57
Lecture 18a Sub-structure: Design of Piers

Lecture13 Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Lecture 18a

Sub-structure:Design of Piers

Page 2: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 3: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 4: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 5: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 6: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 7: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 8: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 9: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 10: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 11: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 12: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 13: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 14: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 15: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 16: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Pier for S-826 connector at NW 103 Street, Miami.

Page 17: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 18: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Expansion of the deck from one-lane to two-lanes for the I-75 ramp from S-826 at Hialeah.

Page 19: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

The new piers for the I-494 Wakota Bridge over the Mississippi River at South St Paul, Minnesota. The new bridge consists of twin long-span, cast-in-place, segmental concrete bridges. Each bridge is 98 feet in width with five lanes and two full-width shoulders. The five spans clear 1,879 feet with the maximum span of 466 feet. Substructure used 4 ksi concrete and the superstructure 6 ksi. Post-tensioning consists of 270-ksi seven wire super strand with 23 x 0.6 in-diam. strand tendons in the longitudinal direction and 4 x 0.6 in-diam. strand tendons in the transverse direction. The piers shown above flare up to match the box girder soffit and web incline angle. Note the icebreaker section. The box girders are attached to the stem walls with the reinforcing steel from the stem wall extending into the box girder diaphragm walls.

Page 20: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 21: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 22: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Lake Maracaibo’s segmental box girder bridge.

Page 23: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 24: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 25: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 26: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 27: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 28: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )
Page 29: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Seismic Effects upon Piers

Page 30: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Route 5 (Truck Lane)/ 405 Separation. This was a cast-in-place pre-stressed box girder with two 177’spans on a curved skewed alignment. The bridge collapsed at the bent, which consisted of two columns with #4 ties at 12”. The structure was a complete loss and was immediately demolished and removed.

Page 31: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

San Fernando Road Overhead (Route 210). Two-span, cast-in-place pre-stressed concrete box girder with single column bents. Approach fills settled on foot. Bridge sagged four feet at base due to shattering of column at base.

Page 32: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

San Fernando Road Overhead (Route 210) – Column Failure. Close up of column base. Concrete core at base was lost and #18 bars buckled (ties were #4 @ 12”). Structure was entirely replaced.

Page 33: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Column shear and buckling failure at 5/210 Interchange – Foothill Boulevard Underpass, four-span reinforced concrete box girder with four column bents. The superstructure appeared to have no damage.

Page 34: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Column shear and buckling failure. Foothill Boulevard Under-crossing. Octagonal tied columns (#4 @ 12 inches).

Page 35: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Shear failure at the top of the column.Foothill Boulevard Under-crossing.

Page 36: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Anchorage failure.Route 210/ Separation & Overhead.Bars pulled out of the pile shaft.

Page 37: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Cypress Creek Viaduct, I-880, collapsed by the Loma Prieta Earthquake, Oakland, California.

Page 38: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

The Cypress Street Viaduct, I- 880 (Nimitz Freeway). This photo of the East side of freeway shows the collapsed structure. The reinforced box girder structure had spans varying from 71 to 90 feet in length (80 feet average). The curb-to-curb width of the bridge was approximately 52 feet. The columns (both lower and upper level) were separated about 15 feet in height.

Page 39: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Cypress Street Viaduct, I-880 (Nimitz Freeway).

Detailed view of the collapsed upper level, with the column showing longitudinal steel.

The confinement was #4 bars at 12-inch spacing.

The hinge at the right was retrofitted with cable restrainers.

Page 40: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Cypress Street Viaduct, I-880 (Nimitz Freeway). Photo shows the East side of the freeway at 32nd Street. The upper level column was tapered at the base and joined to the lower level column as a hinge connection. Note that the shear key and dowels are shown.

Page 41: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Bull Creek Canyon Channel Bridge – Failed columns by the channel paving.

Page 42: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Mission-Gothic Under-crossing. Column failure under the architectural flare.

Page 43: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

La Cienega – Venice under-crossing. Column failure.

Page 44: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Fairfax – Washington Under-crossing. Column failure.

Page 45: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Jan. 1995 Earthquake. Map showing the Hanshin Expressway and the Port of Kobe City.

Page 46: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Failure of the column connections and the collapse of the super-structure spans.

Page 47: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway.

Buckled steel piers.

Close-up of buckled portion of steel piers.

Page 48: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway.

Shear failure of a massive rectangular reinforced concrete pier.

Page 49: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Failure of the butt welds in the longitudinal reinforcement.

Page 50: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Failure of the transverse confining reinforcement.

Page 51: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Shear failure of a massive rectangular reinforced concrete pier.

Page 52: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Pier failure.

Page 53: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Failure of single pier bents.

Page 54: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Bearings

Page 55: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. The spherical housing for the fixed bearing failed at the support for the arch bridge.

Page 56: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway. Shear failure of bolts connecting the transverse keeper plate to the bearing assembly.

Page 57: Lecture13  Piers ( Highway Engineering )

Hanshin Expressway.

The new bearings delivered to the jobsite to replace those that failed were in-kind type replacements.