35
CAN HEALTH BECOME AN EVEN BIGGER PART OF THE ECONOMY WITHOUT UNDERMINING FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY? Mark Pearson Deputy Director Employment, Labour and Social Affairs New Approaches to Economic Thinking Seminar on Project C3, 31 January 2014

Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

OECD Mark Pearson - Can health become an even bigger part of the economy without undermining fiscal sustainability? 31 January 2014.

Citation preview

Page 1: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

CAN HEALTH BECOME AN

EVEN BIGGER PART OF THE

ECONOMY WITHOUT

UNDERMINING FISCAL

SUSTAINABILITY?

Mark Pearson

Deputy Director

Employment, Labour and Social Affairs

New Approaches to Economic Thinking Seminar on Project C3, 31 January 2014

Page 2: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• Health spending is likely to continue to

grow as a share of the economy

• This will put great pressure on public

budgets unless:

– We improve value for money

– We reallocate public funds from other areas

– We raise the efficiency of public funding for health

– We get more private finance into the system

2

Key points

Page 3: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

HEALTH AND THE ECONOMY

3

Page 4: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Health spending outpaced economic growth

in the pre-crisis period

Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013 4

Annual growth rate of health spending per capita and real GDP per capita, 2000-2009

AUS

AUT

BEL CAN

CHI

CZE

DEN

EST

FIN

FRA DEU

GRC

HUN

ISL

IRL

ISR ITA

JPN

KOR

LUX

MEX

NLD

NZL

NOR

POL

PRT

SVK

SVN ESP

SWE

CHE

GBR

USA

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

-1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6%

Av

er

ag

e a

nn

ua

l g

ro

wth

ra

te i

n r

ea

l h

ea

lth

e

xp

en

dit

ur

e p

er

ca

pit

a

Average annual growth rate in real GDP per capita

Page 5: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

5

The crisis has moderated rapid growth in

health spending 5.3

7.0

1.6

7.2

1.8

5.3

3.3

3.8

5.9

4.1

1.6

3.0

4.1

2.2

2.8

3.7

3.1

2.1

3.5

4.5

5.5

7.1

3.4

1.9

3.9

3.4

2.1

3.1

10.9

1.3

2.8

7.5

9.3

-11.1

-6.6

-3.8

-3.0

-2.2

-1.8

-1.8

-1.2

-0.8

-0.5

-0.4

0.0

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.1

2.6

2.8

3.4

4.9

5.5

6.3

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Gre

ece

Irela

nd

Icela

nd

Esto

nia

Port

ug

al

Un

ite

d K

ing

dom

De

nm

ark

Slo

ven

ia

Czech R

epu

blic

Spain

Ita

ly

Austr

alia

OE

CD

32

Austr

ia

No

rwa

y

Belg

ium

Me

xic

o

Fra

nce

Ca

nad

a

Ne

w Z

eala

nd

Ne

therl

and

s

Pola

nd

Un

ite

d S

tate

s

Sw

itzerl

and

Fin

land

Sw

ede

n

Germ

any

Hu

nga

ry

Slo

vak R

epub

lic

Isra

el

Japa

n

Ch

ile ¹

Kore

a

2000-2009 2009-2011

1. CPI used as deflator. Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013

Annual avera

ge g

row

th r

ate

(%

)

Annual average growth rate in per capita health expenditure, real terms, 2000 to 2011 (or nearest year)

Page 6: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

6

But even still, health has been a major

contributor to growth over the last decade

Contribution of health to growth in GDP per capita (%), 2000 to 2011

Page 7: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Health and social care is a fast growing

source of employment in many countries

Source: OECD Database on Labour Force Statistics, countries selected reflect the availability of data 7

Change in employment between 2000 and 2011, various industries

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Ireland Spain Australia Canada UnitedKingdom

Austria France Finland CzechRepublic

All activities Agriculture Industry Services Human health and social work activities

Page 8: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Poor physical and mental health hits the labour market

Employment Wages Absenteeism

Obesity

Lower probability of employment (causal)

Larger wage penalties

(causal)

(Lundborg et al. 2010, Sweden)

More sickness absences,

especially for women (causal)

Alcohol Use

Long-term light

drinkers have better employment opportunities

(Jarl et al 2012, Sweden)

Moderate drinking positively associated with

wages

(Hamilton and Hamilton 1997, Canada)

Absences 20% higher

among abstainers, former and heavy drinkers (causal)

(Vahtera et al 2002, Finland)

Smoking

Heavy smokers more

likely to be unemployed (Jusot et al. 2008, France)

(possible causality)

Smokers earn 4-8% less than non-smokers

(causal)

(Levine et al. 1997, USA)

Smokers 33% more likely

to be absent from work than non-smokers

(causal)

(Weng et al. 2012, meta-analysis) 8

Page 9: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Sickness absence incidence Average absence duration Presenteeism incidence

42

28

19

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Severe disorder

Moderate disorder

No disorder

7.3

5.6

4.8

5.2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Severe disorder

Moderate disorder

No disorder

88

69

26

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Severe disorder

Moderate disorder

No disorder

Source: OECD (Sick on the Job:? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work).

Sickness absence (% and duration) and productivity losses at work (%)

Productivity losses through mental-ill health are

large

Page 10: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

HEALTH AND PUBLIC FINANCES

10

Page 11: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Health care is predominately publicly funded

8

73

85

5 9

83

75

9

82

51

11

78

32

4 7

10

60

7 2

68

27

35

6

69 68 67

24

64

19

8

17

11 6

22

38

77

12

79 74

8

73

30

69

45

73 70

65

15

67

71

5

46

37

65

1

42

1

46

56

45

46

43

25

7

6

15 13 15 12

10 11 15 17 18 18 18 17

8 12

20 20 24

12

21 19 20 24

16 20 18

31 29

26 27

25 37

12

49

38

6

2 0

3 5

2 1 5

14 10

4 2

14

6 6 1

13 8 12

3 5

9 3 10

6

35

4

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Ne

therl

and

s

No

rwa

y

De

nm

ark

Czech R

epu

blic

Lu

xe

mbo

urg

Un

ite

d K

ing

dom

¹

Ne

w Z

eala

nd

Japa

n

Sw

ede

n

Icela

nd

Esto

nia

Ita

ly ¹

Austr

ia

Fra

nce

Germ

any

Belg

ium

Fin

land

Slo

vak R

epub

lic

Slo

ven

ia

Spain

Turk

ey

OE

CD

34

Pola

nd

Ca

nad

a

Austr

alia

Irela

nd

¹

Gre

ece

Port

ug

al

Sw

itzerl

and

Hu

nga

ry

Isra

el

Kore

a

Un

ite

d S

tate

s

Me

xic

o ¹

Ch

ile

General Government Social Security Private out-of-pocket Private insurance Other

% o

f c

urr

en

t e

xp

en

dit

ure

1. Data refer to total health expenditure. Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013

11

Page 12: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

This will make health a major pressure on public budgets

across all OECD countries

Source: OECD Economic Policy Paper n°06, 2013 12

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Average public spending 2006-2010 Increase of public spending 2010-2030 Increase of public spending 2030-2060

% GDP

Page 13: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Drivers of healthcare expenditure growth between 1995 and 2009 in OECD countries

Ageing is not the key driver of health spending

growth

Healthcare expenditure growth (100%)

Demography (12%)

Age structure

Health by age

Income (42%)

Residual (46%)

Relative prices

Technology

Institutions and policies

Source: OECD Economic Policy Paper n°06, 2013

13

Page 14: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• Implications:

– Intergenerational transfer

– As ageing is not the driver we cannot ‘ride out’ health spending by letting budgets run into deficit

– The policy challenges are productivity, relative budget priority and the boundaries of financing

What do we mean by fiscal

sustainability?

14

IMF: The capacity of a government, at least in the future, to finance its desired expenditure programs, to service any debt obligations […] and to ensure its solvency.

EU: This considers the ability of the government to meet the costs of its current and future debt through future revenues (Indicator S1). The finite version of the budget constraint is assessed with reference to a target date of 2030 and a target level of debt of 60 % of GDP (Indicator S2)

Page 15: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

OPTIONS 1. EFFICIENCY

15

Page 16: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

16

Improving health sector productivity can

dramatically change the fiscal outlook

Sensitivity of public sector net debt projections to interest rates

Sensitivity of public sector net debt projections to health productivity

Source: Fiscal Sustainability Report, UK Office for Budget Responsibility, July 2013

Page 17: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

The target areas for expenditure control are

well known among Finance Ministries

17

0 5 10 15 20

Outpatient care spending

Primary health care services

Spending on prevention programs

Long term care spending

Pharmaceutical costs

Hospital expenditure

Source: OECD Survey on Budget Practices and Procedures, 2013

Number of countries

Self-reported priorities for expenditure control, 22 OECD countries

Page 18: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

18

The crisis has been used to slow growth in desirable

areas, but we have fallen short on prevention

4.8% 4.8%

5.9%

2.9%

6.9%

2.5%

3.2%

4.6%

6.2%

2.8%

6.4%

3.5%

0.7% 0.9%

5.3%

0.2%

-1.5%

-0.9%

1.0%

1.7% 1.6%

-1.7% -1.7%

1.7%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Inpatient care Outpatient care Long-term care Pharmaceuticals Prevention Administration

2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013

Average annual growth rates of spending for selected functions, OECD average, in real terms

Page 19: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Proportion of people being treated by a specialist or non-specialist, by severity of their mental disorder

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Seve

re

Mo

de

rate

No

ne

Austria Belgium Denmark Netherlands Sweden United Kingdom OECD-21

Non-specialist Specialist

Treatment rate (in %)

Source: OECD (Sick on the Job:? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work).

There are pervasive under-treatment issues in

mental health

Page 20: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Worthwhile processes are not being

undertaken with consistency

Distribution of French GPs: % of diabetic patients having 3 or more HBA1C tests during the year in the last 12 months (2009)

Average=40% Target=65%

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 21: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Considerable medical practice variations

within and between countries

21

Note: Rates are standardised using OECD’s population structure. Missing country data will be added once available. Source: National reports submitted for the OECD project on Medical Practice Variations.

Rates of PTCA (standardised for age and sex) per 100,000 population, 2011 (or earliest

available)

Rates of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (standardised for age and sex) per 100,000

population, 2011 (or earliest available)

Page 22: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

OPTIONS: 2. REALLOCATE PUBLIC

SPENDING TOWARDS HEALTH

22

Page 23: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

23

Countries have allowed health to become a

bigger share of their budget

Source: OECD National Accounts Statistics (database). Data for Australia are based on Government Finance Statistics provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

-2%

-1%

-1%

0%

1%

1%

2%

2%

Social protection Health Recreation,culture and

religion

Environmentalprotection

Public order andsafety

Education Housing andcommunityamenities

Defence Economic affairs General publicservices

Change in the structure of general government expenditures on average in OECD countries by function (2001 to 2011)

Page 24: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

OPTIONS: 3. GET A MORE SUSTAINABLE WAY OF FINANCING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON HEALTH

24

Page 25: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

25

Our models incorporate estimates of how an ageing

population will increase utilisation of health services…

26% 27% 28% 28% 29% 29% 30%

31% 32%

32% 33%

34% 35%

35% 36%

37% 38%

39% 39% 40% 41% 41% 42% 43% 43% 44% 44% 45%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

201

3

201

4

201

5

201

6

201

7

201

8

201

9

202

0

202

1

202

2

202

3

202

4

202

5

202

6

202

7

202

8

202

9

203

0

203

1

203

2

203

3

203

4

203

5

203

6

203

7

203

8

203

9

204

0

Old age (+65) dependency ratio (20-64), OECD

Page 26: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

… but they do not account for shortfalls in revenues

for countries that rely heavily on payroll taxes

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Other

Sin taxes

Taxes on (company) profits

Taxes on goods and services

Income taxes

Mandatory health insurancepremium

Payroll contributions

Other general taxation

Average share of different sources of revenues for funding health care expenditure, selected OECD countries

Page 27: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• ‘Sin taxes’ are increasingly being used by OECD countries

– These taxes target lifestyle choices that can affect productivity and employment outcomes.

– The arguments for using taxes to attain public health objectives are strong for tobacco products and alcohol.

– The poor are likely to pay more but have greater health benefits.

Some new taxes could be effective in improving

health, but will not be major sources of revenue

27

Page 28: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

OPTIONS: 4. LET PRIVATE SPENDING RISE

28

Page 29: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

29

Source: Paris et al., Measuring coverage (Forthcoming)

Boundaries between public and private

need to be debated

Page 30: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

It is unlikely that countries will want to step back from

covering 100% of their population

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

99.8

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

99.9

99.9

88.9

99.9

99.0

99.5

98.8

97.2

79.8

96.6

95.2

92.9

86.7

31.8

0.2

11.0

0.9

17.0

53.1

0 20 40 60 80 100

Australia

Canada

Czech Rep.

Denmark

Finland

Greece

Hungary

Iceland

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Japan

Korea

New Zealand

Norway

Portugal

Slovenia

Sweden

Switzerland

United Kingdom

Austria

France

Germany

Netherlands

Spain

Turkey

Belgium

Luxembourg

Chile

Poland

Slovak Rep.

Estonia

Mexico

United States

Total public coverage Primary private health coverage

Percentage of total population

30 Source: OECD health data, 2013

Page 31: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

Some shift to private financing

-0.4%

0.1% 0.0% 0.5%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

GeneralGovt./SHI

Private HealthIns.

Out-of-Pocket Total Health Exp.

2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Source: OECD Health Statistics 2013

Page 32: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• The ‘theoretical’ advantages of private health insurance:

– Expanding individual choice

– Spur innovation and flexibility

– Reduce public cost pressure

• The practical risks associated with private health insurance:

– higher administrative costs

– less bargaining power for insurers

– risk selection

– Pressure for tax incentives

32

Private health insurance markets are not

necessarily cost reducing

Page 33: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• Be more specific and selective in defining the range of services covered

• Health systems have become better at assessing new activities, but this misses most spending:

– Cost effectiveness analysis studies are used to assess whether a new service or drug should be funded

– A more systematic assessment of therapeutic strategies by disease should be conducted

33

A better way to cost share…

Page 34: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

• Health spending is likely to continue to

grow as a share of the economy

• This will put great pressure on public

budgets unless:

– We improve value for money

– We reallocate public funds from other areas

– We raise the efficiency of public funding for health

– We get more private finance into the system

34

Key points

Page 35: Can we still spend more on health without breaking the budget?

CAN HEALTH BECOME AN EVEN

BIGGER PART OF THE ECONOMY

WITHOUT UNDERMINING FISCAL

SUSTAINABILITY?

31st January 2014 Mark Pearson Deputy Director Employment, Labour and Social Affairs