View
1.069
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1
Bonn, 8 June 2013Axel Olearius, Tobias Zeller (GIZ, Division Environment and Climate)
Block III : Coordination and Cooperation and learning from lessons –focusing on internal and country-specific processes
V-NAMAInvolving sub-national actors into national mitigation
strategies through vertically integrated NAMAs
Page 2
Title
V-NAMA - Involving sub-national actors into national mitigation strategies through vertically integrated NAMAs
Target Country Global
Implemented by GIZ
Picture
Goals/Activities:• Involving sub-nationals in achieving national mitigation targets• 2 outcomes: Bankable NAMAs & Practical guidelines for V-NAMA design• 2 questions: Success factors for involvement of sub-nationals? How to do MRV?• 2 sectors: Waste Management & Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings• 2 partner countries: Indonesia & South Africa• 3 years: 5/2012 – 4/2015
Page 319/07/2013
V-NAMA – project structure
GIZ HQ (Germany)Project Steering,Global Activities(Guideline etc.),Transferability
South AfricaV-NAMA development: Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings
IndonesiaV-NAMA development: Waste Management
Page 4
Coordination and Cooperation
19/07/2013
Two dimensions
1. Coordination/cooperation between different levels of government regarding climate change mitigation = heart of V-NAMA project
2. Coordination/cooperation between the stakeholders of the V-NAMA project and its steering structure (how to involve the sub-national stakeholders?)
Page 5
Why at all involving sub-nationals in national mitigationstrategies?
19/07/2013
Sub-national actorsProvinces /
Municipalities
…with large share ofGHG emissions
(eg. waste Indonesia: 9%)
Key competencies…• Waste management• Buildings• Transport
high mitigation potential
Page 6
Example for the need for cooperation/coordination –Indonesian Solid Waste Management
19/07/2013
Central government:
Regulation (Mandate) andInfrastructure Investment (Incentives): eg. landfills, recycling facilities)
Provincial governments :
Link between central and localgovernment, monitoring of localactivities
Local governments:
Operation and maintenance of facilities, closure of final disposal sites etc.
Page 7
Example for the need for cooperation/coordination –South Africa Public Buildings
19/07/2013
Central government:
Regulation (Mandate) and Financial Support (Incentives)
Provincial governments :
Provincial administrative buildings, education facilities and hospitals
Local governments:
Municipal administrative buildings, service and community facilities(clinics etc.)
Page 8
What are barriers to cooperation/coordination and sub-national involvement in NAMAs?
19/07/2013
Based on empirical findings of Ecofys study on behalf of GIZ V-NAMA project
Lack of incentives• Lack of financial
incentives• Lack of political/co-
benefit incentives
Lack of integration• institutional
weaknesses• institutional
differences
Lack of capacity• insufficient skills
and knowledge• insufficient data and
information
But also: Different perspectives & interests
V-NAMA project seeks to overcome these barriers
Page 9
2nd Dimension: Coordination/Cooperation in thesteering of a vertically integrated project
19/07/2013
Challenge: How to involve subnationals into a steering structure with manystakeholders from national level without overburdening the structure?
Three Options:
���� Combined approach necessary!
Local Government Associationseg. SALGA
+ official mandate- capacity?
Decentralized Steering Structureeg. provincial level
+ pilot municipalities involved - high costs, difficult processes
Representation by championseg. pioneers
+ capacity available- mandate? political problems?
Page 10
Multilevel working group in Durban (April 2013)
19/07/2013
eThekwiniMetro
Public worksregional office
NationalDEA
International Consultant
National Consultant
National DEA
NationalDPW
NelsonMandela BayMetro
Eastern Cape Province
Page 11
Conclusion
19/07/2013
1. National governments attempt to engage with multiple stakeholders, through a mix of incentives, mandates and persuasion.
2. Successful cooperation and vertically integrated NAMAs will require
• effective incentive mechanism to motivate subnational governments to engage
• platforms which facilitate bottom-up communication and trust building
• capacity building efforts
• pragmatic and locally feasible MRV systems
3. Efforts to engage subnationals will most likely be successful, if the NAMA addresses a local sustainable development priority.
� V-NAMA project concept notes in IND/SA: next steps
� Guidelines/Guidance: Concept still needs to be defined!