18
SIMULATED ANNEALING STOCHASTIC OR RANDOMIZED APPROACH FOR ESCAPING LOCAL OPTIMA OPTIMIZATION

Simulated annealing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Simulated annealing

SIMULATED ANNEALING

STOCHASTIC OR RANDOMIZED APPROACH FOR ESCAPING LOCAL

OPTIMA

OPTIMIZATION

Page 2: Simulated annealing

HILL CLIMBING

GLOBAL OPTIMUMLOCAL OPTIMUM

Let us consider one-dimensional search space as below:HILL CLIMBING WILL REACH LOCAL OPTIMA AND MAY STOP THEREHILLCLIMBING-EXPLOITATION OF GRADIENTSO GLOBAL OPTIMA MAY NOT BE ACHIEVEDLET C-CURRENT NODEN-NEXT NODE

LOOPMOVE FROM C TO N IF BEST(MOVEGEN(C) IS BETTER THAN CEND LOOP;

Page 3: Simulated annealing

RANDOM WALK

• RANDOM WALK IS CHOOSING JUST RANDOM NEXT NODE

• IT IS NOTHING BUT EXPLORATION

Page 4: Simulated annealing

GOING BEYOND LOCAL OPTIMA-APPROACHES

• TABU SEARCH• STOCHASTIC HILL CLIMBING• SIMULATED ANNEALING

Page 5: Simulated annealing

OPTIMIZATION

• OPTIMIZATION IS HAPPENING IN PHYSICAL WORLD AND NATURE

• OPTIMIZATION IN PHYSICAL WORLD REPRESENTS THE WAY ATOMS ARE ARRANGED IN MATERIALS

• FOR EXAMPLE IF ATOMS ARE IN ARRAY –CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE IS FORMED

Page 6: Simulated annealing

OPTIMIZATION

• SO BASIC METHOD OF ACHIEVING A WELL DEFINED PHYSICAL MATERIAL IS BY GRADUALLY1. HAVING A LIQUID FORM OF MATERIAL2. AND SLOWLY COOLING IT DOWN TO FORM

MOLTEN MATERIAL– THIS PROCESS CALLED CASTING IS USED IN

MAKING BRONZE STATUES etc…

Page 7: Simulated annealing

Optimization

• Final form of materials- low energy materials –minimum energy state

• Physical process of MINIMIZATION-ANNEALING

• ANNEALING is nothing but CONTROLLED COOLING

Page 8: Simulated annealing

OPTIMIZATION

• HILL CLIMBING -> Generate neighbors of a given candidate. Inspect their evaluation Heuristic value and depending on that move to efficient nearest neighbor->It can reach local optima.

• RANDOM WALK-UNGUIDED.It Can choose ANY random points-EXPLORATION

• For optimizing we need a mixture of both

Page 9: Simulated annealing

Maximizing and Minimizing Functions

• C-> Current node• N-> next node• eval(c)- Fitness function of c• eval (n)-Fitness function of n• Maximizing function means

Move to n if eval(n)>eval(c)• Minimizing function means

Move to n if eval(n)<eval(c)

Page 10: Simulated annealing

Optimization • Take a Random Neighbour• Then we make a decision to move to that neighbour or not• So we take

– ∆E=eval(n)-eval(c), for maximizing• For maximizing problems if ∆E>0 (OR) positive we will

surely make a move with HIGHER PROBABILITY• With negative ∆E,we will still allow moves with lower

probability• So we NEED A FUNCTION to compute probability such that

– ∆E should influence probability– A control variable how much ∆E should influence probability

Page 11: Simulated annealing

SIGMOIDAL FUNCTION

• WE WILL CHOOSE THAT FUNCTION TO BE SIGMOIDAL

• P(c,n)=1/(1+e- ∆E/T )

• T-CONTROL VARIABLE

Page 12: Simulated annealing

STOCHASTIC HILL CLIMBING

• n<-random neighbor(c)• Evaluate ∆E– ∆E=eval(n)-eval(c)

• Move with Probability– P(c,n)=1/(1+e- ∆E/T )

Page 13: Simulated annealing

EXAMPLES-EFFECT of ∆E• LET US ASSUME T=10,eval(c)=107

eval(n) -∆E e- ∆E/T ProbabilityP(c,n)

Comments

80 27 14.88 0.06 Move with small probability

100 7 2.01 0.33 1/3rd chance

107 0 1.0 0.5 Eval(c)=eval(n)Can make move or cannot make

120 -13 0.27 0.78 Move with Higher Probability

150 -43 0.01 0.99 Move with very Higher Probability

Page 14: Simulated annealing

EXAMPLES-EFFECT of ∆E

• The previous table illustrates HOW STOCHASTIC HILL CLIMBING RESPONDS TO DIFFERENT VALUES OF ∆E

• HOW TO CHOOSE T is the next Question?• Let us take this case which is better one and

evaluate how T effects this case:eval(n) -∆E e- ∆E/T Probability

P(c,n)Comments

120 -13 0.27 0.78 Move with Higher Probability

Page 15: Simulated annealing

How T effects a Sample case when EVAL(N)=120

T e-13/T Probability P Inference

1 0.000002 1.0 SIMILAR TO HILL CLIMBING

5 0.074 0.93

10 0.27 0.78

20 0.52 0.66

50 0.77 0.56

1010 0.9999 0.5 SIMILAR TO RANDOM WALK

1. As energy level increases or T-Temperature value increases it becomes RANDOM WALK

2. IF we want to EXPLORE MORE or want more RANDOMNESS we make Temperature Very high irrespective of ∆E

3. IF we want to follow the GRADIENT we make TEMPERATURE AS LOW.

Page 16: Simulated annealing

SIGMOIDAL PLOT

1

∆E=0

T=1

0.5T=1010

SIGMOIDAL FUNCTION

Page 17: Simulated annealing

SIMULATED ANNEALING-ALGORITHM

• SET T<-VERY HIGH VALUE• OUTER LOOP – INNER LOOP

• N<-RANDOM NEIGHBOR(C) • Evaluate ∆E

– ∆E=eval(n)-eval(c)• Move with Probability

– P(c,n)=1/(1+e- ∆E/T )

– END INNER LOOP– T<-MONOTONIC DECREASING FUNCTION(T)

• END OUTER LOOP

Page 18: Simulated annealing

MONOTONIC DECREASING FUNCTION(T)

• IT IS CALLED COOLOING RATE• SIMPLEST IS T<-T-1