View
307
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An exploration of evergreen agriculture
approaches for scaling up in East Africa
Jonathan Muriuki ICRAF, Nairobi
Synopsis
The regional context
The evergreen agriculture idea
The project objectives
Results from capacity building objective in Machakos, Kenya
Conclusion
HUMID
HIGHLANDS
High Pop. Density
(Home to > 50 % of
region’s pop)
Supply > 50 % of
regions staple &
cash crops
Important water
towers
Rainfed & irrigated
agriculture
Major crops: Maize,
potato, banana,
wheat, coffee, tea,
arrow roots
DRYLANDS
81 % of total land
mass
Significant in
Kenya (75 %);
Tanzania &
Ethiopia (50 %)
Pastoralism / Agro-
pastoralism
Irrigated and
rainfed agriculture
Major crops:
Sorghum, millet &
cassava, cotton
Eastern Africa
Main features
2003 Crop Yields (MT/ha) – Africa, and Global
Crop AFRICA GLO
BAL
Maize 1.61 4.47
Rice 1.87 3.84
Sorghum 0.88 1.30
Millet 0.70 0.82
Sweet Potatoes 4.32 13.49
Cassava 8.83 10.76
Beans 0.62 0.70
Groundnuts 0.86 1.35
Bananas 6.59 15.25
4
(Source: Tittonell, 2013)
What is Evergreen Agriculture?
A form of more
intensive farming
that integrates trees
with annual crops,
maintaining a green
cover on the land
throughout the year.
Evergreen farming
systems are ‘double-
story’ systems that
feature both perennial
and annual species
(food crops and trees).
Project objectives
1. To identify the critical drivers of adoption of evergreen
agriculture technologies and practices in sub Saharan
Africa (baseline study)
2. To establish a robust infrastructure for the multiplication
and supply of improved tree seed/seedling system and its
integration with livestock production systems
3. Build the capacity of smallholder farmers in accessing
evergreen agriculture practises, and supporting services
(e.g technologies, credit and markets),
4. Generate, package and disseminate knowledge to various
categories of smallholder farmers, partners and institutions
Meru County, Kenya
Machakos County, Kenya
Mwanga District, TanzaniaMbarali District, Tanzania
Bugesera District,
Rwanda
Project sites
Lesotho – only baseline studies done in
two sites – north and south of the country
Build the capacity of smallholder farmers
in accessing evergreen agriculture
practises in Machakos
Establishment of demonstration plots at farmers training centre and in each of 40 farmer groups – three tree species tested with three alley spacings and maize-legume intercrop
Training of farmers through four different approaches – government extension, FFS through World Vision, Landcare – through KENDAT and Volunteer farmer trainers
More moisture retention when CA practiced with shrubs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60C
all
at 1
.5
Ca
ll at 3
Ca
ll at 4
.5
No
tre
es
Glir
at 1
.5
Glir
at 3
Glir
at 4
.5
P.p
ea
s a
t 1
.5
P.p
ea
s a
t 3
P.p
ea
s a
t 4
.5
Treatment
CoASR13 LR14 SR14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ca
ll at 1
.5
Ca
ll at 3
Ca
ll at 4
.5
No
tre
es
Glir
at 1
.5
Glir
at 3
Glir
at 4
.5
P.p
ea
s a
t1.5
P.p
ea
s a
t 3
P.p
ea
s a
t4.5
Treatment
CA
SR13 LR14 SR14
Mois
ture
% v
ol-
Till
Mois
ture
% v
ol–
No t
ill
Farm tree diversity as proxy for extension
approach effectiveness for CAWT
Farmers under Landcare had more diversity of tree species and
farm enterprises
Conclusion
• CA with trees generated benefits of higher maize yields (no
difference in legume yields) and increased soil water storage hence
can narrow yield gaps especially useful for moisture stressed lands
• Very close spacing (below 3m) yielded high shrub biomass and
stored more moisture but depressed yields – while best performance
was by Calliandra calothyrsus spaced at 3m
• Tree biomass can serve as fodder and fuelwood and staking for high
value crops such as climbing beans, tomatoes etc
• Extension Approaches that build social capital in communities and
build farmers’ capacity to diagnose NRM issues such as Landcare
may be more appropriate in scaling up INRM