Upload
selva-prakash
View
116
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Faculty of Engineering
ERODE BUILDER EDUCATIONAL TRUST’S GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
ME – Construction Engineering and Management
1
2
EFFECTIVENESS OF USING RECYCLED COARSE AGGREGATES IN CONCRETE
THIRD REVIEW 12.04.2014BATCH 013
UNDER THE GUIDENCES OF
Prof. S.R.Dhamodarasamy, Mr.H.Dineshkumar, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical Manger, EBET-I TEEMAGE PRECAST IN
Thesis ByS.Selvaprakash,
M.E CEM (12CEM015),EBET-I
3
Abstract
Every year concrete industry using 12.6 billion tons of natural resource. Recycling is most effective method for dealing with the increasing volume of waste for preservation of the environment. There is whole range application of recycled materials in both architectural and civil engineering.
In this paper an experimental program is undertaken which contains concrete with five different mixes (i) 10mm aggregate replacement of RCA with admixture, (ii)20mm aggregate replacement of RCA with admixture, (iii) 20mm and 10mm combined replacement of RCA . The concrete is replaced with RCA by 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40% the compressive strength at 12hours, 3days, 7days, and 28days is determined . The above result are compared with compressive strength of conventional concrete.
4
METHEDOLOGY
Topic selection
Literature review
Testing material characteristics
Casting of specimens (Replacement by RCA20%,25%,30%,35%,&40%)
Testing of specimens
Comparison of RCA mix with conventional mix
Conclusion
Report submission
5
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to find out the mechanical properties of recycled coarse
aggregate in concrete by using compressive strength test
6
Mixing Materials Used for M40• Cement – OPC 53 grade dalmia cement• Fly ash• Fine aggregate• M- sand• 10mm aggregate• RCA 10mm aggregate• 20mm aggregate• RCA 20mm aggregate• Admixture – Gelnium Ace 30
7
Mix proportion
• M40 – 1:1.39:2.375• Water-Cement ratio- 0.34• Admixture- Gelnium Ace 30
Material used Percentage in mix For 1m3 (kg)
Cement 89.58 430
Fly Ash 10.42 50
River Sand 54.83 625
M-Sand 45.18 386
20mm Aggregate 30 201
10mm Aggregate 70 469
Admixture 0.55 2.4
8
Test result of Dalmia Cement
Type of test Result Standard value
Fineness 1% Not more than 10%
Consistency 30% by the weight of cement
-------
Initial setting time 55 mins Not less than 30 minutes
Final setting time 4 hours Not more than 10 hours
9
Test result for River sand and M-sand
Type of test River sand M-sand
Specific Gravity Standard value (2.5-2.7)
2.64 2.61
Sieve analysis Zone 2 Zone 3
10
Test result for Normal aggregateType of test 20mm 10mm Standard value
Specific gravity 2.79 2.75 2.6 to 2.8
Water absorption 2% 1% Not more than 3%
Impact value 15.3 24.3 Not more than 45%
Flakiness index 14.96% 7.05% Not more than 40-45%Elongation index 31.28% 35.3%
11
Test result for RCAType of test 20mm 10mm Standard value
Impact test 28% 26.5% Not more than 45%
Flakiness index 14.23% 25% Not more than 40-45%
Elongation index 13.33% 37.5%
Water absorption 2.3% 1.8% Not more than 3%
12
SLUMP VALUES FOR MIXES WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF RCA
Replaced size of aggregate Replacement percentage Slump value in mm
20 mm
20% 180
25% 150
30% 140
35% 160
40% 150
10 mm
20% 140
25% 160
30% 185
35% 165
40% 130
20 mm and 10 mm
(combination)
20% 150
25% 160
30% 170
35% 180
40% 150
Conventional concrete - 160 13
14
Conventional concreteCuring period Load (kN) Compressive strength
in (N/mm2)Average in (N/mm2)
12 hours 310.1 13.9 13.5
319.7 14.2
289.2 12.8
3 days 788.8 35 33.7
769.8 34.2
716.9 31.8
7 days 888.5 39.4 45.2
1048.3 46.5
1119.0 49.7
28 days 1137 50.50 49.29
1083 48.13
1108 49.24
15
REPLACEMENT OF RECYCLED COARSE AGGREGATE
16
Replaced size of aggregate
Replacement Curing period Avg compressive strength N/mm2
20mm 20%
12 hours
20.3325% 15.5330% 19.9335% 18.1240% 19.2
10mm 20% 19.525% 16.9330% 15.6735% 17.6240% 18.8
20mm&10mm combined
20% 22.3625% 17.2530% 19.6335% 20.3640% 20.96
17
Replaced size of aggregate
Replacement Curing period Avg compressive strength N/mm2
20mm 20%
3 days
43.33
25% 31.12
30% 42.85
35% 39
40% 41.26
10mm 20% 37.7
25% 42
30% 41.77
35% 34.2
40% 41.7
20mm&10mm combined
20% 41.7
25% 41.3
30% 40.8
35% 41.33
40% 44.1
18
Replaced size of aggregate
Replacement Curing period Avg compressive strength N/mm2
20mm 20%
7 days
48.1
25% 32.99
30% 46.03
35% 46.8
40% 45.86
10mm 20% 48.13
25% 44.1
30% 46.53
35% 43.82
40% 37.3
20mm&10mm combined
20% 43.2
25% 45.67
30% 43.93
35% 44.63
40% 46.16
19
Replaced size of aggregate
Replacement Curing period Avg compressive strength N/mm2
20mm 20%
28 days
53.96
25% 41.6
30% 47.5
35% 58.43
40% 63.43
10mm 20% 55.33
25% 49.2
30% 45.7
35% 55.9
40% 56.4
20mm&10mm combined
20% 51.87
25% 50.25
30% 53.10
35% 47.25
40% 48.7
20
Comparison of 12 hours conventional concrete vs RCA
conve
ntional
conc
rete
20mm 20
%
20mm 25
%
20mm 30
%
20mm 35
%
20mm 40
%
10mm 20
%
10mm 25
%
10mm 30
%
10mm 35
%
10mm 40
%
20&10
mm 20%
20&10
mm 25%
20&10
mm 30%
20&10
mm 35%
20&10
mm 40%0
5
10
15
20
25
13.5
20.33
15.53
19.9318.12
19.2 19.5
16.9315.67
17.6218.8
22.36
17.25
19.6320.36 20.96
Comparsion of 12 hours
Com
pres
sive
stre
ngth
in M
pa
21
Comparison of 3days conventional concrete vs RCA
conve
ntional
concre
te
20mm 20
%
20mm 25
%
20mm 30
%
20mm 35
%
20mm 40
%
10mm 20
%
10mm 25
%
10mm 30
%
10mm 35
%
10mm 40
%
20&10
mm 20%
20&10
mm 25%
20&10
mm 30%
20&10
mm 35%
20&10
mm 40%0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
33.7
43.33
31.12
42.85
3941.26
37.7
42 41.77
34.2
41.7 41.7 41.3 40.8 41.3344.1
Comparsion of 3 days
Com
pres
sive
stre
ngth
in M
pa
22
Comparison of 7days conventional concrete vs RCA
conve
ntional
concre
te
20mm 20
%
20mm 25
%
20mm 30
%
20 m
m 35%
20mm 40
%
10mm 20
%
10mm 25
%
10mm 30
%
10mm 35
%
10mm 40
%
20&10
mm 20%
20&10
mm 25%
20&10
mm 30%
20&10
mm 35%
20&10
mm 40%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5045.2
48.1
32.99
46.03 46.8 45.8648.13
44.146.53
43.82
37.3
43.245.67
43.93 44.6346.16
Comparsion of 7 days
Com
pres
sive
stre
ngth
in M
pa
23
Fig Comparison of 28 days conventional concrete vs RCA
conv
entio
nal c
oncre
te
20mm 20
%
20mm 25
%
20mm 30
%
20mm 35
%
20mm 40
%
10mm 20
%
10mm 25
%
10mm 30
%
10mm 35
%
10mm 40
%
20&10
mm 20%
20&10
mm 25%
20&10
mm 30%
20&10
mm 35%
20&10
mm 40%0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
49.2953.96
41.6
47.5
58.4363.43
55.33
49.245.7
55.9 56.451.87 50.25
53.1
47.25 48.7
Comparsion of 28 days
Com
pres
sive
stre
ngth
in M
pa
24
PHOTOS
Fig 1 waste concrete
Fig 2 crushed aggregate concrete waste
25
PHOTOS
Fig 3 curing
Fig 4 compressive strength machine
26
CONCLUSION
• For the given mix proportion, cubes are casted by Replacing Recycled coarse aggregates in
different percentages. From the Compressive strength test results, it is observed that 40%
Replacement of 10 mm aggregates and also 40% Replacement of 20 mm aggregates in RCA
mix are gain more strength as compared to conventional mix at 28 days. It is also found that,
Compressive strength of 20%, 25% Replacement of 10 mm, 20 mm and combination of 10
mm and 20 mm in RCA mix cubes are comes closer to the compressive strength results of
conventional concrete at 12 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 28 days. Compressive strength is decreased
while replacing recycled coarse aggregates of 30% in mix at 28 days. But the earlier strength
is same as like conventional concrete mix. Finally, overall results are equal to the conventional
concrete results at all ages. It is also noted that, further investigation should be carried out for
using this concrete in structural purposes.
27
REFERENCE
1. IS: 10262-1982, Indian Guidelines for concrete Mix Design, Fifth edition March 1998. 2. Shetty M.S, Concrete Technology Theory and Practice 2008, S.Chand & company Ltd. 3. M Etxeberria, Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregate and production process on properties of recycled
aggregate concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 37 (2007) 735–742. 4. Khaldoun Rahal, Mechanical properties of concrete with recycled coarse aggregate, Building and Environment 42
(2007) 407–415. 5. H. Falkner, Bond behaviour between recycled aggregate concrete, Construction and Building Materials 21 (2007)
395–401. 6. A.K. Padmini, Influence of parent concrete on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete, Construction and
Building Materials 23 (2009) 829–836. 7. Valeria Corinaldesi, Mechanical and elastic behaviour of concretes made of recycled-concrete coarse aggregates,
Construction and Building Materials 24 (2010) 1616–1620.
28
Thank you