32
PROS and CONS of REACTORS

PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

PROS and CONS of REACTORS

Page 2: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Reactor PerformanceInformation needed to predict the reactor behaviour:

KINETICS

how fast things happen?

input output

CONTACTING PATTERNS

how materials flow & contact each other?

Output = f (input, kinetics, contacting)Performance equation

• very fast - equilibrium• slow - rate, mass, heat • flowing patterns

• contact• aggregation etc.

Page 3: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

The Nature of the Reactor Design Problem

1. What is the composition of the feedstock, conditions, and purification Procedures?

2. What is the scale and capacity of the process?3. Is Catalyst needs?4. What is operating condition?5. Continuous or batch process?6. What type of the reactor best meets the process

requirement?7. What size and shape reactor should be used?8. How are the energy transfer?

Page 4: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

How to choose the reactor• Yield (should be large)• Cost (Should be economic)• Safety Consideration• Pollution

How to Reactor DesignFirstly; You have to know reaction rate expressionSecondly; fluid velocity, temperature process, composition and characteristic of species

Page 5: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Source of the essential data for reactor design

1. Bench scale experiment (Laboratory Scale)The reactors is designed to operate at constant temperature, under condition (minimize heat transfer and mass transfer)

2. Pilot plant studiesThe reactors used is larger than bench scale

3. Operating data from commercial scale reactorThe data come from another company and it can be used to design reactor. Unfortunately, data are often incomplete, inaccurate,

Page 6: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Reactor TypeBatch Reactors (Stirred Tanks)1. The Batch reactor is the generic term for a type of vessel (Cylinder

Tank) widely used in the process industries. 2. A typical batch reactor consists of a tank with an agitator and

integral heating/cooling system. Heating/cooling uses jacketed walls, internal coil, and internal tube.

Batch reactor with single external cooling jacket

Batch reactor with half coil jacket

Batch reactor with constant flux (Coflux) jacket

Page 7: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Advantages1. Batch reactor Can be stopped between batches, so the production

rate is flexible2. Batch reactors are more flexible, in that one can easly use different

compositions in different batches to produces product with different spesification

3. If the process degrades the reactor in some way, a batch reactor can be cleaned, relined, etc. between batches. Where continuous reactors must run a long time before that can be done.

4. If the reactant are stirred, a batche reactor can often achieve better quality than a plug flow reactor, and better productivity than a CSTR

Page 8: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Batch Reactor types

semi-batch reactor

• flexible system but more difficult to analyse• good control of reaction speed • applications:

• calorimetric titrations (lab)• open hearth furnaces for steel production (ind.)

Page 9: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Batch Reactor- design equations -

reactor the inreactant of

onaccumulatiof rate

reactor the in reaction chemical

to due lossreactant of rate

reactor ofout flow

reactantof rate

reactorinto flow

reactantof rate

reactor the inreactant of

onaccumulatiof rate

reactor the in reaction chemical

to due lossreactant of rate

Page 10: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Batch Reactor- design equations -

fluid of volumefluid) of ume(time)(vol

reacting A moles

VrA )(

dtdN A

dtdNVr A

A )(

reactor the inreactant of

onaccumulatiof rate

reactor the in reaction chemical

to due lossreactant of rate

Page 11: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Batch Reactor- design equations -

dtdNVr A

A )(

dtdXN

dtXNd

dtdN A

AAAA

00 )]1([

dt

dXNVr AAA 0)(

AX

A

AA Vr

dXNt00 )(

design equation

= time required to achieve conversion XA

0ANtarea

Page 12: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Batch Reactor- design equations / special cases -

AX

A

AA Vr

dXNt00 )(

Const. density

AA X

A

AA

X

A

AA

rdXC

rdX

VNt

0000

)()(

A

A

A C

CA

AX

A

AA r

dCr

dXCt0 )()(00

0ACtarea

tarea

Page 13: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor

• In a CSTR, one or more fluid reagents are introduced into a tank reactor equipped with an impeller. The impeller stirs the reagents to ensure proper mixing

Impeller

Page 14: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Some important aspects of the CSTR

• At steady-state, the flow rate in must equal the mass flow rate out, otherwise the tank will overflow or go empty (transient state).

• All calculations performed with CSTRs assume perect mixing.

• The reaction proceeds at the reaction rate associated with the final (output) concentration.

• Often, it is economically beneficial to operate several CSTR in series. This allows, for example, the first CSTR to operate at a higher reagent concentration and therefore a higher reaction rate. In these cases, the sizes of the reactors may be varied in order to minimize the total capital investment required to implement the process.

• It can be seen that an infinite number of infinitely small CSTR operating in series would be equivalent to a PFR.

Page 15: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Advantages and DisadvantagesKinds of Phases Present

Usage Advantages Disadvantages

1. Liquid phase2. Gas-liquid rxns3. Solid-liquid rxns

1. When agitation is required

2. Series configurations for different concentration streams

1. Continuous operation

2. Good temperature control

3. Easily adapts to two phase runs

4. Good control5. Simplicity of

construction6. Low operating

(labor) cost7. Easy to clean

1. Lowest conversion per unit volume

2. By-passing and channeling possible with poor agitation

Page 16: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

CSTR Reactor- design equations -

reactor the inreactant of

onaccumulatiof rate

reactor the in reaction chemical

to due lossreactant of rate

reactor ofout flow

reactantof rate

reactorinto flow

reactantof rate

reactor the in reaction chemical

to due lossreactant of rate

reactor ofout flow

reactantof rate

reactorinto flow

reactantof rate

VrA )(

Page 17: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

CSTR Reactor- design equations -

000 )1( AAA FXF

000 AA CvF

flow volumetricv 0flow molarFA 0

sm /3

smol /

reactor into flow

reactant of rate smol /

reactor of out flow

reactant of rate )1(0 AAA XFF

VrXFF AAAA )()1(00 design equation

FA 0XA ( rA )V

smol /

Page 18: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Flow Reactor- space-time / space-velocity -

1s

time required to process one reactor volumeof feed measured at specified conditions

Performance measures of flow reactors:

2 min – every 2 min one reactor volume of feed at specified conditions is treated by the reactor

s 1

number of reactor volumes of feed at specifiedconditions which can be treated in unit time

5 hr-1 – 5 reactor volumes of feed at specified conditions are fed into reactor per hour

Ex.

Ex.

Page 19: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Ideal Flow Reactor- space-time / space-velocity -

1s

CA 0VFA 0

moles A enteringvolume of feed

volume of reactor

moles of A enteringtime

Vv0

reactor volume

volumetric feed rate

Residence time

Page 20: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

CSTR Reactor- design equations -

VFA 0

CA 0

XA

rA

FA 0XA ( rA )V

1s

CA 0VFA 0

Vv0

Design equation:

Residence time:

area V

FA 0

CA 0

A 0

Vv0

CA 0VFA 0

CA 0XA

rA

Page 21: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

CSTR Reactor- design equations / general & special

case -

VFA 0

XA

rA

CA CA 0

CA 0( rA )

XA 1 CA

CA 0

Special case - constant density:

Vv0

CA 0XA

rA

CA CA 0

rA

Feed entering partially converted:

VFA 0

XAf XAi

rA f

VCA 0

FA 0

CA 0(XAf XAi)

rA f

A 0

Page 22: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Plug Flow ReactorDefinition.

“Each and every particle having same residence time, back mixing not allowed.”

The plug flow reactor (PFR) model is used to describe Chemical Reaction in continuous, flowing systems. One application of the PFR model is the estimation of key reactor variables, such as the dimensions of the reactor. PFRs are also sometimes called as Continuous Tubular Reactors (CTRs)

Page 23: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Plug Flow Reactor• The PFR model works well for many fluids: liquids, gases, and

slurries. • Fluid Flow is sometimes turbulent flow or axial diffusion, it is

sufficient to promote mixing in the axial direction, which undermines the required assumption of zero axial mixing. However if these effects are sufficiently small and can be subsequently ignored.

• The PFR can be used to multiple reactions as well as reactions involving changing temperatures, pressures and densities of the flow.

Page 24: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Advantages and disadvantages • Plug flow reactors have a high volumetric unit conversion,

run for long periods of time without labor, and can have excellent heat transfer due to the ability to customize the diameter to the desired value by using parallel reactors.

• Disadvantages of plug flow reactors are that temperatures are hard to control and can result in undesirable temperature gradients. PFR maintenance is expensive. Shutdown and cleaning may be expensive.

ApplicationsPlug flow reactors are used for some of the following applications:• Large-scale reactions • Fast reactions• Homogeneous or heterogeneous reactions• Continuous production • High-temperature reactions

Page 25: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Steady-State Plug Flow Reactor- definition -

The composition of the fluid varies from point to point No mixing or diffusion of the fluid along the flow path Material balance – for a differential element of volume dV (not the whole

reactor!)

Characteristics:

onaccumulatireaction by

ncedisappearaoutputinput

Material balance:

=0

Page 26: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Steady-State Plug Flow Reactor- material balance -

Input of A [moles/time] AF

Output of A [moles/time] AA dFF

Disappearance of A by rxn. dVrA )(

dV

Page 27: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Steady-State Plug Flow Reactor- material balance -

dVrdFFF AAAA )(

dV

ncedisappearaoutputinput

AAAAA dXFXFddF 00 )1( )1(0 AAA XFF

dVrdF AA )(

dVrdXF AAA )(0 AfX

A

AV

A rdX

FdV

000

design equation

Page 28: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Steady-State Plug Flow Reactor- design equations -

AfX

A

AV

A rdX

FdV

000

AfX

A

A

AA rdX

CFV

000

AfX

A

AA

A

A

rdXC

FVC

vV

000

0

0

000 AA CvF

flow volumetricv 0flow molarFA 0

sm /3

smol /

A 0

If the feed enters partially converted

Af

Ai

X

XA

A

AA rdX

CFV

00

Af

Ai

X

XA

AA

A

A

rdXC

FVC

vV

00

0

0

Af

Ai

Af X

X

X

0

Page 29: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Fixed Bed Reactor• Solids take part in reaction unsteady state or semi-batch

mode• Over some time, solids either replaced or regenerated

1 2

CA,in

CA,out

Regeneration

Page 30: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Fluidized bed reactor • A fluidized bed reactor (FBR) is a type of reactor that

can be used to carry out a variety of multiphase chemical reactions. In this type of reactor, a fluid (gas or liquid) is passed through a granular solid material (usually a catalyst possibly shaped as tiny spheres) at high enough velocity to suspend the solid.

Page 31: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Advantages • Uniform Particle Mixing: Due to the intrinsic fluid-like behavior of the solid

material, fluidized beds do not experience poor mixing as in packed beds. This complete mixing allows for a uniform product that can often be hard to achieve in other reactor designs. The elimination of radial and axial concentration also allows for better fluid-solid contact, which is essential for reaction efficiency and quality.

• Uniform Temperature: Many chemical reactions produce or require the addition of heat. Local hot or cold spots within the reaction bed, often a problem in packed beds, are avoided in a fluidized situation such as a FBR. In other reactor types, these local temperature differences, especially hotspots, can result in product degradation. Thus FBR are well suited to exothermic reactions. Researchers have also learned that the bed-to-surface heat transfer coefficients for FBR are high.

• Ability to Operate Reactor in Continuous State: The fluidized bed nature of these reactors allows for the ability to continuously withdraw product and introduce new reactants into the reaction vessel. Operating at a continuous process state allows manufacturers to produce their various products more efficiently due to the removal of startup conditions in batch process.

Page 32: PROS and CONS of REACTORS, Chemical Engineering

Disadvantages • Increased Reactor Vessel Size: Because of the expansion of the bed materials in the

reactor, a larger vessel is often required than that for a packed bed reactor. This larger vessel means that more must be spent on initial startup costs.

• Pumping Requirements and Pressure Drop: The requirement for the fluid to suspend the solid material necessitates that a higher fluid velocity is attained in the reactor. In order to achieve this, more pumping power and thus higher energy costs are needed. In addition, the pressure drop associated with deep beds also requires additional pumping power.

• Particle Entrainment: The high gas velocities present in this style of reactor often result in fine particles becoming entrained in the fluid. These captured particles are then carried out of the reactor with the fluid, where they must be separated. This can be a very difficult and expensive problem to address depending on the design and function of the reactor. This may often continue to be a problem even with other entrainment reducing technologies.

• Lack of Current Understanding: Current understanding of the actual behavior of the materials in a fluidized bed is rather limited. It is very difficult to predict and calculate the complex mass and heat flows within the bed. Due to this lack of understanding, a pilot plant for new processes is required. Even with pilot plants, the scale-up can be very difficult and may not reflect what was experienced in the pilot trial.

• Erosion of Internal Components: The fluid-like behavior of the fine solid particles within the bed eventually results in the wear of the reactor vessel. This can require expensive maintenance and upkeep for the reaction vessel and pipes.