29
Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph. D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC [email protected] @LynnConnaway SUNYLA, Buffalo, NY, June 12-14, 2013 Erin M. Hood, M.L.I.S. Research Support Specialist OCLC Research [email protected] @ErinMHood1 Donna Lanclos, Ph. D. Associate Professor for Anthropological Research University of North Carolina, Charlotte [email protected] @DonnaLanclos This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Participatory design session presented at SUNYLA 2013: Opening Minds, Inspiring Tomorrow, June 13, 2013, Buffalo, New York.

Citation preview

Page 1: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Why Google First? Developing Engagement with

Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and

ResidentsLynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph. D.Senior Research [email protected]@LynnConnaway

SUNYLA, Buffalo, NY, June 12-14, 2013

Erin M. Hood, M.L.I.S.Research Support SpecialistOCLC [email protected]@ErinMHood1

Donna Lanclos, Ph. D.Associate Professor for Anthropological ResearchUniversity of North Carolina, [email protected]@DonnaLanclos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Page 2: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Overview

Page 3: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Partners• JISC (UK funding body)

• OCLC• Lynn Silipigni Connaway,

Ph.D.• Erin M. Hood, M.L.I.S.

• Oxford University• David White • Alison Le Cornu, Ph.D.

• University of North Carolina, Charlotte

• Donna Lanclos, Ph.D.

Visitors and Residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment?

Page 4: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Project Phases

Phase 1• Interviewed 31 (16 US/15 UK) Emerging

educational stage individuals

• Last year of secondary/high school & first year of university

• Majority of students aged 18 & 19 with a few outliers

Phase 2• Interviewed

• 10 (5 US/5 UK) Establishing second/third year undergraduate),

• 10 (5 US/5 UK) Embedding (postgraduates, PhD students), &

• 10 (5 US/5 UK) Experienced (Scholars) stages

• Some Phase 1 participants agreed to submit monthly diaries

Page 5: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Project Phases, cont.

Phase 3• Interviewed second group of 6

students in the Emerging stage

Phase 4• In-depth survey

• 50 participants from each educational stage in both US & UK

• Code, analyze, & compare data

4

Page 6: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Resident Mode

• Visible and persistent online presence

• Collaborative activity online

• Contribute online

• Internet is a place

Page 7: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Visitor Mode

• Functional use of technology

• Formal need

• Invisible online presence

• Internet is a toolbox

Page 8: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

(Connaway and White for OCLC Research, 2012.)

Page 9: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Mapping of Personal Behavior

Page 10: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

(Connaway and White for OCLC Research, 2012.)

Page 11: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

How to Share

• Google Doc

[email protected]

• Email

[email protected]

• Take a photo and email

[email protected]

[email protected]

• Twitter

• #VandR #Me

• Whatever else you can think of!

(Courtesy of David White)

Page 12: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Discussion of Personal Mapping

Page 13: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Mapping of Perceptions of Constituent Behavior

Page 14: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

(Connaway and White for OCLC Research, 2012.)

Page 15: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

How to Share

• Google Doc

[email protected]

• Email

[email protected]

• Take a photo and email

[email protected]

[email protected]

• Twitter

• #VandR #Them

• Whatever else you can think of!

Page 16: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Discussion of Constituent Mapping

Page 17: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Major Findingsof Visitors & Residents Project

Page 18: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

29%, 9

40%, 4

50%, 5

40%, 4

10%, 3

0%, 0

10%, 1

0%, 0

19%, 6

30%, 3

80%, 8

80%, 8

DatabasesOnline TextbooksE-books

Inte

rvie

ws

Digital Sources and Educational Stages

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 19: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Contexts for Digital Sources

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

16%, 5

20%, 2

40%, 4

10%, 1

19%, 6

20%, 2

50%, 5

30%, 3

10%, 3

0%, 0

0%, 0

0%, 0

Digital AND School (K-12)

Digital AND Academic

Digital AND Library

Inte

rvie

ws

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 20: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Digital Sources and Educational Stages

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

26%, 8

50%, 5

70%, 7

40%, 4

77%, 24

90%, 9

70%, 7

50%, 5

Wikipedia

Major Media SitesInte

rvie

ws

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 21: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Evaluating Information/Resources Part 1

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

94%, 29

100%, 10

100%, 10

90%, 9

81%, 25

40%, 4

80%, 8

70%, 7

39%, 12

40%, 4

50%, 5

50%, 5

Available Time

Authority, Legit-imacy

Convenience, Ease of Use, Accessibility

Inte

rvie

ws

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 22: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Evaluating Information/Resources Part 2

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

13%, 4

10%, 1

50%, 5

30%, 3

65%, 20

50%, 5

50%, 5

50%, 5

45%, 14

30%, 3

70%, 7

30%, 3

Reliability

Relevance

Currency

Inte

rvie

ws

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 23: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Motivation

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

81%, 25

40%, 4

40%, 4

70%, 7

10%, 3

10%, 1

20%, 2

0%, 0

Temporal, Im-mediacy

Collaborate

Inte

rvie

ws

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Page 24: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Contact and Educational Stages

(Connaway, Lanclos, and Hood, 2013)

Emerging (n=31)

Establishing (n=10)

Embedding (n=10)

Experiencing (n=10)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

55%, 17

60%, 6

40%, 4

70%, 7

84%, 26

90%, 9

70%, 7

70%, 7

90%, 28

80%, 8

70%, 7

50%, 5

52%, 16

100%, 10

100%, 10

100%, 10

EmailTextingPhone callsFace-to-FaceIn

terv

iew

s

Page 25: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

“I just type it into Google and see what comes up.” (UKS2)

“It’s like a taboo I guess with all teachers, they just all say – you know,

when they explain the paper they always say, ‘Don’t use Wikipedia.’” (USU7, 0:33:05,

Female, Age 19, Political Science)

Learning Black Market

Page 26: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

The word “librarian” was mentioned once in original interviews by Emerging Stage participants as a source of information

One participant referred to “a lady in the library who helps you find things” (USU5, 0:37:17, Male, Age 19, Systems Engineering)

Page 27: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Engaging Constituents

Page 28: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Questions & Discussion

Lynn Silipigni [email protected]@LynnConnaway

Donna [email protected]

@DonnaLanclos

Erin [email protected]@ErinMHood1

Page 29: Why Google First? Developing Engagement with Institutional Services to Meet the Needs of Digital Visitors and Residents

Selected Bibliography

 Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, Donna Lanclos, and Erin M. Hood. “‘I find Google a lot easier than going to the library website.’ Imagine Ways to Innovate and Inspire Students to Use the Academic Library.” Proceedings of the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) 2013 conference, April 10-13, 2013, Indianapolis, IN, 2013, http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/Connaway_Google.pdf.

Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, Donna Lanclos, David White, Alison Le Cornu, and Erin M. Hood. “User-centered Decision Making: A New Model for Developing Academic Library Services and Systems.” IFLA Journal 39, no. 1 (2013): 30-36. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/publications/ifla-journal/ifla-journal-39-1_2013.pdf .

 Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, David White, Donna Lanclos, and Alison Le Cornu. “Visitors and Residents: What Motivates Engagement with the Digital Information Environment?” Information Research 18, no. 1 (2013), http://informationr.net/ir/18-1/infres181.html.

White, David S., and Lynn Silipigni Connaway. Visitors & Residents: What Motivates Engagement with the Digital Information Environment. 2011-2012. Funded by JISC, OCLC, and Oxford University. http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/vandr/.

White, David S., and Alison Le Cornu, A. “Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement.” First Monday 16, no. 9 (2011). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171/3049.