21
Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology Mikko Mäkelä Sveriges landbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology Division of Biomass Technology and Chemistry Umeå, Sweden

S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

  • Upload
    cacheme

  • View
    309

  • Download
    10

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Session 3 – Central composite designs, second order models, ANOVA, blocking, qualitative factors An intensive practical course mainly for PhD-students on the use of designs of experiments (DOE) and response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization problems. The course covers relevant background, nomenclature and general theory of DOE and RSM modelling for factorial and optimisation designs in addition to practical exercises in Matlab. Due to time limitations, the course concentrates on linear and quadratic models on the k≤3 design dimension. This course is an ideal starting point for every experimental engineering wanting to work effectively, extract maximal information and predict the future behaviour of their system. Mikko Mäkelä (DSc, Tech) is a postdoctoral fellow at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Umeå, Sweden and is currently visiting the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Alicante. He is working in close cooperation with Paul Geladi, Professor of Chemometrics, and using DOE and RSM for process optimization mainly for the valorization of industrial wastes in laboratory and pilot scales.” Schedule and details: The course took place at the University of Alicante and would not had been possible without the support of the Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería de Procesos Químicos.

Citation preview

Page 1: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

Mikko Mäkelä

Sveriges landbruksuniversitetSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Department of Forest Biomaterials and TechnologyDivision of Biomass Technology and ChemistryUmeå, Sweden

Page 2: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Contents

Practical course, arranged in 4 individual sessions:

Session 1 – Introduction, factorial design, first order models

Session 2 – Matlab exercise: factorial design

Session 3 – Central composite designs, second order models, ANOVA,

blocking, qualitative factors

Session 4 – Matlab exercise: practical optimization example on given

data

Page 3: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Session 1

Introduction

Why experimental design

Factorial design

Design matrix

Model equation = coefficients

Residual

Response contour

Page 4: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Session 2

Factorial design

Research problem

Design matrix

Model equation = coefficients

Degrees of freedom

Predicted response

Residual

ANOVA

R2

Response contour

Page 5: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Session 3

Central composite designs

Design variance

Common designs

Second order models

Stationary points

ANOVA

Blocking

Confounding

Qualitative factors

Page 6: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Session 4Uncontrolled factors

Factor coding

Realized vs. planned

Response transformation

Coefficients

Observed vs. predicted

Residuals

ANOVA

Contour

Estimated prediction variance

Confidence interval

Page 7: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

A cuboidal (α=1, nc=3) central composite design to

study the effect of three factors on a response

Inlet air temperature, T: 0-90 °C

Slit height, S: 70-150 mm

Sludge feeding, F: 275-775 kg/h

Ambient RH (%) included as an uncontrolled

factor

Cuboidal designα = 1

Page 8: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 9: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Factor coding?

Uncontrolled factors?

Page 10: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problemN:o T S F RH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Page 11: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 12: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 13: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 14: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 15: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Parameter df Sum of squares (SS)

Meansquare (MS) F-value p-value

Total corrected

Regression

Residual

Lack of fit

Pure error

Page 16: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 17: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

′ where

⋯ , ⋮ and

/2 ⋯ /2⋯ /2⋱ ⋮

sym.

→ 0

Page 18: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Research problem

Page 19: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Session 4Uncontrolled factors

Factor coding

Realized vs. planned

Response transformation

Coefficients

Observed vs. predicted

Residuals

ANOVA

Contour

Estimated prediction variance

Confidence interval

Page 20: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

How to continue?

Literature Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM, Response Surface Methodology,

Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd ed., John Wiley &

Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009 (recommended)

Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wikström C, Wold S, Design of

Experiments, Principles and Applications, 3rd ed., Umetrics, Umeå,2008 (useful for

beginners)

Software Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc.), Modde (Umetrics), Design Expert® (Stat-Ease, Inc.),

JMP (SAS Institute Inc.), Minitab (Minitab Inc.)

Page 21: S4 - Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology - Session 4/4

Thank you for participating!

You can contact me via

E-mail ([email protected])

ResearchGate (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mikko_Maekelae)

LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikkomaekelae)