Upload
sule-akin
View
237
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Propofol vs midazolam
Citation preview
Sule AkinSule Akin, Pinar Ergenoglu, Perran Poyraz, Anis Aribogan, Pinar Ergenoglu, Perran Poyraz, Anis Aribogan
Baskent University School of MedicineAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department Adana - TURKEY
Acute and fluctuating change in mental status
Inattention
Altered levels of consciousness
Incidence in orthopedic patients: 5.1% - 61%
May be before or after surgery
To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of IV propofol vs midazolam infusions for postoperative agitation/delirium
Epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia
High-risk patients with CRF
Major hip or knee operations
82 high-risk CRF patients
(ASA III, BUN>40 mg/dl, Serum Cr > 2)
Postoperatively agitation/delirium
Sedation/orientation levels; RASS / CAM-ICU
Sessler et al. AJRCCM 2002; 166: 1338-1344Ely, et al. JAMA 2003; 289: 2983-2991
The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale: The RASSScore
Term Description
+4 Combative Overtly combative, violent, immediate danger to staff
+3 Very agitated Pulls or removes tube(s) or catheter(s); aggressive
+2 Agitated Frequent non-purposeful movent, fights ventilator
+1 Restless Anxious but movements not aggressive vigorous
0 Alert and calm
-1 Drowsy Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening(eye-opening/eye contact) to voice (10 seconds)
-2 Light sedation Briefly awakens with eye contact to voice (<10 seconds)
-3 Moderate sedation
Movement or eye opening to voice (but no eye contact)
-4 Deep sedation No response to voice, but movement or eye openingto physical stimulation
-5 Unarousable No response to voice or physical stimulation
VerbalStimulation
Physical Stimulation
If RASS is -4 or -5, then Stop na Reassess patient at later timeIf RASS is above -4 (-3 through +4) then Proceed to Step 2
Confusion Assessment Method in the ICU (CAM – ICU)
1. Acute onset of change in mentalstatus or a fluctuating course
AND2. Inattention
3. Disorganised thinking 4. Altered level of consciousness
DELIRIUM
OR
Combined lumbar spinal/epidural anesthesia for surgery
Epidurally administered drugs in postoperative period;
Loading dose: 0.25% Bupivacaine 25 mg
Continuous dose: 0.125% bupivacaine 2-4 ml/h
Meperidin with PCA 2mg/bolus, if needed
GROUP P (n=40) GROUP M (n=42)
PROPOFOL MIDAZOLAM
Loading dose: 1-2 mg/kg IV bolus
Loading dose: 0.05-0.2 mg/kg IV bolus
Continuous dose: 1-3 mg/kg/h IV infusion
Continuous dose: 0.05-0.3 mg/kg/h IV infusion
RASS TARGET = +1 and -1
Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SABP, DABP)
SpO2
Sedation/agitation scales
Adverse events
p <0.05 values statistically significant
Groups were demographically comparable (p>0.05)
Group P reached target RASS scores earlier than Group M (p<0.05)
Hemodynamic values were significantly higher in Group M (p<0.05)
Epidural bupivacaine consumption was significantly lower in Group P (p<0.05)
No treatment required adverse events was seen in Group P (p>0.05)
GROUP P(n=40)
GROUP M(n=42)
Sex(F: female M: male)
F:16 (40%)M:24 (60%)
F:17 (40%)M:25 (60%)
Age (years old) 5816 5617
BUN (mg/dl) 5610 5414
Cr (mg/dl) 5.52 52
Hip surgery 21 (52.5%) 22 (52%)
Knee surgery 19 (47.5%) 20 (48%)
RASS SCORES
TIME (min)
IV propofol infusion may be an effective and safe
approach adjunct to epidural analgesia
for possible postoperative agitation/delirium
treatment after major orthopedic surgeries
in high-risk patients with CRF
THANK YOUTHANK YOU