22
Current Concepts: Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus Andrew Bernhard Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine Department of Podiatry, Medical Student Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School A teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School

Contact Precautions and MRSA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A brief presentation on the efficacy and safety of contact precautions and MRSA, given as a student at Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, MA

Citation preview

Page 1: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Current Concepts:

Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus

Andrew BernhardKent State University College of Podiatric Medicine

Department of Podiatry, Medical StudentBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Harvard Medical School

Boston, MA

A teaching hospital of

Harvard Medical School

Page 2: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Methicillin Resistant Staph. Aureus

• Methicillin was first produced in 1959

• During the 1960s, infrequent MRSA outbreaks occurred in Europe and Australia.

• In 1968, Boston City Hospital reported the first case in America.

Page 3: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

MRSA Considerations

• S. aureus is traditionally sensitive to beta-lactam antibiotics.

• These antibiotics inhibit cell wall synthesis, which results in bacteriocidal performance.

Page 4: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

β-Lactam Resistance

• The key to MRSA virulence is its resistance, which can be due to production of hydrolytic enzymes, like β-Lactamase and penicillinase, or altered penicillin binding proteins.

Page 5: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Resistance Mechanisms

Figure 1, above, depicts the conversion of penicillin to penicilloic acid, an inactive compound.

Figure 2, right, depicts mecA encoded PBPs, which do not bind β-Lactam antibiotics.

Page 6: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

What does this mean?

• MRSA rates are generally considered to have been increasing.

• Large, generalized population studies are rare, but studies specifically show increased incidence in the following:

• High school athletes• Dutch animal farmers• Young Ohioans• Hospitalized patients• Nursing home workers• College students

Page 7: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Further statistics

• According to the CDC: – 79 million Americans are

colonized with staph aureus

– 4.1 million are colonized with MRSA

– The prevalence of MRSA has increased from 2% of staph infections in 1974 to

64% in 2004.

Thankfully, some newer research shows a decrease in MRSA rates

Page 8: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Why the downward trend?

• Needles with safety features and antimicrobial coated catheters have offered minimal infection control.

• Improvements in hospital staff behavior have proven more effective.

Page 9: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

What about contact precautions?

• We are all familiar with them but what does the research say?

Page 10: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Contact Precaution Efficacy on MRSA

• Few prospective studies exist.

• The good news is that several studies show a correlation between contact precautions and decreased MRSA transmission, most notably Jernigan in 1996.

Page 11: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

On the down side,

• There are many studies which also demonstrate non-superiority of contact precautions, though they are older.

• More commonly, current literature speaks to adverse effects.

Page 12: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

• From Morgan’s comprehensive literature review

Page 13: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

How does this affect MRSA?

• Most patients under contact precautions are there because they are MRSA colonizers.

• Active surveillance cultures are a great tool for identifying these patients.

• But what new treatments are in the pipeline?

Page 14: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Ceftobiprole

• New 5th generation cephalosporin

• Broad spectrum and bacteriocidal

• No safety concerns

• Efficacy trials were potentially biased

• Currently only available in Switzerland

Page 15: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Oritavancin• A glycopeptide

antibiotic, like Vanco• Seemingly bacteriocidal

against MRSA, VRE, C. diff, and Anthrax

• Has had less ADRs then comparable drugs, but studies were not powerful enough for FDA.

Page 16: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Iclaprim

• Diaminopyrimidine dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor

• Similar to trimethoprim, but active against MRSA, VRSA, S. pneumonia, and gram –

• Has been granted fast-track FDA status

Page 17: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

The State of Antibiotic Research

• Most sources say that antibiotic development is currently very underfunded.

• New classes of drugs are more likely to be successful than newer versions of older drugs.

Page 18: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

New Drug Targets

• Yoneyama and Katsumata offer a review of potential new drug targets: – Peptide deformylase– Non-mevalonate pathway– Bacterial fatty acid

synthesis– Bacterial virulence

factors

Page 19: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

Any Questions?

Page 20: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

References• Albrich WC, Harbarth S. Health-care workers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA?. The Lancet Infectious Diseases

(2008) 8(5), 289-301.

• Tacconelli E, De Angelis G, Cataldo MA, Pozzi E and Cauda R. Does antibiotic exposure increase the risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2008) 61, 26–38.

• Kirkland KB. Taking Off the Gloves: Toward a Less Dogmatic Approach to the Use of Contact Isolation. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2009) 48, 766–771.

• Kirkland KB, Weinstein JM. Adverse effects of contact isolation. The Lancet (1999) 354, 1177-1178.

• Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, Farr BM. SHEA Guideline for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2003) 24(5), 362-386.

• Morgan DJ, Diekema DJ, Sepkowitz K, Perencevich EN. Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: A review of the literature. American Journal of Infection Control (2009) 37(2), 85-93.

• Catalano G, Houston SH, Catalano MC, Butera AS, Jennings SM, Hakala SM, Burrows SL, Hickey MG, Duss CV, Skelton DN, Laliotis GJ. Anxiety and Depression in Hospitalized Patients in Resistant Organism Isolation. Southern Medical Journal (2003) 96(2), 141-145.

• Murray-Leisure KA, Geib S, Graceley D, et al. Control of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990; 11:343-50.

• Bogdanovich T, Ednie LM, Shapiro S, Appelbaum PC. Antistaphylococcal Activity of Ceftobiprole, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2005) 49(10), 4210-4219.

Page 21: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

References• Kallen AJ, Mu Y, Bulens S, Reingold A, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes

JM, Schaffner W, Patel PR, Fridkin SK. Health Care-Associated Invasive MRSA Infections, 2005-2008. JAMA (2010) 304(6), 641-648.

• MRSA History Timeline: The First Half-Century, 1959–2009. MRSA Research Center at The University of Chicago Medical Center. Available: http://mrsa-research-center.bsd.uchicago.edu/timeline.html

• Buss BF, Mueller SW, Theis M, KeyserA, Safranek TJ. Population-Based Estimates of Methicillin-Resistant "Staphylococcus aureus" (MRSA) Infections among High School Athletes--Nebraska, 2006-2008. Journal of School Nursing (2009) 25(4), 282-291.

• Van Rijen MML, Van Keulen PH, Kluytmans JA. Increase in a Dutch Hospital of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Related to Animal Farming. Clinical Infectious Disease (2008) 46(2), 261-263.

• Nasr P, Delorme T, Rose S, Senita J, Callahan C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among younger population in Northeastern Ohio. The Ohio Journal of Science (2008) 108(3).

• Cohen PR, Kurzrock R. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infection: an emerging clinical problem. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2004) 50(2), 277-280.

• Burton DC, Edwards JR, Horan TC,; Jernigan JA, Fridkin SK. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in US Intensive Care Units, 1997-2007. JAMA (2009) 301(7), 727-736.

• Reboli AC, John JF, Levkoff AH. Epidemic methicillin-gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit Am J Dis Control 1989; 143:34-9.

• Yoneyama H, Katsumata R. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria and its Future for Novel Antibiotic Development. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry (2006) 70(5), 1060-1075.

Page 22: Contact Precautions and MRSA

Harvard Medical School

References• Stelfox HT, Bates DW, Redelmeier DA. Safety of Patients Isolated for Infection Control. JAMA (2003) 290(14),

1899-1905.

• Burke JP. Infection Control – A Problem for Patient Safety. New England Journal of Medicine (2003) 348(7), 651-658.

• Jain R, Kralovic SM, Evans ME, Ambrose M, Simbartl LA, Obrosky DS, Render ML, Freyberg RW, Jernigan JA, Muder RR, Miller LJ, Roselle GA. Veterans Affairs Initiative to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections. New England Journal of Medicine (2011) 364(7), 1419-1430.

• Jernigan JA, Titus MG, Groschel DHM, Getchell-White SI, Farr BM. Effectiveness of Contact Isolation during a Hospital Outbreak of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Epidemiology (1996) 143(5), 496-504.

• Boyce JM, Havill NL, Kohan C, Dumigan DG, Ligi CE. Do Infection Control Measures Work for Methacillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2004) 25(5), 395-401.

• Law MR, Gill ON, Turner A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: associated morbidity and effectiveness of control measures. Epidemiol Infect 1988;101:301-9.

• Cohen SH, Morita MM, Bradford M. A seven-year experience with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):233S-237S.

• Rao N, Jacobs S, Joyce L. cost-effective eradication of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a community teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988;9:255-6O.