Antinuclear Antibodies by Bio-Plex 2200

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • One year of experience using multiplex technology in Autoimmunity Lab

    Marta Talise Astier, MD;MT

  • Introduction

    ANA: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies that target nuclear constituents of

    cells, such as the nuclear membrane, nucleoplasm, nucleoli, and nuclear

    organelles.

    Autoantibodies: are immunoglobulins that bind to antigens originating in the same individual or species (autoantigens).

    Measurement of ANA is extensively used for diagnosing and monitoring various

    autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjgren's syndrome,

    scleroderma, mixed connective tissue disease, polymyositis and dermatomyositis

  • IIF (Indirect Immunofluorescence ) Manual Semi-automatic

    PhD System (Bio-rad)

    Ag Hep-2cell

    ANA-Ab

    Fluorescein (FITC)- conjugated anti-human immunoglobulin

    Sample

    Screening Techniques

  • Homogeneus Pattern Speckled Pattern

    Nucleolar Pattern Centromere-B Pattern

    IIF (Indirect Immunofluorescence ) Screening Techniques

  • Difficult to Standardize:

    Disadvantages of the IIF technique

    Large lab-to-lab variation in reporting results of IIF on HEp-2 cells due to:

    Differences in microscopes such as:

    - Power of the objectives

    - Strength of the fluorescent light

    Differences in technicians interpretation of the IIF patterns.

    Differences in the conjugates used to detect the bound autoantibodies

    (IgG-specific compared to IgG-, IgA-, IgM-, or polyspecific),

    Differences of the starting dilution of serum (1:40, 1:80, 1:160) among

    laboratories.

    Differences in the ways that HEp-2 cells are fixed by various

    manufacturers.

  • Very high titers of an autoantibody could mask the fluorescence

    pattern of another.

    Limited capacity to differentiate Antigens

    Disadvantages of the IIF technique

    Laborious Technique

    Relatively high amount of skilled labor is required to perform the test.

    Addition of sample and detecting reagent, and wash steps, can be easily

    automated.

    However, a Trained Technologist must read and interpret the slide by

    examining it under a fluorescent microscope and must manually enter

    the resulting data into the laboratorys information system.

  • Screening Techniques ELISA ANA Screen

    Sensitivity Positive false

    Limitation

    Ags DNA (dsDNA y nDNA), Histonas, Ro, La,

    Sm, SmRNP, Scl 70 y Jo-1, Ags

    Centromricos

  • Western Blot

    Screening Techniques

  • Inmunodot

    Screening Techniques

  • Multiplex These systems utilize a new approach for the simultaneous measurement of autoantibodies based on multiple-dyed (fluorescent) beads coated with specific antigens and flow cytometry detection.

    Screening Techniques

    The BioPlex 2200 ANA screen (by BioRad) is a fully automated Luminex-based system developed for high-throughput analysis of 13 autoimmune analytes simultaneously in a single tube.

    Reacting with SSA (52 and 60 kDa), SSB, Sm, Sm/RNP, RNP-A, RNP-68 kDa, Scl70, centromere B, dsDNA, chromatin, Jo1, ribosomal P proteins.

  • ANA Screen Kit Bioplex 2200

    ANA Screen Reagent Pack use 16 microspheres: 13 Antigens and 3 quality Control

  • Evaluation of ANAs by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

    500 serum samples randomly admitted to the autoimmunity section

    during May and June 2009.

    Samples were tested by IIF on Hep-2 cell line substrate Bio-Rad Lab;

    by enzyme immunoassay ELISA SeraQuest ANA screening; AtheNA

    Multi-lyte ANA test system and finally by BioPlex2200 ANA screen

    (by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

    IIFwas considered positive from the dilution 1 / 80.

    Methodology

    M. Talise1, M. Sevilla1, S. Lermo1, L. Borque2, E. Paz-Artal1, A. Serrano1

    1Immunology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, 2San Pedro Hospital, Logroo, Spain

  • Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)

    IIF ANA Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 51 29 80

    Negative 27 393 420

    Total 78 422 500

    Global Agreement of 88.8%

    Agreement %: Positive IIF-Bioplex + Negative IIF-Bioplex/Total (500) x 100

  • Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)

    IIF ANA Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 51 29 80

    Negative 27 393 420 Total 78 422 500

    Global Agreement of 88.8%

    Agreement %: Positive IIF-Bioplex + Negative IIF-Bioplex/Total (500) x 100

  • Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)

    IIF ANA Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 51 29 80 Negative 27 393 420 Total 78 422 500

    Global Agreement 88.8%

    Agreement %: Positive IIF-Bioplex + Negative IIF-Bioplex/Total (500) x 100

  • Evaluation of ANAs by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

    13 false negatives by IIF for autoinmune diseases:

    4 patients had rheumatoid arthritis 3 Lupus 1 autoimmune hepatitis type I 1 Bowel, 1 Systemic Esclerosis, 1 Sweet sx, 1 vasculitis

    Disagreement

    12 false positives for autoimmune diseases:

    5 patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 3 patients Lupus treated 2 autoimmune hepatitis type I, 1 Dermatomyositis, 1 Behcet's disease, 1 Sjgren Sx, 1 Tumido lupus

    ANA Positive by IIF - Negative by Bioplex 2200: 27

    ANA Negative by IIF- Positive by Bioplex 2200: 29

  • Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (2150) samples)

    IIF ANA Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 297 168 465

    Negative 30 1655 1685

    Total 327 1823 2150

    Global Agreement of 90.8%

    Agreement %: Positive IIF-Bioplex + Negative IIF-Bioplex/Total (2150) x 100

  • Luminex Athena

    Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 35 49 84

    Negative 18 398 416

    Total 53 447 500

    Bioplex 2200 Vs Athena Luminex (500 samples)

    Global Agreement 86.6%

    Agreement %: Positive Athena-Bioplex + Negative Athena-Bioplex/Total (500) x 100

  • ELISA SeroQuest

    Positive Negative

    Bioplex Positive 65 15 80

    Negative 90 280 370

    Total 155 295 450

    Bioplex 2200 Vs ELISA SeroQuest (450 samples)

    Global Agreement 76.7%

    Agreement %: Positive Elisa-Bioplex + Negative Elisa-Bioplex/Total (450) x 100

  • Evaluation of Antinuclear Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B antibodies by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

    INTRODUCTION Autoantibodies to Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B ribonucleoproteins are found in autoimmune diseases such as primary Sjgrens syndrome, systemic lupus erythematousus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis1 (RA). Two types of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies have been described, anti-SSA-52 kDa and anti-SSA-60kDa, historically, these autoantibodies were considered as a uniform autoantibody-system. However, recent studies provided evidence that Ro60 and Ro52 are not part of a stable macromolecular complex and that anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 (SS-A) antibodies have different clinical associations and each specific to different antigens2, for this reason it is necessary to be able to individually identify these antibodies in the autoimmunity laboratory and the Bioplex TM 2200 automated system offers this advantage; We compare this technique with the immunofluorescence (IIF) and AtheNA Multi-lyte ANA test system a multiplex fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for the semi-quantitative of Ig G class antibody to 9 separate analytes (DNA, SSA, SSB, Sm, RNP, Scl-70, Jo-1, Centromere B, and Histone).

    M. Talise1, M. Sevilla1, S. Lermo1, L. Borque2, E. Paz-Artal1, A. Serrano1

    1Immunology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, 2San Pedro Hospital, Logroo, Spain

  • 37

    42

    33

    42

    27

    11

    17

    0 5

    10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    Evaluation of Antinuclear Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B antibodies by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

  • Anti-SSA Negative Athena - Positive Bioplex 2200: 15

    12 Positive by IIF

    6 SLE

    2 Systemic Sclerosis

    2 Autoimmune Hepatitis

    1 Sjgren Sx + Raynaud

    1 Dermatomyositis

    Anti-SSA Positive Athena- Negative Bioplex 2200: 3

    Evaluation of Antinuclear Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B antibodies by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

    Disagreement

    3 Negative by IIF= False positive by Athena

  • Anti-SSB Negative by Athena- Positive by Bioplex 2200: 8

    8 Positive by IIF

    4 Patients SLE

    2 Rheumatoid arthritis

    2 Sjgren Sx

    1 Positive by IIF Rheumatoid A

    Anti-SSB Positive by Athena- Negative by Bioplex 2200: 2

    Evaluation of Antinuclear Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B antibodies by Multiplex technology at the University Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid-Spain)

    Disagreement

    1 Negative by IIF

  • Conclusion

    2.-The observed disagreement may be due to different design and nature of the antigens used in each method and maybe with slight modifications in the cutoff point would ensure greater consistency.

    1.-We conclude that BioPlex 2200 has a good percentage of concordance with the comparative method and represents a fast solution, sensitive and specific for diagnosis of autoimmune diseases.

    3.- Bioplex 2200 can be a good solution as a multiplex approach to diagnose autoimmune diseases like Sjgrens syndrome, systemic lupus erythematousus and rheumatoid arthritis because the separation of Ro / SSA 52 and 60 antigens conferred increased sensitivity, provides greater specificity with a lower rate of false negatives.

  • REFERENCES

    1. Tan EM. Antinuclear antibodies: diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases and probes for

    cell biology. Adv. Immunology. 1989. 44:93-151

    2. Ulvestad E, Kanestrom A, Madland TM et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for antinuclear

    antibodies in rheumatological practice. Scand. J. Immunol. 2000. 52:309

    3. van Woerkom JM, Geertzema JG, Nikkels PG, et al. Expression of Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B

    determined by immunohistochemistry in healthy, inflamed and autoimmune diseased human

    tissues: a generalized phenomenon. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004 May-Jun;22(3):285-92.

    4. J. Schulte-Pelkum a,M. Fritzler , M. Mahler . Latest update on the Ro/SS-A autoantibody

    system. Autoimmunity Reviews 8 (2009) 632637

  • Gracias

    http://biblioragazzi.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/grazie.gif

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10ANA Screen Kit Bioplex 2200Slide Number 12Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)Bioplex 2200 Vs IIF (500 samples)Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26