38
FLOW MEASUREMENT PART II ER. FARUK BIN POYEN, Asst. Professor DEPT. OF AEIE, UIT, BU, BURDWAN, WB, INDIA [email protected]

Flow measurement part II

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Flow measurement   part II

FLOW MEASUREMENT

PART II

ER. FARUK BIN POYEN, Asst. Professor

DEPT. OF AEIE, UIT, BU, BURDWAN, WB, INDIA

[email protected]

Page 2: Flow measurement   part II

Contents:

Variable Head or Differential Meter

Orifice Plates

Venturi Tubes

Flow Nozzle

Dall Tubes

Pitot Tube

Annubar Tube

Elbow Tap

Weir

Flume

2

Page 3: Flow measurement   part II

Variable Head or Differential Meter

Working: A restriction in the line of a flowing fluid, introduced by the orifice plate or

venturi tube or elbow, produces a differential pressure across the restriction element

which is proportional to the flow rate. Head flow meters operate on the principle

of placing a restriction in the line to cause a differential pressure head. The

differential pressure, which is caused by the head, is measured and converted to a flow

measurement.

The devices in general, can therefore be termed as “obstruction type” flow meters.

3

Page 4: Flow measurement   part II

Variable Head or Differential Meter

The proportionality is not a linear one but has a square root of relationship in that flow

rate is proportional to the square root of the differential pressure. This is derived from

Bernoulli’s theorem. Velocity head is defined as the vertical distance through which a

liquid would fall to attain a given velocity. Pressure head is the vertical distance

through which a column of the flowing liquid would rise in an open-end tube as a

result of the static pressure.

𝑉 = 𝐾 2𝑔ℎ𝜌

𝑄 = 𝐾𝐴 2𝑔ℎ𝜌

𝑊 = 𝐾𝐴 2𝑔ℎ𝜌 where 𝐾 =

𝐴1𝐴2

𝐴12−𝐴2

22𝑔

Coefficient of discharge: 𝐶𝑑 =𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙

𝑄𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙

4

V = velocity of flowing fluid

Q = volume flow rate

W = mass flow rate

A = cross – sectional area of pipe through which fluid

is flowing

h = differential head (pressure) across the restriction

element

g = acceleration due to gravity

ρ = density of the flowing fluid

𝐾 =𝐶

1− 𝛽4

C = discharge coefficient

β = diameter ratio = d (diameter of restriction element)/D (inside diameter of the pipe)

Page 5: Flow measurement   part II

Variable Head Flow Meters

Rate of Discharge: 𝑄 = 𝐴1𝑉1 = 𝐴2𝑉2

Applying Bernoulli’s equation (ideal flow assumption)

𝑝1 +𝜌𝑉1

2

2= 𝑝2 +

𝜌𝑉22

2

The differential pressure head ∆ℎ is given by: 𝑝1 − 𝑝2𝜌𝑔

= ∆ℎ

𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 is always less than 𝑄𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙as there are losses due to friction and eddying

motions.

5

Page 6: Flow measurement   part II

Merits and Demerits – Differential Flow Meter

Advantages of Differential Flow meter

Relatively low cost for large lines

Offers widest application coverage of any type of meter

High accuracy (0.25 to 2 %)

Easily removable without tripping of the process

Highly adaptable

Disadvantages & Limitations

Relatively higher permanent pressure loss is involved

Difficult to use for slurry services

Exhibits square root relationship between head and flow rate, rather than linear characteristics,which limits the usable flow range ability to a 3:1 to 5:1 range.

Low flow rates are not easily measured

Faces difficulty to measure pulsating flow.

The position of minimum pressure is located slightly downstream from the restriction at a point where thestream is the narrowest and is called the vena – contracta. Beyond this point, the pressure again rises butdoes not return to the upstream value resulting in a permanent pressure loss.

6

Page 7: Flow measurement   part II

Parts of a Differential Flow meter

It comprises two parts:

Primary Element

Secondary Element

7

Page 8: Flow measurement   part II

Parts of a Differential Flow meter – Primary Elements

Primary element causes restriction in the path of flow and produces differential pressure. It

comprises

i) Orifice plates

ii) Venturi tubes

iii) Flow nozzle

iv) Dall tubes

v) Pitot tubes

vi) Annubar tubes

vii) Elbow taps

viii) Weir

ix) Flume

8

Page 9: Flow measurement   part II

Parts of a Differential Flow meter – Secondary Elements

Secondary element measures the differential pressure. It comprises

manometer

bellow meter

force balance

ring balance.

9

Page 10: Flow measurement   part II

Orifice

The orifice meter when installed in small to moderate sized pipes is probably the

cheapest and simplest flow measuring device at present available for metering liquids,

gases and vapours.

It is not suitable for high viscous liquids or fluids in a pulsating or extremely turbulent

condition.

When the fluid flows through the orifice, its velocity increases and the diameter of the

jet decreases to minimum at a point v, known as the vena contracta.

The jet expands until it again occupies the full bore of the pipe.

The static pressure profile first shows a gradual decrease over the distance L to M due

to friction losses in the pipe.

10

Page 11: Flow measurement   part II

Orifice

From M to P, as light rise occurs due to the resistance of the orifice plate.

A sharp drop in the pressure occurs from P to R due to the fluid velocity through the

orifice. Finally, there is a partial recovery of pressure from R to S.

The net pressure loss due to friction and turbulence across the orifice is, typically,

about 65% of the pressure difference measured by d/p diaphragm.

The fluid flow is proportional to the square root of the pressure difference.

11

Page 12: Flow measurement   part II

Orifice

Advantages of Orifice

- Simple construction.

- Inexpensive.

- Easily fitted between flanges.

- No moving parts.

- Large range of sizes and opening ratios.

- Suitable for most gases and liquids.

- Well understood and proven.

- Price does not increase dramatically with size.

12

Page 13: Flow measurement   part II

Orifice

Disadvantages of Orifice

- Inaccuracy, typically 1%.

- Low rangeability, typically 4:1.

- Accuracy is affected by density, pressure and viscosity fluctuations.

- Erosion and physical damage to the restriction affects measurement accuracy.

- Cause some unrecoverable pressure loss.

- Viscosity limits measuring range.

- Require straight pipe runs to ensure accuracy is maintained.

- Pipeline must be full (typically for liquids).

13

Page 14: Flow measurement   part II

Orifice

Orifice Plate Designs:

1. Concentric – commonly used for general applications (gas, liquid & vapour).

2. Eccentric – recommended for fluids with extraneous matter to a degree that would clog

up concentric type.

3. Segmental – recommended for fluids combine with vapour or vapour with fluids.

Types of Orifice Plate Entrance

1. Square Edge – applicable for higher pipe Reynolds Number; typical Re 500 to 10,000

2. Quadrant – for lower pipe Reynolds Number; typically ranges from Re 250 to 3300.

3. Conical – for Reynolds Number typically range from Re 25 to 75.

14

Page 15: Flow measurement   part II

Venturi Tubes

Venturi meter is used instead of an orifice plate in process systems where it is

important to minimize permanent pressure loss across the restriction device.

In venturi, the restricting element is a tapered tube instead of sharp-edge orifice.

The tube gives a smoother velocity change which results in a small permanent pressure

loss of approximately 10% of the differential pressure measurement.

15

Page 16: Flow measurement   part II

Venturi Tubes

Advantages of Venturi

- Less significant pressure drop across restriction.

- Less unrecoverable pressure loss.

- Requires less straight pipe up and downstream.

Disadvantages of Venturi

- More expensive.

- Bulky - requires large section for installation.

16

Page 17: Flow measurement   part II

Comparison Orifice and Venturi Meters

1. Orifice reducing element is sharp edged while venturi is tapered tube.

2. Permanent pressure loss of orifice is 65% of measured d/p while venturi is only 10%.

3. Venturi tube is less sensitive to Reynolds Number and gives more accurate

measurement when the process flow varies over a wide range.

4. Venturi tube is less affected by dirty fluid which build up deposits at orifice plates and

pressure tap connections.

5. Venturi tube meter is more costly compared to orifice plate costly compared to orifice

plate and requires greater length of pipeline.

6. Orifice plate is relatively easy to change for new range.

17

Page 18: Flow measurement   part II

Flow Nozzle

Flow nozzle is a restriction consisting of an elliptical contoured inlet and a cylindrical

throat section.

Pressure taps used to measure the difference in static pressure created by flow nozzle

are commonly located one pipe diameter (1D) upstream and ½ pipe diameter (1/2D)

downstream from the inlet face of the nozzle.

The Flow Nozzle is similar to the venturi but are in the shape of an ellipse. They have

a higher flow capacity than orifice plates.

Another main difference between the flow nozzle and the venturi is that although they

have similar inlet nozzles, the flow nozzle has no exit section.

These devices are more cost effective, but as such they provide less accuracy than

venturis, and have a higher unrecoverable pressure loss.

18

Page 19: Flow measurement   part II

Flow Nozzle

Flow Nozzles can handle larger solids and be used for higher velocities, greater

turbulence and high temperature applications.

They are often used with fluid or steam applications containing some suspended solids,

and in applications where the product is being discharged from service.

19

Page 20: Flow measurement   part II

Flow Nozzle

Advantages of Flow nozzle

- High velocity applications.

- Operate in higher turbulence.

- Used with fluids containing suspended solids.

- More cost effective than venturis.

- Physically smaller than the venturi.

Disadvantages of Flow nozzle

- More expensive than orifice plates.

- Higher unrecoverable pressure loss.

20

Page 21: Flow measurement   part II

Dall Tube

Dall tube consists of two conical reducers inserted into the fluid – carrying pipe. It has

a shape very similar to venturi without throat.

The construction of Dall is much simpler than that of venture which needs complex

machinery.

It is much shorter in length which makes its insertion into flow line easier.

Its perimeter pressure loss is only 5 % of measured pressure differential and thus it is

only half that due to a venturi.

On the basis of maintenance and operational life, Dall and venturi are similar.

21

Page 22: Flow measurement   part II

Dall Tube

Advantages of Dall

- Shorter lay length.

- Lower unrecoverable pressure loss.

Disadvantages of Dall

- More complex to manufacture.

- Sensitive to turbulence.

- Accuracy based on flow data.

22

Page 23: Flow measurement   part II

Pitot Tube

The pitot tube is a tube with an open end facing the incoming fluid stream.

The Pitot tube measures flow based on differential pressure and is primarily used with

gas flows.

The Pitot tube is a small tube that is directed into the flow stream.

This measures the total pressure (dynamic and static combined). A second

measurement is required, being of static pressure.

The difference between the two measurements gives a value for dynamic pressure.

The flow rate, like other devices, is calculated from the square root of the pressure.

In calculating the flow rate from the pressure, the calculation is dependent on such

factors as tube design and the location of the static tap.

The Pitot-static probe incorporates the static holes in the tube system to eliminate this

parameter.

23

Page 24: Flow measurement   part II

Pitot Tube The Pitot tube is also used to determine the velocity profile in a pipe.

This is done by measuring points at various distances from the pipe wall to construct avelocity profile.

The Pitot tube is the primary device.

It has the advantage over orifice meters of practically no pressure drop.

Its usefulness is limited to clean gases and liquids as the sensing element is a smallorifice.

Foreign materials tend to plug the openings in the tube, and the classical Pitot tubesenses impact pressure at one point only, thus decreasing accuracy.

Assuming a steady, one – dimensional flow of an incompressible, frictionless fluidwith no heat loss for free stream velocity and applying Bernoulli’s principle between apoint in the free stream and another at the tip of the stagnation tube, we may write

𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝜌+𝑉2

2=𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔

𝜌

24

Page 25: Flow measurement   part II

Pitot Tube

𝑉 =2(𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔 − 𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡)

𝜌

∆𝑝 =1

2𝜌𝑉2 →→→→ 𝑉 ∝ ∆𝑝 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∆𝑝 = 𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑔 − 𝑝𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡

Pitot tubes develop a very low differential pressure, which can often be difficult to

measure with the secondary element.

Also the accuracy of the device is dependent on the velocity profile of the fluid.

The velocity profile is also affected by turbulence in the flow stream.

25

Page 26: Flow measurement   part II

Pitot Tube

Advantages of Pitot tube

- Low cost.

- Low permanent pressure loss.

- Ease of installation into existing systems.

Disadvantages of Pitot tube

- Low accuracy.

- Low Rangeability.

- Requires clean liquid, gas or vapour as holes are easily clogged.

26

Page 27: Flow measurement   part II

Annubar Tube

An annubar is very similar to a pitot tube.

The difference is that there is more than one hole into the pressure measuring

chambers.

The pressure in the high pressure chamber represents an average of the velocity across

the pipe.

Annubars are more accurate than pitot tubes as they are not as position sensitive to the

velocity to the velocity profile of the fluid.

27

Page 28: Flow measurement   part II

Elbow Tap Elbow-Tap flow meter operates on the principle that when a fluid moves around a curved

path, the acceleration of the fluid creates centrifugal force.

In operation, the centrifugal force results in a higher pressure on the outside of the elbow

than on the inside.

Thus, a d/p is produced which is proportional to the square of the flow through the elbow.

A pipe elbow can be used as a primary device.

Elbow taps have an advantage in that most piping systems have elbows that can be used.

In applications where cost is a factor and additional pressure loss from an orifice plate is

not permitted, the elbow meter is a viable differential pressure device.

If an existing elbow is used then no additional pressure drop occurs and the expense

involved is minimal.

They can also be produced in-situ from an existing bend, and are typically formed by two

tapings drilled at an angle of 45o through the bend.

These tapings provide the high and low pressure tapping points respectively.

28

Page 29: Flow measurement   part II

Elbow Tap

Tappings at 22.5° have shown to provide more stable and reliable readings and are less

affected by upstream piping.

However 45° tapings are more suited to bi-directional flow measurement.

Velocity, pressure and elevation above the datum level for pressure taps on the inside

and outside surfaces of a 90° elbow can be related like

𝐶𝑘𝑣2

2𝑔=𝑃0𝜌𝑔+ 𝑍0 −

𝑃𝑖𝜌𝑔− 𝑍𝑖

𝑍𝑖 and 𝑍𝑜are the lowest and highest points of tapping respectively.

The volume flow rate is expressed as

𝑄 = 𝐴𝑣 =𝐴

𝐶𝑘2𝑔(

𝑃𝑜𝜌𝑔+ 𝑍0 −

𝑃𝑖𝜌𝑔− 𝑍𝑖) = 𝐶. 𝐴 2𝑔(

𝑃𝑜𝜌𝑔+ 𝑍0 −

𝑃𝑖𝜌𝑔− 𝑍𝑖)

The value of C ranges from 0.56 to 0.88 and A is the area of cross – section of the pipe

29

Page 30: Flow measurement   part II

Elbow Tap

Advantages of Elbow

- Simplified installation.

- Inexpensive.

Disadvantages of Elbow

- Low accuracy

30

Page 31: Flow measurement   part II

Open Channel Meters – Fall under Differential Flow meters

The "open channel" refers to any conduit in which liquid flows with a free surface.

Included are tunnels, non-pressurized sewers, partially filled pipes, canals, streams, and

rivers.

Of the many techniques available for monitoring open-channel flows, depth-related

methods are the most common.

These techniques presume that the instantaneous flow rate may be determined from a

measurement of the water depth, or head.

Weirs and flumes are the oldest and most widely used primary devices for measuring

open-channel flows.

31

Page 32: Flow measurement   part II

Weir

The flow rate over a weir is a function of the weir geometry and of the weir head (the

weir head is defined as the vertical distance between the weir crest and the liquid

surface in the undisturbed region of the upstream flow).

Weirs are variable head, variable area flow meters employed for measuring large

volumes of liquids in open channels.

The device operates on the principle that if a restriction of specified shape and form is

introduced in flow path, a rise in the upstream liquid occurs which is a function of the

flow rate through the restriction.

Weirs operate on the principle that an obstruction in a channel will cause water to back

up, creating a high level (head) behind the barrier.

The head is a function of flow velocity, and, therefore, the flow rate through the

device. Weirs consist of vertical plates with sharp crests.

The top of the plate can be straight or notched. Weirs are classified in accordance with

the shape of the notch. The basic types are V-notch, rectangular, and trapezoidal.

32

Page 33: Flow measurement   part II

Weir Applying Bernoulli’s equation at undisturbed region of upstream flow and at the crest

of the weir, we get

𝐻 +𝑉12

2𝑔= 𝐻 − 𝑦 +

𝑉22

2𝑔

Where 𝑉1 and 𝑉2 are the upstream flow and flow at the crest respectively

𝑉2 = 2𝑔(ℎ +𝑉12

2𝑔)

If 𝑉1 is small compared to 𝑉2, then

𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 = 2𝑔𝑦,

𝑦 = depth from the top surface of water level.

33

Page 34: Flow measurement   part II

Weir

𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 = 2𝑔𝑦𝐿𝑊𝑑𝑦

𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑙𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑟 = 𝐶𝑑√2𝑔𝑦 𝐿_𝑊 𝑑𝑦,

𝐶𝑑 is the coefficient of discharge valuing between 0.57 and 0.64

𝐿𝑊 is the actual crest length

𝑄𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 𝐶𝑑𝐿𝑊 2𝑔𝑦 0

𝐻

𝑦𝑑𝑦 =2

3𝐶𝑑𝐿𝑊 2𝑔(𝐻)

32

For rectangular weir,

𝑄 =2

3𝐶𝑑(𝐿𝑊−0.2𝐻) 2𝑔(𝐻)

3 2

For triangular weir,

𝑄 =8

15𝑡𝑎𝑛

𝜃

22𝑔(𝐻)

52

34

Page 35: Flow measurement   part II

Flume

Flumes are generally used when head loss must be kept to a minimum, or if the

flowing liquid contains large amounts of suspended solids.

Flumes are to open channels what venturi tubes are to closed pipes. Popular flumes are

the Parshall and Palmer-Bowlus designs.

The Parshall flume consists of a converging upstream section, a throat, and a diverging

downstream section.

Flume walls are vertical and the floor of the throat is inclined downward.

Head loss through Parshall flumes is lower than for other types of open-channel flow

measuring devices.

High flow velocities help make the flume self-cleaning. Flow can be measured

accurately under a wide range of conditions.

35

Page 36: Flow measurement   part II

Flume

Palmer-Bowlus flumes have a trapezoidal throat of uniform cross section and a length

about equal to the diameter of the pipe in which it is installed.

It is comparable to a Parshall flume in accuracy and in ability to pass debris without

cleaning.

A principal advantage is the comparative ease with which it can be installed in existing

circular conduits, because a rectangular approach section is not required.

Discharge through weirs and flumes is a function of level, so level measurement

techniques must be used with the equipment to determine flow rates.

Staff gages and float-operated units are the simplest devices used for this purpose.

Various electronic sensing, totalizing, and recording systems are also available.

36

Page 37: Flow measurement   part II

Flume 37

Page 38: Flow measurement   part II

References:

Chapter 11: Flow Measurement, “Industrial Instrumentation and

Control” by S K Singh. Tata McGraw Hill, 3rd Edition. 2009, New

Delhi. ISBN-13: 978-0-07-026222-5.

Chapter 12: Flow Measurement, “Instrumentation, Measurement and

Analysis”. 2nd Edition, B C Nakra, K K Chaudhry, Tata McGraw-Hill,

New Delhi, 2005. ISBN: 0-07-048296-9.

Chapter 7: Flowmeter, “Fundamentals of Industrial Instrumentation”,

1st Edition, Alok Barua, Wiley India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2011. ISBN:

978-81-265-2882-0.

Chapter 5: Flow Measurement, “Principles of Industrial

Instrumentation”, 2nd Edition. D. Patranabis, Tata McGaw-Hill, New

Delhi, 2004. ISBN: 0-07-462334-6.

38