Upload
spa718
View
44
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
When to stop TKI in CMLWhen to stop TKI in CML
Three situationsThree situations
Three situationsThree situations When they don’t workWhen they don’t work When they are too toxicWhen they are too toxic When they appear to have affected a cureWhen they appear to have affected a cure
Three situationsThree situations When they don’t workWhen they don’t work When they are too toxicWhen they are too toxic When they appear to have affected a cureWhen they appear to have affected a cure
CML is cured by alloSCT by eradication CML is cured by alloSCT by eradication CML clones via the GVL effect……right?CML clones via the GVL effect……right?
Gratwohl Haem 2006 91:513; Sekhri Leuk Res 2009 33:1291.
Latest reported relapse at 24 years post-allograft
CureCure
Absence of disease-related symptoms Absence of disease-related symptoms and signsand signs
Freedom from progressionFreedom from progression
No need for treatmentNo need for treatment
PermanentPermanent
CMRCMR
Complete Molecular ResponseComplete Molecular Response No detectable BCR-ABL mRNANo detectable BCR-ABL mRNA RQ-PCR method with sensitivity RQ-PCR method with sensitivity ≥4.5-log≥4.5-log Confirmed on two consecutive measurementsConfirmed on two consecutive measurements
Undetectable MRD (UMRD)Undetectable MRD (UMRD) Molecular Undetectable Leukaemia (MUL)Molecular Undetectable Leukaemia (MUL) Treatment free remissionTreatment free remission
Branford Clin Cancer Res 2007 13:7080
CHR
CCR
CMR
MR4.5
Estimated <106 residual leukaemic cells
Less is betterLess is better
Mutations occur stochastically – fewer Mutations occur stochastically – fewer cells means fewer opportunitiescells means fewer opportunities
CML LSCs have increased ROS and CML LSCs have increased ROS and increased mutation rateincreased mutation rate
Imatinib does not correct ROS-induced Imatinib does not correct ROS-induced mutagenesis in the most primitive CML mutagenesis in the most primitive CML cells (mouse model)cells (mouse model)
Bolton-Gillespie Blood 2013 121:4175
AllograftingAllografting
Achievement of UMRD required for EFSAchievement of UMRD required for EFS Relapse risk: UMRD 5%Relapse risk: UMRD 5% detectable MRD 70%detectable MRD 70%
Rate of unstable UMRD is lower than in Rate of unstable UMRD is lower than in imatinib-treated patientsimatinib-treated patients
BCR-ABL DNA not detected in 8/9 BCR-ABL DNA not detected in 8/9 patients in long-term remissionpatients in long-term remission
Radich Blood 1995 85:2632; Mughal BJH 2001 115:569; Lange Leukemia 2005 19:1262; Simoes Blood 2010 116:1329
Ross & Melo ASHEP 2011.
Biology of TFRBiology of TFR
Possible models Possible models for MRDfor MRD
Stopping ImatinibStopping Imatinib
All reported cases of cessation in CCR or All reported cases of cessation in CCR or MMR led to relapse MMR led to relapse Doubling time Doubling time ~~10 days10 days
First reported TFR cases had UMRDFirst reported TFR cases had UMRD
Mahon Blood 2007 109:58; Branford Blood 2012 119:4264
ALLG CML8 studyALLG CML8 studyclinical outlineclinical outline
Clinical trial of withdrawing imatinib from chronic Clinical trial of withdrawing imatinib from chronic phase CML patients with sustained undetectable phase CML patients with sustained undetectable BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR for at least two yearsBCR-ABL by RQ-PCR for at least two years
Close RQ-PCR monitoring for two yearsClose RQ-PCR monitoring for two years
Completed accrual of 40 patients: Completed accrual of 40 patients:
21 patients received IFN before imatinib21 patients received IFN before imatinib
19 patients received imatinib in early CP19 patients received imatinib in early CP
Ross Blood 2013 122:515.
RelapseRelapse
Defined as:Defined as: Loss of MMR (BCR-ABLLoss of MMR (BCR-ABL ISIS >0.1%) >0.1%)
• OROR Any two consecutive positive resultsAny two consecutive positive results
Imatinib re-commenced at previous doseImatinib re-commenced at previous dose
Patients (n=40)Patients (n=40)
Male sex 48%Male sex 48% Median age 61 yearsMedian age 61 years
Median interval (months)Median interval (months) Imatinib prior to study entryImatinib prior to study entry 70 (44-108)70 (44-108) Time to UMRDTime to UMRD 32 (3-73)32 (3-73) UMRD prior to study entryUMRD prior to study entry 36 (24-82)36 (24-82) Follow-upFollow-up 40 (12-72)40 (12-72)
CML8 TFRCML8 TFR
Ross Blood 2013 122:515.
Patient-specific DNA PCRPatient-specific DNA PCRBCR ABL
Years in treatment-free remission
Ross Blood 2013 122:515.
P<0.001P<0.001
10
0.1
0.001
1
0.01
BCR-ABL
DN
A%
Not detected
0.0001
UMRD at study entry
Molecular relapse
UMRD after retreatment
NS
Ross Blood 2013 122:515.
A-STIMA-STIM
Single case of lymphoid blast crisis developing abruptly after regaining UMRD
Started imatinib 10 years after original diagnosis
Rousselot JCO 2014 32:424.
Interferon-Interferon-αα
Mahon JCO 2001 20:214
Stopping of 2G TKIStopping of 2G TKI ENESTopENESTop
MR4.5 after second-line nilotinibMR4.5 after second-line nilotinib One year nilotinib ‘consolidation’ then stop if MRD One year nilotinib ‘consolidation’ then stop if MRD
criteria metcriteria met
ENESTfreedomENESTfreedom MR4.5 after first-line nilotinib (ENESTnd)MR4.5 after first-line nilotinib (ENESTnd) Similar designSimilar design
EuroSKI registryEuroSKI registry
Question #1Question #1
What MRD threshold is good enough to What MRD threshold is good enough to achieve TFR?achieve TFR? UMRD is arbitrary and varies from test to testUMRD is arbitrary and varies from test to test MR4.5 being tested in prospective trialsMR4.5 being tested in prospective trials Probably also depends on Probably also depends on speed speed and and durationduration of of
MRMR
Question #2Question #2
What is the latest that relapse can occur?What is the latest that relapse can occur? How should we monitor patients in TFR?How should we monitor patients in TFR? Latest reported relapse from TFR at 42 monthsLatest reported relapse from TFR at 42 months Latest reported loss of MMR (A-STIM) at 17 Latest reported loss of MMR (A-STIM) at 17
monthsmonths
Question #3Question #3
Why do some people with stable UMRD Why do some people with stable UMRD relapse early while others remain in TFR?relapse early while others remain in TFR? Pre-determined by disease biology?Pre-determined by disease biology? Immune control?Immune control? Persistence of differing subclones or cell types?Persistence of differing subclones or cell types?
ConclusionsConclusions
Some patients appear to be ‘cured’ with Some patients appear to be ‘cured’ with follow-up of >5 years after stopping imatinibfollow-up of >5 years after stopping imatinib
TFR after imatinib is often (or always) TFR after imatinib is often (or always) associated with detectable MRD by highly associated with detectable MRD by highly sensitive BCR-ABL DNA PCRsensitive BCR-ABL DNA PCR
Thank you.Thank you.
Imatinib is still a great drugIRIS and many, many, many
ASH updates
3 year Dasision data Jabbour; Blood 2014
Ischemic heart Ischemic heart diseasedisease
Ischemic Ischemic cerebrovascular cerebrovascular
eventsevents
Peripheral Peripheral arterial arterial diseasedisease
2020
1818
1010
22
00
1616
88
66
44
1414
1212
Nu
mb
er
of p
atie
nts
Nu
mb
er
of p
atie
nts
Cardiovascular events (CVE) by 36 months (safety population)Cardiovascular events (CVE) by 36 months (safety population)
Any CVEAny CVE
NilotinibNilotinibMedian exposure, 3.0 yMedian exposure, 3.0 y
Imatinib Imatinib Median exposure on study, Median exposure on study, 2.2 y2.2 y
Crossover to Nilotinib Median Crossover to Nilotinib Median exposure, 1.0 y exposure, 1.0 y
1212
22 22
77
44
001111 11
0 0 11
33
1515
More cases of CVEs were reported in patients More cases of CVEs were reported in patients randomized to nilotinib compared with imatinibrandomized to nilotinib compared with imatinib
What if you do wait until 6 months?
6 month landmark analysis
37 85
3-Month EvaluationRecommended assessments
Level of response achieved
Follow-up assessments
Treatment options
Ongoing monitoring
Ongoing management
Cytogenetics if RQ-PCR using the IS is not available
BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% or PCyR BCR-ABLIS > 10% or < PCyR
Continue same dose of TKI
Evaluate patient compliance and drug-drug interactions
RQ-PCR every 3 months RQ-PCR at least every 3 months
Switch to alternate TKI (other than imatinib)
OR Continue same dose/dose-escalatea
Continue ongoing monitoring until
12-month evaluation
Proceed according to recommendations for patients with
BCR-ABLIS > 10% or < PCyR at 3 months
RelapseNo relapseEvent
RQ-PCR using the IS
OR Clinical trial
Additional monitoring or mutational
analysis as indicated
Mutational analysis
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Version 1.2014.
a Increase dose of imatinib if not candidate for alternate TKI or continue same dose of nilotinib or dasatinib (for patients on first-line nilotinib or dasatinib).
AND Evaluate for HSCT
OPTIMAL WARNING FAILURE
BASELINE NA -HIGH RISK,-CCA/Ph+ (Major route)
NA
3 mo Ph+ ≤ 35% and/orBCR-ABL ≤ 10%
Ph + 36-95% and/orBCR-ABL ≥ 10%
No CHR and/or Ph + > 95%
6 mo Ph+ 0 and/orBCR-ABL < 1%
Ph + 1-35% and/orBCR-ABL 1-10%
Ph + > 35% and/orBCR-ABL > 10%
12 mo BCR-ABL≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL 0.1-1 % Ph + ≥ 1%, and/orBCR-ABL > 1%
24 mo BCR-ABL ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL 0.1-1% BCR-ABL > 1%
EUROPEAN LEUKEMIANET 2013RESPONSE TO TREATMENT FIRSTLINE
Baccarani M et al, Blood. 2013 Jun 26. [Epub ahead of print].Yellow = cytogenetic response
00
halving time > 90 days, n=58 (64%)halving time > 90 days, n=58 (64%)halving time ≤ 90 days, n=33 (36%)halving time ≤ 90 days, n=33 (36%)
P P < .0001< .0001
1001009090
5050
101000
66 1212 1818 242433 99 1515 2121
8080
404030302020
70706060
Confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 2 years Confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 2 years – dynamics of response– dynamics of response
48%
5%
Months after switch to nilotinib Months after switch to nilotinib
91 evaluable patients91 evaluable patients
Cum
ula
tive
inci
den
ce %
Cum
ula
tive
inci
den
ce %
2020For distribution in response to an unsolicited request for medical information pending local NP4 approval.