41
Sheila Augustine and David Temperley Lennard Funk, John Haines, Ian Trail, Mike Walton, Puneet Monga

Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Hydrodilation distension injection for forzen shoulder - results from Wrightington Upper Limb Unit 2011

Citation preview

Page 1: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Sheila Augustine and David TemperleyLennard Funk, John Haines, Ian Trail, Mike Walton, Puneet Monga

Page 2: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Filling spot films

Subcoracoid

Axillary recess

Page 3: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Biceps sheath

Page 4: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Rupture of subcoracoid bursa

Page 5: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Introduction

! We have used hydrodilatation as a treatment for frozen shoulder for several years. We have been monitoring our results informally; this is the first formal audit of the procedure in WWL.

Page 6: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Presentation

! We will present! - information on frozen shoulder! - how we undertake hydrodilatation! - information on hydrodilatation from the literature! - how the study was undertaken ! - results! - summary and recommendations.

Page 7: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Patient selection and indications for HD WWL

! Most patients with stiff shoulder are offered HD! Almost all with FS ! Occasional patient with stiff shoulder + other Dx! Most would go on to capsular release if HD not

available ! However threshold for HD lower than surgery! Occasionally surgery first; e.g. DM with very stiff

shoulder or patient with good experience of surgery for other side or needle phobic

Page 8: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Contra-indications- infection! Special precautions- anticoagulation.! Consent! Patient supine, turned towards affected

shoulder! Arm externally rotated

Page 9: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! identify GH joint ! (upper/ medial humerus) ! Inject local anaesthetic.! Needle directed vertically into joint.! Injection of Omnipaque 120mg/ml- confirm position! Inject Depomedrone 2ml/80mg. Local 8ml.! Return to contrast injection

Page 10: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Continue injection until! …capsular rupture! …injection limited by pain! …50-55ml injected (is this frozen shoulder!)! Procedure takes 15 minutes! Patient waits in department for 10-15mins! Not to drive home, but do not restrict activities

for too long! Physiotherapy within 1 week.

Page 11: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Complications

! Pain- immediate due to distension. Ceases with capsular rupture or subsides in 5-15 minutes

! Pain ongoing as with any joint injection- 1-2 days, can take pain killers or anti inflammatories prn

! Infection- rate unknown- estimate vary from 1:1000 to 1:50,000

! Allergy especially to contrast.! Corticosteroid effect. 80mg Depomedrone/

methylprednisolone= 400mg hydrocortisone or 100 mg prednisolone. Warn Diabetics!

Page 12: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Fluid should be injected to achieve capsular rupture if possible!

! Steroid and local anaesthetic injection should be used.!

! Diabetic patients respond less well.

Page 13: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Improvement can occur immediately or take 1-2 weeks. Full improvement often requires time and physiotherapy !

! Improvement is as likely to occur in any phase of the disease, and with any severity.!

! Multiple injections can be used, but not necessary routinely

Page 14: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Lots of relatively small observational studies, few controlled trials!

! Non- controlled studies indicate ‘good’ outcome of 67-94%.

! Typically 70% show significant improvement in movement and up to 90% improvement in pain.

Page 15: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

! Controlled studies: -!

! The most quoted study shows no benefit over steroid injection only

! Other studies show HD better than steroid only and MUA

! Small studies with flawed technique.

Page 16: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Aims of Audit

! To assess whether Hydrodilatation is effective in the treatment of Frozen Shoulder

! Is it equally effective in all groups of patients?! Can we predict whether it will work at the time of the

procedure?! To assess how quickly patients respond- can response

be predicted at one week?! To review side effects.

Page 17: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Study technique- data

! 116 patients who had HD during 2010 and 2011 (118 shoulders, 119 procedures)

! Information from EPR, CRIS and PACS.! Either day lists assessed, and hydrodilatation

identified or patients followed prospectively.! INFORMATION GATHERED! PAS No, age, sex, date of H,

Page 18: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Study Technique- data

! Co- morbidity (diabetes and others)! Length of Symptoms! Technique- Volume injected, rupture?,

complications.! 25 patients were contacted at 1 week! Physiotherapy?! Length of follow up! Outcome: Response (pain, movement)! Outcome: Usually discharge or surgery.

Page 19: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Outcome/ Response! Primary outcome- surgery or discharge! Special attention if patient unfit for surgery.! Secondary outcome- pain and movement

response ‘semi-quantitative’! Standard scores for pain relief or function not

used ! e.g. SPADI, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ-UK) and

Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) (Generally not available)

Page 20: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Comparison made for different groups-! 1. Male/ Female ! 2. Age groups. ! 3. Healthy/DM/other co-morbidity ! 4. Idiopathic vs Traumatic! 5. Early rupture/ standard/ no rupture. ! 6. Consultant/ Registrar ! 7. Response at 1 week vs. final response. ! 8. Length of symptoms vs. response

Page 21: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Scoring of ResponseExcellent- no or minimal pain, can do all activities

without pain. Full or nearly full movement= 4 Good- Some pain and reduced movement, but can do

activities of normal daily living without restriction= 3 Fair/ Partial- Significant relief, but still some pain and

reduced movement on normal activities= 2 !

Little/ Poor- Some improvement, but still significant pain and reduced movement= 1

None= 0 Worse= -2

Page 22: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Patient Details

! 118 Shoulders, 116 Patients, 119 procedures!

! Indication: All frozen shoulder except 1 (OA) !

! All cases: 56 Male 62 Female (47%M:53%F)! Spontaneous FS 11 Male 15 Female (42%M:58%F)!

! Age 26-77, Mean 53

Page 23: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Patient age groupings

Age groups

Page 24: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

TECHNIQUE

! 35ml injected (mean)!

! All received 80mg Depomedrone, IA LA, contrast, saline and post op physio except: !

! 1 patient- no record of LA, ! 2-patients- no record of physiotherapy

Page 25: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Analysis of Data

! Time from procedure to audit- 10-21 months.

! Referrers Orthopaedic 96% Rheumatology 4%

! Co-morbidity (medical)! DM 20! Others 10! Asthma, cardiac, warfarin, CRF, depression, CVD, PVD,

CML, breast ca, MS, RA! ‘DNA’

10- no record of FU, 108 Followed up

Page 26: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Duration of symptoms (Months)- 32 patients Mean 11 months- Median 7.5 months

Months

Page 27: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

RESPONSE out of 108 shoulders

! Discharged without surgery, fair response or better = ‘SUCCESS’ (Special attention if not fit for surgery)!

! Needed surgery, offered surgery or awaiting surgery for frozen shoulder, or poor response in those not fit for surgery = ‘FAILURE’

Page 28: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

RESPONSE, 108 shoulders

!

!Success 81 = 75% !

!Failure 27 = 25%

Page 29: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response Scores

Score

Page 30: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response- Sex and Age

Criterion Number +ve/-ve

Success %

Male 36/12 75Female 45/15 75Age <40 4/3 57Age 40’s 24/8 75Age 50’s 33/11 75Age 60+ 20/5 80

Page 31: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response- co-morbidity

Criterion Number +ve/ -ve

Success %

1. Spontaneous 21/4 842. Diabetes 12/7 633. Other morbidity 6/4 604. Post trauma or surgery 12/7 635. TOTAL all cases 81/27 75

Page 32: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response- Pain vs. Movement

! 58 cases!

! 44 Equal improvement (or equal lack of improvement) in pain and movement

! 11 Pain response greater! 3 Movement response greater

Page 33: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response- Injected volume/ rupture. Grade of operator.

Criterion Number +ve/-ve

Success %

All rupture 65/23 74%No rupture 16/4 80%

Low volume rupture (<30ml)

6/3 67%

Consultant 66/22 75%Registrar 15/5 75%TOTAL 81/27 75%

Page 34: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Duration of symptoms vs response 30 patients

Success/Failure

%Success

< 7.5 months symptoms 11/4 73

> 7.5 months symptoms 11/4 73

Page 35: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Length of Follow Up

!Length of follow up- ! (to discharge)

!

! Mean 16 weeks! Half<3/12

Page 36: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Response at 1 week vs final response

N=25 FinalEx/ Good

FinalFair/ Partial

Final Poor/ None

1 week Excellent/good 12 0 11 week Fair/ Partial

3 3 21 weekPoor/None

1 0 3Few cases did well initially then badly

Page 37: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Complications

! Painful procedure- 2 cases recorded- recovered quickly!

! Distension of shoulder is painful, but pain goes away when capsule ruptures!

! No record of any other complications!

! Two patients died- 1 lung cancer, 1 unknown cause

Page 38: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Analysis of surgery

! HD> failed > surgery (N=15)! Excellent 6! Good 2! Fair 5! Poor/ Nil 2 > HD- 2nd attempt in 1>success!

! Surgery first 2 > HD- both unsuccessful

Page 39: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Problems with Audit

! Pain and movement measurement not objective –(however surgery or discharge is good outcome measure)!

! No control group!

! Inadequate research base!

! No accepted standard.

Page 40: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Summary! Hydrodilatation is a treatment for Frozen Shoulder! It is well tolerated, with no side effects apart from pain

at and soon after the time of the study. It takes about 15 minutes, and the patient goes home within 30’.

! It is associated with a ‘good’ outcome, with significant pain relief and increase in movement, precluding the need for surgery, in 75% of cases.

! It works in all groups of patients that were referred, but there is some evidence that those with secondary FS, diabetes and other co-morbidity do a little less well.

! Of those patients who do well, some recover almost immediately, while some improve slowly with physio. In most cases outcome can be predicted in 1 week.

Page 41: Hydrodilatation distension for frozen shoulder wrightington 2011

Recommendations

!! Hydrodilatation is a treatment for frozen

shoulder. It is simple to perform, with few side effects, and is effective in ¾ of cases. It is recommended that we continue to undertake this procedure in appropriate patients.

! Present this audit to orthopaedic surgeons. Discuss referral criteria.