Upload
intasave-caribsavegroup
View
113
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Community-Based Vulnerability Assessments (CBVAs) in GIVRAPD and ParCA
Johanna Wandel
Caribsave Research Partners Workshop Courtleigh Hotel and Suites, Kingston, Jamaica
24 July 2014
Vulnerability (and adaptation) Assessments
• Various methods, various strengths: indicator-based, mapping, modelling, contextual/case study
• Quantification appealing from scientific and intervention perspective but challenges with common metric and what is included
• Aim of ParCA and GIVRAPD CBVA case studies: contextual baseline understanding of how climate-related stresses are experienced, managed, emergent challenges in the context of other stresses
• Broader research question: how similar/different are climate-related vulnerabilities for small island states, coastal communities in other parts of the world? Are there transferable strategies for adapting to climate change?
ParCA Research Framework Current
Exposures and Sensitivities
Current Adaptive
Strategies
Future Exposures and
Sensitivities
Future Adaptive Capacity
Expected Changes
in Natural and Social Systems
Governance Assessment
(multi-level networks,
adaptivness, transformations)
Community Adaptation Visioning and Evaluation Against Maladaptation Criteria
Knowledge Mobilization and Regional Scale-Up
Site Desk work
Primary data collection, transcription
Community feedback workshop on draft
Final case study report
Inclusion in broader knowledge products
Tobago In progress Expected
Bluefields/White House
Not planned Expected
Negril-Orange Bay
Expected
St. Lucia Not planned Expected
Mauritius Not planned Expected
Seychelles Not planned Expected
Nova Scotia In progress Expected
PEI ongoing Expected Expected
Scaling Out CBVA: Results so far • Vulnerability “context” has
broader applicability (in sites with similar livelihood descriptions)
• Vulnerability reduction shows promise for some transferable lessons
• Vulnerability and adaptation “assessment” not very comparable – urgent need to identify “good” adaptation (lack of metrics, criteria… – potential for indicators for temporal monitoring but not comparison)