32
ChildCentered Climate Change Adapta1on Lessons from Asia Kimberly Junmookda GNO ROA Workshop Presenta<on 1 November 2016

Involving Children in Climate Change Adaptation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Child-­‐Centered  Climate  Change  Adapta1on  Lessons  from  Asia  

Kimberly  Junmookda    

GNO  ROA  Workshop  Presenta<on      

1  November  2016  

Photo  Courtesy  of  Plan  Interna1onal  Nepal  

Part  I  

Part  2  

Part  3  

Part  4  

Conclusion  and  further  resources  

Key  Findings:  Lessons  Learned  

A  very  short  quiz!!  

Introduc=on  and  context    

Presenta-on  Outline  

25  minutes  

•  9  Countries  in  the  region  have  been  involved  in  4CA  projects  thus  far  (Bangladesh,  Cambodia,  Indonesia,  Laos,  Myanmar,  Nepal,  the  Philippines,  Thailand  and  Vietnam).  Projects  have  been  funded  by  external  donors  including  the  Asia  Development  Bank,  DFAT,  DfID  and  Nordic  Climate  Facility.  

•  2  More  regional  projects  are  in  the  pipeline  as  of  November  2016.  •  Growing  internal  capacity,  experience  and  network!    •  Building  the  credibility,  regionally  and  interna<onally,  of  Plan  in  CCA.  

This  Presenta-on  Will…  

Share  learnings  from:    •  The  DFAT-­‐funded  Child-­‐Centered  Climate  

Change  Adapta1on  project  was  implemented  in  three  countries  in  Southeast  Asia  between  2014  and  2016.  It  involved  Indonesia,  Vietnam,  Myanmar  and  regional-­‐level  ac<vi<es,  targe<ng  3347  beneficiaries  in  23  communi<es.    

•  In  November  2015,  our  new  regional  Child-­‐Centered  Climate  Change  Adapta<on  project  was  launched,  funded  by  the  German  Federal  Ministry  of  Environment  (BMUB)  and  GNO.  The  project  includes  Indonesia,  the  Philippines  and  Thailand,  as  well  as  involving  regional-­‐level  ac<vi<es.    

Short  Quiz!  What  do  you  think  is    the  right  response?  

Quiz  

•  Designing  and  implemen<ng  adapta<on  projects  automa<cally  involves  children  (T/F)  

•  Boys  and  girls  face  similar  vulnerabili<es;  they  should  be  reached  in  the  same  way  (T/F).  

•  Children  already  know  and  understand  climate  risks  well  (T/F).    

•  It  is  always  more  effec<ve  to  involve  boys  and  girls  together  when  conduc<ng  ac<vi<es  (T/F).  

•  It  is  always  more  effec<ve  to  involve  children  together  with  adults  when  conduc<ng  ac<vi<es  (T/F)  

•  In  many  local  communi<es,  Plan  is  the  only  organiza<on  championing  climate  change  adapta<on  (T/F).    

Quiz  

•  Local  governments  already  have  the  ability  to  facilitate  local  adapta<on  (T/F).  

•  Involving  children  in  climate  change  adapta<on  is  easy  (T/F).    

•  Most  communi<es  welcome  the  involvement  of  children  (T/F).  

•  What  would  be  one  example  of  a  climate  change  adapta<on  solu<on?  ________________?    

•  What  would  be  one  example  of  a  climate  change  adapta<on  solu<on  involving  children?  ___________________.    

•  What  do  you  think  the  greatest  challenge  will  be  in  terms  of  implemen<ng  4CA?  ________________.  

•  What  about  4CA  most  mo<vates  you?  What  are  you  most  excited  about?  _______________.    

Recap:  The  4CA  Model  

It’s  About  Pu<ng  Children  at  the  Center    of  Climate  Change  Adapta-on!    

Products Clients

Educa1on    and  Awareness  

Community-­‐Based  Ac1on  

Advocacy  

Three  Main  Components  

1.      Educa<on  and  Awareness:  Building  the  awareness  of  children,  youth  and  communi<es  to  climate  change’s  impacts,  by  working  with  teachers,  schools  and  local  partners.    

2.      Community-­‐Based  Ac<on:  Involving  children  in  community-­‐based  adapta<on  planning  and  implementa<on  of  solu<ons.      

3.      Advocacy:  Empowering  children  and  communi<es  to  understand  their  right  to  and  take  part  building  a  climate-­‐resilient  future.  Empowering  them  to  have  a  role  in  local,  na<onal  and  regional  processes  and  to  have  a  voice  in  decisions  that  affect  them.      

Here’s  What  We’ve  Learned  So  Far….  

Key  Lessons  In  working  with  stakeholders:    Engaging  Government  Stakeholders    • Engaging  government  counterparts  from  the  beginning.  • Give  agencies  a  sense  of  ownership  -­‐  give  more  prominence  to  the  government  if  needed.    • Capacity:  In  some  contexts,  much  capacity  already  exists;  in  others,  it  may  need  to  be  built  (don’t  assume  MOE  officials  or  science  teachers  know  about  CC).    

Working  with  Partners    • Build  the  capacity  of  partners  to  engage  in  good  child-­‐centered  CCA;  iden<fy  and  address  any  gaps  in  their  capacity.    • Don’t  just  build  capacity  within  Plan!  Think  about  what  capaci<es  will  be  embedded  ager  the  project  ends.  Local  partners  in  the  DFAT  project  con<nued  to  be  4CA  champions  ager  the  project  ended.      

 Engaging  Beyond  “the  Usual  Suspects”    • The  mul7-­‐disciplinary  nature  of  CC  means  needing  to  work  “ver<cally”  (across  sectors  –  environment,  agriculture,  water  management,  educa<on  agencies)  and  “horizontally”  (across  levels  –  local,  regional,  na<onal).  • In  addi<on  to  formal  partners  of  the  project,  parents  and  other  community  members  can  also  be  key  project  partners.    

Iden<fying  and  Engaging  Key    4CA  “Champions”:    Seek  champions  who  will  serve  as  ac<ve  promoters  of  the  4CA  approach.  This  could  be  a  local  government  official,  a  local  partner  staff,  village  leader,  parent,  or  highly  ac<ve  youth  –  seek  them  out!    

 

Key  Lessons  In  programming  ac7vi7es:    Ensure  educa<on  and  awareness  reach  the  most  vulnerable  children      

•  Work  with  educa<on  stakeholders  at  various  levels  –  school  teachers,  school  administrators,  principals,  district  educa<on  agencies,  regional  educa<on  departments,  ministries  of  educa<on.  

•  Engage  with  out-­‐of-­‐school  children  and  youth  (MoEs  ogen  have  Non-­‐Formal  Educa<on  departments).    

•  Mainstream  curricula  through  various  entry  points:  core  curriculum,  subject-­‐specific  (science,  social  studies,  local  knowledge)  or  extracurricular  ac<vi<es.  

•  Great  success  stories  the  Philippines  (working  through  the  ALS  system).    

 

Key  Lessons  

CCA  Knowledge  Requires  Facilita<on  and  Transla<on  

 •  Ensure  the  appropriate  content  is  taught  by  

facilitators  (teachers,  local  and  Plan  staff),  •  Translate  climate  informa<on  so  that  the  local  

community  can  understand  it  (e.g.,  in  terms  of  stresses  on  agriculture  or  climate  variability).  

•  Curriculum  and  learning  materials  need  to  be  made  child-­‐sensi<ve  and  age-­‐appropriate.    

•  Consider  various  methods,  including  lessons  conveyed  through  games  and  pictures.  

•  Materials  should  also  be  tailored  to  the  local  language  and  context.  They  also  need  to  complement  well  the  local  curriculum.    

 

 Reaching  the  Hardest  to  Reach    In  the  DFAT  project,  we  could  have  improved  our  ability  to  truly  reach  the  most  marginalized  groups  of  children,  including:      •  Reaching  girls  •  Reaching  out-­‐of-­‐school  children  and  youth  •  Reaching  children  with  disabili<es    •  Special  approaches  and  partnerships  are  

needed  (e.g.,  partnering  with  local  CBOs  specializing  in  reaching  people  with  disabili<es).    

 

Key  Lessons    

In  Community-­‐Based  Ac<vi<es      •  Ensure  communi<es  balance  between  u<lizing  

science-­‐based  climate  forecas<ng  and  local,  indigenous  knowledge.        

•  Ensure  not  only  the  most  vocal  are  heard  in  community  mee<ngs;  ensure  community  planning  processes  are  inclusive.    

•  Find  ways  to  meaningfully  involve  children  and  youth  -­‐  some  countries  have  been  successful  (PHL).    

Acknowledge  the  Differen<al  Gender  and  Age  Roles  within  Communi<es:    Encourage  leadership  from  girls  and  women.  Mainstream  gender  equality;  create  safe  spaces  to  shig  the  power  dynamic  of  women  and  girls.      Consider  differen<al  gender  and  age  roles  when  programming  ac<vi<es.    

•  Are  women  about  to  voice  opinions  in  community  planning  mee<ngs?  

•  Will  children  be  able  to  receive  informa<on  in  the  same  way  as  adults?    

 

Maintain  Conceptual  Clarity:  Ensure  Everything  Links  to  Increasing  Children’s  Adap<ve  Capaci<es    • Ensure  con<nued  reinforcement  of  the  CCA  concept,  and  the  reason  why  we  are  engaging  in  the  ac<vity  in  the  first  place.    • Beware  of  ac<vi<es  that  drig  from  being  centered  around  CCA  and  ensure  there  is  a  clear  ra<onale  why  it  is  child-­‐centered  climate  change  adapta<on.  • Ensure  priori<zed  community  adapta<on  ac<ons  DO  reflect  community  and  children’s  priori<es,  not  what  the  most  powerful  village  leaders  want.      At  the  same  <me,  make  an  effort  to  integrate  as  much  as  possible  the  CCA  understandings  and  ac<ons  with  DRR.  Use  opportuni<es  where  there  is  already  engagement  to  teach  children,  community  members  and  other  project  stakeholders  about  child  protec<on,  gender  equality,  health  and  sanita<on,  among  other  key  issues  Plan  supports.    • At  the  same  <me,  be  clear  what  the  project  IS  and  IS  NOT.  This  helps  ensure  expecta<ons  are  met.    

Key  Lessons  

 .  Knowledge  and  Communica<ons      • Don’t  forget  to  learn,  document  and  share  throughout  the  project.    • Use  M&E  to  inform  itera<ve  management  and  as  informa<on  useful  for  communica<ons/dissemina<on  purposes.    • Documenta<on,  research  and  communica<ons  support  advocacy;  They  also  help  build  credibility  for  Plan’s  work  in  this  space.    

Key  Lessons  

Sepng  Clear  Advocacy  Targets    • Iden<fy  key  targets  for  advocacy  –  e.g.,  mainstreaming  CCA  curricula  into  all  schools  at  the  district-­‐level  by  X  date,  then  work  towards  this  goal.  New  scale-­‐up  opportuni<es  may  also  arise  during  the  course  of  the  project.    • Be  proac<ve  in  ensuring  targets  are  influenced;  understand  the  <ming  of  government  decisions,  who  needs  to  be  influenced  and  what  is  needed  to  ‘make  the  case.”    Star<ng  with  the  End  in  Mind    • Pay  asen<on  to  the  cri<cal  final  year  of  ac<vi<es;  don’t  leave  key  outputs  to  the  final  3  months  of  the  project.  Implementa<on  becomes  extremely  risky,  especially  if  the  funding  situa<on  is  uncertain.    • Have  a  formal  project  “handover”  to  the  local  government,  and  as  a  way  of  thanking  all  stakeholders  and  signaling  the  end  of  the  project  officially.  Use  the  event  as  an  opportunity  to  engage  higher-­‐level  decision-­‐makers  and  reiterate  the  importance  of  sustaining  4CA  approaches.    

Key  Lessons  

Beyond  the  technical  quality  of  the  project,  please  consider:  

 The  Importance  of  Good  Project  Management    • Maintaining  flexibility  to  iterate  and  improve  approaches  given  unforeseen  circumstances  while  maintaining  rigidity  about  the  quality  and  delivery  of  impacts  promised  in  the  results  framework.    • Delays  at  the  beginning  of  the  project  need  to  be  addressed;  don’t  risk  further  delays  down  the  line.    

•  Consider  whether  an  extension  is  realis<cally  needed.  

Key  Lessons  

The  Importance  of  Timing  

•  Balance  the  need  for  planning  with  the  need  to  demonstrate  visible  results;  addressing  longer-­‐term  impacts  versus  present-­‐day  community  needs.    

•  Consider  sustainability,  advocacy  and  scaling-­‐up  from  the  beginning!  Don’t  leave  key  project  ac<vi<es  un<l  Year  3;  don’t  implement  the  bulk  of  key  project  ac<vi<es  in  the  final  months.    

Individual  adap1ve  capacity  

Community  adap1ve  capacity  

System-­‐wide  adapta1on  

Household  adapta1on  capacity  

Working  at  Mul-ple  Levels  to    Build  Children’s  Adap-ve  Capacity  

Building  resilience    

Further  Resources  

Conclusion  

Next  Steps      Keep  building  our  exper<se  in  implemen<ng  impacuul  4CA  programs!    External  sharing:  Document,  share  and  advocate  with  others  

Internal  sharing:  Harness  knowledge  from  our  exis<ng  network!  Share  between  ROA  and  ARO!      

Resources  Further  CCA  resources    •  Plan  regional  4CA  network  •  Child-­‐centered  CCA  research:  UNICEF,  Save  the  Children,  Children  in  a  Changing  

Climate  Coali<on  (CCCC),  ODI      •  Adapta<on  resources  and  networks:  IISD,  IIED,  CDKN,  UNEP  EETU,  UNEP  

Global  Adapta<on  Networks  (GAN),  AdaptAbility,  BRACED,    •  External  interna<onal  plauorms,  including  WeAdapt  (managed  by  SEI),  ReliefWeb,  

Preven<onWeb,  Eldis    •  CCA  Tools:  CARE,  Oxfam,  Mercy  Corps    

Relevant  Plan  approaches  and  tools    •  CP  approaches,  including  child  par<cipa<on  best  prac<ces,  and  

disability  inclusion  approaches.  •  CCCD  approach  •  Gender  mainstreaming  tools  

 

Ques1ons?  

 Kimberly  Junmookda  Regional  Climate  Change  Specialist  Asia  Regional  Office    Kimberly.junmookda@plan-­‐interna<onal.org