Upload
kerry-kallas-md
View
181
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Musculoskeletal Imaging Guidelines
Kerry Kallas, MDMusculoskeletal Radiologist
2
Imaging Modalities
• Radiography• Arthrography• Computed Tomography (CT)• Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)• ------------------------------------------------• Ultrasound• Nuclear Medicine
March 7, 2010
3March 7, 2010
4
Radiography
• Technologies– Screen-Film– Computed Radiography– Digital Radiography
March 7, 2010
5
Radiography
• Advantages– Convenient– Relatively inexpensive
• Disadvantages– 3D volume projected on 2D image– Ionizing radiation
March 7, 2010
6March 7, 2010
7March 7, 2010
8
Arthrography
• Technique– Localize joint space under fluoroscopy– Insert needle into joint along axis of x-ray beam– Confirm intra-articular position of needle tip with
injection of radiopaque contrast (Omnipaque 240)– Injection of full amount of contrast• Arthrography: Omnipaque 240 (full strength)• CT Arthrography: Omnipaque 240 (full strength)• MR Arthrography: Omniscan (gadolinium – 1:250)
March 7, 2010
9
Arthrography
• Volume of contrast depends on joint– Shoulder: 15cc– Elbow: 10cc– Wrist: 2cc– Hip: 15cc– Knee: 30cc– Ankle: 10cc– Toe: 1cc
March 7, 2010
10
Arthrography
• Advantages– Functional exam to evaluate for rotator cuff tears– Not used very often with other joints– Can be combined with CT, MR
• Disadvantages– Allergic reactions to contrast– Invasive– Relatively low exposure to ionizing radiation– Post procedural pain
March 7, 2010
11March 7, 2010
12March 7, 2010
13
Computed Tomography (CT)
• Technologies– “Spiral Scanner”: buzz words from 1990’s– Incremental versus Helical techniques– Multislice configurations (4,16,64…320)
March 7, 2010
14
Computed Tomography (CT)
• Image Production– Need to select parameters prior to scan (slice
thickness, overlap, FOV, scan mode, kV, mA, pitch)– 3D anatomic volume reduced to series (“stack”) of
2-D images– Reconstructions in any plane• “Isotropic” voxels allow imaging reconstructions in any
plan that have identical resolution to original scan
– 3-D reconstructions
March 7, 2010
15
Computed Tomography (CT)
• Advantages– Good spatial resolution– Good bone-soft tissue contrast resolution– Typical slice thicknesses of 0.6 – 1.2 mm for
extremities– Fast, not much patient movement during exam– Patient comfort
March 7, 2010
16
Computed Tomography (CT)
• Disadvantages– Much higher doses of ionizing radiation than
radiography– Higher cost, but not most expensive– Poor soft tissue contrast resolution– Poor at differentiating soft tissue pathology (fluid,
edema) from normal anatomy– Contrast enhanced studies not effective for
extremities– Allergic reactions to contrast if administered
March 7, 2010
17
Computed Tomography (CT)
• MSK Indications– Complex fractures or acute trauma– Small fracture fragments or intra-articular bodies– Fracture healing (nonunion, delayed union– Patients who are MR incompatible (e.g.
pacemakers, aneurysm clips)– Patients with metal hardware near area of interest• Suture anchors• ORIF hardware
March 7, 2010
18March 7, 2010
19March 7, 2010
20
CT Arthrography
• Combined study of Arthrography and CT– Perform arthrogram first using Omnipaque 240– CT scan immediately after arthrography– Cannot wait too long to image as the radiopaque
contrast is absorbed by the body fairly quickly• Reconstruct in standard orthogonal planes
March 7, 2010
21
CT Arthrography
• Advantages– Contrast outlines normal intra-articular structures
that cannot be separated with conventional CT– Contrast distends the joint capsule and moves
capsular structures away from each other– Contrast that extends into abnormal areas implies
pathology (tears, chondromalacia)– Need to know what normal anatomy is first!
March 7, 2010
22
CT Arthrography
• Disadvantages– All the same individual disadvantages of
Arthrography and CT– Higher cost for combined study– Same soft tissue contrast resolution limitations
where there is no contrast• Bursal surface rotator cuff tears
March 7, 2010
23
CT Arthrography
• MSK Indications– Patients who are not MR compatible and…– Need to evaluate intra-articular structures (other
than bony structures)– CT only of joints provides LIMITED information• Bone detail• Very little soft tissue detail (exceptions: tendons, fat)
March 7, 2010
24March 7, 2010
25March 7, 2010
26
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Technologies– 1.5 Tesla field strength most common– 3.0 Tesla available, but higher cost (usually
hospitals, less outpatients centers)– Low field scanners (0.2T – 1.0T)• Open scanners• Extremity scanners
– No difference in reimbursement from insurance– Marked difference in image quality and capability
March 7, 2010
27
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Image Production– Need to select many more scan parameters prior
to scanning (usually contained in preprogrammed “protocol”)
– Not usually able to reconstruct images (slice thickness usually much larger than pixel size)
– “Isotropic” voxels allow reconstructions in any plane• Usually gradient echo sequences• Now there are isotropic “spin echo” 3-D sequences
March 7, 2010
28
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Intravenous Contrast– Volume based on weight, usually max 20cc
Omniscan– Indications• Synovitis• Cellulitis and other infections• Masses (differentiate solid from cystic)• Ischemia/Avascular Necrosis• Indirect MR arthrography (not common)
March 7, 2010
29
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Advantages– No ionizing radiation– Superb soft tissue and bone contrast • Cortex• Bone marrow and fat• Hyaline cartilage• Fibrocartilage (meniscus, labrum)• Ligaments, tendons• Fluid• Muscle
March 7, 2010
30
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Disadvantages– Less in-plane spatial resolution than CT• CT matrix typically 512• MRI matrix usually 256, 320, 384, occasionally 512
– Less on-axis spatial resolution than CT• CT slice thicknesses usually less than 1.0 mm• MRI slice thickness usually 3.0 – 4.0 mm for MSK• Greater partial volume averaging
– Poor discrimination between fat and bone marrow
March 7, 2010
31
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• Disadvantages– Longer scan times (20-30 minutes)• Patient needs to lays still for longer time• Greater motion artifact
– Higher costs than CT– Claustrophobia, may require sedation– Need to screen for MRI incompatibilities (metal
fragments in eyes, pacemakers, etc.)– Greater number of imaging artifacts
March 7, 2010
32
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
• MSK Indications– Usually preferred examination after Radiography
for evaluation of internal derangement of joints– Excellent soft tissue resolution with need for
contrast– Usually good spatial resolution (although less than
CT)– Differentiates pathology (fluid, edema) from
normal anatomy
March 7, 2010
33March 7, 2010
34March 7, 2010
35
MR Arthrography
• Combined study of Arthrography and MRI– Perform arthrogram first using gadolinium
contrast agent (Omniscan, 1:250)– MRI performed soon after arthrography (not as
urgent as CT to image immediately)• Image using combination of standard and
“gadolinium sensitive” sequences– Gadolinium bright on T1-weighted images– Add fat suppression for MSK imaging (FST1)
March 7, 2010
36
MR Arthrography
• Advantages– Contrast distends joint capsule and capsular
structures– Contrast surrounds and separates normal intra-
articular structures– Leakage of contrast into abnormal locations may
imply pathology– May add anesthetic to contrast to determine pain
relief (intra-articular versus extra-articular source)
March 7, 2010
37
MR Arthrography
• Disadvantages– All the same individual disadvantages of MRI and
Arthrography– Higher cost with combined studies
March 7, 2010
38
MR Arthrography
• MSK Indications– Shoulder: Labral tear– Elbow: OCD, MCL tear– Wrist: TFC, SLL tear– Thumb: UCL tear– Hip: Labral tear– Knee: OCD, post-op meniscus– Ankle: OCD– Toe: Plantar plate tear– Post-op evaluations
March 7, 2010
39March 7, 2010
40March 7, 2010
41
Ultrasound
• Advantages– No ionizing radiation– Lower cost than CT and MRI– May visualize superficial structures at high
resolution• Tendons• Masses
– Tolerated by patients very well– May perform US guided procedures
March 7, 2010
42
Ultrasound
• Disadvantages– Requires highly skilled/experienced technologist
or physician– Operator must know underlying anatomy– Takes time to perform exam– Real time exam versus imaging– Convincing surgeons to operate based on US
images
March 7, 2010
43March 7, 2010
44March 7, 2010
45
Nuclear Medicine
• MSK Indications– Bone Scan• Metastatic disease
– Indium (I111) labeled WBC• Osteomyelitis in Charcot joint (diabetic)
March 7, 2010