38
Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Mul=ple Animal Models

Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

Examining  Drug  Candidates  for  Pulmonary  Arterial  Hypertension:  Ups  and  

Downs  of  Mul=ple  Animal  Models  

     

Page 2: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

Ups  and  Downs  of  Mul=ple  Animal  Models  

     

Page 3: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

Von  Romberg  (1891)  –  ‘pulmonary  vascular  stenosis’    increase  in  pulmonary  blood  pressure    

 -­‐pulmonary  artery,  pulmonary  vein,  or  pulmonary    capillaries    -­‐shortness  of  breath,  dizziness,  fainCng    -­‐exacerbated  by  exerCon    -­‐heart  failure  

 Normal  pulmonary  arterial  pressure    =    12–16  mm  Hg  PAH  =  mean  pulmonary  artery  pressure  >  25  mm  Hg                  

 Pulmonary  Hypertension  

Page 4: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 This  is  PAH  

Page 5: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

USA    -­‐  ~200,000  hospitalizaCons/yr,  ~15,000  deaths/yr    1980s  -­‐untreated  median  survival  of  2–3  years  from  Cme  of  diagnosis  

 -­‐cause  of  death  -­‐-­‐  cor  pulmonale    Recent  -­‐outcome  study  show  89%  survival  at  2  yrs  with  Rx    -­‐future  expectaCon  is  median  survival  of  10+  years    -­‐pregnancy  is  contraindicated  in  PAH        

 Pulmonary  Hypertension  

Page 6: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

PATHWAYS  OF  PAH                                          Schermuly  et  al  –  Nature  Reviews  Cardiology  August  2011  

 

Page 7: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Animal  Models  of  PAH  

MONOCROTALINE  RAT    Monocrotaline  (MCT)  is  a  11-­‐membered  macrocyclic  pyrrolizidine  plant  alkaloid    A  single  SQ  injecCon  into  rats  results  in  hepaCc  generaCon  of  toxic  metabolite  –  MCT  pyrrole    Phase  II  metabolism  of  MCT  is  through  glutathione  conjugaCon    ReacCve  metabolite  is  transported  to  lungs,  injuring  pulmonary  vasculature                  

Page 8: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

                                           

Page 9: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Monocrotaline  Rat  

Three  weeks  a^er  MCT  (60  mg/kg,  SQ)                      

Page 10: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 5HT2B    antagonism  in  MCT  rat  

                             

                         

Platelets  take  up  5HT  in  blood,  deliver  to  sites  of  microvascular  injury  and  coagulaCon    5-­‐HT  is  a  mitogen  for  pulmonary  endothelial  cells,  SMC  and  myofibroblasts    PaCents  that  ingested  5HT2B  agonists  develop  PAH  (fenfluramine)    5HT2B  knockout  mice  resist  development  of  hypoxic  vasoconstricCon      C-­‐122  is  novel  antagonist  for  5HT2B  receptors  

Page 11: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 5HT2B    antagonism  in  MCT  rat  

                             

                         

Serotonin  plays  a  role  in  proliferaCve  and  funcConal  components  of  PAH  

Page 12: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

                                           

                             

                         

Page 13: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

   

                                           

Antagonism  of  5HT2B    helps  to  prevent  the  development  of  PAH  in  rats  treated  with  MCT    Pros  of  MCT  model  -­‐well  characterized  -­‐reproducible  -­‐similar  to  human  condiCon  

 -­‐muscularizaCon  of  PAs    -­‐increases  PAP    -­‐RV  hypertrophy  

-­‐generally  works  across  species  -­‐easy  to  interrogate  prevenCon    Cons  of  MCT  model  -­‐dis-­‐similar  to  human  condiCon  

 -­‐lacks  EC  proliferaCon,  lumen  -­‐addiConal  organ  toxicity  -­‐more  of  challenge  to  interrogate  reversal            

Page 14: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  Cofactor  model    

Hypoxia  +  Co-­‐admin  Induced  PAH  Model  -­‐exposure  to  hypoxia  alone  results  in  vasoconstricCon  of  the  pulmonary  arterial  tree  in  mammalian  research  species  –  (HPV)      

Page 15: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  alone  

Hypoxia  PAH  Model  -­‐exposure  to  hypoxia  alone  results  in  vasoconstricCon  of  the  pulmonary  arterial  tree  in  mammalian  research  species  –  (HPV)    -­‐chronic  hypoxia  exposure  results  in  moderate  PAH      

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mouse  RVSP  (mmHg)

Vehicle  Normoxia  21  Days

Vehicle  10%  Hypoxia  21  Days

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Rat  SPAP  (mm  Hg)

Normoxia  Vehicle  28  Days

Hypoxia  Vehicle  28  Days

Page 16: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  Cofactor  model    

Hypoxia  +  Cofactor  Induced  PAH  Model  exposure  to  chronic  robust  hypoxia  results  in  pathophysiology  similar  to  effect  of  monocrotaline  

 -­‐thickening  and  muscularizaCon  of  PAs    -­‐increase  in  PAP    -­‐RV  hypertrophy  

 The  goal  was  to  produce  the  desired  effects  above  –  and  add  the  development  of  endothelial  cell  overgrowth  to  narrow  the  vascular  lumen  

 -­‐increased  clinical  relevance  compared  to  either  MCT  /  hypoxia    alone    -­‐severe  human  PAH  has  luminal  plexiform  lesions  that  express    angiogenesis  factors  

       

Page 17: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  Cofactor  model    

Hypoxia  +  Cofactor  PAH  Model*  In  human  PAH,  increased  expression  of  VEGF  receptor  

 -­‐the  lung  endothelial  cells  expand  in  a  monoclonal  pagern    -­‐contain  an  inacCvaCng  mutaCon  of  transforming  growth  factor    receptor  II  

 It  was  postulated  that  plexiform  lesions  arise  from    

 -­‐dysregulated  angiogenesis  common  to  neoplasCc  processes    Since  VEGF  is  involved  in  maintenance,  differenCaCon,  funcCon  of  EC..  

 -­‐hypothesis  was  to  disrupt  VEGF  signaling  –  examine  effects  on  EC    VEGF  antagonism  +  hypoxia  results  in  endothelial  cell  death  that  selects  for  apoptosis  resistant  phenotype  =  overgrowth    *TARASEVICIENE-­‐STEWART  et  al,  The  FASEB  Journal.  2001;15:427-­‐438        

Page 18: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

Hypoxia  +  VEGF  Antagonist  Model    Worked  with  commercial  athleCc  training  company    to  construct  customized  hypoxia  chambers  for  animals  at  higher  throughput    Variable  simulated  alCtudes  (sea  level  to  21,000  ^)    IniCal  experiments  at  10%  O2  proved  fuCle  in  short  term    Final  ‘alCtude’  of  12,500  ^  is  used  (13%  O2)      Senese  et  al,  Journal  of  Pharmacological  and  Toxicological  Methods,  Volume  64,  Issue  1,  July–August  2011-­‐  

           

Page 19: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

(mm Hg)

Telemetered Hemodynamic Evaluation of Vehicle Administration in the Rat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Model Induced with Semaxanib (Day 1) and a Low

Oxygen Environment - Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Vehicle

Days of Hypoxia

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

Page 20: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

Figure 3. Effect of semaxanib and a low oxygen environment on pulmonary arterial pressure in

rats. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n=10 per study, 3 studies).

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46

(mm

Hg)

Telemetered Hemodynamic Evaluation of Vehicle Administration in the RatPulmonary Arterial Hypertension Model Induced with Semaxanib (Day 1) and a Low Oxygen Environment - Systolic Pulmonary Artery Presssure

Vehicle Study 1 (n=10)

Vehicle Study 2 (n=10)

Vehicle Study 3 (n=10)

Days of Hypoxia

Page 21: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

0"

10"

20"

30"

40"

50"

60"

70"

SPAP

$($mm$Hg)$

Systolic$Pulmonary$Arterial$Pressure$(SPAP)$

G1"2"Days"(Normoxia)"

G2"4"Days"(Normoxia)"

G3"8"Days"(Normoxia)"

G4"15"Days"(Normoxia)"

G5"22"Days"(Normoxia)"

G6"29"Days"(Normoxia)"

G7"2"Days"(Hypoxia)"

G8"4"Days"(Hypoxia)"

G9"8"Days"(Hypoxia)"

G10"15"Days"(Hypoxia)"

G11"22"Days"(Hypoxia)"

G12"29"Days"(Hypoxia)"

0.00#

0.10#

0.20#

0.30#

0.40#

0.50#

0.60#

0.70#

0.80#

Fulton's)Index)(RV/LV+S))

G1#2#Days#(Normoxia)#

G2#4#Days#(Normoxia)#

G3#8#Days#(Normoxia)#

G4#15#Days#(Normoxia)#

G5#22#Days#(Normoxia)#

G6#29#Days#(Normoxia)#

G7#2#Days#(Hypoxia)#

G8#4#Days#(Hypoxia)#

G9#8#Days#(Hypoxia)#

G10#15#Days#(Hypoxia)#

G11#22#Days#(Hypoxia)#

G12#29#Days#(Hypoxia)#

Time  Course:    Pulmonary  Artery  Pressure  Fulton’s  Hypertrophy  Index    Days  2,  4,  8,  15,  22,  29    

Page 22: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

IllustraCve  image  from  rat  αSMA/elasCn  stain  showing  a  completely  muscularized  arteriole  (short  arrow)  and  a  parCally  muscularized  arteriole  (long  arrow).    The  long  arrow  points  to  the  non-­‐muscularized  porCon  of  the  parCally  muscularized  arteriole  

Normal  –  4  weeks  

Page 23: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

IllustraCve  image  from  rat    αSMA/elasCn  stain  showing  completely  muscularized  arterioles  (arrows)  and  a  parCally  muscularized  arteriole  (P).    Note  the  thick  muscular  walls  relaCve  to  the  size  of  the  arteriolar  lumens.    

PAH  –  4  weeks  Untreated  

Page 24: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

IllustraCve  image  from  αSMA/elasCn  stain  showing  parCally  muscularized  arterioles  (arrows).    The  arrows  point  to  the  non-­‐muscularized  porCon  of  the  parCally  muscularized  arterioles.    The  arteriolar  walls  are  thinner  than  those  of  similarly  sized  arterioles  in  untreated  

PAH  –  4  weeks  Treated  

Page 25: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

-­‐  On  Day  28,  animals  were  instrumented  for  measurement  of  pulmonary  arterial  pressure  and  right  ventricular  hypertrophy    -­‐  Sildenafil  rats  were  compared  against  normoxia  controls  and  hypoxia/SU5416  vehicle  treatments  

           

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

RV  /  (LV+

S) Vehicle  normoxia  (n=5)

Vehicle  (n=10)

Sildenafil  (n=10)

*

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Systolic  Pulmon

ary  Artery  Pressure  (m

m  Hg)

Vehicle  normoxia  (n=5)

Vehicle  (n=10)

Sildenafil  (n=10)

*

-­‐  Sildenafil  significantly  protects  against  development  PAH  in  the  28  day  hypoxia/SU5416  rat  model.  Bosentan  has  similar  protecJve  effects.  

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

Page 26: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

-­‐  On  Day  28,  established  PAH  animals  were  interrogated  using  an  intervenJon  treatment  strategy.  Treatment  occurred  from  Day  28  to  Day  56    -­‐  Sildenafil  and  riociguat  rats  were  compared  against  hypoxia/SU5416  vehicle  treatments  

           

-­‐  Sildenafil  and  riociguat  significantly  reduce  PAH  in  the  56  day  hypoxia/SU5416  rat  model  using  an  intervenJonal  treatment  strategy.  

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

 Dose  Group  

SPAP

 (mm  Hg)  

Systolic  Pulmonary  Arterial  Pressure  (SPAP)  

Vehicle  

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg/day  

Riociguat  10  mg/kg/day  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

 Dose  Group  

SPAP

 (mm  Hg)  

Systolic  Pulmonary  Arterial  Pressure  (SPAP)  

Vehicle  

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg/day  

Riociguat  10  mg/kg/day  

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

 Dose  Group  

SPAP

 (mm  Hg)  

Systolic  Pulmonary  Arterial  Pressure  (SPAP)  

Vehicle  

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg/day  

Riociguat  10  mg/kg/day  

0"

20"

40"

60"

80"

100"

120"

"Dose"Group"

SPAP

$(mm$Hg)$

Systolic$Pulmonary$Arterial$Pressure$(SPAP)$

Vehicle"

Sildenafil"60"mg/kg/day"

Riociguat"10"mg/kg/day"

0.0#

0.1#

0.2#

0.3#

0.4#

0.5#

0.6#

0.7#

#Dose#Group#

Fulton's)Index)(RV/LV+S))

Vehicle#

Sildenafil#60#mg/kg/day#

Riociguat#10#mg/kg/day#

0.0  

0.1  

0.2  

0.3  

0.4  

0.5  

0.6  

0.7  

 Dose  Group  

Fulton's  Index  (RV/LV+S)  

Vehicle  

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg/day  

Riociguat  10  mg/kg/day  

*   *

*

Page 27: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

At  Days  28  and  42,  SPAP  of  MCT  rat  is  strongly  elevated  from  both  normal  and  Day  21  rat.  Sildenafil  has  strengthening  protecJve  effect  at  Days  28  and  42.  

           

0  

20  

40  

60  

80  

100  

120  

Normal  rat   21  days   28  days   42  days  

SPAP

 (mmHg

)  

The  Effect  of  Sildenafil  on  SPAP  caused  by  HxSu  

Control  

sildenafil  

Page 28: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

AddiConal  development  of  intravascular  plexiform  lesions  –  a  hallmark  of  severe  human  PAH  

PAH  –  12  weeks  (untreated)  

Page 29: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

PAH  –  12  weeks  (sildenafil)  

Page 30: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

PAH  –  12  weeks  (sildenafil)  

Page 31: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

PAH  –  12  weeks  (sildenafil)  

Early  evidence  suggests  sildenafil  confers  a  survival  benefit  in  severe  PAH  in  the  absence  of  long  term  pathological  protecQon  –  more  work!  

Page 32: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Immuno  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

T-­‐cell  deficient  +  VEGF  receptor  antagonist  PAH  Model*  In  certain  human  PAH  cohorts,  inflammaCon  plays  a  major  role  in  pathogenesis  

 -­‐macrophages  are  prominent  components  of  inflammatory  infiltrates      -­‐produce  leukotrienes,  important  mediators  of  inflammaCon  

 In  athymic  (T-­‐cell  deficient)  rats,  semaxanib  induces  strong  PAH  even  in  normoxia.    

 -­‐in  these  rats  (as  in  humans),  macrophages  accumulate  around  occluded  pulmonary  arterioles  and  release  leukotriene  B4    It  was  postulated  that  blocking  LTB4    may  miCgate  development/progression  of  PAH  

   *TIAN  et  al,  Science  TranslaQonal  Medicine.  2013;5(200):1-­‐14        

Page 33: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Immuno  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

-­‐  Athymic  nude  rats  were  telemetrized  with  pulmonary  artery  pressure  catheters  

-­‐  Following  recovery,  rats  were  dosed  once  with  semaxanib  and  monitored  for  42  days.  

           

0"

20"

40"

60"

80"

100"

120"

0" 5" 10" 15" 20" 25" 30" 35" 40" 45"

Systolic)Pulmon

ary)Artery)Pressure)(m

m)Hg))

Days)

)Effect)of)Semaxanib)on)SPAP)in)the)Conscious,)Telemetrized)Athymic)

Nude)Rat)

Page 34: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Hypoxia  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

Figure 3. Effect of semaxanib and a low oxygen environment on pulmonary arterial pressure in

rats. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n=10 per study, 3 studies).

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46

(mm

Hg)

Telemetered Hemodynamic Evaluation of Vehicle Administration in the RatPulmonary Arterial Hypertension Model Induced with Semaxanib (Day 1) and a Low Oxygen Environment - Systolic Pulmonary Artery Presssure

Vehicle Study 1 (n=10)

Vehicle Study 2 (n=10)

Vehicle Study 3 (n=10)

Days of Hypoxia

Page 35: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Immuno  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

-­‐  In  a  different  study  -­‐  on  Day  35,  surviving  animals  were  instrumented  for  measurement  of  pulmonary  arterial  pressure  and  right  ventricular  hypertrophy    -­‐  BestaJn  (inhibits  LTA4  hydrolase)  and  sildenafil  rats  were  compared  against  vehicle  treatments  

           

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Systolic  Pulmon

ary  Artery  Prssure  (m

m  Hg)

Vehicle  n=4

Bestatin  1  mg/kg  n=7

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg  n=10

0.0000

0.1000

0.2000

0.3000

0.4000

0.5000

0.6000

RV  /  LV+S Vehicle  n=5

Bestatin  1  mg/kg  n=8

Sildenafil  60  mg/kg  n=10

Page 36: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Immuno  –  VEGF  antagonist  model    

-­‐Both  bestaJn  and  sildenafil  conferred  a  protecJve  effect  on  survival  proporJons  in  this  model    -­‐BestaJn  observaJons  are  consistent  with  the  literature,  and  the  sildenafil  data  are  the  first  reported  with  this  model  

           

Kiss  et  al;  PLOS  One,  8/18,  2014  –  AnJ-­‐inflamm  effects  of  sildenafil  in  MCT  PAH  

Page 37: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

 Immuno  –  MCT  model    

-­‐  Athymic  nude  rats  dosed  once  with  monocrotaline  and  monitored  for  42  days.  

           

0"

5"

10"

15"

20"

25"

30"

35"

40"

SPAP$(mmHg)$

Monocrotaline"(n=12)"

Vehicle"(n=9)"

0.0000#0.0500#0.1000#0.1500#0.2000#0.2500#0.3000#0.3500#0.4000#0.4500#

RV/LV+S'

Monocrotaline#(n=12)#

Vehicle#(n=9)#

Page 38: Examining Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Ups and Downs of Multiple Models

Welcome  to  CorDynamics,  a  contract  research  provider  and  consulCng  group    focused  on  examining  the  cardiovascular  effects  of  emerging  drug  candidates.  

Thank  You!    QuesCons?