Upload
eric-asboe
View
102
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chattanooga Rail Implementation Study
Third Public MeetingApril 28, 2016
Overview
Project goals & study process
Input received
Alternatives considered
Recommendations
» Benefits and costs
» Station plans, connectivity
What’s next?
2
Goals - Priorities
GOALS
Economic Development/ Redevelopment
Transportation
Land Use
Environment
Program of Public Meetings
October 22, 2015
January 21, 2016
April 28, 2016
• Preliminary Alternatives
• Evaluation• Review and
comment
• Refined Alternatives• Project
Recommendations
• Project Goals• Peer Cities• Transit
Technologies• Existing
Conditions
Study Process
5
Define the problem
Develop alternatives
consistent with goals
Compare; Select preferred
alternative
Calculate costs and benefits
Study Tasks
Vision, Goals, Plans
History, Benefits of
Transit
Data Collection,
Infrastructure
Existing Conditions
Growth Projections
Modes and Technologies
Peer Cities RailNeighborhood Demographics
Economic Conditions
Development Area
Opportunities
Outreach and Input
Public
» Workshops
» Various media
Stakeholders
» Senior elected officials
» Transportation agencies
» Neighborhoods
» Businesses
» Foundations, non-profits
» Railroads
7
By the numbers
» 600+ email list
» 200+ meeting attendees, evaluations
» 160+ stakeholders in-person
» 220+ web surveys
What we’ve heard from the public…
“we need this project” – multiple benefits, “let’s get it built”
Concerned about costs - $20+m/mi in Denver
Downtown could really benefit
Coordinate rails with trails
8
Online survey results…
Question Agree Question Agree
Support rail? 87% Would you use this frequently? 61%
Links the right places? 55% Would use 3-5 times/week 46%
Will replace car trips? 82% Best transit investment? 65%
Growth Projections
9
2010 Growth 2040 Percent
Region
Population 443,000 +115,000 558,000 +26%
Employment 216,000 +84,000 300,000 +39%
Alternatives Considered
1. Infrastructure reuse
2. Economic Development
3. Mobility
10
Preliminary Evaluation Measures
Ridership
Costs – capital and operating
Population & Jobs served
Economic development potential
Environmental impact
Traffic congestion impact
11
Evaluation of Alternatives
12
MEASURE Alt 1Infrastructure
Reuse
Alt 2Economic
Development
Alt 3Mobility
Total Ridership (rail & bus) 2,150 2,400 2,560
Capital Cost (millions) $110 $134 $157
Operating Cost/year (millions) $9.8 $11.4 $9.6
D Station area population (thousands) 9.4 17 26
D Station area jobs (thousands) 16 22 17
D Building Value (millions) $470 $580 $1,145
» Vehicle Delay = -8%
» Zero auto households served
» Low income households served
» Local community support
» Environmental impact
» Multimodal facility investment
Capital Cost
13
Estimate of Probable Cost
Rail Totals Estimated Total Cost
Route Miles
StationsService Vehicles
Low (Million) High (Million)
Alt. 1 10.70 5 2 $90.3 $132.6
Alt 2 7.2 6 3 $107.7 $160.9
Alt 3 12.59 16 6 $156.5 $246,7
What are we recommending?
Recommendation
Alternative 1, modified
» Eliminated ESIP extension
» Revise land use –streetcar stations
» Starter line:Main/Central station
15
Recommended Alternative
Technology
» Diesel powered trains
» Austin, San Diego
Service plan
» 7 am to 7 pm
» 22 trains/day
» 30 to 120 min service
Fare
» $2 (Carta $1.50)
16
Evaluation Measures
17
MEASURE Alt 1
Rail Ridership 500
Total Ridership (rail & bus) 750
Capital Cost (millions) $80
Operating Cost/year (millions) $3.4
EJ households served 3,600
D Station area jobs (thousands) 11,000
D Building Value (millions) +$532
Station Placetypes
Choo Choo
Holtzclaw
Glass Street
RR Museum Enterprise South
Urban Core Commuter Rail TOD
High Intensity Commuter Rail TOD
Moderate Intensity TOD
Metropolitan Center
TND
Industrial
Protected Open Space
Station Area Buildout
2040 Status Quo
Build Plan Increment
Downtown 2,400 4,500 2,100
Holtzclaw 950 1,800 850
Glass Street 1,150 3,900 2,750
Museum 150 900 750
Enterprise S 400 0 -400
TOTAL 5,050 11,050 +6,000
2040 Status Quo
Build Plan Increment
Downtown 2,800 7,300 4,500
Holtzclaw 200 300 100
Glass Street 200 1,300 1,100
Museum 350 350 -
Enterprise S 50 500 450
TOTAL 3,600 9,700 +6,100
POPULATION EMPLOYMENT
Access / Connections
Transit connections
» Downtown
» East Chat
» Intercity rail?
Multimodal
» Drive / park• Choo Choo• Zoo• Glass Street• TVRM
20
Linear Trail
Bicycle Facilities Plan in Context
22
Existing Trail
Proposed Trail
Existing Bike Lane
Proposed Trail
Proposed Bike Route
***
**
Economic Development
Property Value
Property Type
Property Location
Labor Pool
Job Location vs. Worker Residence
Education Levels
Calculation of Increase in Building Value
24
Current Value per Square foot
(Building Appraised Value)/(Building Square Footage)
• Residential
• Industrial
• Office
• Retail
Increase in Square Footage
(Current Square Footage) X (Percent Increase in Population/Jobs)
• Residential
• Industrial
• Office
• Retail
R² = 0.99
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000
Res
iden
tial
Sq
ft
Population
Residential Sqft vs. Population
R² = 0.98
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Off
ice
Sqft
Office Jobs
Office Sqft vs. Office Jobs
Local Funding Options
25
Traditional Taxes & Fee-Based Sources
• Sales Taxes (goods, services, motor fuels)
• Property Taxes (real property, incl. vehicles)
• General Revenues
• Vehicle Fees (title, registration, tags)
• Sin Taxes
• Lease, Advertising, Concessions revenues
• Contract or Purchase-of-Service Revenues
Common Business, Activity & Related
• Employer/Payroll Taxes
• Income Taxes
• Parking Fees
• Car Rental, Lease Fees
• Realty Transfer Taxes/Mortgage Recording Fees
• Room/Occupancy Taxes
• Business License Fees
• Corporate Franchise Taxes
• Other Business Taxes
• Utility Fees/Taxes
Project Revenue Streams (Transportation
& Others)
• Transit-Oriented Development/Joint Development
• Value Capture/ Beneficiary Charges
• Tax-Increment Financing Districts
• Community Improvement/ Facilities Districts
• Impact Fees
• Right-of-Way Leasing
New “User” or “Market-Based” Funding Sources
• Tolling (fixed, dynamic)
• Congestion Pricing
• Emissions Fees
• VMT Fees
What’s Next?
Station area planning / development
Multimodal transportation enhancements
Trail implementation
Pursue funding – operating & capital
26
Breakout Stations
1. Alternatives Comparison
2. Transportation Context
3. Engineering, Cost, Technology
4. Station Areas
5. Trails and Neighborhoods
6. Economic Development Ideas
7. Advocacy – How Do I Help?
27