12
PRIVATEPUBLICPEOPLE PARTNERSHIP (PPPP):

Vanessa Sanson - INFORMEST

  • Upload
    erfc

  • View
    61

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

 

   PRIVATE-­‐PUBLIC-­‐PEOPLE-­‐

PARTNERSHIP  (PPPP):        

Page 2: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

SEAP  AND  PARTICIPATION  Ø Civil society and stakeholders participation are essential for the success of

SEAP and for the achievement of its objectives.

Ø The European Commission guidelines for the elaboration of a SEAP

emphasize the fundamental role of participation for the development of effective measures aimed at EE and RES.

Ø Stakeholders: •  whose activity are concerned with the plan; •  who are in possession of information and resources important for the

planning of actions and for their implementation; •  who have decision-making / implementation power for the success of

actions aimed at EE and RES.

Page 3: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

PUBLIC-­‐PRIVATE  PARTNERSHIP  (PPP)  “Forms of cooperation between public authorities and the world of business which aim to ensure the funding, construction, renovation, management or maintenance of an infrastructure or the provision of a service” (EC, 2004) •  Long duration •  Funding from the private sector •  Central role of the economic operator (design, completion, implementation) •  Objectives usually defined by the public partner •  Distribution of risks between the public and the private partner

PPPs can be: •  Contractual: based on contractual links •  Institutional: involving the creation of a new entity (joint venture)

ü  Funding and know-how from the private sector ü  Increased efficiency and implementation capacity ü  Reduced risks for the public sector

Page 4: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

FROM  PPP  TO  PPPP  •  Top-down decisions

•  The developer and the end-user have little decision-making power within the planning process

•  “Both interfaces, municipality-developer and developer-end user are unilateral, with information and decision-making g o i n g o n l y d ow n s t r e a m , a n d discontinuities do occur” (Vayrynen, 2007)

•  Proliferation of conflicts: o  dissatisfaction o  early termination of contracts o  changes in users needs are not tracked

•  “Uncertainty about the quality of PPP services” (Majamaa, 2008)

Decision  maker:  planning  

Developer:  realizaAon  

End-­‐user:        usage  

Tradi6onal  situa6on  (PPPs)  

Page 5: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

THE  4Ps  MODEL  “Participation is a broadly accepted sustainability criterion, and at the same time, it is often a crucial condition to reach sustainability goals” (Arnold and Barth, 2011) Primary actors involved: •  Public - municipality •  Private - developer •  People - end-user

The 4P process: •  Interactive •  Direct formal and informal relations between all actors involved

How to include People perspective in PPP?

Page 6: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

GOOD  PRACTICES  ANALYSIS  

Selection of 6 case studies •  3 PPPs •  3 PPPPs

Selection criteria •  Relevance to:

o  REMIDA project o  EU framework

•  Sustainability •  Transferability

Page 7: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

THE  4th  P    4th P added value:

•  Integration of perspectives à new knowledge •  More connection among all actors •  Innovative decisions •  Legitimacy, sustainability and efficacy of actions •  Behavioural changes/citizens’ commitment •  Greater sense of shared responsibility and citizenship

BUT

•  possibility to retard decisions •  Increased complexity •  weak impact à frustration

People: taxpayers, decision makers, administrative subjects, stakeholders, customers, end-users

Early stages à contribution to planning and design Implementation stages à contribution to construction, operation and management

Page 8: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

PPPP  SUCCESS  FACTORS  Dimensions   Factors  

Process   •  Early  involvements  of  ciAzens  and  stakeholders  •  RepresentaAveness  of  stakeholders  •  Focus  groups/workshops/meeAngs/on-­‐line  quesAonnaires  •  Flexibility  •  Presence  of  a  facilitator  •  Clear  objecAves  

Implementa6on   •  CiAzens  playing  an  acAve  role  (e.g.  direct  funding)  •  InteracAve  tools    •  FormaAon  of  ciAzens  •  Tangible  benefits  both  for  the  private  operator  and  for  ciAzens  

Communica6on   •  Clear  informaAon  •  ConAnuous  communicaAon  •  Info  point  

Ins6tu6onal  framework   •  CoordinaAon  between  neighbouring  municipaliAes  •  Presence   of   a   supporAng   structure   (i.e.   Province,   Region,  

University)  

Page 9: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

PARTICIPATION  PLANNING  

Stakeholders  analysis  

Context  analysis  

ParAcipaAon  strategy    

Page 10: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

ACTION  DEFINITION  

Start  of  the  consultaAon    

CollecAon  of  ideas  

SelecAon  of  feasible  acAons  

Page 11: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

TOWARDS  A  MODEL…  

Successful  PPPPs  

People:  ideas  and  

commitment  

Private:  resources  and  know  

how  

Public:    objecAves  

and  coordinaAon  

Early  involvement  of  ciAzens  

CiAzens  playing  an    acAve  role  

InteracAve  tools  

Clear  communicaAo

n  

Flexibility  of  the  process  

Clear  objecAves  

Page 12: Vanessa Sanson  - INFORMEST

       

Thank  you!!!  Vanessa  Sanson    INFORMEST    

[email protected]