41
Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose? Photo by L. Heady Laura Heady NYSDEC Hudson River Estuary Program and Cornell University Woodlands and Wetlands: What Communities Need to Know December 5, 2016

Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

  • Upload
    smc427

  • View
    48

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Photo by L. HeadyLaura Heady NYSDEC Hudson River Estuary Program and Cornell University Woodlands and Wetlands: What Communities Need to KnowDecember 5, 2016

Page 2: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Hudson River Estuary Program

- vital estuary ecosystem- clean water- resilient communities- conservation of fish, wildlife, and habitats- preservation of river’s natural scenery- enhanced opportunities for education, river access, recreation, and inspiration

Working to achieve six key benefits:Photo by Laura Heady

Photo by Laura Heady

Photo by Amanda Higgs

Photo by Laura Heady

Photo by Laura Heady

Photo by Laura Heady

Page 3: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Hudson River Estuary Program

Our website: http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/4920.html

Page 4: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

How many of you think wetlands are important?

Photo by L. Heady

How many of you feel confident about how to conserve and protect wetlands?

Page 5: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

• What is a Wetland?

• Value and Function of Wetlands

• Threats to Wetlands

• Wetland Conservation

Presentation Outline

Photo by L. Heady

Page 6: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

What is a wetland?

Photo by L. Heady

What is a wetland?

Page 7: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

“Wetlands are areas saturated by surface or ground water sufficient to support

distinctive vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.”

http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/305.html

Page 8: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

“Wetlands are areas saturated by surface or ground water sufficient to support

distinctive vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.”

http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/305.html

Page 9: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetlands are identified by three main components:1.) hydrology: indicators of water (inundation or saturation)

2.) hydric soils: soils with indicators of prolonged saturation

3.) hydrophytic vegetation: vegetation that is adapted to wet conditions

Photo by L. Heady

Page 10: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

No two wetlands are alike!The diversity of freshwater, non-tidal wetlands in Ulster County includes:

Photo by L. Heady

dwarf shrub bogfloodplain forest

hemlock-hardwood swamphighbush blueberry bog thicket

perched bogpitch pine-blueberry peat swamp

red maple-blackgum swampred maple-hardwood swamp

sedge meadowvernal pool

Page 11: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

wet meadowPhoto by L. Heady

Page 12: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

emergent marshPhoto by L. Heady

Page 13: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

hardwood swampPhoto by L. Heady

Page 14: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

woodland poolPhoto by L. Heady

Photos by L. Heady

Page 15: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Photo by L. Heady

salt marshestuarine rocky shoretidal tributary mouth

brackish meadowbrackish tidal marsh

freshwater tidal swampfreshwater intertidal mudflats

supratidal pool

The diversity of tidal wetlands in the Hudson River estuary includes:

Page 16: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Value and Function of Wetlands

Photo by L. Heady

Page 17: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Value and Function of Wetlands

*filter and store water *slow/store flood water

*prevent erosion*wildlife and plant habitat

*recreation

and more!

Photo by L. Heady

Page 18: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetlands are hydrologically connected to the surrounding landscape through surface water and groundwater.

www.geoscape.nrcan.gc.ca

Page 19: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetlands can slow down and absorb significant amounts of rainwater, runoff, and snowmelt before flooding. This can prevent or reduce flooding downstream.

A single acre of wetland can store

1-1.5 million gallons of floodwater!

(United States EPA)

Photo by L. Heady

Flood Control

Photo by L. Zucker

Page 20: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Some wetlands help maintain water table levels by recharging ground-water. This is especially important for communities that rely on drinking water wells.

Groundwater Recharge/Discharge

Most wetlands discharge groundwater, thus providing a continuous flow of source water to surface waters.

Page 21: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Clean Water

We all need clean water! The U.S. spends more than $2 billion annually for clean water initiatives.

It’s easier to prevent pollution than to clean contaminated water.

For more information:http://esa.org/ecoservices/wate/body.wate.fact.html Photo by L. Heady

Page 22: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Clean Water

Wetlands purify water. They can:

• remove 20 to 60% of metals

• trap and retain 80 to 90% of sediment from runoff

• eliminate 70 to 90% of entering nitrogen.

For more information:http://esa.org/ecoservices/wate/body.wate.fact.html Photo by L. Heady

Page 23: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

“In many instances, it is less expensive for a community to maintain open space that naturally maintains water quality, reduces runoff, or controls flooding than to use tax dollars for costly engineered infrastructure projects such as water filtration plants and storm sewers.”

These functions add up to economic benefits!

Page 24: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

USFWS estimates that up to 43% of threatened and endangered species rely directly or indirectly on wetlands for their survival.

Although wetlands cover only around 5% of the land in the lower 48 state, they are home to 31% of plant species.

Approximately one-half of all North American bird species nest or feed in wetlands.

(EPA, USFWS)

Photo by L. Heady

Habitat

Page 25: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Photo: USFWS Photo by C. Bowser

Photo: Laura Heady

Page 26: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Outdoor enthusiasts enjoy hunting, fishing, bird watching, and recreating in streams and wetlands.

In 2011 in New York:5.5 million people (16 and over) fished, hunted, or wildlife watched: -1.9 million anglers

-823,000 hunters-4.2 million wildlife watchers (USFWS 2014)

Recreation

Photos by L. Heady

Page 27: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

In 2011, residents and nonresidents spent $9.2 billion on wildlife recreation in New York.

(USFWS 2014)

Photo by L. Heady

Recreation

Phot

o by

L. H

eady

Page 28: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

2010 study found thattourism and park/preserve operations generate a positive economic impact on the local area of $12.3 million and support 358 local jobs.

Local Case Study: Shawangunk Ridge

Page 29: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

What are threats to wetlands?

Photo by L. HeadyPhoto by L. Heady

Page 30: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetland Degradation

hydrologic alterations (fill, drainage, etc.)

pollutants (leaky landfills, runoff, etc.)

inadequate buffers

invasive species

Photo by L. Heady

Page 31: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

• USFWS estimates that more than half of New York State’s wetlands have been lost since colonization.

• Between 1985 and 1995, the Hudson Valley had a net loss of wetlands of almost 3,000 acres.

• Overall in NYS, wetland gains were in rural areas and losses were in urbanized areas, where benefits of wetlands were also lost.

Wetland Loss

Page 32: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Wetland Conservation

Photo by L. Heady

Page 33: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

• New York State regulates activities in wetlands ≥12.4 acres, or wetlands with the designation of “Unusual Local Importance,” and adjacent areas that extend 100 feet from the wetland boundary.The DEC requires permits for certain activities, such as construction or excavation, to prevent impairment to wetland functions.

• Regulated wetlands must be on the Freshwater Wetlands Map.

• Freshwater wetlands are regulated under NYS Article 24 of Environmental Conservation Law (http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/5133.html).

(continued on next slide)

Photo by L. Heady

What freshwater wetlands are protected in New York?

Page 34: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

• The federal government regulates activities in wetlands of any size that meet certain criteria (under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act). It does not generally regulate the adjacent area or buffer zone around each wetland, but can impose restrictions in those areas on a case-by-case basis.

• The Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) is the agency responsible for federal wetlands protection.

• To be eligible for federal protection, a wetland must be associated with a permanent waterway. This leaves many hydrologically isolated wetlands unprotected. (The determination of jurisdiction is made by the Army Corps of Engineers.)

What freshwater wetlands are protected in New York?

Page 35: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

For the most part, New York State protects “larger” wetlands (≥12.4 acres) with 100-foot adjacent area.

Photo by L. Heady

In short, what wetlands are protected in New York?

For the most part, Federal jurisdiction protects wetlands connected to permanent waterways, but leaves many “isolated” wetlands unprotected.

Wetlands can also be protected through municipal efforts.

Page 36: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Changes to Federal jurisdiction in the last decade left many “isolated” wetlands vulnerable.

61% of palustrine and riverine wetlands on NWI maps in Ulster County are “small” (<12.4 ac) and geographically isolated. (Zucker & Lau 2009)

Photo by L. Heady

Page 37: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Center for Watershed Protection

Photo by S. Cuppett

“Direct and Indirect Impacts of Urbanization on Wetland Quality” December 2006

“Development in urban and rural areas now is the cause of more than 60% of national wetland loss. Several national assessments have noted deficiencies in current federal and state regulatory programs…These regulatory gaps can best be closed by increased local management and regulation of wetlands.”

Page 38: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

From the NYSDEC website:“The science of wetlands…has matured in the past 20 years. The old perception that all wetlands are marshy and have open water has been placed in a new context. We now know that only about 14% of our wetlands fit this cattail-marsh-with-a-duck image. Most of our wetlands are shrub or forested swamps, and many lie along rivers and streams in the floodplain riparian zone. In the past, many of these critical wetlands were missed in the mapping process.”

Page 39: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Take Home Messages1.) There are a variety of wetland types in the region.

2.) Wetlands have tremendous value and provide important services that support human and natural communities, such as flood control and clean water.

3.) Many wetlands are not protected by existing State and Federal regulations.

4.) Local communities have opportunities to conserve vulnerable wetlands and the services and economic benefits they provide to residents.

Photo by L. Heady

Photo by L. Heady

Page 40: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

For more information:

Connect with NYSDEC:Facebook: www.facebook.com/NYSDECTwitter: twitter.com/NYSDECFlickr: www.flickr.com/photos/nysdec

Laura HeadyConservation & Land Use Coordinator

[email protected] Hudson River Estuary Program and Cornell University

Thank you!

Photo by Laura Heady

Page 41: Wetland Conservation: What Do We Have to Lose?

Otter Creek Video

Photo by L. Heady

http://youtu.be/ucb-Y8iipng

Conservation Law Foundation video on Vermont flooding