25
Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value C. Daniel Smith, MD 1

Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Hospitals across the country are aggressively pursuing cost-cutting strategies, and the high-value, high-cost environment of the operating room is a prime target for cost reduction. Applying variability methodology swings the pendulum for access to the hospital’s operating rooms from “whatever and whenever” the surgeon wants, to what is best for the hospital. Put more directly, in this model, the surgeon is asked to compromise to meet the hospital’s financial needs. The resultant tension between a surgeon and hospital administration can become intense and was certainly present during the redesign and implementation detailed in this case study. Software and information technology tools to help schedule surgical cases within the redesign goals, and reporting tools within a quantitative dashboard are essential to facilitate adoption of this program. Transparency regarding leadership decisions and frequent feedback to all providers about performance improvements should be emphasized. Change management and analytics support should be identified either internally or pursued externally before starting such a program.

Citation preview

Page 1: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve

Healthcare Value

C. Daniel Smith, MD

1

Page 2: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Healthcare Delivery Goals

2

To provide the right care

To the right patient

At the right time

In the right place

VARIABILITY IS THE ENEMY

*Outcomes, Safety, Service

Page 3: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Variability in Operating Rooms

3

• Peaks and valleys in day-to-day volume of surgical cases

• “No one wants to operate on Monday or Friday”

Day-to-Day

• On the day of surgery, changes to the OR schedule and resource allocation

• Emergencies, add-ons, delays, etc.

Within-Day

Page 4: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Day-to-Day Variability

StaffingHospital censusSupply chain…..

Page 5: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

101 102 103 104 105 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

EE

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

0900

0800

0700

EE

EEEEEE

UUUU

X

EEEE

Within-Day Variability

Page 6: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

101 102 103 104 105 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

EE

EE

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

0900

0800

0700

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

UU

EE

X

X

EE

Within-Day Variability

EE

X

Page 7: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Within-Day Variability

No.

Roo

m C

hang

esElective Rooms on Day of Surgery

2009-2010

SafetyPatient satisfactionTeamwork….

Page 8: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Variability Theory in Surgery

8

Natural Variability•a result of naturally occurring processes•uncontrollable

Artificial Variability•a function of man made decisions•controllable

• Emergency or unscheduled Operations

• Uneven scheduling of elective cases

Page 9: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Within 48 hours

Urgent / Emergent (3)

Elective (16)Scheduled

Natural Variability

Artificial Variability

401 402 403 404 102 103 104 105 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

0900

0800

0700

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

401 402 404 102 103 104 105 403 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

UU

Page 10: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Case Study Setting

10

Page 11: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Mayo Clinic Florida

• 214 bed hospital (21 ORs, 28 ICUs) and outpatient practice within a single complex/campus – opened in 2008

• 11,900 admissions/ year: 55% surgical

• 12,000 operations/year – complex case mix (e.g., 150 liver transplants, 1,200 NS, 900 GISurg)

• 443,500 outpatient visits annually

11

Page 12: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

• Prime time OR utilization <65%

• 15 FTEs of overtime every pay period

• Low surgeon and staff satisfaction with OR management and efficiencies

• Concern about absence of specialty specific teams

• Frequent disruptions of elective cases by transplants and urgent cases

Baseline Data 2009

Page 13: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Proposal / Hypothesis

13

Applying variability theory and methodology, we could

expand the capacity of our hospital’s operating rooms

and increase surgical throughput without adding

infrastructure or expense.

Page 14: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Goals for Variability Management Program

14

Page 15: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Within 48 hours

Urgent / Emergent (3)

Elective (16)Scheduled

Natural Variability

Artificial Variability

401 402 403 404 102 103 104 105 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

0900

0800

0700

EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE EE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EEEE

EE

EE

EEEE

EE

EE

EE

401 402 404 102 103 104 105 403 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 414 415

• 3 month prospective data collection

• Rooms reallocated based on real volumes/utilization

• Staff allocated to services (added 15 FTEs)

• Implemented November 1, 2010

• Impact assessed at one year

Page 16: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Operating Room Redesign

Results

16

Page 17: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Pre- MVP Post-MVP % ChangeSurgical Cases 11,874 12,367 4%Surgical Minutes 1,757,008 1,844,479 5%OR Utilization (19 Room Model) 61% 64% 5%Number of Overtime FTE's (average) 7.4 5.4 -27%Staff Turnover (highest to most recent) 20.3% 11.5% -43%Daily Case Volume Variation 55.24 44.06 -20%Daily Surgery Minutes Variation 6,531 5,124 -22%Elective Room Changes (Average/Mon) 80 25 -69%Elective Room Changes (%) 8% 2% -70%

Salary Dollars (Adjusted for Salary Increases) Total $12,607,061 $13,395,997 6% Monthly $1,045,942 $1,115,646 7%

Cost/Case $1,062 $1,070 0%Cost/Minute of Surgery $7.18 $7.26 1%

Staff Turnover Cost (millions) $2.47 $1.47 -41%Overtime Cost Savings $111,488

Total OR Net Revenue (Fee increase adjusted) $93,929,569 $98,686,693 5%

17

Page 18: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Pre- MVP Post-MVP % ChangeSurgical Cases 11,874 12,367 4%Surgical Minutes 1,757,008 1,844,479 5%OR Utilization (19 Room Model) 61% 64% 5%Number of Overtime FTE's (average) 7.4 5.4 -27%Staff Turnover (highest to most recent) 20.3% 11.5% -43%Daily Case Volume Variation 55.24 44.06 -20%Daily Surgery Minutes Variation 6,531 5,124 -22%Elective Room Changes (Average/Mon) 80 25 -69%Elective Room Changes (%) 8% 2% -70%

Salary Dollars (Adjusted for Salary Increases) Total $12,607,061 $13,395,997 6% Monthly $1,045,942 $1,115,646 7%

Cost/Case $1,062 $1,070 0%Cost/Minute of Surgery $7.18 $7.26 1%

Staff Turnover Cost (millions) $2.47 $1.47 -41%Overtime Cost Savings $111,488

Total OR Net Revenue (Fee increase adjusted) $93,929,569 $98,686,693 5%

18

Page 19: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Pre- MVP Post-MVP % ChangeSurgical Cases 11,874 12,367 4%Surgical Minutes 1,757,008 1,844,479 5%OR Utilization (19 Room Model) 61% 64% 5%Number of Overtime FTE's (average) 7.4 5.4 -27%Staff Turnover (highest to most recent) 20.3% 11.5% -43%Daily Case Volume Variation 55.24 44.06 -20%Daily Surgery Minutes Variation 6,531 5,124 -22%Elective Room Changes (Average/Mon) 80 25 -69%Elective Room Changes (%) 8% 2% -70%

Salary Dollars (Adjusted for Salary Increases) Total $12,607,061 $13,395,997 6% Monthly $1,045,942 $1,115,646 7%

Cost/Case $1,062 $1,070 0%Cost/Minute of Surgery $7.18 $7.26 1%

Staff Turnover Cost (millions) $2.47 $1.47 -41%Overtime Cost Savings $111,488

Total OR Net Revenue (Fee increase adjusted) $93,929,569 $98,686,693 5%

19

Page 20: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

20

Pre- MVP Post-MVP % ChangeSurgical Cases 11,874 12,367 4%Surgical Minutes 1,757,008 1,844,479 5%OR Utilization (19 Room Model) 61% 64% 5%Number of Overtime FTE's (average) 7.4 5.4 -27%Staff Turnover (highest to most recent) 20.3% 11.5% -43%Daily Case Volume Variation 55.24 44.06 -20%Daily Surgery Minutes Variation 6,531 5,124 -22%Elective Room Changes (Average/Mon) 80 25 -69%Elective Room Changes (%) 8% 2% -70%

Salary Dollars (Adjusted for Salary Increases) Total $12,607,061 $13,395,997 6% Monthly $1,045,942 $1,115,646 7%

Cost/Case $1,062 $1,070 0%Cost/Minute of Surgery $7.18 $7.26 1%

Staff Turnover Cost (millions) $2.47 $1.47 -41%Overtime Cost Savings $111,488

Total OR Net Revenue (Fee increase adjusted) $93,929,569 $98,686,693 5%

Page 21: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

21

Pre- MVP Post-MVP % ChangeSurgical Cases 11,874 12,367 4%Surgical Minutes 1,757,008 1,844,479 5%OR Utilization (19 Room Model) 61% 64% 5%Number of Overtime FTE's (average) 7.4 5.4 -27%Staff Turnover (highest to most recent) 20.3% 11.5% -43%Daily Case Volume Variation 55.24 44.06 -20%Daily Surgery Minutes Variation 6,531 5,124 -22%Elective Room Changes (Average/Mon) 80 25 -69%Elective Room Changes (%) 8% 2% -70%

Salary Dollars (Adjusted for Salary Increases) Total $12,607,061 $13,395,997 6% Monthly $1,045,942 $1,115,646 7%

Cost/Case $1,062 $1,070 0%Cost/Minute of Surgery $7.18 $7.26 1%

Staff Turnover Cost (millions) $2.47 $1.47 -41%Overtime Cost Savings $111,488

Total OR Net Revenue (Fee increase adjusted) $93,929,569 $98,686,693 5%

Page 22: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

OR Redesign - Summary

22

• Increased volume of surgery

• Added 15 FTEs without significant increase in cost/case

• Prime-time utilization increased and overtime decreased

• The overall surgical schedule became more predictable and reliable

• Staff satisfaction improved as evidenced by decreased staff turnover

• Increased volume without added cost & cost avoidance resulted in improved financial performance

Page 23: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

OR Redesign - Conclusion

23

• Major cultural and operational change to operating room management

• Re-design around managing variability worth pursuing

• The increased capacity without increased operational costs may be important adjunct to tactics to deal with expected payment reductions accompanying healthcare reform

Page 24: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve

Healthcare Value

C. Daniel Smith, MD

Southern Surgical Association124th Annual Session

December 3, 2012The Breakers

Palm Beach, Florida

24

Page 25: Re-engineering the Operating Room Using Variability Methodology to Improve Healthcare Value

25