investment spending. b. C = 100 + .75 Y I = 25 800 500 125 100 25 0 200 800 500 Planned aggregate expenditure, C + I (billions of dollars) C + I a. 800 725 600 500 275 200 125 200 500 Planned aggregate expenditure: (AE C + I) Unplanned rise in inventory: output falls Unplanned fall in inventory: output rises Aggregate output, Y (billions of dollars) Planned aggregate expenditure, C + I (billions of dollars) 800 45º Equilibrium point: Y = C + I 441 442 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets planned investment is a constant, the planned aggregate expenditure function is simply the consumption function displaced vertically by that constant amount. Figure 19.8(b) plots the planned aggregate expenditure function with the 45° line. The 45° line, which represents all points on the graph where the variables on the horizontal and vertical axes are equal, allows us to compare measurements along the two axes. The planned aggregate expenditure function crosses the 45° line at a single point, where Y $500 billion. (The point at which the two lines cross is sometimes called the Keynesian cross.) At that point, Y C I. Now let us look at some other levels of aggregate output (income). First, consider Y $800 billion. Is this an equilibrium output? Clearly it is not. At Y $800 billion, planned aggregate expenditure is $725 billion. (See Table 19.1.) This amount is less than aggregate output, which is $800 billion. Because output is greater than planned spending, the difference ends up in inventory as unplanned inventory investment. In this case, unplanned inventory investment is $75 billion. Next, consider Y $200 billion. Is this an equilibrium output? No. At Y $200 billion, planned aggregate expenditure is $275 billion. Planned spending (AE) is greater than output (Y ), and there is unplanned inventory disinvestment of $75 billion. At Y $200 billion and Y $800 billion, planned investment and actual investment are unequal. There is unplanned investment, and the system is out of balance. Only at Y $500 billion, where planned aggregate expenditure and aggregate output are equal, will planned investment equal actual investment. Finally, let us find the equilibrium level of output (income) algebraically. Recall that we know the following: (1) (equilibrium) (2) (consumption function) (3) (planned investment) By substituting (2) and (3) into (1), we get: C I There is only one value of Y for which this statement is true, and we can find it by rearranging terms: The equilibrium level of output is 500, as seen in Table 19.1 and Figure 19.8. THE SAVING/ INVESTMENT APPROACH TO EQUILIBRIUM Because aggregate income must either be saved or spent, by definition, Y C S, which is an identity. The equilibrium condition is Y C I, but this is not an identity because it does not hold when we are out of equilibrium.4 By substituting C S for Y in the equilibrium condition, we can write: The saving/investment approach to equilibrium is C S C I. Because we can subtract C from both sides of this equation, we are left with S I. Thus, only when planned investment equals saving will there be equilibrium. Y 125 .25 500 .25Y 125 Y .75Y 125 Y .75Y 100 25 Y 100 .75Y 25. I 25 C 100 .75Y Y C I 4It would be an identity if I included unplanned inventory accumulations—in other words, if I were actual investment instead of planned investment. This saving/investment approach to equilibrium stands to reason intuitively if we recall two things: (1)

Output and income are equal, and (2) saving is income that is not spent. Because it is not spent, saving is like a leakage out of the spending stream. Only if that ACTIVE GRAPH ACTIVE GRAPH News Analysis Inventories Increase in the Second Quarter of 2000 On July 28, 2000, the Department of Commerce announced that real gross domestic product (Y) increased at an annual rate of 5.2 percent during the second quarter of the year. At the same time, consumption spending by households (C) slowed to a 3 percent annual growth rate and business inventories rose. As we have seen, changes in business inventories are part of investment spending (I). The question that analysts had to answer was were those inventory increases planned or unplanned? If they were unplanned, the result of slower consumer spending than what was anticipated, they could be an early signal of the slowdown in production. The following article appeared the following day in the Los Angeles Times. Growth in 2nd Quarter Up an Unexpected 5.2% —Los Angeles Times Visit www.prenhall.com/casefair for more news articles. The U.S. economy grew substantially faster than expected this spring, extending good times for most Americans but raising some doubt about whether policymakers can throttle it back to a sustainable pace. The economy grew at an annual rate of 5.2% from April through June, according to figures released Friday by the Commerce Department. That is a full percentage point faster than most economists had predicted and faster than the revised 4.8% rate at which it expanded from January through March. The economy’s strong performance caught some analysts by surprise, coming after statistics indicating that consumers might be wrapping up their long spending spree and after Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan voiced increasing confidence that growth is headed for a less inflation-prone course. In fact, the new growth figures showed that some of the very trends Greenspan & Co. are seeking seem to be taking hold. Consumer spending, which has been driving the nation’s record boom, grew a mere 3% in the second quarter, less than half the 7.6% rate of the first quarter. Much of the growth during the April – June period was due to investment by business rather than spending by consumers. The Commerce Department said that a boost in business inventories accounted for almost a full percentage point of the second quarter’s 5.2% growth rate. Analysts interpreted the rise as evidence that companies kept producing items even as consumers bought less. If they are correct, it suggests the spring’s strong growth figure was more the result of a mismatch of supply and demand than a continued booming economy. Source: Peter G. Gosselin,“Growth in 2nd Quarter Up an Unexpected 5.2%,” Los Angeles Times, July 29, 2000, p. C-1. Reprinted by permission. When cars and trucks don’t sell, inventories build up in lots. New technology is helping manage inventory. leakage is counterbalanced by some other component of planned spending can the resulting planned aggregate expenditure equal aggregate output. This other component is planned investment (I). This counterbalancing effect can be seen in Figure 19.9. Aggregate income flows into households, and consumption and saving flow out. The diagram shows saving flowing from 443 444 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets FIGURE 19.9 Planned Aggregate Expenditure and Aggregate Output (Income) Saving is a leakage out of the spending stream. If planned investment is exactly equal to saving, then planned aggregate expenditure is exactly equal to aggregate output, and there is equilibrium. Households (Y C + S) Firms Planned aggregate expenditure (AE C + I) Financial markets Aggregate output (Y ) Consumption (C P ) lanned investment (I) Aggregate income (Y ) Saving (S) FIGURE 19.10 The S I Approach to Equilibrium Aggregate output will be equal to planned aggregate expenditure only when saving equals planned investment (S I). Saving and planned investment are equal at Y 500. households into the financial market. Firms use this saving to finance investment projects. If the planned investment of firms equals the saving of households, then planned

aggregate expenditure (AE C I) equals aggregate output (income) (Y ), and there is equilibrium: The leakage out of the spending stream—saving—is matched by an equal injection of planned investment spending into the spending stream. For this reason, the saving/investment approach to equilibrium is also called the leakages/injections approach to equilibrium. Figure 19.10 reproduces the saving schedule derived in Figure 19.6 and the horizontal investment function from Figure 19.7. Notice that S I at one, and only one, level of aggregate output, Y 500. At Y 500, C 475 and I 25. In other words, Y C I, and therefore equilibrium exists. Aggregate output, Y (billions of dollars) Aggregate saving and planned investment, S and I (billions of dollars) 100 25 0 –100 100 200 300 400 500 600 S I Chapter 19 445 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output ADJUSTMENT TO EQUILIBRIUM We have defined equilibrium and learned how to find it, but we have said nothing about how firms might react to disequilibrium. Let us consider the actions firms might take when planned aggregate expenditure exceeds aggregate output (income). We already know the only way firms can sell more than they produce is by selling some inventory. This means that when planned aggregate expenditure exceeds aggregate output, unplanned inventory reductions have occurred. It seems reasonable to assume firms will respond to unplanned inventory reductions by increasing output. If firms increase output, income must also increase (output and income are two ways of measuring the same thing). As GM builds more cars it hires more workers (or pays its existing workforce for working more hours), buys more steel, uses more electricity, and so on. These purchases by GM represent income for the producers of labor, steel, electricity, and so on. If GM (and all other firms) try to keep their inventories intact by increasing production, they will generate more income in the economy as a whole. This will lead to more consumption. Remember, when income rises, consumption also rises. The adjustment process will continue as long as output (income) is below planned aggregate expenditure. If firms react to unplanned inventory reductions by increasing output, an economy with planned spending greater than output will adjust to equilibrium, with Y higher than before. If planned spending is less than output, there will be unplanned increases in inventories. In this case, firms will respond by reducing output. As output falls, income falls, consumption falls, and so forth, until equilibrium is restored, with Y lower than before. 5In discussing simple supply and demand equilibrium in Chapters 3 and 4, we saw that when quantity supplied exceeds quantity demanded, the price falls and the quantity supplied declines. Similarly, when quantity demanded exceeds quantity supplied, the price rises and the quantity supplied increases. In the analysis here we are ignoring potential changes in prices or in the price level and focusing on changes in the level of real output (income). Later, after we have introduced money and the price level into the analysis, prices will be very important. At this stage, however, only aggregate output (income) (Y ) adjusts when aggregate expenditure exceeds aggregate output (with inventory falling) or when aggregate output exceeds aggregate expenditure (with inventory rising). multiplier The ratio of the change in the equilibrium level of output to a change in some autonomous variable. As Figure 19.8 shows, at any level of output above Y 500, such as Y 800, output will fall until it reaches equilibrium at Y 500, and at any level of output below Y 500, such as Y 200, output will rise until it reaches equilibrium at Y 500.5 THE MULTIPLIER Now that we know how the equilibrium value of income is determined, we ask: How does the equilibrium level of output change when planned investment changes? If there is a sudden change in planned investment, how will output respond, if it responds at all? As we will see, the change in equilibrium output is greater than the initial change in planned investment. Output changes by a multiple of the change in planned investment. So, this multiple is called the multiplier. The

multiplier is defined as the ratio of the change in the equilibrium level of output to a change in some autonomous variable. A variable is autonomous when it is assumed not to depend on the state of the economy—that is, a variable is autonomous if it does not change when the economy changes. In this chapter, we consider planned investment to be autonomous. This simplifies our analysis and provides a foundation for later discussions. With planned investment autonomous, we can ask how much the equilibrium level of output changes when planned investment changes. Remember that we are not trying here to explain why planned investment changes; we are simply asking how much the equilibrium level of output changes when (for whatever reason) planned investment changes. (Beginning in Chapter 23, we will no longer take planned investment as given and will explain how planned investment is determined.) Consider a sustained increase in planned investment of $25 billion—that is, suppose I increases from $25 billion to $50 billion and stays at $50 billion. If equilibrium existed at I $25 billion, an increase in planned investment of $25 billion will cause a disequilibrium, autonomous variable A variable that is assumed not to depend on the state of the economy—that is, it does not change when the economy changes. 446 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets with planned aggregate expenditure greater than aggregate output by $25 billion. Firms immediately see unplanned reductions in their inventories, and, as a result, they begin to increase output. Let us say the increase in planned investment comes from an anticipated increase in travel that leads airlines to purchase more airplanes, car rental companies to increase purchases of automobiles, and bus companies to purchase more buses (all capital goods). The firms experiencing unplanned inventory declines will be automobile manufacturers, bus producers, and aircraft producers—GM, Ford, McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, and so forth. In response to declining inventories of planes, buses, and cars, these firms will increase output. Now suppose these firms raise output by the full $25 billion increase in planned investment. Does this restore equilibrium? No, it does not, because when output goes up, people earn more income and a part of that income will be spent. This increases planned aggregate expenditure even further. In other words, an increase in I also leads indirectly to an increase in C. To produce more airplanes, Boeing has to hire more workers or ask its existing employees to work more hours. It also must buy more engines from General Electric, more tires from Goodyear, and so forth. Owners of these firms will earn more profits, produce more, hire more workers, and pay out more in wages and salaries. This added income does not vanish into thin air. It is paid to households that spend some of it and save the rest. The added production leads to added income, which leads to added consumption spending. 6Figure 19.9 can help you understand the multiplier effect. Note in the figure how an increase in planned investment makes its way through the circular flow. Initially, aggregate output is at equilibrium with Y C I. That is, every period, aggregate output is produced by firms, and every period, planned aggregate expenditure is just sufficient to take all those goods and services off the market. Now note what happens when planned investment spending increases and is sustained at a higher level. Firms experience unplanned declines in inventories and they increase output; more real output is produced in subsequent periods. However, the added output means more income; thus we see added income flowing to households. This means more spending. Households spend some portion of their added income (equal to the added income times the MPC) on consumer goods. The higher consumption spending means that even if firms responded fully to the increase in investment spending in the first round, the economy is still out of equilibrium. Follow the added spending back over to firms in Figure 19.9 and you can see that with higher consumption, planned aggregate expenditure will be greater. Firms again see an unplanned

decline in inventories and they respond by increasing the output of consumer goods. This sets off yet another round of income and expenditure increases: Output rises, and income rises as a result, thus increasing consumption. Higher consumption leads to yet another disequilibrium, inventories fall, and output (income) rises again. If planned investment (I) goes up by $25 billion initially and is sustained at this higher level, an increase of output of $25 billion will not restore equilibrium, because it generates even more consumption spending (C). People buy more consumer goods. There are unplanned reductions of inventories of basic consumption items—washing machines, food, clothing, and so forth—and this prompts other firms to increase output. The cycle starts all over again.6 Output and income can rise by significantly more than the initial increase in planned investment, but how much and how large is the multiplier? This is answered graphically in Figure 19.11. Assume the economy is in equilibrium at point A, where equilibrium output is 500. The increase in I of 25 shifts the curve up by 25, because I is higher by 25 at every level of income. The new equilibrium occurs at point B, where the equilibrium level of output is 600. Like point A, point B is on the 45° line and is an equilibrium value. Output (Y ) has increased by 100 (600 500), or four times the initial increase in planned investment of 25, between point A and point B. The multiplier in this example is 4. At point B, aggregate spending is also higher by 100. If 25 of this additional 100 is investment (I), as we know it is, the remaining 75 is added consumption (C). From point A to point B then, Y 100, I 25, and C 75. Why doesn’t the multiplier process go on forever? The answer is because only a fraction of the increase in income is consumed in each round. Successive increases in income become smaller and smaller in each round of the multiplier process until equilibrium is restored. The size of the multiplier depends on the slope of the planned aggregate expenditure line. The steeper the slope of this line is, the greater the change in output for a given change in investment. When planned investment is fixed, as in our example, the slope of the AE C I Chapter 19 447 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output FIGURE 19.11 The Multiplier as Seen in the Planned Aggregate Expenditure Diagram At point A, the economy is in equilibrium at Y 500. When I increases by 25, planned aggregate expenditure is initially greater than aggregate output. As output rises in response, additional consumption is generated, pushing equilibrium output up by a multiple of the initial increase in I. The new equilibrium is found at point B, where Y 600. Equilibrium output has increased by 100 (600 500), or four times the amount of the increase in planned investment. Planned aggregate expenditure, AE (billions of dollars) 600 575 500 400 300 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 200 0 Aggregate output, Y (billions of dollars) 45º 125 150 AE1 C + I I = 25 AE = 100 C = 75 A B I = 25 Y=100 AE2 C + I + I line is just the marginal propensity to consume (C/Y ). The greater the MPC is, the greater the multiplier. This should not be surprising. A large MPC means that consumption increases a lot when income increases. The more consumption changes, the more output has to change to achieve equilibrium. THE MULTIPLIER EQUATION Is there a way to determine the size of the multiplier without using graphic analysis? Yes, there is. Assume that the market is in equilibrium at an income level of Y 500. Now suppose planned investment (I)—thus planned aggregate expenditure (AE)—increases and remains higher by $25 billion. Planned aggregate expenditure is greater than output, there is an unplanned inventory reduction, and firms respond by increasing output (income) (Y ). This leads to a second round of increases, and so on. What will restore equilibrium? Look at Figure 19.10 and recall: planned aggregate expenditure is not equal to aggregate output (Y ) unless S I; the leakage of saving must exactly match the injection of planned investment spending for the economy to be in equilibrium. Recall also, we assumed that planned investment jumps to a new higher level and stays there; it is a

sustained increase of $25 billion in planned investment spending. As income rises, consumption rises and so does saving. Our S I approach to equilibrium leads us to conclude: Equilibrium will be restored only when saving has increased by exactly the amount of the initial increase in I. (AE C I) AE C I ACTIVE GRAPH ACTIVE GRAPH An interesting paradox can arise when households attempt to increase their saving. What happens if households become concerned about the future and want to save more today to be prepared for hard times tomorrow? If households increase their planned saving, the saving schedule in Figure 1 shifts upward, from S to S. The plan to save more is a plan to consume less, and the resulting drop in spending leads to a drop in income. Income drops by a multiple of the initial shift in the saving schedule. Before the increase in saving, equilibrium exists at point A, where S I and Y $500 billion. Increased saving shifts the equilibrium to point B, the point at which SI. New equilibrium output is $300 billion—a $200 billion decrease (Y ) from the initial equilibrium. By consuming less, households have actually caused the hard times about which they were apprehensive. Worse, the new equilibrium finds saving at the same level as it was before consumption dropped ($25 billion). In their attempt to save more, households have caused a contraction in output, and thus in income. They end up consuming less, but they have not saved any more. It should be clear why saving at the new equilibrium is equal to saving at the old equilibrium. Equilibrium requires that saving equal planned investment, and because planned investment is unchanged, saving must remain unchanged for equilibrium to exist. This paradox shows that the interactions among sectors in the economy can be of crucial importance. The paradox of thrift is “paradoxical” because it contradicts the widely held belief that “a penny saved is a penny earned.” This may be true for an individual, but when society as a whole saves more, the result is a drop in income but no increased saving. Does the paradox of thrift always hold? Recall our assumption that planned investment is fixed. Let us drop this assumption for a moment. If the extra saving that households want to do to ward off hard times is channeled into additional investment through financial markets, there is a shift up in the I schedule. The paradox could then be averted. If investment increases, a new equilibrium can be achieved at a higher level of saving and income. This result, however, depends critically on the existence of a channel through which additional household saving finances additional investment. The Paradox of Thrift Aggregate output, Y (billions of dollars) Aggregate saving and planned investment, S and I (billions of dollars) 200 100 25 0 –50 100 200 300 400 500 S I 50 –100 –200 S B A Y FIGURE 1 The Paradox of Thrift An increase in planned saving from S to S causes equilibrium output to decrease from $500 billion to $300 billion. The decreased consumption that accompanies increased saving leads to a contraction of the economy and to a reduction of income, but at the new equilibrium, saving is the same as it was at the initial equilibrium. Increased efforts to save have caused a drop in income but no overall change in saving. Otherwise, I will continue to be greater than S, and C I will continue to be greater than Y. (The S I approach to equilibrium leads to an interesting paradox in the macroeconomy. See the Further Exploration box, “The Paradox of Thrift.”) It is possible to figure how much Y must increase in response to the additional planned investment before equilibrium will be restored. Y will rise, pulling S up with it until the change in saving is exactly equal to the change in planned investment—that is, until S is again equal to I at its new higher level. Because added saving is a fraction of added income (the MPS), the increase in income required to restore equilibrium must be a multiple of the increase in planned investment. 448 Chapter 19 449 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output Recall that the marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the fraction of a change in income that is saved. It is defined as the change in S (S) over the change in income (Y ): Because S must

be equal to I for equilibrium to be restored, we can substitute I for S and solve: Therefore: As you can see, the change in equilibrium income (Y ) is equal to the initial change in planned investment (I) times 1/MPS. The multiplier is 1/MPS: multiplier 1 MPS Y I 1 MPS MPS I Y MPS S Y Because It follows that the multiplier is equal to: multiplier 1 1 MPC MPS MPC 1, MPS 1 MPC. 7The multiplier can also be derived algebraically, as the appendix to this chapter demonstrates. In our example, the MPC is .75, so the MPS must equal 1 .75, or .25. Thus, the multiplier is 1 divided by .25, or 4. The change in the equilibrium level of Y is 4 $25 billion, or $100 billion.7 Also note that the same analysis holds when planned investment falls. If planned investment falls by a certain amount and is sustained at this lower level, output will fall by a multiple of the reduction in I. As the initial shock is felt and firms cut output, they lay people off. The result: Income, and subsequently consumption, falls. THE SIZE OF THE MULTIPLIER IN THE REAL WORLD In considering the size of the multiplier, it is important to realize that the multiplier we derived in this chapter is based on a very simplified picture of the economy. First, we have assumed that planned investment is autonomous and does not respond to changes in the economy. Second, we have thus far ignored the role of government, financial markets, and the rest of the world in the macroeconomy. For these reasons, it would be a mistake to move on from this chapter thinking that national income can be increased by $100 billion simply by increasing planned investment spending by $25 billion. As we relax these assumptions in the following chapters, you will see that most of what we add to make our analysis more realistic has the effect of reducing the size of the multiplier. For example: 1. The Appendix to Chapter 20 shows that when tax payments depend on income (as they do in the real world), the size of the multiplier is reduced. As the economy expands, tax payments increase and act as a drag on the economy. The multiplier effect is smaller. 2. We will see in Chapter 23 that planned investment (I) is not autonomous; instead, it depends on the interest rate in the economy. This too has the effect of reducing the size of the multiplier. 450 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets 3. Thus far we have not discussed how the overall price level is determined in the economy. When we do in Chapter 24, we will see that part of an expansion of the economy is likely to take the form of an increase in the price level instead of an increase in output. When this happens, the size of the multiplier is reduced. 4. The multiplier is also reduced when imports are introduced in Chapter 32 because some domestic spending leaks into foreign markets. These juicy tidbits give you something to look forward to as you proceed through the rest of this book. For now, however, it is enough to point out that: In reality, the size of the multiplier is about 1.4. That is, a sustained increase in autonomous spending of $10 billion into the U.S. economy can be expected to raise real GDP over time by about $14 billion. This is a far cry from the value of 4.0 that we used in this chapter. THE MULTIPLIER IN ACTION: RECOVERING FROM THE GREAT DEPRESSION The Great Depression began in 1930 and lasted nearly a decade. Real output in 1938 was lower than real output in 1929, and the unemployment rate never fell below 14 percent of the labor force between 1930 and 1940. How did the economy get “stuck” at such a low level of income and a high level of unemployment? The Keynesian model that we analyzed in this chapter can help us answer this question. If firms do not wish to undertake much investment (I is low) or if consumers decide to increase their saving and cut back on consumption, then planned spending will be low. Firms do not want to produce more because, with many workers unemployed, households do not have the income to buy the extra output that firms might produce. Households, who would purchase more if they had more income, cannot find jobs that would enable them to earn additional income. The economy is caught in a vicious circle. How might such a cycle be broken? One way is for planned aggregate

expenditure to increase, increasing aggregate output via the multiplier effect. This increase in AE may occur naturally, or it may be caused by a change in government policy. In the late 1930s, for example, the economy experienced a surge of both residential and nonresidential investment. Between 1935 and 1940, total investment spending (in real terms) increased 64 percent and residential investment more than doubled. There can be no doubt that this increased investment had a multiplier effect. In just 5 years, employment in the construction industry increased by more than 400,000, employment in manufacturing industries jumped by more than 1 million, and total employment grew by more than 5 million. As more workers were employed, more income was generated, and some of this added income was spent on consumption goods. Inventories declined and firms began to expand output. Between 1935 and 1940, real output (income) increased by more than one-third and the unemployment rate dropped from 20.3 percent to 14.6 percent. However, 14.6 percent is a very high rate of unemployment; the Depression was not yet over. Between 1940 and 1943 the Depression ended, with the unemployment rate dropping to 1.9 percent in 1943. This recovery was triggered by the mobilization for World War II and the significant increase in government purchases of goods and services, which rose from $14 billion in 1940 to $88.6 billion in 1943. In the next chapter, we will explore this government spending multiplier, and you will see how the government can help stimulate the economy by increasing its spending. LOOKING AHEAD In this chapter, we took the first step in understanding how the economy works. We described the behavior of two sectors (household and firm) and discussed how equilibrium is achieved in the market for goods and services. In the next chapter, we will relax some of the assumptions we have made and take into account the roles of government spending and net exports in the economy. This will give us a more realistic picture of how our economy works. Chapter 19 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output 451 www.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefai SUMMARY AGGREGATE OUTPUT AND AGGREGATE INCOME (Y) 1. Each period, firms produce an aggregate quantity of goods and services called aggregate output (Y ). Because every dollar of expenditure is received by someone as income, aggregate output and aggregate income are the same thing. 2. The total amount of aggregate consumption that takes place in any given period of time depends on factors such as household income, household wealth, interest rates, and households’ expectations about the future. 3. If taxes are zero, households do only two things with their income: They can either spend on consumption or save. C refers to aggregate consumption by households. S refers to aggregate saving by households. By definition, saving equals income minus consumption: 4. The higher people’s income is, the higher their consumption is likely to be. This is also true for the economy as a whole: There is a positive relationship between aggregate consumption (C) and aggregate income (Y ). 5. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the fraction of a change in income that is consumed, or spent. The marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the fraction of a change in income that is saved. Because all income must be either saved or spent, 6. The primary form of spending that firms engage in is investment. Strictly speaking, investment refers to the purchase by firms of new buildings and equipment and additions to inventories, all of which add to firms’ capital stock. 7. Actual investment can differ from planned investment because changes in firms’ inventories are part of actual investment and inventory changes are not under the complete control of firms. Inventory changes are partly determined by how much households decide to buy. I refers to planned investment only. EQUILIBRIUM AGGREGATE

OUTPUT (INCOME) 8. In an economy in which government spending and net exports are zero, planned aggregate expenditure (AE) equals consumption plus planned investment: AE C I. MPS MPC 1. S Y C. Equilibrium in the goods market is achieved when planned aggregate expenditure equals aggregate output: C I Y. This holds if, and only if, planned investment and actual investment are equal. 9. Because aggregate income must be saved or spent, the equilibrium condition Y C I can be rewritten as C S C I, or S I. Only when planned investment equals saving will there be equilibrium. This approach to equilibrium is the saving/investment approach to equilibrium or the leakages/injections approach to equilibrium. 10. When planned aggregate expenditure exceeds aggregate output (income), there is an unplanned fall in inventories. Firms will increase output. This increased output leads to increased income and even more consumption. This process will continue as long as output (income) is below planned aggregate expenditure. If firms react to unplanned inventory reductions by increasing output, an economy with planned spending greater than output will adjust to equilibrium, with Y higher than before. THE MULTIPLIER 11. Equilibrium output changes by a multiple of the change in planned investment or any other autonomous variable. The multiplier is 1/MPS. 12. When households increase their planned saving, income decreases and saving does not change. Saving does not increase because in equilibrium saving must equal planned investment and planned investment is fixed. If planned investment also increased, this paradox of thrift could be averted and a new equilibrium could be achieved at a higher level of saving and income. This result depends on the existence of a channel through which additional household saving finances additional investment. REVIEW TERMS AND CONCEPTS actual investment, 439 aggregate income, 432 aggregate output, 432 aggregate output (income) (Y ), 433 autonomous variable, 445 change in inventory, 439 consumption function, 434 desired, or planned, investment (I), 439 equilibrium, 440 identity, 433 investment, 437 marginal propensity to consume (MPC), 435 marginal propensity to save (MPS), 436 multiplier, 445 paradox of thrift, 448 planned aggregate expenditure (AE), 440 saving (S), 433 c. By assuming there is no change in the level of the MPC and the MPS, and planned investment jumps by 200 and is sustained at that higher level, recompute the table. What is the new equilibrium level of Y? Is this consistent with what you compute using the multiplier? 4. Explain the multiplier intuitively. Why is it that an increase in planned investment of $100 raises equilibrium output by more than $100? Why is the effect on equilibrium output finite? How do we know that the multiplier is 1/MPS? 5. Explain how planned investment can differ from actual investment. 6. You are given the following data concerning Freedonia, a legendary country: (1) Consumption function: C 200 0.8Y (2) Investment function: I 100 (3) (4) AE Y a. What are the marginal propensity to consume in Freedonia, and the marginal propensity to save? b. Graph equations (3) and (4) and solve for equilibrium income. c. Suppose equation (2) were changed to (2) I 110. What is the new equilibrium level of income? By how much does the $10 increase in planned investment change equilibrium income? What is the value of the multiplier? d. Calculate the saving function for Freedonia. Plot this saving function on a graph with equation (2). Explain why the equilibrium income in this graph must be the same as in part b. 7. At the beginning of the section entitled “Household Consumption and Saving,” it was argued that saving and spending behavior depended in part on wealth (accumulated savings and inheritance) but our simple model does not incorporate this effect. Consider the following model of a very simple economy: If you assume that wealth (W) and investment (I) remain constant (we are ignoring the fact that saving adds to the stock of wealth), what are the equilibrium level of GDP (Y ), consumpS Y C Y C I W 1000 I 100 C 10 .75Y .04W AE C I 452 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets

www.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/cawww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.p PROBLEM SET 1. Briefly define the following terms and explain the relationship between them: MPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multiplier Actual investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Planned investment Aggregate expenditure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Real GDP Aggregate output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aggregate income 2. Crack econometricians in the Republic of Yuck estimate the following: Real GNP (Y) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 billion Yuck dollars Planned investment spending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 billion Yuck dollars Yuck is a simple economy with no government, no taxes, and no imports or exports. Yuckers (citizens of Yuck) are creatures of habit. They have a rule that everyone saves exactly 25 percent of income. Assume that planned investment is fixed and remains at 75 billion Yuck dollars. You are asked by the business editor of the Weird Harold, the local newspaper, to predict the economic events of the next few months. By using the data given, can you make a forecast? What is likely to happen to inventories? What is likely to happen to the level of real GDP? Is the economy at an equilibrium? When will things stop changing? 3. The following questions refer to this table: Aggregate Planned Output / Income Consumption Investment 2,000 2,100 300 2,500 2,500 300 3,000 2,900 300 3,500 3,300 300 4,000 3,700 300 4,500 4,100 300 5,000 4,500 300 5,500 4,900 300 a. At each level of output, calculate saving. At each level of output, calculate unplanned investment (inventory change). What is likely to happen to aggregate output if the economy were producing at each of the levels indicated? What is the equilibrium level of output? b. Over each range of income (2,000 to 2,500, 2,500 to 3,000, and so on), calculate the marginal propensity to consume. Calculate the marginal propensity to save. What is the multiplier? 1. 2. 3. 4. AE C I MPC MPS 1 MPC slope of consumption function C Y S Y C 5. Equilibrium condition: Y AE or Y C I 6. Saving/investment approach to equilibrium: S I 7. Multiplier 1 MPS 1 1 MPC Chapter 19 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output 453 www.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefai 1. According to the chapter, inventory changes play a key role in predicting movements in output. To get inventory data, go to http://www.economagic.com and follow the link to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Follow the links to U.S. Business and Fiscal Data to Inventory/Sales Ratio. Now click to convert this to a GIF chart and change the chart to 1974 through 1999. Recalling that major recessions occurred in 1975, 1981–1982 and 1990–1991, do the patterns that you observe make sense? Explain your answer. 2. Saving plays a key role in determining the size of the multiplier and the equilibrium level of output/income. Go to http://www.economagic.com and follow the link to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Follow the links to GDP data and to the Personal Savings Rate. Click to convert this to a GIF chart for 1990 through 1999. What happened to the savings rate over the decade? If the propensity to save changed as the data indicate, what likely happened to the value of the multiplier? Can you offer any explanation for why the savings rate might have changed as it did during the 1990s? Could it have anything to do with the stock market? APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 19 DERIVING THE MULTIPLIER ALGEBRAICALLY In addition to deriving the multiplier using the simple substitution we used in the chapter, we can also derive the formula for the multiplier by using simple algebra. Recall that our consumption function is: where b is the marginal propensity to consume. In equilibrium: Y C I C a bY Now we solve these two equations for Y in terms of I. By substituting the first equation into the second, we get: C This equation can be rearranged to yield: We can then solve for Y in terms of I by dividing

through by (1 b): Y(1 b) a I Y bY a I Y a bY I WEB EXERCISES Turn to the “Business Cycles” episode on the Mastering Economics CD-ROM to complete an interactive, video-enhanced exercise that looks at how the staff at CanGo—an e-business start-up—uses the economic principles presented in this chapter to make business decisions. MASTERING ECONOMICS CD-ROM tion (C), and saving (S)? Now suppose that wealth increases by 50 percent to 1,500. Recalculate the equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S. What impact does wealth accumulation have on GDP? Many were concerned with the very large increase in stock values in the late 1990s. Does this present a problem for the economy? 8. If I decide to save an extra dollar, my saving goes up by that amount. If everyone decides to save an extra dollar, income falls and saving does not rise. Explain. 9. You learned earlier that expenditures and income should always be equal. In this chapter, you have learned that AE and aggregate output (income) can be different. Is there an inconsistency here? 10. Inventory makes up a very significant component of the capital stock of retail stores and e-commerce retailers. The service that is sold by retail stores is in large measure “convenience.” When you go shopping, you like to see different styles and different colors and, of course, we all come in different sizes. To serve consumers with diverse tastes and different shapes and sizes requires inventory. The following table from the Department of Commerce shows the change in inventory in the retail sector for the quarters indicated: Q2 1999 $ 5.9 billion Q3 1999 $14.3 billion Q4 1999 $45.2 billion Q1 2000 $ 1.7 billion What possible stories could you tell about these numbers? Do they contradict the point made in the box on page 443? What else would you need to know to interpret such numbers? 454 Part 5 The Goods and Money Markets Now look carefully at this expression and think about increasing I by some amount, I, with a held constant. If I increases by I, income will increase by: Because b MPC, the expression becomes: Y I 1 1 b Y (a I) 1 1 b www.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/cawww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.prenhall.com/casefairwww.p The multiplier is: Finally, because MPS MPC 1, MPS is equal to 1 MPC, making the alternative expression for the multiplier 1/MPS, just as we saw in this chapter. 1 1 MPC Y I 1 1 MPC