Upload
shamjith-km
View
286
Download
13
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
GCE Kannur
Citation preview
Structural Analysis - III
Fl ibilit M th d 1Flexibility Method - 1
Dr. Rajesh K. N.Assistant Professor in Civil EngineeringAssistant Professor in Civil EngineeringGovt. College of Engineering, Kannur
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1
Module I
Matrix analysis of structures
Module I
• Definition of flexibility and stiffness influence coefficients –d l t f fl ibilit t i b h i l h &
Matrix analysis of structures
development of flexibility matrices by physical approach & energy principle.
Flexibility method
• Flexibility matrices for truss beam and frame elements –• Flexibility matrices for truss, beam and frame elements –load transformation matrix-development of total flexibility matrix of the structure –analysis of simple structures –
l t ti b d l f d l l d plane truss, continuous beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element loads – lack of fit and temperature effects.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2
FUNDAMENTALS OF FLEXIBILITY METHOD
Introduction
•This method is a generalization of the Maxwell-Mohrmethod(1874)method(1874)
•Not conducive to computer programming, because the choice f d d t i t iof redundants is not unique
•Unknowns are the redundant actions, which are arbitrarily, ychosen
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3
Flexibility method (Explanation using principle of superposition)
Example 1: Single redundant - Continuous 2-span beam
Flexibility method (Explanation using principle of superposition)
Released structure
45384B
wLEI
−Δ =
Deflection of released structure due to actual loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN4
(Negative, since deflection is downward)
BRApply unit load corresponding to
C
3
BL
=δDisplacement due to unit load 48B EI
δDisplacement due to unit load,
BR B BR δDisplacement due to is
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN5
Deflection of released B BR δstructure due to redundant applied as a load
C
0R δΔ + = Compatibility condition (or equation of 0B B BR δΔ + = superposition or equation of geometry)
58
BB
B
wLR −Δ∴ = =
δ
δ(Displacement due to unit load corresponding to ) BR
Bδ flexibility coefficient
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
6
Example 2 – More than one redundant
Ch i f d d t
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Choice of redundants
Q Q b th d d tL t 1 2,Q Q be the redundantsLet
Deflections corresponding to redundantsredundants
&D D Displacements in the released 1 2&QL QLD D Displacements in the released
structure corresponding to redundants, due to external loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
8
•To get flexibility coefficientsTo get flexibility coefficients
1 2&Q Q•Apply unit loads corresponding to
Fl ibilit ffi i t Flexibility coefficients
Net deflection is zero at B and C
1 11 1 12 2 0QLD F Q F Q+ + =
0D F Q F Q1 11 12 1 0
0QLD F F Q
D F F Q⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤
+ =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN9
2 21 1 22 2 0QLD F Q F Q+ + = 2 21 22 2 0QLD F F Q⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭
•Generally, net deflection need not be zero
1 1 11 1 12 2Q QLD D F Q F Q= + +
D D F Q F Q+ +2 2 21 1 22 2Q QLD D F Q F Q= + +
Q Qh di l di 1 2,Q QD D 1 2,Q Q•Where :support displacements corresponding to
{ } { } [ ]{ }D D F Q{ } { } [ ]{ }Q QLD D F Q= +
D⎧ ⎫ D⎧ ⎫ F F⎡ ⎤ Q⎧ ⎫{ } 1
2
Q
DD
D⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
{ } 1
2
QLQL
QL
DD
D⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
[ ] 11 12
21 22
F FF
F F⎡ ⎤
= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
{ } 1
2
Q⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
F QQDFlexibility coefficient is sometimes denoted as
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
10
F QQDFlexibility coefficient is sometimes denoted as
{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q QLQ F D D−= −
{ } { }0D•If there are no support displacements
{ } [ ] { }1Q F D−∴
{ } { }0QD =•If there are no support displacements,
{ } [ ] { }QLQ F D∴ = −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
11
• Example: To find out redundants
: 2P P M PL PGiv n P Pe P= = = =1 2 3: 2P P M PL PGiv n P Pe P= = = =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
12
313PL397PL3
11324QL
PLDEI
= 29748QL
PLDEI
=
⎡ ⎤3 269748QL
PLDEI
⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎣ ⎦∴
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
13
⎣ ⎦
33
11 3LFEI
=
35L21
56
LFEI
=
35LF12 6F
EI=
3
2283
LFEI
= [ ]3 2 5
5 166LFEI
⎡=∴
⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
14
22 3EI 5 166EI ⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤[ ] 13
16 565 27
EIFL
− −⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
Q⎡ ⎤[ ] [ ] 11
2QL
QQ F D
Q−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦
⎣ ⎦
316 5 26⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤3
3
16 5 2665 2 977 48
EI PLL EI
−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤−= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
696456
P ⎡=
⎤⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
1 269 8, ,P Pi e Q Q −
= =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
15
1 2. ., ,56 7
i e Q Q
Temperature changes, pre-strains and p g , psupport displacements not corresponding to redundants
L t
Displacements corresponding to redundants due to { }D
Let:
Displacements corresponding to redundants due to temperature changes, in the released structure
{ }QTD
Displacements corresponding to redundants due to pre strains in the released structure
{ }QPDpre-strains, in the released structure
Di l di d d d { } Displacements corresponding to redundants due to support displacements not corresponding to redundants in the released structure
{ }QRD
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
16
redundants, in the released structure
{ } { } { } { } { } [ ]{ }{ } { } { } { } { } [ ]{ }Q QL QT QP QRD D D D D F Q= + + + +
{ } { } { } { } { }QC QL QT QP QRD D D D D= + + +•Let { } { } { } { } { }
{ } { } [ ]{ }Q QCD D F Q= +•Hence, and
{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q QCQ F D D−= −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
17
Member end actions
• Member end actions are the couples and forces that act at the ends of a member when it is considered to be isolated the ends of a member when it is considered to be isolated from the remainder of the structure
• In the above case, member end actions are the SFs and BMs at the ends of members AB and BC
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
18
• In the above figure are the member end actions considered (upward forces and
l k )
1 2 3 4, , ,M M M MA A A A
anticlockwise moments are +ve).
•The first two are just to the left of B, and the last two are just to the right of B
A A+ gives the reaction at B and 1 3M MA A+ gives the reaction at B, and
A A i th b di t t B2 4M MA A+ gives the bending moment at B
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
19
Joint displacements, member end actions, and
•Once the redundants are found all the joint
support reactions
Once the redundants are found, all the joint displacements, member end actions, and support reactions can be found subsequentlyq y
•But it is easier to incorporate such calculations into the b i t ti i t d f t i th t basic computations, instead of postponing them as separate calculations
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
20
• Example: To find outj i di l • joint displacements,
• member end actions and • reactions other than redundants• reactions other than redundants
Actual structure
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 2 3: 2Given P P M PL P P P P= = = =
{ } 1JJ
DD
D⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
Joint displacements in the actual structured l d2JD⎩ ⎭ due to loads
Q⎧ ⎫{ } 1
2
Q⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
Redundants
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
22
Joint displacements in the released structure due to loads{ } 1
2
JLJL
JL
DD
D⎧ ⎫
= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭2JLD⎩ ⎭
{ } 1RLA⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬ Reactions in the released structure due to { } 1
2
RLRL
RL
AA
⎧ ⎫= ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭
Reactions in the released structure due to loads
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
23
Joint displacements in the released structure due to i l f d dJQijD
unit values of redundantsJQij
RQijA Reactions in the released structure due to unit
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
24
RQijAvalues of redundants
D D D Q D Q= + +Joint displacements 1 1 11 1 12 2
2 2 21 1 22 2
J JL JQ JQ
J JL JQ JQ
D D D Q D Q
D D D Q D Q
= + +
= + +
J p
{ } { } { }D D D Q⎡ ⎤
oIn matrix form,
{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
D D⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫{ } { }1 1
2 2
, ,, J JLJ JL
J JL
D DD D
D Dw ereh
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
{ }11 12 1
21 22 2
,JQ JQJQ
JQ JQ
D D QD Q
D QD⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫
⎡ ⎤ = = ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦21 22 2JQ JQD QD ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦
D Joint displacement i in the released structure
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
25JQijD J p
due to unit value of redundant j
• If there are j joint displacements to be obtained,
{ } { } { }D D D Q⎡ ⎤
and there are q redundants,
{ } { } { }11 1
J JL JQqj j j q
D D D Q×× × ×
⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
26
Reactions (other than redundants)
1 1 11 1 12 2R RL RQ RQA A A Q A QA A A Q A Q
= + +
= + +
A AA A Q⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫
2 2 21 1 22 2R RL RQ RQA A A Q A Q= + +
11 121 1 1
21 222 2 2
RQ RQR RL
RQ RQR RL
A AA A QA AA A Q⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫
= +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦
{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q⎣ ⎦
• If there are r reactions to be obtained (other than
{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
redundants) and q redundants,
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
27
{ } { } { }11 1
R RL RQqr r r q
A A A Q×× × ×
⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
Member end actions
• Member end actions { } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
{ }A Member end actions in the released structure
{ } { } { }M ML MQ Q⎣ ⎦
{ }MLA Member end actions in the released structure due to loads
MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦Member end actions in the released structure due to unit values of redundants
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
If th b d ti d d d t
{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤
If there are m member end actions and q redundants,
{ } { } { }11 1
M ML MQqm m m q
A A A Q×× × ×
⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
29
• In the given example,In the given example,
1 2 32P P M PL P P P P= = = =
[ ] 6964
PQ ⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦As found out earlier,
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ]6456
Q ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦,
{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
To be found out
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ]DTo get [ ]JLDTo get
2 10PL ⎡ ⎤2
154JLPLDEI
=2
2138JLPLDEI
= [ ]2 10
138JLPLDEI
∴⎡ ⎤
= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
32
D⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get JQD⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get
2 23L L⎡ ⎤2
11 12
2 221 22
31 32 21 424
JQ JQJQ
JQ JQ
L LD D LEI EIDD D EIL L
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
⎡ ⎤ = = =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
21 22
2 2JQ JQ
EI EI⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
[ ] 69PQ ⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥Already we know [ ]
6456Q = ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦
Already we know,
Joint displacements
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦2 210 1 3 69
13 1 4 648 2 56PL L PEI EI
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
2 17PL ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥=
5112EI ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ }RLATo get { }RL
M AM
Released structure with loads d i
AVand reactions
1 23
3 22 2 2A
PL P L PLM M P L −= − + − =
1 2 3 2AV P P P P= + − =
{ } 12
RLRL
PAA PL
⎧ ⎫⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ }2 2
RLRL
PLA⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
RQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get
LL L L
R l d t t ith it l 1 Released structure with unit value of redundant Q1
2L
1L L
R l d t t ith it l
1 1A
− −⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Released structure with unit value of redundant Q2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2RQAL L
⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ − −⎣ ⎦
{ } { } { }⎡ ⎤
Reactions (other than redundants)
{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
2 691 1PP− −⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ 69
64562
1 12L
PPL L
⎡ ⎤⎢
⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥−− ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭⎥− −⎣ ⎦
107P ⎡ ⎤
2⎩ ⎭
1073156
PL
⎡=
⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
37
Choice of member end actions
AM BMA
V VBA
AV BV
•Any number among the 4 member end actions can be
chosen for analysis
•Usually two among the 4 are chosen•Usually two among the 4 are chosen
•Any two of the 4 member end actions can be chosen for
analysis
•Usually the moments at both ends are chosen
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Usually the moments at both ends are chosen
Member end actions
{ }MLATo get1MA A
L BA1M 2MA
Member end actions considered
are the reactive moments at the end of members in the actual structure
1 2,M MA A
1 2,ML MLA A are the reactive moments at the end of 1 2ML MLmembers in the released structure
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
PLM PL=
2P P= 3P P=1 2P P=
2PL Released
structure
2 3
2P
2P L
32PL
L
2P
B
2 P 0
L BA
1MLA = reactive moment just to the right of A2PL−
=
2MLA = reactive moment just to the left of B 32PL
=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
40
2
P2
PL
L
P P
0
3MLA = reactive moment just to the right of BPL−
=0
L
B C0
3MLA reactive moment just to the right of B2
A = reactive moment just to the left of C 0=4MLA = reactive moment just to the left of C 0=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
41
A B CPL 2P P PPL
A B C2
L L2P
P L3
2PL2P
2PL P P
2 2
0
L BA2
0L
B C0
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫
2 P 0 B C
{ }
1
2
23 2
ML
ML
A PLA PL
A
−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ }
3
4
20
MLML
ML
AA PLA
= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
42
4ML ⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭
A B CLMQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get
11L L MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
1 21 1
2Q Q
L L= =
⎡ ⎤L 0 0
0 20L L
L− −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
0
A B C2 LL L
00 0
L⎢ ⎥=
−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦1
1
L L 0 0⎣ ⎦
2L L L−
0
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
43
H b d tiHence, member end actions
{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦
2 2PL L L− − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ 0 554PL⎧ ⎫2 23 2 0 69
PL L LPL L P
⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦
0.5540.357
PLL
⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪= ⎪⎨ ⎬2 0 6456
0 0 0PL L⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦
0.6430
L= ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭0⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN44
Member end actions (with a different choice of member end actions for analysis)
Member end actions considered
{ }MLATo get
A A
In the released structure,
are SF and BM (equal to reactions) just to the left of B, and
1 2,ML MLA A
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3 4,ML MLA A are SF and BM just to the right of B
PLM PL=
2P P= 3P P=1 2P P=
2PL Released
structure
2 3
2P3PL
2P L
32PL
L
2P
BA
2 P 0A
1MLA = Shear force just to the left of B 3 2 0P P= − =
2MLA = Bending moment just to the left of B
2 3P L PLP L M
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
46
23 2 2
P L M= − + =
2PL P P2
0L
B CB C
A = Shear force just to the right of B3MLA = Shear force just to the right of B
12 2 2 0P P P P= − = − =
4MLA = Bending moment just to the right of B4ML g j g
122 2PL PLPL M−
= − + +2 2
22PL PL PLPL PL− −+ +
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
47
22 2 2
PL PL= − + + =
A B CPL 2P P PPL
A B C2
L L
P L 3P L2P PL P
2P
2P L
2
0L
2P2
PL
L
P P
0⎧ ⎫
2 P0 0
{ }
1
2
03
2ML
ML
A PLA
A
⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ } 2
3
4
20
MLML
ML
ML
AAA PL
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
48
4
2ML⎩ ⎭ −⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
A B CLMQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦To get
11L L
MQA⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
1 21 1
1 1Q Q= =
⎡ ⎤L 0 0
1 10 L⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1 1
L0
L
A B C2 LL L
0 10 L
⎢ ⎥=−⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦1
1
L L 0 L−⎣ ⎦
2L L
L
L−
1L
1Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
491 111−
Hence, member end actions
{ } { } { }A A A Q⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
5⎡ ⎤
01 13PL
⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ 5
20LP⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
=
30 692
0 0 1 6456
PLL P
⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ 6456
36L⎢ ⎥⎢
⎦⎥
⎣
0 0 1 64560PL L
⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ −⎣ ⎦−⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭2⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN50
Flexibilities of prismatic membersp
•Flexibility coefficients of a structure are calculated from the contributions of individual members
•Hence it is worthwhile to construct member flexibility matrices for various types of actionsyp
•Member oriented axes (local coordinates) and structure oriented axes (global coordinates)
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
51
Member flexibility matrices for prismatic members with
B b
one end fixed and the other free3 2L L⎡ ⎤•Beam member
[ ] 11 122
21 22
3 2M MMi
M M
L LF F EI EIFF F L L
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦21 22
2M MF F L L
EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ] LF =•Truss member [ ]MiFEA
=•Truss member
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Plane frame member Plane frame member
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1
FM33
11 12 13 3 2
0 0M M M
LEAF F F
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥
⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥[ ]
11 12 13 3 2
21 22 23
231 32 33
03 2
M M M
Mi M M M
M M M
L LF F F FEI EI
F F FL L
⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
231 32 33
02
M M M L LEI EI
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
G id b •Grid member
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
FM31
FM33
3 2L L⎡ ⎤
[ ]11 12 13
03 2
M M M
L LEI EIF F F
L
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥
⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥[ ] 21 22 23
231 32 33
0 0Mi M M M
M M M
LF F F FGJ
F F FL L
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎢ ⎥
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
02L LEI EI
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
•Space frame member •Space frame member
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
0 0 0 0 0LE A
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥3 2
0 0 0 03 2Z Z
E AL LE I E I
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
[ ]
3 2
0 0 0 03 2
Z Z
Y Y
L LE I E I
F
⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥[ ]
0 0 0 0 0M iF
LG J
⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥2
0 0 0 02 Y Y
L LE I E I
⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
2
0 0 0 02 Z Z
L LE I E I
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Formalization of the Flexibility method(Explanation using principle of complimentary virtual work)
{ } [ ]{ }D F A
For each member,
{ } [ ]{ }Mi Mi MiD F A=
contains relative displacements of the k end { }DH contains relative displacements of the k end with respect to j end of the i-th member{ }MiDHere
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•If there are m members in the structure,
{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }11 10 0 0 0MM MFD A⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥{ }{ }
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
{ }{ }
22 2
33 3
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
MM M
MM M
FD AFD A
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥
{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }0 0 0 0MiMi MiFD A
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥
{ } [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { }0 0 0 0 MmMm MmFD A
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦
{ } [ ]{ }D F A
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ } [ ]{ }M M MD F A=
{ } [ ]{ }M M MD F A={ } [ ]{ }M M M
[ ]MF is the unassembled flexibility matrix of the entire structure
{ }MA{ }A
•Member end actions in will be related to the structure actions applied to the released structure
{ }SA { }JA { }QAconsists of joint loads and redundant actions
{ }SAstructure actions applied to the released structure.
{ }S { }J { }Qj
{ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B A=Hence,A i f i i Action transformation matrix (equilibrium matrix)
{ } [ ]{ }{ }
JM MJ MQ
AA B B
⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦i.e.,
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ } [ ] { }M MJ MQQA⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
[ ]B { }A { }A andl t to[ ]MJB
MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
{ }MA { }JA
{ }QA
andrelate to
relate to{ }MA
•Each column in the submatrix consists of [ ]MJB
MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ { }Qrelate { }M
•Each column in the submatrix consists of member end actions caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.
[ ]MJB
pp
•Each column in the submatrix consists of member end actions caused by a unit value of a
MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦member end actions caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to the released structure.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ }SAδ•Suppose an arbitrary set of virtual actions { }SSuppose an arbitrary set of virtual actions is applied on the structure.
{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }{ }
JM MS S MJ MQ
AA B A B B
A
δδ δ
δ
⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
{ } [ ]{ } [ ] { }QQAδ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
External complimentary virtual work produced by the { }SAδ { }SD
External complimentary virtual work produced by the virtual loads and actual displacements is
{ } { } { } { }TT T* JDW A D A Aδ δ δ δ
⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎨ ⎬{ } { } { } { }T T JS S J Q
QW A D A A
Dδ δ δ δ⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Internal complimentary virtual work produced by the virtual member end actions and actual (relative) { }MAδend displacements is
{ }M
{ }MD
{ } { }T*M MU A Dδ δ=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•Equating the above two (principle of complimentary i t l k)
{ } { } { } { }T TS S M MA D A Dδ δ=
virtual work),
{ } { } { } { }S S M MA D A Dδ δ
{ } [ ]{ }{ } [ ]{ }A A { } [ ]{ }M M MD F A={ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B A=But and
{ } [ ]{ }M MS SA B Aδ δ=Also,
{ } { } { } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }TT TS S S MS M MS SA D A B F B Aδ δ=Hence, { } { } { } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }S S S MS M MS S
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }TD B F B A{ } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }S MS M MS SD B F B A=
{ } [ ]{ }S S SD F A=
[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TF B F B
Where,
the assembled flexibility matrix [ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B= , the assembled flexibility matrix
for the entire structure.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ]SF is partitioned into submatrices related to:[ ]S
{ }JA
p
joint loads
{ }QAand redundant actions
{ } [ ]{ }{ } [ ] { }JJ JQJ JF FD A
A⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬{ } [ ]{ }
{ }{ }
[ ] { }{ }
QJ J
Q QQJ
S S S
DD AF F
F A ⎪ ⎪ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦
=⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
⇒
T T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
Where,
[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B= [ ] [ ]T
JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ][ ]T
QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ [ ]T
QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
{ } { } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q QJ J QQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
1{ } { } { }1
Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣⇒ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
In the subsequent calculations, the above {AQ} should be d
However the final values of redundants are obtained
used.
However, the final values of redundants are obtained by including actual or equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supports.y pp
{ } { } { }Q QC QFINALA A A= − +Thus, { } { } { }Q QC QFINAL,
{ }QCA represents actual and equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supports, corresponding to redundants
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
70
redundants.
{ }{ }QA
{ }JD• Once redundants are found,
can be found out from,
{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦
{ }J ,
{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
71
• Similarly, support reactions caused by joint loads and redundant can be obtained with an action transformation matrix [ ]RSB[ ]RS
{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }JA⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }{ }
JR RS S RJ RQ
Q
A B A B BA
⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
•Each column in the submatrix consists of support i d b i l f j i l d li d
[ ]RJBreactions caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.
B⎡ ⎤RQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦•Each column in the submatrix consists of support reactions caused by a unit value of a
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
pp yredundant applied to the released structure.
• If actual or equivalent joint loads are applied • If actual or equivalent joint loads are applied directly to the supports,
{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦
t bi d j i t l d ( t l d { }RCA represents combined joint loads (actual and equivalent) applied directly to the supports.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•As seen earlier, member end actions due to actual loads ,are obtained by superimposing member end actions due to restraint actions and combined joint loads
{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ Q⎣ ⎦
{ }Awhere represents fixed end actions{ }MFAwhere represents fixed end actions
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Comparison of the procedures explained with principle of superposition and principle of complimentary virtual work•For calculating redundants,
{ } [ ] { } { }( )1Q F D D−P i i l f iti
Principle of complimentary virtual work
{ } [ ] { } { }( )Q QLQ F D D= −Principle of superposition
{ } { } { }1
Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
Principle of complimentary virtual work
{ } { } { }Q QQ Q QJ J⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
[ ]F F⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦H [ ] QQF F⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦Hence,
{ } { }D F A⎡ ⎤d{ } { }Q A
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
{ } { }QL QJ JD F A⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦and{ } { }QQ A=
•For calculating joint displacements,g j p
{ } { } { }J JL JQD D D Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition
Principle of complimentary virtual work
{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦
{ } [ ]{ }JL JJ JD F A=Hence and{ } [ ]{ }JL JJ JD F A
JQ JQD F⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Hence, and
Q Q⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•For calculating member end actions,g ,
{ } { } { }M ML MQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition
Principle of complimentary virtual work
{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦
{ } { } [ ]{ }ML MF MJ JA A B A= +Hence, and
MQ MQA B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
•For calculating support reactions•For calculating support reactions,
{ } { } { }R RL RQA A A Q⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Principle of superposition
Principle of complimentary virtual work
{ } { } { }R RL RQ Q⎣ ⎦p p p
{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦
{ } { } [ ]{ }RL RC RJ JA A B A= − +Hence, and
RQ RQA B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Member flexibility matrix for a beam member with t t th d b d timoments at the ends as member end actions
Required to find out rotations at the ends due to unit h d l
12x d yM EI−
= = −
moments at each end separately
1
1 1x
2xM EIL dx
= =
2d1L
1L
x 2
12dy xEI Cdx L
= +
3
1 26xEIy C x CL
= + +
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
79
1 26L
0 Ly C −= ⇒ =0 0y C= ⇒ = 10
6x Ly C== ⇒ =2
00 0
xy C== ⇒ =
212 6
dy x Ldx EI L
⎛ ⎞∴ = −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
L Ly y−′ ′0
,6 3x x L
y yEI EI= =
= =
1 1 3MLFE I
= 21 6MLF
EI−
=6
1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1
Similarly,
LFLF −
111 3MF
EI=12 6MF
EI=
11 12 3 6L L
F F EI EI−⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12
21 22
3 6
6 3
M MMi
M M
F F EI EIFF F L L
EI EI
⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤∴ = = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
81
6 3EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Member flexibility matrix for a beam member with t d h t d b d timoment and shear at one end as member end actions
3 2L LF F
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12
221 22
3 2M MMi
M M
F F EI EIFF F L L
⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
SummarySummary
Flexibility method
• Flexibility matrices for truss beam and frame elements –load transformation matrix-development of total flexibility matrix of the structure .
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
83
James Clerk Maxwell (13 June 1831 – 5 November 1879) was a Scottish theoretical physicist and 1879) was a Scottish theoretical physicist and mathematician. His most important achievement was classical electromagnetic theory. Maxwell also developed the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, a p ,statistical means of describing aspects of the kinetic theory of gases. These two discoveries helped usher in the era of modern physics, laying the foundation for p y y gsuch fields as special relativity and quantum mechanics.Maxwell is also known for creating the first true colour photograph in 1861 and for his foundational work on the rigidity of rod-and-joint frameworks like those in many bridges.
Maxwell is considered by many physicists to be the 19th-century scientist with the greatest influence on 20th-century physics. His contributions to the science are considered by many to be of the same magnitude as those of Isaac Newton y y gand Albert Einstein. Einstein himself described Maxwell's work as the "most profound and the most fruitful that physics has experienced since the time of Newton." Einstein kept a photograph of Maxwell on his study wall, alongside
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
84
pictures of Michael Faraday and Newton.
Christian Otto Mohr (October 8, 1835 – October 2, 1918) was a German civil engineer one of the most 1918) was a German civil engineer, one of the most celebrated of the nineteenth century.Starting in 1855, his early working life was spent in railroad engineering for the Hanover and Oldenburg railroad engineering for the Hanover and Oldenburg state railways, designing some famous bridges and making some of the earliest uses of steel trusses.Even during his early railway years, Mohr had g y y y ,developed an interest in the theories of mechanics and the strength of materials. In 1867, he became professor of mechanics at Stuttgart Polytechnic, and p g yin 1873 at Dresden Polytechnic in 1873. In 1874, Mohr formalised the idea of a statically determinate structure.
In 1882, he famously developed the graphical method for analysing stress known as Mohr's circle and used it to propose an early theory of strength based on shear stress He also developed the Williot-Mohr diagram for truss on shear stress. He also developed the Williot Mohr diagram for truss displacements and the Maxwell-Mohr method for analysing statically indeterminate structures, it can also be used to determine the displacement of truss nodes and forces acting on each member. The Maxwell-Mohr method is
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
85
galso referred to as the virtual force method for redundant trusses.