35
Diabetes and Macrosomia Pennington Biomedical Research Center Division of Education Publication # 30

Diabetes and macrosomia

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Diabetes and macrosomia

Diabetes and Macrosomia

Pennington Biomedical Research CenterDivision of Education

Publication # 30

Page 2: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20092 of 35

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) Overview

Affects 2 to 9 percent of all pregnancies. Associated with maternal and perinatal complications.

Long-term adverse health outcomes among infants born to mothers with GDM:

– Sustained impairment of glucose tolerance– Subsequent obesity– Impaired intellectual achievement

The risk of macrosomia is increased.

Page 3: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20093 of 35

Gestational Diabetes (GDM)Development

Related to increased maternal body mass index (BMI). Pre-pregnancy BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher is a strong risk factor for the

development of GDM. Maternal obesity combined with an excessive weight gain during

pregnancy are major risk factors for: – pre-eclampsia – Cesarean section– preterm delivery– fetal macrosomia– fetal death.

Page 4: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20094 of 35

Macrosomia

An oversized fetus.

Occurs frequently in women with diabetes.

Can lead to trauma during birth and a greater chance of a cesarean delivery.

Page 5: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20095 of 35

Large for Gestational Age babies

Birth weight above the 90th percentile, is considered as LGA (large for gestational age).

Page 6: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20096 of 35

Around the World

Increasing proportion of infants born with a high birth weight (HBW). In Sweden, HBW infants has risen to more than 20%. A similar pattern occurs in North America and Europe. Researchers have found that

– increasing maternal weight– gestational weight gain – gestational diabetes– reduced smoking prevalence

among pregnant women may likely explain the increase in proportion of LGA births between 1976 and 1996 in Canada.

Page 7: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20097 of 35

Factors relating to LGA babies

Related to the level of glycemic control that the mother achieves.

Other factors that contribute to the development of LGA neonates are:

– Obesity of the mother– Excessive weight gain in pregnancy

Page 8: Diabetes and macrosomia

Research

Maternal diabetes control on infant

health at birth and in later life.

Page 9: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 20099 of 35

Fetal Growth Spurt and Pregestational Diabetic Pregnancy

Researchers assessed the timing of the fetal growth spurt among pre-existing diabetic pregnancies (types 1 and 2) and its relationship with diabetic control.

They hoped to find correlations between fetal growth acceleration and factors influencing this occurrence.

Wong S, Oats J, Chan F, McIntyre D. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1681-1684

Page 10: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200910 of 35

Fetal Growth Spurt and Pregestational Diabetic Pregnancy

In this study of 101 diabetic pregnancies, glucose control was found not to have a direct effect on the incidence of LGA babies.

Instead, maternal BMI was shown to have the more direct and greater effect.

Pregnancies were separated into two groups:

– Diabetic mothers with normal weight babies– Diabetic mothers with LGA babies

Wong S, Oats J, Chan F, McIntyre D. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1681-1684

Page 11: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200911 of 35

Fetal Growth Spurt and Pregestational Diabetic Pregnancy

The women of the group with LGA babies were shown to have significantly higher pre-pregnancy body weights and BMI’s.

There were no differences between the two

groups with glucose control in either the first, second, or third trimester.

Wong S, Oats J, Chan F, McIntyre D. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1681-1684

Page 12: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200912 of 35

Conclusions

Fetal growth acceleration in LGA fetuses of diabetic mothers was shown to begin in the second trimester, from as early as 18 weeks.

In this particular study, glucose control did not appear to have any direct effect on the incidence of LGA babies, and such observation might result from the effects of other not yet identified contributing factors.

Wong S, Oats J, Chan F, McIntyre D. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1681-1684

Page 13: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200913 of 35

Determinants of Fetal Growth at Different Periods of Pregnancies Complicated by GDM or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

The aim of this study was to determine what maternal factors had the strongest influence on fetal growth at different periods of pregnancies complicated by an abnormal glucose tolerance test (GTT).

The fetal abdominal circumference (AC) is used to describe fetal growth in this study because accelerated growth in the fetal AC in the early 3rd trimester has been shown to be a good predictor of macrosomia at birth.

Schaefer-Graf U et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 193-198.

Page 14: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200914 of 35

Determinants of Fetal Growth at Different Periods of Pregnancies Complicated by GDM or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Normalizing the macrosomia rate is the primary goal in treating women with pregnancies complicated by GDM.

Macrosomia is not only associated with a higher rate of birth injury for the mother and newborn, but it is also associated with higher weight and accumulation of fat in childhood, with a higher rate of obesity in adulthood.

Although normalizing maternal glucose levels has reduced neonatal morbidity in GDM, it has not been as effective in regards to macrosomia.

Macrosomia rates in mothers with GDM when compared to mothers without GDM still remain elevated even with maternal glucose normalization.

Schaefer-Graf U et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 193-198.

Page 15: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200915 of 35

Because maternal weight, glycemia after therapy, rates of fetal macrosomia, and LGA were not significantly different between GDM and IGT groups, they were analyzed together.

Results indicated that in the late 2nd and early 3rd trimester, maternal BMI and LGA in a previous pregnancy appear to have the strongest influence on fetal growth.

Later in the 3rd trimester, coincident with the period of maximal growth described in diabetic pregnancies, maternal glycemia predominates.

Determinants of Fetal Growth at Different Periods of Pregnancies Complicated by GDM or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Schaefer-Graf U et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 193-198.

Page 16: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200916 of 35

Conclusions

Conclusions of this second study were in agreement with the first, stating that maternal BMI has a great effect on the development of LGA babies.

However, this study went a step further in finding that both maternal BMI and LGA in a previous pregnancy had the largest influence on fetal growth, and identified the time frame when this effect was predominant.

This study also found that maternal glycemia does effect fetal growth, and found the particular time frame when its effects occurred.

Schaefer-Graf U et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 193-198.

Page 17: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200917 of 35

What Degree of Maternal Metabolic Control in Women With Type 1 DM is Associated with Normal Size & Proportions in Full-Term Infants?

The aim of this study was to assess the degree of maternal metabolic control in women with Type 1 DM necessary to allow for normal fetal growth and normal neonatal body proportions.

In this study, the anthropometric characteristics of 98 full-term singleton infants born to 98 Caucasian women with Type 1 DM were measured.

All women were enrolled within 12 weeks of gestation and were later placed in one of three mother-infant pair groups based on the level of glycemic control they were able to maintain over the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy.

Mello G et al. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1494-1498.

Page 18: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200918 of 35

What Degree of Maternal Metabolic Control in Women With Type 1 DM is Associated with Normal Size & Proportions in Full-Term Infants?

The three groups were:

There was a control group of 1,415 Caucasian mother-infant pairs with full-term singleton pregnancies. Members of the control group had normal glucose challenge test when screened for gestational diabetes.

Number of mother-infant pairs

Criteria required to be a member

Group 1 37 An average daily glucose level during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of ≤ 95 mg/dl

Group 2 37 An average daily glucose level during the 2nd trimester of > 95 mg/dl and during the 3rd trimester of ≤ 95 mg/dl

Group 3 24 An average daily glucose level during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of > 95 mg/dl

Mello G et al. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1494-1498.

Page 19: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200919 of 35

What Degree of Maternal Metabolic Control in Women With Type 1 DM is Associated with Normal Size & Proportions in Full-Term Infants?

Infants of diabetic mothers in group 1 of this study were found to be similar to those of the control group in birth weight and in other anthropometric parameters.

In contrast, offspring of diabetic mothers of groups 2 and 3 had an increased incidence of LGA, significantly greater means of ponderal index and thoracic circumferences, and significantly smaller cranial/thoracic circumference ratios with respect to the control group.

Mello G et al. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1494-1498.

Page 20: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200920 of 35

Conclusions

The results of the study indicate that, in diabetic pregnancies, only overall daily glucose values of ≤ 95 mg/dl throughout the second and third trimesters can avoid alterations in fetal growth.

Mello G et al. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1494-1498.

Page 21: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200921 of 35

Evaluation of Body Composition of LGA Infants of Women with GDM compared with Women with Normal Glucose Tolerance Levels

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not there is a difference in body composition in the LGA infants of women with GDM compared with the LGA infants of women with normal glucose tolerance levels.

The researchers also wanted to identify factors associated with the different levels of fat mass in these infants if a difference in body composition was found.

Durnwald C, Huston-Presley L, Amini S, Catalano P. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 804-8

Page 22: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200922 of 35

Evaluation of Body Composition of LGA Infants of Women with GDM compared with Women with Normal Glucose Tolerance Levels

Fifty cases of women with gestational diabetes and 52 cases of women with normal glucose tolerance levels were evaluated in the study.

Researchers found that infants born in the two groups did have similar birth weights.

Infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes did, in fact, have increased fat mass and percent body fat, with decreased lean body mass, when compared to infants of mothers with normal glucose tolerance levels.

Durnwald C, Huston-Presley L, Amini S, Catalano P. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 804-8

Page 23: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200923 of 35

Conclusions

Results of the study indicated that LGA infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus have increased fat mass and decreased lean body mass when compared with infants of mothers with normal glucose tolerance levels.

Factors were also identified which are believed to affect the level of fat mass an infant has.

Researchers indicated that in gestational diabetes, gestational age, and fasting value of the oral glucose tolerance test was shown to correlate best with the fat mass observed.

Durnwald C, Huston-Presley L, Amini S, Catalano P. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 804-8

Page 24: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200924 of 35

Growth and Fatness at Three to Six Years of Age of Children Born Small- or Large-for Gestational Age

The objective of this study was to determine whether or not there are differences in growth and fatness in early childhood as associated with birth weight status.

Children 3 to 6 years of age who were born small-for-gestational age (SGA) or large-for-gestational age (LGA) were compared with those who were born appropriate-for-gestational age.

Hediger M et al. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3).

Page 25: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200925 of 35

Growth and Fatness at Three to Six Years of Age of Children Born Small- or Large-for Gestational Age

From the third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, 3,192 US-born non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican-American children were included in the study.

The children were categorized, and growth outcome was assessed by birth weight-for-gestational age status.

The growth outcomes considered in these analyses were body weight (kg), height (cm), head circumference (cm), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC; cm), and triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (mm).

Hediger M et al. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3).

Page 26: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200926 of 35

Growth and Fatness at Three to Six Years of Age of Children Born Small- or Large-for Gestational Age

The study found that SGA children remain significantly shorter and lighter throughout early childhood.

The children do not seem to catch up from 36 to 83 months of age.

On the other hand, LGA infants remain longer and heavier throughout 83 months of age, but, unlike children born SGA, LGA children have a tendency to accumulate fat in early childhood.

This indicates that early childhood may be a particularly sensitive period in which there are increases in variation in levels of fatness associated with size at birth. If this is so, then one could conclude that intrauterine growth is associated with size in early childhood.

Hediger M et al. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3).

Page 27: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200927 of 35

Conclusions

Further research is needed to confirm that LGA children may be at risk for accumulating excess fat at an early age.

This study suggests that birth weight status and gestational age may be useful in assembling a prognostic risk profile for children, with LGA infants being placed in a category of “highest risk.”

Hediger M et al. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3).

Page 28: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200928 of 35

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes if Gestational Impaired Glucose Tolerance is Not Treated

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there is increased maternal or neonatal morbidity in connection with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) during pregnancy when the condition is not treated.

The 213 study participants were from a defined geographic area in Sweden, and the study period was from 1997-2001.

Ostlund I et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(7): 2107-2111.

Page 29: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200929 of 35

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes if Gestational Impaired Glucose Tolerance is Not Treated

The diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in this area was limited to the criteria used for diabetes.

Because of this, 213 women, who were identified with IGT during pregnancy, were not diagnosed or treated.

Researchers collected the data on the maternal and fetal outcomes for each subject.

For each research subject used in the study, four control subjects were taken from the same delivery department.

Ostlund I et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(7): 2107-2111.

Page 30: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200930 of 35

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes if Gestational Impaired Glucose Tolerance is Not Treated

The researchers found that the proportion of women who underwent cesarean section was significantly higher in the research subjects than in the control subjects and was independently associated with IGT.

They also found that the proportion of infants who were LGA was independently and significantly associated with untreated IGT during pregnancy.

Admission to a neonatal intensive care unit for 2 days or longer was also more common for infants of mothers with untreated IGT during pregnancy.

Overall, 71.3% of the children in the IGT group and 87.3% of the children in the control group had no neonatal complications.

Ostlund I et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(7): 2107-2111.

Page 31: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200931 of 35

Conclusions

The researchers concluded that there is an increased independent association between cesarean section rate, prematurity, LGA, and macrosomic infants born to mothers with untreated IGT.

Although most of the children were healthy in this study, there was still increased morbidity in the group of children born to mothers with untreated IGT.

Researchers call for further investigations on this topic.

Ostlund I et al. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(7): 2107-2111.

Page 32: Diabetes and macrosomia

Heli J Roy, PhD, MBA, RD

Division of EducationPhillip Brantley, PhD, DirectorPennington Biomedical Research CenterSteven Heymfield, MD, Executive Director.

Page 33: Diabetes and macrosomia

About Our Company

Pennington Biomedical Research Center

VISION

Our vision is to lead the world in eliminating chronic diseases. 

MISSION

Our mission is to discover the triggers of chronic diseases through innovative research that improves human health across the lifespan.  We are helping people live Well Beyond the Expected.

 The Pennington Center has several research areas, including:

Clinical Obesity Research

Experimental Obesity

Functional Foods

Health and Performance Enhancement

Nutrition and Chronic Diseases

Nutrition and the Brain

Dementia, Alzheimer’s and healthy aging

Diet, exercise, weight loss and weight loss maintenance

The research fostered in these areas can have a profound impact on healthy living and on the prevention of common chronic diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, hypertension and osteoporosis.

 The Division of Education provides education and information to the scientific community and the public about research findings, training programs and research areas, and coordinates educational events for the public on various health issues.

 We invite people of all ages and backgrounds to participate in the exciting research studies being conducted at the Pennington Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. If you would like to take part, visit the clinical trials web page at www.pbrc.edu or call (225) 763-3000.

PBRC 200933 of 35

Page 34: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200934 of 35

References

Wong S, Oats J, Chan F, McIntyre D. Fetal growth spurt and pre-gestational diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1681-1684.

Crowther C, Hiller J, Moss J, McPhee A, Jeffries W, Robinson J. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM. 2005; 352(24): 2477-2486.

Schaefer-Graf U et al. Determinants of fetal growth at different periods of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 193-198.

Mello G et al. What degree of maternal metabolic control in women with type 1 diabetes is associated with normal body size and proportions in full-term infants? Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 1494-1498.

Page 35: Diabetes and macrosomia

PBRC 200935 of 35

References

Durnwald C, Huston-Presley L, Amini S, Catalano P. Evaluation of body composition of large-for-gestational age infants of women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared with women with normal glucose tolerance levels. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004; 191: 804-8.

Hediger M et al. Growth and fatness at three to six years of age of children born small- or large-for-gestational age. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(3).

Ostlund I et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes if gestational impaired glucose tolerance is not treated. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(7): 2107-2111.

http://www.umm.edu/ency/article/002248.htm

Copyright 2009PBRC # PPT30