Upload
arthur-shum
View
127
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Week 9Chapter 22
Decentralization and Transfer Pricing
11
Big PictureActivity-Based versus Strategic-Based Responsibility Accounting
22
Responsibility Accounting
Financial-based centers (Cost,
Revenue, Profit, Investment)
Strategy-basedResponsibility accounting system translates
the strategy of the organization into operational objectives and measures
Which one is bottom up/top down?
Activity-based AB system adds a process perspective to the financial perspective of the functional-based
responsibility accounting system.
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003
Big Idea
- 3 -
1. Size- Large Manufacturing (ODM)
Firm (Fortune Ltd)- Firm with many branches (e.g. Yunhong group), countries
(e.g. MNC)2. Competition- Short life cycle (e.g. customers
buy new mobile phones every 6 months)
3. Environment uncertainty
- Volatility
1. Automation2. Aggregate knowledge
(e.g. ability to use an aggregate measure like accounting to capture knowledge, measure performance)
3. Technology (e.g. CCTV, RFID, Bar code)
Knowledge forces (knowledge transfer
costs)
DecentralizeGive decision authority to managers lower in your firm so that you can do more.
Rewards- Incentives- Monetary- Non-monetary
Measurement- Financial measures
ROIRIEVA
ResponsibilityCenters
- Activity based- Strategy basedAccounting based- Cost center- Revenue center- Profit center- Investment center
Control costs (agency costs)
(E.g. ABC Ltd)
Transfer pricing- Goal congruence- Management effort- Subunit Performance evaluation- Subunit autonomy
+
-
Why decentralize?
Why use responsibility centers?
Why use transfer pricing?
4
Decentralization and Control
-
5
Decentralization and Control
Factors that increase
knowledge transfer costs
Factors that decrease
knowledge transfer costs
If you decentralize then you need to have a system to
assign some responsibility (D)
If you assign some responsibility then
you need to measure the performance of that responsibility
If you assign, then measure then you have to give some
incentive or the (H) in DHL won’t
happen
Agency costs are the costs of monitoring as well as the
bad behavior (H) of employees (agents) – (eg gamesmanship)
6
Decentralization and Control
Factors that increase
knowledge transfer costs
Factors that decrease
knowledge transfer costs
Agency costs are the costs of monitoring as well as the
bad behavior (H) of employees (agents) – (eg gamesmanship)
Reasons for decentralization
• Better access to local information
• Cognitive limitations
• More timely response
• Focusing of central management
• Training and evaluation of segment managers
• Motivation of segment managers
• Enhanced competition
Decentralization and Control
7
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
8
May hinder coordination among strategic business units Can cause conflict among strategic business units
Drawbacks of Decentralization
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
Cost to EmployerNeed to make managers responsible (responsibility center), but it costs $$$ to monitor (measure) performance and reward achievement.
Benefit to Employerminimize information processing (minimize knowledge transfer costs) – in order to fuel faster expansion
Knowledge Transfer and Agency Costs Trade Off
99
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
10
Decentralization and ControlIf you decentralize then you need to have a system to
assign some responsibility (D)
If you assign some responsibility then
you need to measure the performance of that responsibility
If you assign, then measure then you have to give some
incentive or the (H) in DHL won’t
happen
1111
Decentralization and Control
1212
DecentralizeGive decision authority to managers lower
in your firm so that you can do more.
Measurement- Financial measures
- ROI- RI- EVA
Rewards- Incentives
- Monetary- Non-monetary
Decentralization and Control
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
Decentralization and Control – The Three Legged Stool and DHL Control
Problem Framework
SCENARIO Decentralization Measurement Rewards
1 √ ⨯ √2 ⨯ √ √
3 √ √ ⨯
No MeasurementNo MeasurementScenario 1: This will result the worker not Scenario 1: This will result the worker not
being motivated to put in their best effort, being motivated to put in their best effort, as there will be an unparalleled match as there will be an unparalleled match between incentives and effort without between incentives and effort without proper measurement. In addition, there will proper measurement. In addition, there will be a lack of direction as the incentives be a lack of direction as the incentives given to employees may be seen as an given to employees may be seen as an impartial treatment, and affect team’s impartial treatment, and affect team’s morale.morale.
No decentralisationNo decentralisationScenario 2: They know what they should Scenario 2: They know what they should
do, but are not given authority and do, but are not given authority and autonomy to do so. Although they are not autonomy to do so. Although they are not able to make crucial decision, tight able to make crucial decision, tight controls are in place to measure them. controls are in place to measure them. Thus, this may result in frustration and a Thus, this may result in frustration and a lack of motivation. In addition, there will lack of motivation. In addition, there will also be an increase in knowledge transfer also be an increase in knowledge transfer cost as the top management may not have cost as the top management may not have access to the local environment.access to the local environment.
No rewardNo rewardScenario 3: There will be a lack of Scenario 3: There will be a lack of
motivation. Even though they have the motivation. Even though they have the autonomy to do anything, and autonomy to do anything, and measurements of effort are in place, they measurements of effort are in place, they are still going to end up with a fixed or are still going to end up with a fixed or comparable pay. Here, there is a case comparable pay. Here, there is a case when incentives do not match up to the when incentives do not match up to the effort put in.effort put in.
17
Decentralization and ControlIf you
decentralize then you need to have
a system to assign some
responsibility (D)
If you assign some responsibility then
you need to measure the
performance of that responsibility
If you assign, then measure then you have to give some incentive or the (H)
in DHL won’t happen
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
- 18 -
Financial results controls ... Three core elements:
– Financial responsibility centers» The apportioning of accountability for financial results within the
organization.
– Formal management processes (planning & budgeting) » To define performance expectations and standards for
evaluating performance.
– Motivational contracts» To define the links between results and various organizational
incentives.
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
19
Decentralization and ControlIf you
decentralize then you need to have
a system to assign some
responsibility (D)
Types of Responsibility Centers1. Revenue center: only responsible for revenues
2. Cost center: only responsible for costs
3. Profit center: responsible for both revenues and costs
4. Investment center: responsible for revenues, costs, and investments
Responsibility accounting is a system that measures the results of each responsibility center and compares those results with some measure of expected or budgeted outcome.
Responsibility Accounting
2020
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
Cost Centers-Producing and Support Departments
2121
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
The discretionary-cost method is input oriented, since costs are considered largely uncontrollable and discretion is applied at the planning stage.
The engineer-cost method is the output-oriented approach since costs are variable and therefore “engineered,” that is, controllable
Two methods of implementing cost SBUs for producing and support departments
2222
Administration dept’s are typical cost centers– Discretionary cost centers
» Money is budgeted based on inputs
» E.g. number of student enrollments
– Engineered cost centers» Focus is on improving the efficiency of the administration process
» Number of students per staff processed, or
» Cost to administer each student.
» The aim is to improve this efficiency ratio over time regardless of the size of the input (number of enrolments).
Student
Example: Value for Money in Government Organizations
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
23
Decentralization and Control
Transfer pricing- Motivations
a)Excess capacityb)Save Sales
expenses
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003
Transfer Pricing
Goal Congruence Performance
Evaluation Incentives Autonomy (KT)
- 24 -
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Consumer Products Division
Motor Products Division
Product: Sorbet maker-Selling Price: $ 89-50,000 Units -Require: Electric Motor-Variable cost: $ 54/unit-Fixed cost: $180,000/yr-Additional operating assets: $3,000,000 (ROI)
Product: Electric Motor-Variable cost:$12/unit-Fixed cost:$30,000/yr-Additional operating assets: $400,000 (ROI)
Divisional manager performance: Minimum
required rate of return: 20% 2525
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Consumer Products Division
Motor Products Division
$69.60
target price + 19.40
selling price = $89.00
VC $ 54.00
FC 3.60
ROI 12.00
VC $ 13.00
FC 0.60
ROI 1.60
$15.20
Solutions
2626
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
- 27 -
Transfer pricing ... The price at which products or services are transferred
between profit centers within the same corporation.– It affects the revenues of the producing profit center (PC),
the costs of the buying PC, and hence, the profits of both entities.
Purposes– Provide proper economic signals so that PC managers make
good economic decisions from a corporate standpoint;
– Provide information for evaluating PC performance;
– Purposely move profits between company entities / locations.» e.g., for tax purposes, or in joint-ventures.
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
2828
A transfer pricing system should satisfy three objectives: Accurate performance evaluation
Goal congruence
Preservation on divisional autonomy
Setting Transfer Prices
The opportunity cost approach identifies the minimum transfer price and the maximum transfer price.
Pareto optimal
Div managers select actions that maximize firm wide profits
Maintain decision freedom among divisional managers
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
2929
Exhibit 22-3Exhibit 22-3
Criteria Market-Based Cost-Based Negotiated
Achieves goal Achieves goal congruencecongruence
Yes, when markets are competitive
Often, but not always Yes
Motivates Motivates management effortmanagement effort
Yes Yes, when based on budgeted costs; less incentive to control costs if
transfers are based on actual costs
Yes
Useful for evaluating Useful for evaluating subunit performancesubunit performance
Yes, when markets are competitive
Difficult unless transfer price exceeds full cost and even then is somewhat
arbitrary
Yes, but transfer prices are affected by bargaining
strengths of the buying and selling divisions
Preserves subunit Preserves subunit autonomyautonomy
Yes, when markets are competitive
No, because it is rule-based Yes, because it is based on negotiations between subunits
Other Other factorsfactors
Market may not exist, or markets may be imperfect
or in distress
Useful for determining full cost of products and services; easy to
implement
Bargaining and negotiations take time and may need to be
reviewed repeatedly as conditions change
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Comparison of Transfer-Pricing Methods
General Guideline for Determininga Minimum Transfer Price
Minimum transfer price=
Incremental costs per unit incurredup to the point of transfer
+ Opportunity costs per unit
to the selling division
Summary of Sales and Production Data
Example 1: Avoidable Distribution Costs
Avoidable distribution costs
1. What is the maximum transfer price that Games division will pay? $22, $21 or $20
2. What does each party want? Board Division? Games Division?
Printed circuit boards
Setting Transfer Prices
Games division will like to buy 91,000 circuit boards from the board division
3131
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
At Capacity
Comparative Income StatementsExample 1: Avoidable distribution costs
External Market
Printed circuit boards $22.00
Setting Transfer Prices
3232
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Comparative Income Statements (continued)
Example 1: Avoidable Distribution Costs
Internal Market
Printed circuit boards $21.10
Extra revenue 1.1 ($2.00 sell costs saved - $0.90 lower price) * 91,000 = $100,100
Saving
$0.90*
91,000 = $81,900
internal Market
Printed circuit boards $21.10
Sales = less $81,900 Costs = less $182,000
Net saving = $100,100
Setting Transfer Prices
3333
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Comparative StatementsExample 2: Excess Capacity
1. Special order 250,000 bottles @ $0.85 per bottle less VC (aspirins) $0.60 = $0.25
2. What is the maximum transfer price that Pharmaceuticals will pay? $0.20, $0.25 or $0.40?
3. What is the minimum transfer price that Plastics want to receive?
Transfer plastic bottles to Pharma division
250,000 * 0.60 0.40
250,000 * 0.60 0.25
Setting Transfer PricesPharmaceutical division will like to buy 250,000 bottles from the plastics division
3434
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Comparative Statements (continued)Example 2: Excess Capacity
250,000 * 0.60 0.20
250,000 * 0.60 0.15
Setting Transfer Prices
3535
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions ImpactTransfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003 36
Decentralization and Control
Factors that increase
knowledge transfer costs
Factors that decrease
knowledge transfer costs
If you decentralize then you need to have
a system to assign some
responsibility (D)
If you assign some responsibility then
you need to measure the
performance of that responsibility
If you assign, then measure then you have to give some incentive or the (H)
in DHL won’t happen
Agency costs are the costs of monitoring as
well as the bad behavior (H) of employees (agents)
– (eg gamesmanship)
Merchant and Van der Stede: Management Control Systems © Pearson Education Limited 2003
Big Idea
- 37 -
My first job - Junior Clerical Stores Person- 1980
4141
Dakoil Corporation has two divisions, Refining and Production. The company's primary product is Enkoil Oil. Each division's costs are provided below:
Production: Variable costs per barrel of oil $ 9Fixed costs per barrel of oil $ 6
Refining: Variable costs per barrel of oil $30Fixed costs per barrel of oil $36
The Refining Division has been operating at a capacity of 40,000 barrels a day and usually purchases 25,000 barrels of oil from the Production Division and 15,000 barrels from other suppliers at $20 per barrel.
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingTypes Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingAssume 200 barrels are transferred from the Production Division to the Refining Division for a transfer price of $18 per barrel. The Refining Division sells the 200 barrels at a price of $120 each to customers. What is the operating income of both divisions together?
A) $7,200B) $7,800C) $10,800 D) $20,400
4242
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingA benefit of using a market-based transfer price is the: A) profits of the transferring division are sacrificed for the overall good of the corporation B) profits of the division receiving the products are sacrificed for the overall good of the corporation C) economic viability and profitability of each division can be evaluated individually D) None of these answers is correct.
4343
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
Transfer PricingTransfer PricingAn advantage of using budgeted costs for transfer pricing among divisions is that:
A) overall corporate profitability is usually higher B) it usually provides a basis for optimal decision making C) the divisions know the transfer price in advance D) it promotes subunit autonomy
4444
Types Qualitative ExampleConditions Impact Transfer Pricing Setting Transfer Pricing
4545
DecentralizeGive decision authority to managers
lower in your firm so that you can do more.
Measurement- Financial measures
- ROI- RI- EVA
Rewards- Incentives
- Monetary- Non-monetary
Decentralization and Control
Management Control System Responsibility Centers Case StudyThree Legged Stool Benefit and Cost
FRC (Autonomy
KTC)
SRC (Customer
WHY)
Management Control Systems