Upload
chris-hanretty
View
169
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Covers
Citation preview
Epistemologyand method
Chris Hanretty
1 / 57
What is a science?
A demarcation criterion
Popper and the social sciences
General laws
Meaning and value
2 / 57
#1:
What is ascience?
3 / 57
The story of this module
Originally designed toaccompany this bookBook's authors havedifferentepistemologicalstand-pointChoice of title thereforeintriguing
4 / 57
Some candidates
Physics
Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
5 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading
Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
6 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering
EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
7 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering English
Study of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
8 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution
Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
9 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology
PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
10 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology Philosophy
Meteorology Astrology
11 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology
Astrology
12 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
13 / 57
Some candidates
Physics Palm-reading Engineering EnglishStudy of evolution Psychology PhilosophyMeteorology Astrology
14 / 57
The candidates
SciencePhysicsEngineeringStudy of evolutionMeterologySome psychology
Not-SciencePalm-readingEnglishSome psychologyAstrologyPhilosophy
15 / 57
Some characteristics
What unites entries in theScience column?
16 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'
Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
17 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
18 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
Usesnumbers
Subject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
19 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
20 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
Makespredictions
Charac-terised byargument
21 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
22 / 57
Some characteristics (2)
`Objective'Is taught inuniversities
UsesnumbersSubject of`scientificdisputes'
MakespredictionsCharac-terised byargument
23 / 57
Strategies
Admit that science does not havenecessary and/or sufficientcharacteristics(cf. Wittgenstein on games)Argue for a criterion standing behindall these
24 / 57
#2:
A demarcationcriterion
25 / 57
Karl Popper(1902-1994)
26 / 57
The problem of induction
We believe, very strongly, that the sunwill rise tomorrowOn what basis do we believe?
27 / 57
Black swans
The basic problem: induction worksfine until it doesn'tThe example of the black swan(Cygnus atratus)Belief in white swans was almost aswell supported as belief in sun'scontinual rising
28 / 57
Marxism, FreudianismBoth theories popular in Popper'smilieu; basic claims sound `scientific'Freudianism: patient's mental statecan be explained by interplay of id,ego, superego. State of thesecomponents revealed in unconsciousaction.Marxism: society driven by conflictsbetween owners of capital and sellersof labour
29 / 57
The `success' of Freudianism
Freud's method of dream analysisseemed to reveal many sublimatedsexual urges. . . but with enough effort, `skilled'analysts can reduce anything to urgesSometimes a cigar is just a cigarThis seems like counting (artificiallyinflated) white swans
30 / 57
The `success' of Marxism
Many political conflicts seem toinvolve class conflictBut failure to recognize other sourcesof conflictMost notoriously, failure to predictcollapse of capitalism
31 / 57
The problem
These theories have not giveninstances where they would be shownwrongTime-limit on capitalist overthrow; listof non-sexual imageryIn other words, we need to havepotential falsifiability
32 / 57
The criterion
A subject is a science if itproduces potentially falsifiablestatements about the world
English? Psychology? Political science?Evolution?
33 / 57
The criterion
A subject is a science if itproduces potentially falsifiablestatements about the world
English?
Psychology? Political science?Evolution?
34 / 57
The criterion
A subject is a science if itproduces potentially falsifiablestatements about the world
English? Psychology?
Political science?Evolution?
35 / 57
The criterion
A subject is a science if itproduces potentially falsifiablestatements about the world
English? Psychology? Political science?
Evolution?
36 / 57
The criterion
A subject is a science if itproduces potentially falsifiablestatements about the world
English? Psychology? Political science?Evolution?
37 / 57
#3:
Popper and thesocial sciences
38 / 57
Two questions
Do the social sciences satisfy Popper'scriterion?Is there anything else we shouldproperly add?
39 / 57
Probabilistic statements
Nate Silver's election forecastHad Romney won, would Silver'smodel have been falsified?Many social science claims areprobabilisticcf. M. Rouget example (Hollis)
40 / 57
A record of failure?
Is it okay to keep failing?Are the general laws we have anygood?
41 / 57
Successful black boxes?
Problem of data mining (Google Flutrends)Often assumed to be equivalent tofamiliar statement, `correlation 6=causation'Problem is a little bit bigger (stepfunctions, other functions)
42 / 57
A toy example
43 / 57
A toy example (2)
Does this allow us to make boldfalsifiable predictions?
Hell yes!Is this social science?Unlikely
44 / 57
A toy example (2)
Does this allow us to make boldfalsifiable predictions?Hell yes!Is this social science?Unlikely
45 / 57
Social scienceSomething which produces potentiallyfalsifiable statements, even ifprobabilisticSomething which has as its subjecthuman societiesWhich works with some idea ofmechanisms which operate onhumansi.e., rational choices, roles, values
46 / 57
#4:
General laws
47 / 57
Some candidates
The richer a country, the more likely itis to become a democracyDemocracies never go to war witheach otherDemocracies never suffer faminesFirst-past-the-post causes atwo-party system (Duverger's law)
48 / 57
And mechanisms?
This is a big, big topic. . .Sometimes, the same generalisationcan have multiple rationalesThese are only partly testable
49 / 57
Where should we spendeffort?
The age of grand theory is overModernization theory died outMore and more data is becomingavailableWe have less grand theory, moretesting theories of the middle-range
50 / 57
#5:
Meaning andvalue
51 / 57
Value-driven social science
1. Social science is about values2. But stuff about values is subjective3. Science is not subjective
52 / 57
Yes, values matter
We research democracy because webelieve it to be a good thingi.e., we value democracyValues enter in to the choice of subjectThey need not affect the analysis
See Machlup for more.
53 / 57
Value-laden social science
Social scienceinvolves recognizingthings asdemocraciesBut that recognitiondepends on a web ofunderstanding
54 / 57
Conclusions
Social sciences produce falsifiableclaimsThey are thus scientificProducing falsifiable claims is not allthat they doThey also investigate mechanismsunderpinning these claims
55 / 57
Conclusions (2)
Many parts of the study of politics donot involve falsifiable claims(e.g., normative political philosophy,analysis of ideology)but this does not mean that they donot have valuerather, that their value is of the samekind as philosophy or literary criticism
56 / 57
Links
Popper recurs when we talk aboutpredictionMacintyre recurs next week when wetalk about comparison(Parts of) Marxism recur in a topic ofits own
57 / 57