Upload
bcpsqc
View
249
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This was presented in session D2 at the Quality Forum 2014 by: Trudy Robertson Clinical Nurse Specialist, Neurosurgery Fraser Health
Citation preview
1
Oral Intensity: Reducing the Risk of
Non-Ventilator-Associated Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (NV-HAP)
Trudy Robertson CNS Fraser Health Neurosurgery&
Dulcie Carter BSc MMedSci, RSLP RCH
22
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Acknowledgments
Fraser Health Department of Evaluation and Research Services (FH DERS)
Team “Oral Intensity” and staff of the Neurosurgical Unit, Royal Columbian Hospital in New Westminster, BC, Canada
33
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Disclosures
Seed grant funding from the FH DERS to conduct this point of care research (FHREB # 2011-088) Unrestricted modest donation of oral care
supplies was received from SAGE® Products Inc. during the study period
44
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
How This Research All Began
Clinical observation on the RCH Neurosurgical Unit Looked into the literature Point of Care Research Challenge
coincided with a call to action “Team Oral Intensity”
55
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
RCH Neurosurgery Unit
32 beds, 4 bed neuro observation room (NOA) 5 neurosurgeons, trauma service Case mix: Post-operative brain surgery,
TBI, complex spine, intracranial bleed Staff mix- RNs, LPNs, CA, rehab team Limited resources
66
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Current Oral Hygiene Standards
Current standard: nurse discretion “prn” Current practice: varies, nurse-to-nurse Where are the gaps? Nursing knowledge Variation in practice Nursing workload Lack of formal protocol
77
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Literature review
Neuroscience literature Nursing literature Critical care Residential, older adult
Medical literature AMMI Canada Guidelines – HAP including
VAP Dysphagia literature Dental literature
88
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
The Research
Defined the research question Design the study Ethics Board application Consent by substitute decision maker BC Privacy Office
Development of tools, staff education
99
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Purpose
To test the efficacy of a enhanced, prevention-based oral care protocol in reducing NV-HAP in the care-dependent neurosurgical population outside the critical care environment Hypothesis: an enhanced oral care
protocol would decrease the incidence of HAP
1010
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Design
Comparative, quantitative study Key measure: NV-HAP rates between
subjects who received standard oral care (SOC; retrospective group) and those who received an enhanced, prevention-based, oral hygiene protocol (EOC; prospective group) Identified other variables of interest
1111
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Methods
Data collected for both groups for a 6 month period SOC group: retrospective chart review EOC group: eligible neurosurgical patients
who received the enhanced protocol Diagnostic criteria for hospital acquired
pneumonia were determined* Inclusion/exclusion criteria developed Data collection tools were developed
*AMMI Canada Guidelines: Clinical practice guidelines for hospital acquired pneumonia and ventilator associated pneumoniain adults. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Vol 19 No 1 January/February 2008
1212
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
NV-HAP
Diagnosis criteria >48 hours post admission Positive chest x-ray for infiltrates, consolidation, etc And 2 of the following 3 criteria
Presence of fever Positive sputum culture Elevated serum WBC count
Did not rely on physician documentation or health records coding of HAP
1313
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Methods: Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Table 1. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Adult (>19 years) Admitted to RCH neuroscience
unit Primary diagnosis is neurological
(brain injury/insult) Non-intubated Dependent for oral care and
unable to direct their own oral care
<19 years Off service patients Intubated, on Bipap or Cpap
(respiratory assistive devices) Palliative Capable of directing their own oral
care Unable to receive oral care due to: oral
tubes, nasal/oral airways, wired jaws, or behaviours such as resistiveness, combativeness, non-compliance, etc.
1414
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Methods: Retrospective Group
Charts were pulled according to Unit Primary diagnosis neurologic Time period
300 charts were identified Care dependency confirmed ICU/HAU days excluded
52 met the inclusion criteria
1515
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Methods: Prospective Group
Screening upon admission to unit Approached TSDM of eligible subjects Upon consent, subject was enrolled in
study, EOC protocol commenced Consented: n=34 Excluded: 2 Withdrawal: 1 (7 days on study)
32 included in analysis
1616
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Study Protocol
Universal handwashing Elevation of head of the bed Teeth brushing twice a day Scheduled inspection, cleaning,
moisturizing mouth, lips every 2-4 hours Oral and tracheostomy suctioning Standardization of oral care supplies,
equipment*Informed by Bopp, 2006; De Riso et al, 1996; Fields, 2008; Grap et al., 2003; Safdar et al, 2005; Shorr & Kollef, 2005.
1717
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Methods: Oral Care Protocol
Table 2. Oral Care Protocol Worksheet
Date: March 7, 2012 Minimum HOB 300 for all Mouth Care
Intervention Write in Time of Care and Initial
Change mouth suction equipment every 24 hours
- - - - -
Mouth assessment every 2-4 hours
Cleanse mouth with toothbrush every 12 hours
- - - -
Cleanse oral mucosa with oral rinse solution every 2-4 hours
Moisturize mouth/lips with swab and standard
mouth moisturizer every 4 hours
Suction mouth and throat as needed
Patient Name
1818
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Data Collection: Both Groups
Demographic information Data collected weekly Incidences of NV-HAP Mode of nutrition Presence of: Tracheostomy Teeth versus dentures Dysphagia
1919
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Findings: Demographic Data
Table 3. Summary of Demographics and Medical Status
SOC Group Retrospective Data (2010)
EOC Group (2012)Prospective Data (2012)
Number of participants 51 32
M:F ratio 27:24 23:9
Age (average) 57Range: 19-88 years
61Range: 33-84 years
Tracheostomy 12 (24%) 13 (40%)
Dysphagia 42 (84%) 27 (84%)
HAP events 13 2
Average LOS* 23 days (on unit) 21 days (on study)
Median LOS* 15 days (on unit) 13.5 days (on study)
*Not comparable variables
2020
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Findings: Case Mix
Figure 2. Neurological diagnosis: EOC group
3%9%3%
63%
22%
TBI ICH tumour hydrocephalus other
Figure 1. Neurological diagnosis: SOC group
4%4%8%
70%
14%
TBI ICH tumour hydrocephalus other
2121
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Findings
A statistically significant decrease in the rate of HAP occurred in the prospective group (p<0.05)
Figure 3. HAP rate between groups
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
SOC group EOC group
% HAP % no HAP
2222
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Findings: NV-HAP
Presence of tracheostomy * With trach: 28% Without: 13.8%
Teeth versus dentures** Length of stay*** Mode of nutrition Dysphagia
* p=0.134, 2 sided Fishers Exact test ** p=0.720, 1-sided Fishers exact test*** p=0.044, Mann-Whitney test
2323
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Implications: Patient
An enhanced oral care protocol: Improves health outcomes by decreasing: The risk of infections, inflammatory processes, fever The need for diagnostic tests, treatments, medications,
procedures, NV-HAP complications Length of stay (readiness for rehabilitation)
Improves patient comfort, QOL, family satisfaction Improves overall satisfaction with care
2424
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Implications: Nursing Practice
Important to assess the risk factors for NV-HAP Important to implement preventative care We need to examine nurses’ decision-making &
attitudes towards preventative-based care What are the barriers to prevention-based care? Dispelling myths about workload impact
It takes leadership to advance care practices, to foster a culture of inquiry, improving quality of care, leading change
We need to foster team-based approaches to care Foundational nursing care practices are still
important
2525
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Need for improved continuity in care throughout the care continuum, across settings, sites, sectors
Improved quality of care Improved access to specialty beds Financial impact Decreases transfers to higher level of care Increase supply costs is offset by decreased rates of
NV-HAP Decreased LOS Decreased medical and diagnostic costs
Implications: Systems
2626
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Limitations
Study limited to 1 unit, 1 institution First clinical nursing research study on this unit Small sample size limited analysis of some
variables Documentation limitations Nursing compliance 95%: 32 patients, combined total
of 676 days NV-HAP diagnosis by physicians Confirming care dependency was difficult in the
retrospective group
2727
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Future Studies
Explore further the relationship between NV-HAP and other factors e.g. tracheostomy
Study enhanced oral care protocols in other populations e.g. acute medical patients
Explore nurses’ attitudes and barriers to performing oral care
Economic analysis on the financial impact of enhanced oral care Length of stay, medical and supply costs, nursing
workload
2828
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Next Steps
Formalize an oral care protocol Spread protocol regionally to all care-
dependent in-patients in acute care within Fraser Health Published manuscript in the Canadian
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Incorporate oral care into peri-operative
practices
2929
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
In Closing
Basics of nursing practice continue to be fundamental to patient outcomes An ounce of prevention is still worth a
pound of cure Changing nursing practice begins with
critical inquiry and seeking to understand and question why we do what we do
3030
T. Robertson & D. Carter August 2013
Contact Information
Thank You !
Trudy Robertson, Clinical Nurse Specialist: [email protected]
Dulcie Carter, Registered Speech Language [email protected]