Upload
solange-quintella
View
27
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–1074
An integrated approach to produce biodiesel and monoglycerides by enzymaticinterestification of babassu oil (Orbinya sp)
Larissa Freitas, Patricia C.M. Da Ros, Julio C. Santos, Heizir F. de Castro *
Engineering School of Lorena, University of Sao Paulo, PO Box 116-12602-810, Lorena, SP, Brazil
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 30 July 2008
Received in revised form 14 May 2009
Accepted 19 May 2009
Keywords:
Biodiesel
Monoglycerides
Lipase
Silica–PVA composite
Glycerol
Babassu oil
A B S T R A C T
Two screenings of commercial lipases were performed to find a lipase with superior performance for the
integrated production of biodiesel and monoglycerides. The first screening was carried out under
alcoholysis conditions using ethanol as acyl acceptor to convert triglycerides to their corresponding
ethyl esters (biodiesel). The second screening was performed under glycerolysis conditions to yield
monoglycerides (MG). All lipases were immobilized on silica–PVA composite by covalent immobiliza-
tion. The assays were performed using babassu oil and alcohols (ethanol or glycerol) in solvent free
systems. For both substrates, lipase from Burkholderia cepacia (lipase PS) was found to be the most
suitable enzyme to attain satisfactory yields. To further improve the process, the Response Surface
Methodology (RSM) was used to determine the optima operating conditions for each biotransformation.
For biodiesel production, the highest transesterification yield (>98%) was achieved within 48 h reaction
at 39 8C using an oil-to-ethanol molar ratio of 1:7. For MG production, optima conditions corresponded
to oil-to-glycerol molar ratio of 1:15 at 55 8C, yielding 25 wt.% MG in 6 h reaction. These results show the
potential of B. cepacia lipase to catalyze both reactions and the feasibility to consider an integrated
approach for biodiesel and MG production.
� 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Process Biochemistry
journal homepage: www.e lsev ier .com/ locate /procbio
1. Introduction
Of the 80 million metric ton of fats and oils produced each yearworldwide, most are used directly in food, but about 2 million tonscan be used as raw material to produce a wide variety compounds ofindustrial applications [1]. Recently, great interest has appeared inthe biotechnological transformation of oils and fats, seeking the useof theserawmaterials intheproductionofhighvalue addedproductswith potential to be used in pharmaceutical industry, foods, plastics,renewable fuels, emulsifiers and other products [2–4].
Among the most promising processes for lipids modification arethe hydrolysis, synthesis of esters and transesterification of thesematerials in the presence of lipases–glycerol ester hydrolases; E.C.3.1.1.3 [5,6]. Lipases belong to the class of serine hydrolases andtherefore do not require any cofactor. The natural substrates oflipases are triacylglycerols, having very low solubility in water.Under natural conditions, they catalyze the hydrolysis of esterbonds at the interface between an insoluble substrate phase andthe aqueous phase in which the enzyme is dissolved. However, thepotential application of lipases in this segment is not exploitedenough. In this way, the reaction engineering is a critical issue that
* Corresponding author. Fax: +55 12 31595051.
E-mail address: [email protected] (H.F. de Castro).
1359-5113/$ – see front matter � 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2009.05.011
needs to be solved prior to its industrial application. Many studieshave been performed to optimize the oil and fat modifications bylipases, including the use of strategies to improve the immobiliza-tion and stabilization of the enzyme, kinetic studies, modificationsand bioreactor development [1,6–9].
The present work makes use of lipases as catalysts in thebiotechnological transformation of oils and fats, aiming atproducing compounds with potential application in the generationof energy (biodiesel, monoalkyl esters) and in the food industry(monoglycerides, glyceryl esters). The fatty acid esters obtainedthrough the transesterification of oils with short chain alcohols(mainly methanol or ethanol) are known as biodiesel and showssimilar physical characteristics to petrol diesel that could be usedin motors of the cycle diesel without any modification [10,11]. Theglyceryl esters show relevant properties as emulsify agents and,depending on their composition can be used in creams, sauces andlotions formulations [12].
It is important to mention that in case biodiesel turns out to bean industrial reality, a surplus of approximately 25 thousand tonsof glycerol per year is expected to exist in the market (consideringdemand of 20 thousand ton/year), becoming strictly necessary todevelop new applications for low cost glycerol available frombiodiesel units operation [13,14]. The present work also looks forthis supply through the proposition of an enzymatic technology forusing this by-product to obtain high value added compounds.
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–1074 1069
This work was carried out in two steps. First of all, four selectedcommercially lipase preparations were screened to perform theproposed reactions using babassu oil and alcohols (ethanol orglycerol) in solvent free systems. All lipases were immobilized onsilica–PVA composite activated with epichlorohydrin following aprocedure previously described as suitable to immobilize lipasefrom several sources [4,15]. In the second step, conditions toperform both reactions using the most suitable lipase preparationwere optimized by using experimental design.
For transesterification reactions, ethanol was chosen as acylacceptor since it can easily be formed from renewable sources byfermentation, which makes the process of biodiesel production,totally independent from petrol derivatives. Therefore, ethanol ismore readily accepted for use in a variety of industrial situationsthan methanol, which has also as constraint its toxicity [4,6,11].
In relation to the lipid feedstock, babassu oil was selected,which is extracted from Orbinya martiana, a tree whose coconutscontain in average 7 wt.% of almonds with 62 wt.% of oil. Amongthem, lauric acid (C12H24O2) is the most important fatty acid[16,17]. On the pragmatic point of view, babassu cannot beconsidered as an oleaginous species, as it contains only 4% of oil.However, considering the millions of hectares of tropical forestswith a great amount of babassu palm trees and the possibilities ofthe integral usage of the coconut, babassu constitutes, potentiallyan extraordinary raw material source for biodiesel production,meanwhile the other parts of the tree can be used for otherpurposes [17,18]. In addition, it is more reasonable to use inedibleoil such as babassu oil, as edible oils are not in surplus supply.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Lipase preparations manufactured from several companies include samples of
Candida antartica B (CAL B) kindly given by Novozymes (Araucaria, PR, Brazil);
Pseudomonas fluorescens (Lipase AK), Burkholderia cepacia (Lipase PS) and Penicillum
camembertii (Lipase G) bought from Amano Pharmaceuticals (Japan). All lipases
were used as received without further purification. Tetraethoxysilane was acquired
from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Ethanol (minimum 99%) and
glycerol (purity, 99.5%, w/w) were purchased from Merck (Germany). Epichlor-
ohydrin, hydrochloric acid (minimum 36%), polyvinyl alcohol (MW 72,000) and
polyethylene glycol (molecular weight-1500) were supplied by Reagen (Rio de
Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). Babassu oil was kindly supplied by Cognis (Jacareı, SP, Brazil)
having the following composition in fatty acids: (w/v): 3.5% octanoic, 4.5% decanoic,
44.7% lauric, 17.5% myristic, 9.7% palmitic, 3.1% steriac, 15.2% oleic and 1.8% linoleic
with average molecular weight 709.90 g/mol. Solvents were of standard laboratory
grade (Synth, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil). All the other reagents were of analytical degree.
2.2. Support synthesis and lipase immobilization
Silica–PVA composite was prepared by the hydrolysis and polycondensation of
tetraethoxysilane according to the methodology previously described [19]. Then,
the spheres were ground in the ball mill to attain nearly 0.175 mm diameter
particles, having the following properties: average pore diameter (22.91 A); surface
area BET (461.00 m2/g) and porous volume (0.275 cm3/g). Activation of silica–PVA
particles was carried out with epichlorohydrin at 2.5% (w/v) pH 7.0 for 1 h at room
temperature, followed by exhaustive washings with distilled water [13]. Activated
silica–PVA particles were soaked into hexane under stirring (100 rpm) for 1 h at
25 8C. Then, excess of hexane was removed and lipase was added at a ratio of 1:4
gram of enzyme per gram of support. PEG-1500 was added together with the
enzyme solution at a fixed amount (100 mL/g of support). Lipase-support system
was maintained in contact for 16 h at 4 8C under static conditions. The immobilized
lipase derivatives were filtered (nylon membrane 62HD from Scheiz Seidengaze-
fabrik AG, Thal Schweiz, Switzerland) and thoroughly rinsed with hexane.
2.3. Lipase activity
The immobilized derivatives were analyzed under both aqueous and non-
aqueous media. In the aqueous media, hydrolytic activities of immobilized lipase
derivatives were assayed by the olive oil emulsion method according to the
modification proposed by Soares et al. [20]. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was
defined as the amount of enzyme that liberates 1 mol of free fatty acid per min
under the assay conditions (37 8C, pH 7.0). Synthetic activities were carried out in a
closed spherical glass reactor containing 10 g of glycerol and lauric acid at 1:3 molar
ratio and incubating with immobilized lipase preparations (5% w/v based on the
total reaction volume). The esterification reaction was carried out at 60 8C with
continuous shaking at 200 rpm. The ester content was quantified by measurements
of the concentration of residual lauric acid in the reaction mixture. For these
measurements, withdrawn samples (150–200 mg) were diluted in 10 mL of an
ethanol/acetone 50:50 (v/v) mixture and titrated with KOH solution in ethanol
(0.05 mol/L).
2.4. Biodiesel synthesis
The reactions were performed in closed reactors with a capacity of 25 mL
containing 12 g of substrate consisting of babassu oil and anhydrous ethanol,
without the addition of solvents, at oil-to-ethanol molar ratio of 1:12. The mixtures
were incubated with the lipase from different sources immobilized on silica-PVA at
proportions of 20% (w/w) in relation to the total weight of reactants involved in the
reaction media [4]. The experiments were carried out at 40 8C. Reactions were
performed for a maximum period of 72 h under constant magnetic agitation of
150 rpm. For the time course studies, an aliquot of reaction medium was taken at
various time intervals and diluted in n-heptane for GC-analysis.
2.5. Glycerolysis reaction
The glycerolysis reactions were carried out in closed reactors with a capacity of
50 mL containing 25 g of substrate consisting of babassu oil and glycerol, without
the addition of solvents, at oil-to-glycerol molar ratio of 1:6. The enzyme amount
was kept constant at 10% (w/w) based on total mass of reagents. The temperature
was controlled at 45 8C. The reaction was mixed by magnetic stirrer at 200 rpm.
Samples taken at regular intervals were treated for extraction of the water and
glycerol followed previously methodology [3].
2.6. Experimental design
The influence of the variables (molar ratio and temperature) on both biodiesel
and monoglycerides formation were studied employing a 22 full factorial design,
with the addition of star points when necessary to compose a second order model.
Runs were performed at random. Three experiments were carried out at the center
point level, for experimental error estimation. Results were analyzed using
Statistica version 5 (StatSoft Inc., USA) and Design-Expert 6.0 (Stat-Ease
Corporation, USA) softwares. The statistical significance of the regression
coefficients was determined by Student’s test, the second order model equation
was evaluated by Fischer’s test and the proportion of variance explained by the
model obtained was given by the multiple coefficient of determination, R2.
2.7. Gas chromatography analysis
2.7.1. Biodiesel
Samples prepared as described above were analyzed by injecting 1 mL of heptane
solution and internal standard into a FID gas chromatograph Varian 3800 model
(Varian Inc. Corporate Headquarters, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with flame-
ionization detector and with a 6 ft 5% DEGS on Chromosorb WHP, 80/10 mesh
column (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following previous established
conditions [21]. All samples were measured in triplicate. The transesterification
yield was defined as the ratio between the produced and theoretical esters
concentrations � 100%. Theoretical ester concentrations were calculated by taking
into consideration the babassu oil fatty acid composition and its initial weight mass
in the reaction medium [4,21].
2.7.2. Monoglycerides
Mono–di and triacylglycerols were analyzed by gas chromatograph using a
Varian 3800 model (Varian, Inc., Corporate Headquarters, Palo Alto, CA, USA)
equipped with flame-ionization detector and with a 10 m � 0.25 mm � 0.12 mm CP
Sil 5CB capillary column (Varian Inc., Corporate Headquarters, Palo Alto, CA, USA).
The chromatograms were processed using a Varian data integrator version 4.51
computational program. Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of
2 mL/min. The detector and injector temperatures were 350 8C. The column
temperature was set to 80 8C for 1 min and was then programmed at 20 8C/min to
320 8C which was maintained constant for 2 min. Other conditions were split ratio
of 1:20 and attenuation equal to 1. An organic phase was dissolved in hexane/ethyl
acetate (proportion of 1:1) which contained tetradecane as internal standard, and
the injection was carried out into the gas chromatograph.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Screening of biocatalysts for biodiesel and monoglycerides
synthesis
The support obtained by the sol–gel technique was activatedwith epichlorohydrin and used to immobilize all tested lipases by
Table 1Hydrolytic and synthetic activities of the lipases immobilized on silica–PVA
composite.
Lipase source Hydrolytic
activity (U/g)
Synthetic
activity (U/g)
Pseudomonas fluorescens (lipase AK) 1210 � 68.36 26.32 � 1.34
Burkholderia cepacia (lipase PS) 1460 � 83.66 29.50 � 1.65
Candida antarctica B (Calb L) 48 � 10.40 27.33 � 1.31
Penicillium camembertii (lipase G) n.d. 39.83 � 2.01
Table 2Transesterification yield and productivity in the alcoholysis of babassu oil using
lipases from different sources immobilized on silica–PVA (data corresponding to
72 h reaction).
Lipase source Transesterification
yielda (%)
Productivity
(mg/g h)
Pseudomonas fluorescens (lipase AK) 70.28 5.4
Burkholderia cepacia (lipase PS) 90.93 7.0
Candida antarctica B (Calb L) 61.67 4.7
Penicillium camembertii (lipase G) 9.06 0.6
a The transesterification yield was defined as the ratio between the produced and
theoretical esters concentrations � 100. Theoretical esters concentration was
calculated by taking into consideration the total oil mass and its fatty acid
composition [4].
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–10741070
covalent binding and the catalytic activities in both aqueous andnon-aqueous media for the resulting derivatives are displayed inTable 1.
The highest hydrolytic activity was detected by the immobi-lized derivative obtained with B. cepacia (lipase PS) while thehighest synthetic activity was exhibited by the P. camembertii
(lipase G). Results also showed that the C. antarctica lipase (Calb L)derivative gave the lowest hydrolytic activity and the immobilizedP. camembertii lipase did not exhibit any hydrolytic activity at all.These variations can be attributed either to the different microbialsources of the tested lipases or to their distinct interactions withthe support. In relation to the lipase from P. camembertii, theabsence of the hydrolytic activity may be explained by itsclassification as mono- and di-acylglycerol lipases (partialglyceride hydrolases, EC 3.1.1.23), which have higher preferencetowards mono- and di-glycerides than triglycerides [22].
As the screening experiments were intended for an initialevaluation of the activity of the lipases, they were conducted undera preliminary set of reaction conditions that may not have been theoptimum set for all the lipases.
In a typical reaction for biodiesel production, 20% (w/w) of dryenzyme was added to the mixture of oil-to-ethanol molar ratio of1:12. The reactions were carried out at 40 8C according to thereaction setup as described in the materials and methods. Thescreening results for the tested lipases are shown in terms of totalethyl esters formation as a function of time (Fig. 1). Yields andproductivities attained at 72 h are displayed in Table 2.
The observation of the Fig. 1 and Table 2 indicates that all testedlipases were able to form ethyl esters from all fatty acids present in
Fig. 1. Profile of ethyl esters formation in the alcoholysis of babassu oil as a function
of time using lipases from different sources (*) lipase PS, (&) lipase AK; (~) lipase
Calb L and (~) lipase G immobilized on silica–PVA. All reactions were performed at
45 8C, using oil-to-ethanol molar ratio (1:12) under 150 rpm magnetic agitation.
the babassu oil. However, both reaction rate and yield weredependent on the lipase source tested. Ethyl esters concentrationsvaried in the range from 5.03 to 50.47 wt.%, corresponding totransesterification yields from 9.06 to 90.9% and productivitiesfrom 0.6 to 7 mg biodiesel/g h.
The best performance was attained by lipase PS rendering thehighest values for transesterification yield (90.9%) and productiv-ity (7 mg of biodiesel/g h). Lower performances were achieved bylipase AK (yield = 70.28%) and lipase Calb L (yield = 61.67%). LipaseG gave unsatisfactory results attaining less than 10% yield. Suchlow performance was associated to the stated preference towardsmono- and di-glycerides.
In all reaction systems, a good dispersion of the biocatalyst wasvisually observed in the substrate during the reaction. Inagreement with these results, among the tested lipases, lipasefrom B. cepacia (lipase PS) showed the highest activity towards thetransesterification of babassu oil with ethanol and was, therefore,selected for further study.
In relation to the monoglycerides (MG) synthesis, in a typicalreaction, 10% (w/w) of immobilized derivative was added to themixture of glycerol/babassu oil at a fixed molar ratio 6 to 1. Thescreening results for the tested lipases are shown in terms of MGconcentration (wt.%) as a function of time (Fig. 2).
Among the tested lipases, the best performance was attained bythe lipase PS which was able to form 9.7 wt.% of monoglycerideswithin 4 h reaction. Lipase AK gave slight lower performanceachieving 7.8% of MG within 6 h reaction. No satisfactory resultswere found for both Calb L and G lipase immobilized on silica–PVA,producing less than 2% MG. Such limitations were not verifiedwhen these enzymes were tested for monoglycerides formationusing the esterification route [3].
Based on these results, B. cepacia (lipase PS) was also chosen todetermine conditions at which monoglycerides formation wouldbe higher.
3.2. Experimental design for the lipase catalyzed biodiesel synthesis
Experimental design was used as a tool to study thecombined effect of oil-to-ethanol molar ratio and temperaturein the transesterification yield of the lipase catalyzed biodiesel.The range of molar ratio and temperature was between 1:7and 1:18 and 39–56 8C. In all experiments, the immobilizedPS derivative was used at proportions of 20% (w/w) in relationto the total weight of reactants involved in the reactionmedia.
The experimental matrix and the transesterification yields (%)are shown in Table 3. The results clearly showed that transester-ification yield was strongly affected by both variables. Thetransesterification yields varied from 71.43 to 98.44% and thehighest values was attained when lower levels of both molar ratio(1:7) and temperature 39 8C were used (run 1).
Fig. 2. Profile of monoglycerides formation in the glycerolysis of babassu oil using
lipases from different sources (*) lipase PS, (&) lipase AK; (~) lipase G and (~)
lipase Cal B immobilized on silica–PVA. All reactions were performed at 45 8C, using
oil-to-glycerol molar ratio (1:6) under 200 rpm magnetic agitation.
Table 4Estimated effects, standard errors and Student’s t test for transesterification yield in
biodiesel production using the 22 full factorial design.
Variables Effects Standard errors t p
Mean 81.54 �0.58 141.76 0.000*
Oil-to-ethanol molar ratio (x1) �6.66 �1.52 �4.37 0.048*
Temperature (x2) �10.64 �1.52 �6.99 0.020*
x1�x2 16.36 �1.52 10.75 0.009*
* Significant at 95% confidence level.
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–1074 1071
The statistical analysis of the results shows significant effect forboth variables and their interactions at 95% of confidence level(Table 4). Moreover, both variables had negative main effects.
The negative effect of molar ratio on the reaction yield can bedirectly related to this lipase source which appears to be lessethanol tolerant than the others described in the literature, such asPseudomonas fluorescens lipase [4] and Novozym 435 [23]. Forthese enzymes, reaction proceeds to a greater extent in thepresence of a large excess of ethanol. Therefore, for each lipasesource the excess of ethanol should be determined taking intoconsideration the complex mechanism involving reaction stoi-chiometry, polarity of the reaction medium and deactivation of theenzyme, among others.
In terms of the reaction stoichiometry, the use of equimolaramounts of ethanol to the number of fatty acids (FA) residues issufficient to obtain complete conversion of the FA residues to theircorresponding ethyl esters. However, some constraints maypreclude complete conversion. For example, in the immobilizedenzyme transesterification reaction, reactants initially form athree-phase system (triglyceride/alcohol/support). The reaction isdiffusion-controlled and poor diffusion between the phases exists.
Table 3Experimental design and results according to the 22 full factorial design to evaluate
the influence of the variables oil-to-ethanol molar ratio and temperature on the
transesterification yield (variables in coded values with real values in parenthesis)
for biodiesel production.
Runs Variables Transesterification
yield (%)a
Oil-to-ethanol molar ratio Temperature (8C)
1 �1 (1:7) �1 (39) 98.44
2 +1 (1:18) �1 (39) 75.42
3 �1 (1:7) +1 (56) 71.43
4 +1 (1:18) +1 (56) 81.14
5 0 (1:12.5) 0 (48) 83.20
6 0 (1:12.5) 0 (48) 80.60
7 0 (1:12.5) 0 (48) 80.53
a Correspondent to 48 h reaction.
As alkyl esters are formed, they act as a mutual solvent for thereactants and a two-phase liquid/solid system results [24]. As thereaction progresses towards completion and the by-product(glycerol) concentration increases, the alcohol and glycerol phaseseparate from the rich alkyl ester phase and a three-phase systemforms again. This is more likely to occur at lower initial alcoholconcentrations, and sometimes can result in an incompletereaction [25].
The entries in Table 3 indicate that for lipase PS highconversions of the oil to the FAEE (fatty acids ethyl esters) couldbe achieved when a lower excess of alcohol was utilized (runs 1and 3). Intermediate conversions were achieved at average molarratios (runs 5 and 6), but conversion was markedly decreasedwhen the largest excess of ethanol was present in the reactionmedium (runs 2 and 4). This decrease can be attributed toinactivation of lipase PS by ethanol. Watanabe et al. [26] havedemonstrated that high molar ratios of ethanol to FA residues leadto deactivation of lipases because of contact of the enzyme with theimmiscible polar organic phase formed as a consequence of a lackof complete solubility of the alcohol, as well as the productglycerol, in the oil phase. Thus, in the present work, alcohol inexcess was used to warrant the medium homogeneity during theprocess, but when this excess was increased even more, theinhibition effect in the enzyme was more important and the yielddecreased.
The influence of temperature on the transesterification yieldwas more important than that for oil/ethanol molar ratio, as seenclearly in Table 4. The negative influence of temperature is inagreement with thermal stability data for this immobilized lipasepreparation as previously determined by Da Ros [27]. According tothis study, lipase PS immobilized on silica–PVA composite is athermostable lipase preparation with a maximum activity in therange 50–60 8C. However, working temperatures in the range of40–50 8C are recommended to extend the operational stability.
The interaction effect of the variables was also statisticallysignificant at the same confidence level. As a result, at lower molarratio the transesterification yield was improved by lowering thetemperature (runs 1 and 3). But, at higher molar ratio thetransesterification yield was improved by rising the temperature(runs 2 and 4).
The main effects were fitted by multiple regression analysis to alinear model, and the best fitting response function can bedemonstrated by Eq. (1).
y ¼ 81:61� 3:33x1 � 5:32x2 þ 8:18x1 � x2 (1)
where y is transesterification yield (%) and x1 and x2 are molar ratioand temperature, respectively.
The statistical significance of this model was evaluated by the F-test (Table 5), which revealed that this regression is statisticallysignificant at a 95% probability level. The model did not show lackof fit and the determination coefficient (R2 = 0.99) indicates thatthe model can explain 99% of the variability.
A numeric optimization of the transesterification yield as afunction of the molar ratio and temperature was carried out using
Table 5Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the regression of the model that represents
transesterification yield in biodiesel synthesis.
Source Sum of
squares
Degree of
freedom
Mean
square
F
Values Prob > F
Model 425.42 3 141.81 90.95 0.002*
Lack of fit 0.05 1 0.05 0.02 0.901
Pure error 4.63 2 2.32
Cor total 430.10 6
R2 0.99
* Significant at 95% confidence level.
Fig. 4. Ethyl esters profile in the alcoholysis of babassu oil using lipase from
Burkholderia cepacia (lipase PS) under the predicted conditions (oil-to-ethanol
molar ratio of 1:7 at 39 8C). Symbols: Ethyl esters from caprilic acid (x); capric acid
(*); lauric acid (~); myristic acid (!); palmitic acid (^); stearic acid (&); oleic
acid (5) and total esters (full line).
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–10741072
the software Design-Expert 6.0. According to this study, themaximum transesterification yield can be obtained at the lowestlevels of both variables (oil-to-ethanol molar ratio of 1:7 andtemperature of 39 8C) as displayed in the response surface (Fig. 3)correspondent to the model described by Eq. (1).
To confirm this model, experiments were carried out under theestablished condition and the differences between the experi-mental and theoretical values were lower than 1%. The runconducted to study particular conditions arising from the results ofthe experimental design attained a concentration of 77.46 wt.% ofethyl esters, which corresponded to a yield of 98%.
For this experiment, Fig. 4 displays the results considering thedifferent ethyl esters produced. No important changes, in the ethylesters concentration, after 48 h reaction was verified. The mainester produced was the ethyl laurate, followed by the ethylmyristate and ethyl oleate, with the other esters produced at loweramounts. This profile was as expected by taking into considerationthe babassu oil fatty acid composition [28] and was similar for allexperiments performed.
3.3. Experimental design for the lipase catalyzed monoglycerides
synthesis
The influence of the variables molar ratio and temperature inthe synthesis of monoglycerides by lipase catalyzed glycerolysis ofbabassu oil was, initially, evaluated in experiments carried outaccording to 22 full factorial design. Analysis of variance revealed a
Fig. 3. Response surface described by the model y1 that represents the
transesterification yield in the formation of biodiesel from babassu oil catalyzed
by PS lipase as a function of molar ratio (x1) and temperature (x2) according to
Eq. (1).
significant value for curvature (p < 0.05, data not shown),indicating the non-linearity of the model and thus justifying toadd points to the statistical design in order to determine amathematical model that provides the highest conversion of thestarting materials (glycerol and babassu oil) into monoglycerides.For this purpose, a central composite ‘‘22 + star’’ rotatable withthree replicates at the center points was built considering theworking range for oil-to-glycerol molar ratio from 1:8 to 1:22 andtemperature from 41 to 69 8C. In all experiments, the immobilizedPS derivative was used at proportions of 10% (w/w) in relation tothe total weight of reactants involved in the reaction media.
Table 6 shows the experimental matrix for the experimentaldesign together with data for the response variable (MG, wt.%).Results indicated that monoglycerides formation varied from 10 to28 wt.% of monoglycerides and the highest concentration was
Table 6Experimental design and results according to the central composite ‘‘22 + star’’
factorial design carried out to evaluate the influence of the variables oil-to-glycerol
molar ratio and temperature on the monoglyceride concentrations (MG) (variables
in coded values with real values in parenthesis) obtained in the glycerolysis of
babassu oil.
Runs Variables MG (wt.%)a
Oil-to-glycerol molar ratio Temperature ( 8C)
1 �1 (1:10) �1 (45) 16.48
2 +1 (1:20) �1 (45) 14.65
3 �1 (1:10) +1 (65) 17.24
4 +1 (1:20) +1 (65) 10.37
5 �1.41 (1:8) 0 (55) 13.84
6 +1.41 (1:22) 0 (55) 13.63
7 0 (1:15) �1.41 (41) 15.53
8 0 (1:15) +1.41 (69) 10.59
9 0 (1:15) 0 (55) 27.94
10 0 (1:15) 0 (55) 23.07
11 0 (1:15) 0 (55) 20.77
a Correspondent to 6 h reaction.
Table 7Estimated effects, standard errors and Student’s t test for monoglycerides formation
according to the central composite ‘‘22 + star’’ factorial design.
Variables Effects Standard
errors
t p
Mean 23.93 �1.64 14.57 0.000
Oil-to-glycerol molar ratio (x1) L �2.25 �2.01 �1.12 0.314
Oil-to-glycerol molar ratio (x1) Q �9.56 �2.40 �3.99 0.010*
Temperature (x2) L �2.63 �2.01 �1.31 0.248
Temperature (x2) Q �10.22 �2.40 �4.27 0.008*
x1�x2 �2.52 �2.85 �0.89 0.416
* Significant at 95% confidence level.
Table 8Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the regression of the model that represents the
monoglycerides formation (wt.%) in the glycerolysis of babassu oil as a function of
oil-to-glycerol molar ratio (x1) and temperature (x2).
Source Sum of
squares
Degree of
freedom
Mean
square
F
Values Prob > F
Model 213.67 2 106.83 12.09 0.004*
Lack of fit 44.22 6 7.37 0.549 0.759
Pure error 26.81 2 13.40
Cor total 284.38 10
R2 0.75
* Significant at 95% confidence level.
Fig. 5. Response surface described by the model y1 that represents the glycerolysis
of babassu oil in the formation of monoglycerides (wt.%) catalyzed by PS lipase as a
function of molar ratio (x1) and temperature (x2) according to Eq. (2).
Fig. 6. Glycerides profile in the glycerolysis of babassu oil using lipase from
Burkholderia cepacia (lipase PS) under the predicted conditions (oil-to-glycerol
molar ratio of 1:15 at 55 8C). Symbols: monoglycerides (*); diglycerides (~);
triglycerides (&).
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–1074 1073
achieved using both variables at center point (molar ratio oil toglycerol of 1:15 and temperature at 55 8C).
In agreement with the test t of Student’s (Table 7) it was verifiedthat the quadratic effect of molar ratio (x1) and the temperature(x2) presented a significant influence (p < 0.05) on the mono-glycerides production. The linear effects and the interaction of thevariables were not statistically significant at the same confidencelevel and therefore were excluded from the model (Table 8).
From these results, the main effects were fitted by multipleregression analysis to a quadratic model, and the best fittingresponse function can be described by Eq. (2).
y2 ¼ 23:92� 4:77x21 � 5:11x2
2 (2)
where y2 is the response variable (monoglycerides, wt.%) and x1
and x2 represent the values coded for oil-to-glycerol molar ratioand temperature, respectively.
The statistical analysis of the model indicated that theregression is statistically significant (p = 0.04) at 95% confidencelevel, without significant lack of fit (p > 0.10). Moreover, the R2
value indicated that the model could explain more than 75% of theexperimental variability. Thus, the Eq. (2) was considered adequatefor describing the formation of monoglycerides as a function of thestudied variables and was used to plot the response surface asshown in Fig. 5.
The response surface described by the second order model forbabassu oil glycerolysis showed that the maximum monoglycer-ides formation could be attained at 55 8C and oil-to-glycerol molarratio of 1:15. These conditions correspond to runs 9–11 in Table 6and allow attaining 24 wt.% MG in 6 h. This result was similar todata described by Kaewtong et al. [12], using the same lipasesource immobilized on a different support (Accurel EP 100) andraw material (palm oil). In that work, 21% MG was obtained within24 h reaction.
The effect of oil-to-glycerol molar ratio can be explained byconsidering that alcohol in excess is needed to favor the MGaccumulation in the reaction medium, instead of diglycerides ortriglycerides [29]. However, high excess of glycerol can inhibit thelipase activity and affect, negatively, the process [30]. In the
present work, intermediary level of glycerol corresponded to thebest condition to lipase catalyzed MG production.
The same observation can be pointed for the temperature. Inthis process, low temperatures impair the homogeneity, restrain-ing the contact between the lipase and the hydrophobic substratesthat represents an obstacle to improve the MG yield. Thus, 55 8Cwas the optimum temperature value that could result in high MGproduction while preventing the lipase from thermal deactivationeffects (critical temperature at which the enzyme starts todeactivate was found to be 60 8C revealing a biocatalyst half-lifeof 6.24 h as reported by Da Ros [27].
Experiments were carried out under optima conditions andglyceride concentrations as a function of time are displayed inFig. 6. Under these conditions, about 25% of monoglycerides were
L. Freitas et al. / Process Biochemistry 44 (2009) 1068–10741074
accumulated in the purified reaction medium within 6 h reactionand this value remained almost constant up to 12 h process.Triglycerides were fast consumed in the first 3 h reaction withconsequent formation of diglycerides at concentrations reachinglevels of about 63%. Thus, the highest MG production wascorrespondent to 6 h reaction, having the following compositionin glyceryl esters: glyceryl laurate (57% of the total MG), glycerylmyristate (18% of the total MG), glyceryl oleate (11% of the totalMG) and others produced at lower amounts. Such profile was asexpected taking into consideration the babassu oil fatty acidcomposition, as already mentioned for biodiesel synthesis. Theseresults showed that the model fitted well with the experimentaldata, and thus described well the region studied.
4. Conclusion
Among four lipase sources, the enzyme from B. cepacia
immobilized on silica–PVA matrix was found to be the mostactive to catalyze both ethanolysis and glycerolysis of babassu oil.Further optimization was carried out which allowed to proposemathematical models representing each product formation in therange studied. For biodiesel production, the composed model was‘‘y = 81.61 � 3.33�x1 � 5.32�x2 + 8.18�x1�x2’’, where y is the transes-terification yield (%) and x1 and x2 are the coded values for molarratio and temperature, respectively. In this case, optima conditionswere: 39 8C using an oil-to-ethanol molar ratio of 1:7. For MGproduction, the composed model was ‘‘y2 = 23.92 � 4.77�x1
2 �5.11�x2
2’’, where y2 is the monoglycerides concentration (wt.%) andx1 and x2 represent the coded values for oil-to-glycerol molar ratioand temperature, respectively. In this case, the optima conditionswere 55 8C using an oil-to-glycerol molar ratio of 1:15. Theapproach proposed could allow associating environmental andeconomical concerns in addition to the use of non-edible vegetableoil as feedstock for biodiesel production and a by-product,‘‘glycerol’’, for production of high added value compound. Morework is still necessary in this fast-moving field.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the financial support provided byFAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientıfico eTecnologico), Brazil.
References
[1] Akoh CC, Min DB, editors. Food lipids chemistry, nutrition and biotechnology.second ed., New York: Macel Dekker Inc.; 2002. ISBN 0-8247-0749-4, p. 330.
[2] Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A. Industrial applications of microbial lipases.Enzyme Microb Technol 2006;39:235–51.
[3] Freitas L, Perez VH, Santos JC, de Castro HF. Enzymatic synthesis of glycerideesters in solvent-free system: influence of the molar ratio, lipase source andfunctional activating agent of the support. J Braz Chem Soc 2007;18:1360–6.
[4] Moreira ABR, Perez VH, Zanin GM, de Castro HF. Biodiesel synthesis byenzymatic transesterification of palm oil with ethanol using lipases fromseveral sources immobilized on silica–PVA composite. Energ Fuel2007;21:3689–94.
[5] De Castro HF, Mendes AA, Santos JC, Aguiar CL. Modificacao de oleos degorduras por biotransformacao. Quim Nova 2004;1:146–56.
[6] Caballero V, Bautista FM, Campelo JM, Luna D, Marinas JM, Romero AA, et al.Sustainable preparation of a novel glycerol-free biofuel by using pig pancreaticlipase: partial 1,3-regiospecific alcoholysis of sunflower oil. Process Biochem2009;44:334–42.
[7] Dandavate V, Keharia H, Madamwar D. Ethyl isovalerate synthesis usingCandida rugosa lipase immobilized on silica nanoparticles prepared in non-ionic reverse micelles. Process Biochem 2009;44:349–52.
[8] Cao X, Yang J, Shu L, Yu B, Yan Y. Improving esterification activity of Burkhol-deria cepacia lipase encapsulated in silica by bioimprinting with substrateanalogues. Process Biochem 2009;44:177–82.
[9] Fernandes P, Cabral JMS. Biotransformation. In: Ratledge C, Kristiansen B,editors. Basic biotechnology. third ed., Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress; 2006. p. 579–621. ISBN 0521549582.
[10] Li N, Zong M, Wu H. Highly efficient transformation of waste oil to biodiesel byimmobilized lipase from Penicillium expansum. Process Biochem 2009;44:685–8.
[11] Shah S, Gupta MN. Lipase catalyzed preparation of biodiesel from Jatropha oilin a solvent free system. Process Biochem 2007;42:409–14.
[12] Kaewthong W, Sirisansaneeyakul S, Prasertsan P. Continuous production ofmonoacylglycerols of palm olein with immobilized lipase. Process Biochem2005;40:1525–30.
[13] Pagliaro M, Ciriminna R, Kimura H, Rossi M, Pina CD. From glycerol to value-added products. Angew Chem Int 2007;46:4434–40.
[14] Chi Z, Pyle D, Wen Z, Frear C, Chen S. A laboratory study of producingdocosahexaenoic acid from biodiesel-waste glycerol by microalgal fermenta-tion. Process Biochem 2007;42:1537–45.
[15] Santos JC, Paula AV, Nunes GFM, De Castro HF. Pseudomonas fluorescens lipaseimmobilization on polysiloxane-polyvinyl alcohol composite chemically mod-ified with epichlorohydrin. J Mol Catal B-Enzyme 2008;52–53:49–57.
[16] Santos NA, Tavares MLA, Rosenhaim R, Silva FC, Fernandes VJ, Santos IMG, et al.Thermogravimetric and calorimetric evaluation of babassu biodiesel obtainedby the methanol route. Therm Anal Calorim 2007;87:649–52.
[17] Teixeira MA. Babassu—a new approach for an ancient Brazilian biomass.Biomass Bionerg 2007;32:857–64.
[18] Albiero D, Maciel AJS, Lopes AC, Mello CA, Gamero CA. Proposta de umamaquina para colheita mecanizada de babacu (Orbignya phalerata Mart) paraa agricultura familiar. Acta Amazonica 2007;37:337–46.
[19] Paula AV, Moreira ABR, Braga LP, Bruno LM, de Castro HF. Comparacao dodesempenho da lipase de Candida rugosa imobilizada em suporte hıbrido depolissiloxano-polivinilalcool empregando diferentes metodologias. QuimNova 2008;31:35–40.
[20] Soares CMF, de Castro HF, Moraes FF, Zanin GM. Characterization and utiliza-tion of Candida rugosa lipase immobilized on controlled pore silica. ApplBiochem Biotechnol 1999;77–79:745–57.
[21] Urioste D, Castro MBA, Biaggio FC. De Castro HF, Sıntese de padroes cromato-graficos e estabelecimento de metodo para dosagem da composicao de esteresde acidos graxos presentes no biodiesel a partir do oleo de babacu. Quim Nova2008;31:407–12.
[22] Nakano H, Kitahata S, Shimada Y, Nakamura M, Tominaga Y. Esterification ofglycosides by a mono- and di-acylglycerol lipase from Penicillium camembertiiand comparison of the products with Candida cylindracea lipase. J FermentBioeng 1995;80:24–9.
[23] Hernandez-Martın E, Otero C. Different enzyme requirements for the synth-esis of biodiesel: Novozym1 435 and Lipozyme1 TL IM. Bioresour Technol2008;99:77–286.
[24] Noureddini H, Zhu D. Kinetics of transesterification of soybean oil. J Am ChemSoc 1997;74:1457–63.
[25] Noureddini H, Gao X, Philkana RS. Immobilized Pseudomonas cepacia lipase forbiodiesel fuel production from soybean oil. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:769–77.
[26] Watanabe Y, Shimada Y, Sugihara A, Tominaga Y. Stepwise ethanolysis of tunaoil using immobilized Candida antarctica lipase. J Biosci Bioeng 1999;88:622–6.
[27] Da Ros P.C.M. Etanolise de oleos vegetais por catalise enzimatica acelerada porirradiacao de micro-ondas. MSc Dissertation, Lorena, Brazil: Escola de Engen-haria de Lorena—EEL-USP 2009. (available at www.hptt/eel.usp.br).
[28] Firestone D. Physical and chemical characteristics of oils, fats, and waxes, 2nded., Washington: AOCS PRESS; 2006. p. 237.
[29] Tuter M, Babali B, Kose O, Dural S, Aksoy HA. Solvent-free glycerolysis of palmand kernel oils catalyzed by a 1,3-specific lipase and fatty acid composition ofglycerolysis products. Biotechnol Lett 1999;21:245–8.
[30] Ferreira-Dias S, Correia AC, Baptista FO, Fonseca MMR. Contribution ofresponse surface design to the development of glycerolysis systems catalyzedby commercial immobilized lipases. J Mol Catal B-Enzyme 2001;11:699–711.