Upload
prasanna-shanmugasundaram
View
82
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Performance Analysis of CREIDO Enhanced Chord Overlay Protocol for
Wireless Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks(WSN)
• Potential societal applications like Body Area Networks, etc.
• Becomes data generating and people centric nodes in recentapplications like urban sensing etc.
• Data has to be managed and transported in a appropriate manner.
• So, Chord Overlay Protocol is implemented over WSNs and anamendment is proposed to traditional chord to improve PacketDelivery Ratio.
SOME USEFUL APPLICATIONS
Chord Overlay Protocol
• Chord is a ring like structure.
• Connections to the nodes are in logarithmic distance.
• Each node has a successor and a predecessor contiguous in the ring.
• Nodes maintain a routing table with m entries called finger table.
An Example Chord Ring
• A chord with 16 vertices.
• This chord structure will have4 entries in the finger table.
Advantages of Chord Overlay Protocol
• Load Balancing
• Decentralization
• Flexible Naming
• Scalability
Stabilize Function
• Used in Chord to make the architecture robust.
• Runs periodically to check new nodes joins and failures to modify routing entries.
• Periodical execution incurs overhead in power restricted sensor networks also leading to unstable architecture resulting in low Packet delivery ration.
CREIDO Packet
• Periodical light weight packet.
• Every nodes sends CREIDO packet to its successor and predecessor.
• When a node departs, CREIDO packets from that particular node is stopped making the neighbours to run stabilize function.
• When a node joins, it sends CREIDO to the neighbour notifying its new presence to run stabilize function.
Results
• Simulator: OverSim framework for OMNeT++
• No. of Nodes: 25 nodes
• Simulation Time:1500s.
• Metrics: Packet Delivery Ratio(PDR), Throughput and Control Packet Overhead(CPO).
• Mobility model: Random waypoint model
• CREIDO periodicity: 10s, 15s and 20s.
Results (contd.)
Packet Delivery Ratio:
CREIDO PERIODICITY (seconds) INCREASE IN PDR (percentage)
10 14
15 19
20 12
Results (contd.)
Throughput:
CREIDO PERIODICITY (seconds) INCREASE IN THROUGHPUT (PERCENTAGE)
10 10
15 14
20 13
Results (contd.)
Control Packet Overhead:
CREIDO PERIODICITY(seconds) INCREASE (IN PERCENTAGE)
10 9
15 12
15 9
Conclusion
• Simulation results describes that PDR, Throughput and CPO is escalated to 15%, 12.33 %, 10% respectively.
• Future expansion is analysing the proposed model for various movement models and mitigating the security issues arising due to the amendment of CREIDO packets.