85
Structural Analysis - III Fl ibilit M th d 1 Flexibility Method - 1 Dr. Rajesh K. N. Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Govt. College of Engineering, Kannur Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN 1

Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GCE Kannur

Citation preview

Page 1: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Structural Analysis - III

Fl ibilit M th d 1Flexibility Method - 1

Dr. Rajesh K. N.Assistant Professor in Civil EngineeringAssistant Professor in Civil EngineeringGovt. College of Engineering, Kannur

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1

Page 2: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Module I

Matrix analysis of structures

Module I

• Definition of flexibility and stiffness influence coefficients –d l t f fl ibilit t i b h i l h &

Matrix analysis of structures

development of flexibility matrices by physical approach & energy principle.

Flexibility method

• Flexibility matrices for truss beam and frame elements –• Flexibility matrices for truss, beam and frame elements –load transformation matrix-development of total flexibility matrix of the structure –analysis of simple structures –

l t ti b d l f d l l d plane truss, continuous beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element loads – lack of fit and temperature effects.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2

Page 3: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

FUNDAMENTALS OF FLEXIBILITY METHOD

Introduction

•This method is a generalization of the Maxwell-Mohrmethod(1874)method(1874)

•Not conducive to computer programming, because the choice f d d t i t iof redundants is not unique

•Unknowns are the redundant actions, which are arbitrarily, ychosen

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

3

Page 4: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Flexibility method (Explanation using principle of superposition)

Example 1: Single redundant - Continuous 2-span beam

Flexibility method (Explanation using principle of superposition)

Released structure

45384B

wLEI

−Δ =

Deflection of released structure due to actual loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN4

(Negative, since deflection is downward)

Page 5: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

BRApply unit load corresponding to

C

3

BL

=δDisplacement due to unit load 48B EI

δDisplacement due to unit load,

BR B BR δDisplacement due to is

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN5

Page 6: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Deflection of released B BR δstructure due to redundant applied as a load

C

0R δΔ + = Compatibility condition (or equation of 0B B BR δΔ + = superposition or equation of geometry)

58

BB

B

wLR −Δ∴ = =

δ

δ(Displacement due to unit load corresponding to ) BR

Bδ flexibility coefficient

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

6

Page 7: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Example 2 – More than one redundant

Ch i f d d t

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Choice of redundants

Page 8: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Q Q b th d d tL t 1 2,Q Q be the redundantsLet

Deflections corresponding to redundantsredundants

&D D Displacements in the released 1 2&QL QLD D Displacements in the released

structure corresponding to redundants, due to external loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

8

Page 9: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•To get flexibility coefficientsTo get flexibility coefficients

1 2&Q Q•Apply unit loads corresponding to

Fl ibilit ffi i t Flexibility coefficients

Net deflection is zero at B and C

1 11 1 12 2 0QLD F Q F Q+ + =

0D F Q F Q1 11 12 1 0

0QLD F F Q

D F F Q⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤

+ =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN9

2 21 1 22 2 0QLD F Q F Q+ + = 2 21 22 2 0QLD F F Q⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭

Page 10: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•Generally, net deflection need not be zero

1 1 11 1 12 2Q QLD D F Q F Q= + +

D D F Q F Q+ +2 2 21 1 22 2Q QLD D F Q F Q= + +

Q Qh di l di 1 2,Q QD D 1 2,Q Q•Where :support displacements corresponding to

{ } { } [ ]{ }D D F Q{ } { } [ ]{ }Q QLD D F Q= +

D⎧ ⎫ D⎧ ⎫ F F⎡ ⎤ Q⎧ ⎫{ } 1

2

QQ

Q

DD

D⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

{ } 1

2

QLQL

QL

DD

D⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

[ ] 11 12

21 22

F FF

F F⎡ ⎤

= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

{ } 1

2

QQ

Q⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

F QQDFlexibility coefficient is sometimes denoted as

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

10

F QQDFlexibility coefficient is sometimes denoted as

Page 11: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q QLQ F D D−= −

{ } { }0D•If there are no support displacements

{ } [ ] { }1Q F D−∴

{ } { }0QD =•If there are no support displacements,

{ } [ ] { }QLQ F D∴ = −

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

11

Page 12: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• Example: To find out redundants

: 2P P M PL PGiv n P Pe P= = = =1 2 3: 2P P M PL PGiv n P Pe P= = = =

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

12

Page 13: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

313PL397PL3

11324QL

PLDEI

= 29748QL

PLDEI

=

⎡ ⎤3 269748QL

PLDEI

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎣ ⎦∴

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

13

⎣ ⎦

Page 14: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

33

11 3LFEI

=

35L21

56

LFEI

=

35LF12 6F

EI=

3

2283

LFEI

= [ ]3 2 5

5 166LFEI

⎡=∴

⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

14

22 3EI 5 166EI ⎣ ⎦

Page 15: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

⎡ ⎤[ ] 13

16 565 27

EIFL

− −⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Q⎡ ⎤[ ] [ ] 11

2QL

QQ F D

Q−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦

⎣ ⎦

316 5 26⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤3

3

16 5 2665 2 977 48

EI PLL EI

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤−= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

696456

P ⎡=

⎤⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

1 269 8, ,P Pi e Q Q −

= =

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

15

1 2. ., ,56 7

i e Q Q

Page 16: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Temperature changes, pre-strains and p g , psupport displacements not corresponding to redundants

L t

Displacements corresponding to redundants due to { }D

Let:

Displacements corresponding to redundants due to temperature changes, in the released structure

{ }QTD

Displacements corresponding to redundants due to pre strains in the released structure

{ }QPDpre-strains, in the released structure

Di l di d d d { } Displacements corresponding to redundants due to support displacements not corresponding to redundants in the released structure

{ }QRD

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

16

redundants, in the released structure

Page 17: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } { } { } { } { } [ ]{ }{ } { } { } { } { } [ ]{ }Q QL QT QP QRD D D D D F Q= + + + +

{ } { } { } { } { }QC QL QT QP QRD D D D D= + + +•Let { } { } { } { } { }

{ } { } [ ]{ }Q QCD D F Q= +•Hence, and

{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q QCQ F D D−= −

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

17

Page 18: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member end actions

• Member end actions are the couples and forces that act at the ends of a member when it is considered to be isolated the ends of a member when it is considered to be isolated from the remainder of the structure

• In the above case, member end actions are the SFs and BMs at the ends of members AB and BC

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

18

Page 19: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• In the above figure are the member end actions considered (upward forces and

l k )

1 2 3 4, , ,M M M MA A A A

anticlockwise moments are +ve).

•The first two are just to the left of B, and the last two are just to the right of B

A A+ gives the reaction at B and 1 3M MA A+ gives the reaction at B, and

A A i th b di t t B2 4M MA A+ gives the bending moment at B

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

19

Page 20: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Joint displacements, member end actions, and

•Once the redundants are found all the joint

support reactions

Once the redundants are found, all the joint displacements, member end actions, and support reactions can be found subsequentlyq y

•But it is easier to incorporate such calculations into the b i t ti i t d f t i th t basic computations, instead of postponing them as separate calculations

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

20

Page 21: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• Example: To find outj i di l • joint displacements,

• member end actions and • reactions other than redundants• reactions other than redundants

Actual structure

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1 2 3: 2Given P P M PL P P P P= = = =

Page 22: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } 1JJ

DD

D⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

Joint displacements in the actual structured l d2JD⎩ ⎭ due to loads

Q⎧ ⎫{ } 1

2

QQ

Q⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

Redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

22

Page 23: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Joint displacements in the released structure due to loads{ } 1

2

JLJL

JL

DD

D⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭2JLD⎩ ⎭

{ } 1RLA⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬ Reactions in the released structure due to { } 1

2

RLRL

RL

AA

⎧ ⎫= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

Reactions in the released structure due to loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

23

Page 24: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Joint displacements in the released structure due to i l f d dJQijD

unit values of redundantsJQij

RQijA Reactions in the released structure due to unit

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

24

RQijAvalues of redundants

Page 25: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

D D D Q D Q= + +Joint displacements 1 1 11 1 12 2

2 2 21 1 22 2

J JL JQ JQ

J JL JQ JQ

D D D Q D Q

D D D Q D Q

= + +

= + +

J p

{ } { } { }D D D Q⎡ ⎤

oIn matrix form,

{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

D D⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫{ } { }1 1

2 2

, ,, J JLJ JL

J JL

D DD D

D Dw ereh

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

{ }11 12 1

21 22 2

,JQ JQJQ

JQ JQ

D D QD Q

D QD⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫

⎡ ⎤ = = ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦21 22 2JQ JQD QD ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

D Joint displacement i in the released structure

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

25JQijD J p

due to unit value of redundant j

Page 26: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• If there are j joint displacements to be obtained,

{ } { } { }D D D Q⎡ ⎤

and there are q redundants,

{ } { } { }11 1

J JL JQqj j j q

D D D Q×× × ×

⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

26

Page 27: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Reactions (other than redundants)

1 1 11 1 12 2R RL RQ RQA A A Q A QA A A Q A Q

= + +

= + +

A AA A Q⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

2 2 21 1 22 2R RL RQ RQA A A Q A Q= + +

11 121 1 1

21 222 2 2

RQ RQR RL

RQ RQR RL

A AA A QA AA A Q⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

= +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q⎣ ⎦

• If there are r reactions to be obtained (other than

{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

redundants) and q redundants,

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

27

{ } { } { }11 1

R RL RQqr r r q

A A A Q×× × ×

⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Page 28: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member end actions

• Member end actions { } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

{ }A Member end actions in the released structure

{ } { } { }M ML MQ Q⎣ ⎦

{ }MLA Member end actions in the released structure due to loads

MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦Member end actions in the released structure due to unit values of redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 29: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

If th b d ti d d d t

{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤

If there are m member end actions and q redundants,

{ } { } { }11 1

M ML MQqm m m q

A A A Q×× × ×

⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

29

Page 30: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• In the given example,In the given example,

1 2 32P P M PL P P P P= = = =

[ ] 6964

PQ ⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦As found out earlier,

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

[ ]6456

Q ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦,

Page 31: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

To be found out

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 32: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

[ ]DTo get [ ]JLDTo get

2 10PL ⎡ ⎤2

154JLPLDEI

=2

2138JLPLDEI

= [ ]2 10

138JLPLDEI

∴⎡ ⎤

= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

32

Page 33: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

D⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get JQD⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get

2 23L L⎡ ⎤2

11 12

2 221 22

31 32 21 424

JQ JQJQ

JQ JQ

L LD D LEI EIDD D EIL L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

⎡ ⎤ = = =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

21 22

2 2JQ JQ

EI EI⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 34: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

[ ] 69PQ ⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥Already we know [ ]

6456Q = ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Already we know,

Joint displacements

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦2 210 1 3 69

13 1 4 648 2 56PL L PEI EI

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

2 17PL ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥=

5112EI ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 35: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ }RLATo get { }RL

M AM

Released structure with loads d i

AVand reactions

1 23

3 22 2 2A

PL P L PLM M P L −= − + − =

1 2 3 2AV P P P P= + − =

{ } 12

RLRL

PAA PL

⎧ ⎫⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

{ }2 2

RLRL

PLA⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 36: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

RQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get

LL L L

R l d t t ith it l 1 Released structure with unit value of redundant Q1

2L

1L L

R l d t t ith it l

1 1A

− −⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Released structure with unit value of redundant Q2

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2RQAL L

⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ − −⎣ ⎦

Page 37: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } { } { }⎡ ⎤

Reactions (other than redundants)

{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

2 691 1PP− −⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ 69

64562

1 12L

PPL L

⎡ ⎤⎢

⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥−− ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭⎥− −⎣ ⎦

107P ⎡ ⎤

2⎩ ⎭

1073156

PL

⎡=

⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

37

Page 38: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Choice of member end actions

AM BMA

V VBA

AV BV

•Any number among the 4 member end actions can be

chosen for analysis

•Usually two among the 4 are chosen•Usually two among the 4 are chosen

•Any two of the 4 member end actions can be chosen for

analysis

•Usually the moments at both ends are chosen

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Usually the moments at both ends are chosen

Page 39: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ }MLATo get1MA A

L BA1M 2MA

Member end actions considered

are the reactive moments at the end of members in the actual structure

1 2,M MA A

1 2,ML MLA A are the reactive moments at the end of 1 2ML MLmembers in the released structure

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 40: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

PLM PL=

2P P= 3P P=1 2P P=

2PL Released

structure

2 3

2P

2P L

32PL

L

2P

B

2 P 0

L BA

1MLA = reactive moment just to the right of A2PL−

=

2MLA = reactive moment just to the left of B 32PL

=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

40

2

Page 41: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

P2

PL

L

P P

0

3MLA = reactive moment just to the right of BPL−

=0

L

B C0

3MLA reactive moment just to the right of B2

A = reactive moment just to the left of C 0=4MLA = reactive moment just to the left of C 0=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

41

Page 42: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

A B CPL 2P P PPL

A B C2

L L2P

P L3

2PL2P

2PL P P

2 2

0

L BA2

0L

B C0

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

2 P 0 B C

{ }

1

2

23 2

ML

ML

A PLA PL

A

−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ }

3

4

20

MLML

ML

AA PLA

= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

42

4ML ⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭

Page 43: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

A B CLMQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get

11L L MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

1 21 1

2Q Q

L L= =

⎡ ⎤L 0 0

0 20L L

L− −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

0

A B C2 LL L

00 0

L⎢ ⎥=

−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦1

1

L L 0 0⎣ ⎦

2L L L−

0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

43

Page 44: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

H b d tiHence, member end actions

{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦

2 2PL L L− − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ 0 554PL⎧ ⎫2 23 2 0 69

PL L LPL L P

⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦

0.5540.357

PLL

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪= ⎪⎨ ⎬2 0 6456

0 0 0PL L⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦

0.6430

L= ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭0⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN44

Page 45: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member end actions (with a different choice of member end actions for analysis)

Member end actions considered

{ }MLATo get

A A

In the released structure,

are SF and BM (equal to reactions) just to the left of B, and

1 2,ML MLA A

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

3 4,ML MLA A are SF and BM just to the right of B

Page 46: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

PLM PL=

2P P= 3P P=1 2P P=

2PL Released

structure

2 3

2P3PL

2P L

32PL

L

2P

BA

2 P 0A

1MLA = Shear force just to the left of B 3 2 0P P= − =

2MLA = Bending moment just to the left of B

2 3P L PLP L M

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

46

23 2 2

P L M= − + =

Page 47: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

2PL P P2

0L

B CB C

A = Shear force just to the right of B3MLA = Shear force just to the right of B

12 2 2 0P P P P= − = − =

4MLA = Bending moment just to the right of B4ML g j g

122 2PL PLPL M−

= − + +2 2

22PL PL PLPL PL− −+ +

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

47

22 2 2

PL PL= − + + =

Page 48: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

A B CPL 2P P PPL

A B C2

L L

P L 3P L2P PL P

2P

2P L

2

0L

2P2

PL

L

P P

0⎧ ⎫

2 P0 0

{ }

1

2

03

2ML

ML

A PLA

A

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ } 2

3

4

20

MLML

ML

ML

AAA PL

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

48

4

2ML⎩ ⎭ −⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 49: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

A B CLMQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get

11L L

MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

1 21 1

1 1Q Q= =

⎡ ⎤L 0 0

1 10 L⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1 1

L0

L

A B C2 LL L

0 10 L

⎢ ⎥=−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦1

1

L L 0 L−⎣ ⎦

2L L

L

L−

1L

1Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

491 111−

Page 50: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Hence, member end actions

{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

5⎡ ⎤

01 13PL

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ 5

20LP⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

=

30 692

0 0 1 6456

PLL P

⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ 6456

36L⎢ ⎥⎢

⎦⎥

0 0 1 64560PL L

⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ −⎣ ⎦−⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭2⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN50

Page 51: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Flexibilities of prismatic membersp

•Flexibility coefficients of a structure are calculated from the contributions of individual members

•Hence it is worthwhile to construct member flexibility matrices for various types of actionsyp

•Member oriented axes (local coordinates) and structure oriented axes (global coordinates)

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

51

Page 52: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrices for prismatic members with

B b

one end fixed and the other free3 2L L⎡ ⎤•Beam member

[ ] 11 122

21 22

3 2M MMi

M M

L LF F EI EIFF F L L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦21 22

2M MF F L L

EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 53: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

[ ] LF =•Truss member [ ]MiFEA

=•Truss member

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 54: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•Plane frame member Plane frame member

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 55: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

1

FM33

11 12 13 3 2

0 0M M M

LEAF F F

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥[ ]

11 12 13 3 2

21 22 23

231 32 33

03 2

M M M

Mi M M M

M M M

L LF F F FEI EI

F F FL L

⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

231 32 33

02

M M M L LEI EI

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 56: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

G id b •Grid member

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 57: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

FM31

FM33

3 2L L⎡ ⎤

[ ]11 12 13

03 2

M M M

L LEI EIF F F

L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥[ ] 21 22 23

231 32 33

0 0Mi M M M

M M M

LF F F FGJ

F F FL L

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

02L LEI EI

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 58: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•Space frame member •Space frame member

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 59: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

0 0 0 0 0LE A

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥3 2

0 0 0 03 2Z Z

E AL LE I E I

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ]

3 2

0 0 0 03 2

Z Z

Y Y

L LE I E I

F

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥[ ]

0 0 0 0 0M iF

LG J

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥2

0 0 0 02 Y Y

L LE I E I

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

2

0 0 0 02 Z Z

L LE I E I

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 60: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Formalization of the Flexibility method(Explanation using principle of complimentary virtual work)

{ } [ ]{ }D F A

For each member,

{ } [ ]{ }Mi Mi MiD F A=

contains relative displacements of the k end { }DH contains relative displacements of the k end with respect to j end of the i-th member{ }MiDHere

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 61: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•If there are m members in the structure,

{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }11 10 0 0 0MM MFD A⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥{ }{ }

[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

{ }{ }

22 2

33 3

0 0 0 00 0 0 0

MM M

MM M

FD AFD A

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥

{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }0 0 0 0MiMi MiFD A

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥

{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }0 0 0 0 MmMm MmFD A

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

{ } [ ]{ }D F A

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

{ } [ ]{ }M M MD F A=

Page 62: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ }M M MD F A={ } [ ]{ }M M M

[ ]MF is the unassembled flexibility matrix of the entire structure

{ }MA{ }A

•Member end actions in will be related to the structure actions applied to the released structure

{ }SA { }JA { }QAconsists of joint loads and redundant actions

{ }SAstructure actions applied to the released structure.

{ }S { }J { }Qj

{ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B A=Hence,A i f i i Action transformation matrix (equilibrium matrix)

{ } [ ]{ }{ }

JM MJ MQ

AA B B

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦i.e.,

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

{ } [ ] { }M MJ MQQA⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 63: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

[ ]B { }A { }A andl t to[ ]MJB

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

{ }MA { }JA

{ }QA

andrelate to

relate to{ }MA

•Each column in the submatrix consists of [ ]MJB

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ { }Qrelate { }M

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member end actions caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.

[ ]MJB

pp

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member end actions caused by a unit value of a

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦member end actions caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to the released structure.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 64: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ }SAδ•Suppose an arbitrary set of virtual actions { }SSuppose an arbitrary set of virtual actions is applied on the structure.

{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }{ }

JM MS S MJ MQ

AA B A B B

A

δδ δ

δ

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

{ } [ ]{ } [ ] { }QQAδ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

External complimentary virtual work produced by the { }SAδ { }SD

External complimentary virtual work produced by the virtual loads and actual displacements is

{ } { } { } { }TT T* JDW A D A Aδ δ δ δ

⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎨ ⎬{ } { } { } { }T T JS S J Q

QW A D A A

Dδ δ δ δ⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 65: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Internal complimentary virtual work produced by the virtual member end actions and actual (relative) { }MAδend displacements is

{ }M

{ }MD

{ } { }T*M MU A Dδ δ=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 66: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•Equating the above two (principle of complimentary i t l k)

{ } { } { } { }T TS S M MA D A Dδ δ=

virtual work),

{ } { } { } { }S S M MA D A Dδ δ

{ } [ ]{ }{ } [ ]{ }A A { } [ ]{ }M M MD F A={ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B A=But and

{ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B Aδ δ=Also,

{ } { } { } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }TT TS S S MS M MS SA D A B F B Aδ δ=Hence, { } { } { } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }S S S MS M MS S

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 67: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }TD B F B A{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }S MS M MS SD B F B A=

{ } [ ]{ }S S SD F A=

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TF B F B

Where,

the assembled flexibility matrix [ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B= , the assembled flexibility matrix

for the entire structure.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 68: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

[ ]SF is partitioned into submatrices related to:[ ]S

{ }JA

p

joint loads

{ }QAand redundant actions

{ } [ ]{ }{ } [ ] { }JJ JQJ JF FD A

A⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ } [ ]{ }

{ }{ }

[ ] { }{ }

QJ J

Q QQJ

S S S

QQ

DD AF F

F A ⎪ ⎪ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

=⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

T T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

Where,

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B= [ ] [ ]T

JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ [ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Page 69: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

{ } { } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q QJ J QQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

1{ } { } { }1

Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣⇒ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 70: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

In the subsequent calculations, the above {AQ} should be d

However the final values of redundants are obtained

used.

However, the final values of redundants are obtained by including actual or equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supports.y pp

{ } { } { }Q QC QFINALA A A= − +Thus, { } { } { }Q QC QFINAL,

{ }QCA represents actual and equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supports, corresponding to redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

70

redundants.

Page 71: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

{ }{ }QA

{ }JD• Once redundants are found,

can be found out from,

{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦

{ }J ,

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

71

Page 72: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• Similarly, support reactions caused by joint loads and redundant can be obtained with an action transformation matrix [ ]RSB[ ]RS

{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }JA⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }{ }

JR RS S RJ RQ

Q

A B A B BA

⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

•Each column in the submatrix consists of support i d b i l f j i l d li d

[ ]RJBreactions caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.

B⎡ ⎤RQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦•Each column in the submatrix consists of support reactions caused by a unit value of a

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

pp yredundant applied to the released structure.

Page 73: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

• If actual or equivalent joint loads are applied • If actual or equivalent joint loads are applied directly to the supports,

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

t bi d j i t l d ( t l d { }RCA represents combined joint loads (actual and equivalent) applied directly to the supports.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 74: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•As seen earlier, member end actions due to actual loads ,are obtained by superimposing member end actions due to restraint actions and combined joint loads

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ Q⎣ ⎦

{ }Awhere represents fixed end actions{ }MFAwhere represents fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 75: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Comparison of the procedures explained with principle of superposition and principle of complimentary virtual work•For calculating redundants,

{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q F D D−P i i l f iti

Principle of complimentary virtual work

{ } [ ] { } { }( )Q QLQ F D D= −Principle of superposition

{ } { } { }1

Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Principle of complimentary virtual work

{ } { } { }Q QQ Q QJ J⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

[ ]F F⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦H [ ] QQF F⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦Hence,

{ } { }D F A⎡ ⎤d{ } { }Q A

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

{ } { }QL QJ JD F A⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦and{ } { }QQ A=

Page 76: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•For calculating joint displacements,g j p

{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition

Principle of complimentary virtual work

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

{ } [ ]{ }JL JJ JD F A=Hence and{ } [ ]{ }JL JJ JD F A

JQ JQD F⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Hence, and

Q Q⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 77: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•For calculating member end actions,g ,

{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition

Principle of complimentary virtual work

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

{ } { } [ ]{ }ML MF MJ JA A B A= +Hence, and

MQ MQA B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 78: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

•For calculating support reactions•For calculating support reactions,

{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition

Principle of complimentary virtual work

{ } { } { }R RL RQ Q⎣ ⎦p p p

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

{ } { } [ ]{ }RL RC RJ JA A B A= − +Hence, and

RQ RQA B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 79: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix for a beam member with t t th d b d timoments at the ends as member end actions

Required to find out rotations at the ends due to unit h d l

12x d yM EI−

= = −

moments at each end separately

1

1 1x

2xM EIL dx

= =

2d1L

1L

x 2

12dy xEI Cdx L

= +

3

1 26xEIy C x CL

= + +

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

79

1 26L

Page 80: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

0 Ly C −= ⇒ =0 0y C= ⇒ = 10

6x Ly C== ⇒ =2

00 0

xy C== ⇒ =

212 6

dy x Ldx EI L

⎛ ⎞∴ = −⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

L Ly y−′ ′0

,6 3x x L

y yEI EI= =

= =

1 1 3MLFE I

= 21 6MLF

EI−

=6

1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1

Page 81: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Similarly,

LFLF −

111 3MF

EI=12 6MF

EI=

11 12 3 6L L

F F EI EI−⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

21 22

3 6

6 3

M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

EI EI

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤∴ = = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

81

6 3EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 82: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix for a beam member with t d h t d b d timoment and shear at one end as member end actions

3 2L LF F

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

221 22

3 2M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 83: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

SummarySummary

Flexibility method

• Flexibility matrices for truss beam and frame elements –load transformation matrix-development of total flexibility matrix of the structure .

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

83

Page 84: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

James Clerk Maxwell (13 June 1831 – 5 November 1879) was a Scottish theoretical physicist and 1879) was a Scottish theoretical physicist and mathematician. His most important achievement was classical electromagnetic theory. Maxwell also developed the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, a p ,statistical means of describing aspects of the kinetic theory of gases. These two discoveries helped usher in the era of modern physics, laying the foundation for p y y gsuch fields as special relativity and quantum mechanics.Maxwell is also known for creating the first true colour photograph in 1861 and for his foundational work on the rigidity of rod-and-joint frameworks like those in many bridges.

Maxwell is considered by many physicists to be the 19th-century scientist with the greatest influence on 20th-century physics. His contributions to the science are considered by many to be of the same magnitude as those of Isaac Newton y y gand Albert Einstein. Einstein himself described Maxwell's work as the "most profound and the most fruitful that physics has experienced since the time of Newton." Einstein kept a photograph of Maxwell on his study wall, alongside

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

84

pictures of Michael Faraday and Newton.

Page 85: Module1 flexibility-1- rajesh sir

Christian Otto Mohr (October 8, 1835 – October 2, 1918) was a German civil engineer one of the most 1918) was a German civil engineer, one of the most celebrated of the nineteenth century.Starting in 1855, his early working life was spent in railroad engineering for the Hanover and Oldenburg railroad engineering for the Hanover and Oldenburg state railways, designing some famous bridges and making some of the earliest uses of steel trusses.Even during his early railway years, Mohr had g y y y ,developed an interest in the theories of mechanics and the strength of materials. In 1867, he became professor of mechanics at Stuttgart Polytechnic, and p g yin 1873 at Dresden Polytechnic in 1873. In 1874, Mohr formalised the idea of a statically determinate structure.

In 1882, he famously developed the graphical method for analysing stress known as Mohr's circle and used it to propose an early theory of strength based on shear stress He also developed the Williot-Mohr diagram for truss on shear stress. He also developed the Williot Mohr diagram for truss displacements and the Maxwell-Mohr method for analysing statically indeterminate structures, it can also be used to determine the displacement of truss nodes and forces acting on each member. The Maxwell-Mohr method is

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

85

galso referred to as the virtual force method for redundant trusses.