36
1 Closing the door on Barriers to adoption Margaret Slater, Ph.D., DVM Senior Director of Veterinary Epidemiology Emily Weiss, Ph.D. CAAB Vice President, Research and Development

Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

1

Closing the door on Barriers to adoption

Margaret Slater, Ph.D., DVM

Senior Director of Veterinary Epidemiology

Emily Weiss, Ph.D. CAAB

Vice President, Research and Development

Page 2: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

2

Where we are going

• Volunteers may make better adoption counselors than us

• Impact of adoption fees

• Pets obtained as gifts…are they at high risk?

• Exploration of policy based adoptions vs conversation based adoptions

Page 3: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

3

Adoption Ambassadors

Fosters as Adoption Agents…

a Louisiana SPCA Innovation

Page 4: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

4

Adopted through traditional adoption

yes

no

Have you ever adopted a pet from a shelter or

rescue group before?

51.9%

48.1%

Page 5: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

5

Adopted from Foster as Adoption Agents

Have you ever adopted a pet from a shelter or

rescue group before?

no

yes

30.3%

69.7%

Page 6: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

6

Adopted through traditional adoption How did you learn that the dog you most recently

adopted was available for adoption?

33.3%

Website

7.4% Other

59.3%

Visited the shelter

Page 7: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

7

Adopted from Foster as Adoption Agents

How did you learn that the dog you most recently

adopted was available for adoption?

24.2%

Website

18.2%

9.1% Other

24.2% Saw dog “out” wearing

“adopt me” vest Visited shelter 9.1%

15.2%

Friend told me

Saw dog at offsite

adoption event

Page 8: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

8

Figure 2. Density maps of adopter addresses in Charleston, SC.

Mohan-Gibbons H, Weiss E, Garrison L, Allison M (2014) Evaluation of a Novel Dog Adoption Program in Two US Communities.

PLoS ONE 9(3): e91959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091959

http://127.0.0.1:8081/plosone/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0091959

Page 9: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

9

Returns are significantly lower for Adoption Ambassador dogs

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Returns

AA

Shelter

Page 10: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

10

What if they are free? Our Research

Page 11: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

11

FREE CATS

Page 12: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

12

Fee-waived cat study in Canada

Fee-waived

and not fee-

waived cats at

same events

Followed

up 3

months

later

Standard

survey to

all

Page 13: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

13

Fee-waived adopters in Canada

Adopted

adult cats Could afford

regular fee

but preferred

free

Heard about

number of

cats needing

homes

More likely

to adopt

second fee-

waived cat

87% of fee-

waived adopters

drawn to cat due

to time cat in

shelter

> 2x as many fee-

waived adopters

made an extra

donation vs non-

fee waived

Why fee-waived?

Page 14: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

14

Fee-waived and non-fee waived

adopters cared for their cats!

Page 15: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

15

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

free vet check no free checkup

Did you use the free veterinary check up?

Fee waived

Non-fee waived

Page 16: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

16

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

still have cat don't have cat

Do you still have the cat?

Fee-waived

Non-fee waved

Page 17: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

17

Let’s give pets as a gifts

Page 18: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

18

What the Data Tells us…

•Dogs obtained as gifts are less likely to be

relinquished than dogs obtained from a

shelter, a friend, as a stray or from a pet

shop. (New et al, 2000)

•Cats obtained as gifts are less likely to be

relinquished than those that are obtained

from a shelter, a friend, as a stray or from a

pet shop. (New et al, 2000)

Page 19: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

19

Page 20: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

20

•Pets are rarely relinquished because they

are a unwanted gift (Scarlett, 1999)

• Dogs received as gifts are significantly

less at risk for relinquishment compared to

those that were purchased or adopted

(Patronek, 1996)

Page 21: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

21

Did receiving a pet as a gift increase, decrease

or have no impact on your love or attachment

to the pet?

36%

3%

60%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

No Impact

Decreased

Increased

Page 22: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

22

Were you involved in the selection

process of the pet that you received as

a gift?

34%

60%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Yes

No, I was ok with the surprise

No, but I wish I were involved

Page 23: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

23

What we found

No significant relationship between receiving a dog

or cat as a gift, whether a surprise or not, and the

receivers reported love or attachment for the pet

Page 24: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

24

Is that pet still with you?

74%

12%

13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Yes

No, pet passed away

No, pet is no longer with me

Page 25: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

25

No significant relationship between receiving a dog

or cat as a gift as a surprise or not and whether the

pet was still living in the home

Page 26: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

26

What about Dogs and Cats under the Tree?

Page 27: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

27

Page 28: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

28

What Happens when Policies are Removed and

Replaced with Dialogue?

Page 29: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

29

Attachment

Page 30: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

30

ID Tag

Page 31: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

31

Where he sleeps

Page 32: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

32

Going to the vet

Page 33: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

33

Declaw

Page 34: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

34

Resident dog issues

Page 35: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

35

Publications

•Gibbons, H., Weiss, E., Garrison, L., Allison, M. (2014) Evaluation

of a novel dog adoption program in two US communities . Plos1

•Weiss E. Gramann, S (2009). A comparison of attachment levels

of adopters of cats – fee based adoptions vs. free adoptions.

Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science Vol 4.

•Weiss, E., Dolan, E., Garrison, L., Hong, J., Slater, M., (2013).

Should dogs and cats be given as gifts? Animals. Volume 3(4)

995-1101.

• Weiss, E., Gramann, S., Dolan, E., Scotto, J., Slater M., (2014).

Do policy based adoptions increase the care a pet receives? An

exploration of a shift to conversation based adoption at one

shelter. Open Journal of Animal Sciences.

Page 36: Closing the door on Policy based adoptions

36