View
436
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on national approaches to monitoring and evaluating adaptation: Brazil’s experience in auditing adaptation. Presented at the Meeting of the OECD Joint DAC-EPOC Task Team on Climate Change and Development Co-operation, April 2014, Zürich, Switzerland. For more information, please contact Michael Mullan ([email protected]) & Jan Corfee-Morlot ([email protected]).
Citation preview
Auditing Adaptation to Climate Change in Brazil
Marcelo Cardoso SoaresDepartment of Agriculture and Environmental AuditFederal Court of Accounts – Brazil (TCU)
Outline
• The Federal Court of Accounts;• International Audit on Climate Change;• Audits in Brazil;• Main findings• First follow up;• Lessons learned;• Opportunities for cooperation.
The Federal Court of Accounts (TCU)
• Supreme Audit Institution in Brazil;• Carries out regularity and performance audits
of federal government activities, including policies and programs;
• Can determine (regularity) or recommend (performance) measures to be adopted by audited entities;
International Audit on Climate Change
• Proposed by the Working Group on Environmental Auditing (WGEA) in 2008 – 14 countries;
• Each SAI could audit government initiatives regarding mitigation and adaptation to climate change according to national needs;
• International report issued in November 2010
Audits in Brazil
• 1 audit on mitigation and 3 audits on adaptation;
• Adaptation themes indicated by experts: coastal zones, agriculture and livestock and water safety in semiarid areas;
Audits in Brazil
• Support from the British Embassy - overseas travel expenses, consultants, publications (£ 250.000);
• Coordination of a similar audit in Latin America in 2011 – 9 countries.
Main findings
Little concern for adaptation in public policies
• Emphasis on mitigation in the National Plan on Climate Change;
• No active efforts to identify potential risks arising from climate change;
Main findings
• Lack of downscaled climate models to predict impacts on regional level;
• Climate data not easily accessible and shaped into information for decision makers;
• Interesting initiative: development of seeds fit for a hotter and drier climate.
First follow-up (2012)
• Creation of the National Center for Disaster Monitoring and Alert;
• Better access to climate time series data by researchers, including digitalization of physical records;
• Consideration of climate change scenarios by the National Water Agency when planning and implementing public policies;
Lessons learned• Adaptation to CC was not in the government’s
agenda, it was “imported” from international environmental accords;
• Audits highlighted the importance of adaptation and encouraged more efforts to deal with it;
• Follow-up helped with the adoption of measures beyond one single term of government.
Opportunities for cooperation
Attendance at events (COP), consultants (best practices in adaptation):• Second follow-up (2015);• Future audits? – definition of a national plan
on adaptation is underway.
THANK YOU!
Marcelo Cardoso [email protected]