Dr. D. N. BidSarvajanik College of

PhysiotherapyRampura, Surat -395003, India

dnbid 1

Scoliosis is defined as a lateral curvature of the spine combined with a rotational component, due to various etiologies. : -Scoliosis Research Society (SRS).

2dnbid

dnbid 3

Nonstructural scoliosis

postural scoliosis

compensatory scoliosis

•Transient structural scoliosis

sciatic scoliosis

hysterical scoliosis

inflammatory scoliosis

•Structural scoliosis •idiopathic (70 - 80 % of all cases) •congenital •neuromuscular

poliomyelitis cerebral palsy syringomyelia muscular dystrophy amyotonia congenita Friedreich's ataxia

•neurofibromatosis

•mesenchymal disorders Marfan's syndrome Morquio's syndrome rheumatoid arthritis osteogenesis imperfecta certain dwarves

•trauma fractures irradiation surgery

dnbid 4

dnbid 5

dnbid 6

Congenital result of an abnormality of the

development of the vertebrae Neuromuscular

caused by cerebral palsy, spina bifida, muscular dystrophies, spinal cord injuries

Poor posture Unequal leg length Idiopathic scoliosis

cause unknown most common form (80%)

7dnbid

dnbid 8

- Ehler’s Danlos syndrome

- Marfan syndrome- Homocystinuria

9dnbid

Syringomyelia Spinal tumor Neurofibromatos

is Muscular

dystrophy

Cerebral palsy Polio Friedeich’s

ataxia

10dnbid

Leg length discrepancy

Developmental hip dysplasia

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Klippel-Feil syndrome

11dnbid

Of adolescents diagnosed with scoliosis, only 10% have curve progression requiring medical intervention

Three main determinants of curve progression are:(1) Patient gender(2) Future growth potential(3) Curve magnitude at time of diagnosis

12dnbid

Assessing future growth potential using Tanner staging:

Tanner stages 2-3 (just after onset of pubertal growth) are the stages of maximal scoliosis progression

13dnbid

Assessing growth potential using Risser grading:

- Measures progress of bony fusion of iliac apophysis- Ranges from zero (no ossification) to 5

(complete bony fusion of the apophysis)- The lower the grade, the higher the potential

for progression

14dnbid

Risk of Curve Progression

Curve (degree) Growth potential (Risser grade) Risk *

10 to 19 Limited (2 to 4) Low

10 to 19 High (0 to 1) Moderate

20 to 29 Limited (2 to 4) Low/mod

20 to 29 High (0 to 1) High

>29 Limited (2 to 4) High

>29 High (0 to 1) Very high

.

*—Low risk = 5 to 15 percent; moderate risk = 15 to 40 percent; high risk = 40 to 70 percent; very high risk = 70 to 90 percent.

15dnbid

Curve (degrees) Risser grade X-ray/refer Treatment

10 to 19 0 to 1 Every 6 months/no Observe

10 to 19 2 to 4 Every 6 months/no Observe

20 to 29 0 to 1 Every 6 months/yes Brace after 25 degrees

20 to 29 2 to 4 Every 6 months/yes Observe or brace *

29 to 40 0 to 1 Refer Brace

29 to 40 2 to 4 Refer Brace

>40 0 to 4 Refer Surgery †

16dnbid

Back pain not significantly higher in pts with scoliosis

Curves in untreated adolescents with curves < 30 º at time of bony maturity are unlikely to progress

Curves >50 º at maturity progress 1º per year

Up to 19% of females with curves >40 º have significant psychological illness

Life-threatening effects on pulmonary function do not occur until curve is >100 º (ie: Cor pulmonale)

17dnbid

•Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of spinal deformity.

• Its onset can be rather insidious, its progression relentless, and its end results deadly.

•Proper recognition and treatment of idiopathic scoliosis help to optimize patient outcomes.

•Once the disease is recognized, effective ways exist to treat it.

Some Examples…

19dnbid

Comparison of spinal alignment between unaffectedteenager and a teenager with right

idopathic scoliosis.

dnbid 20

dnbid 21

It is, at times, grossly oversimplified as mere lateral deviation of the spine, when in reality, it is a complex 3-dimensional deformity (Asher, 1999).

dnbid 22

In fact, some have used the term rotoscoliosis to help emphasize this very point.

Two-dimensional imaging systems (plain radiographs) remain somewhat limiting, and scoliosis is commonly defined as greater than 10° of lateral deviation of the spine from its central axis.

dnbid 23

J.I.P. James is credited with classifying idiopathic scoliosis according to the age of the patient at the time of diagnosis (James, 1954).

Using his classification system, children diagnosed when they are: younger than 3 years ►infantile idiopathic scoliosis. aged 3-10 years ► juvenile idiopathic scoliosis,

and older than 10 years ► adolescent idiopathic

scoliosis.

These age distinctions, though seemingly arbitrary, have prognostic significance.

dnbid 24

Scoliosis is almost always discussed in terms of its prevalence (i.e., the total number of existing cases within a defined population at risk).

dnbid 25

Stirling and his coauthors studied almost 16,000 patients aged 6-14 years in England and found the point prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle >10°) to be 0.5% (76 of 15,799 patients) (Stirling, 1996).

The prevalence of scoliosis was highest (1.2%) in patients aged 12-14 years (Stirling, 1996).

Data such as these indicate that the focus of screening efforts should be on children in this age group. (12-14 years)

dnbid 26

dnbid 27

SCHOOL SCREENING

28dnbid

The precise etiology of idiopathic scoliosis remains unknown, but several intriguing research avenues exist.

dnbid 29

It was found that increased levels of platelet calmodulin were associated with increasingly severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cohen, 1985).

dnbid 30

Disorganized skeletal growth, probably with its root cause at gene locus or group of loci, has been discussed as a possible etiologic explanation for idiopathic scoliosis.

The Hueter-Volkmann principle states that compressive forces tend to stunt skeletal growth and distractive forces tend to accelerate skeletal growth.

A possible, yet unproven, association with such a growth disturbance is the osteopenia that has been identified in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (Cheng, 1997).

dnbid 31

The vast majority of patients initially present due to perceived deformity. This may be patient or family perception of asymmetry about the shoulders, waist, or rib cage.

A primary care physician or school-screening nurse may perceive similar findings.

Adams forward-bending test (in conjunction with the use of a scoliometer) has been found to be an effective screening tool.

dnbid 32

A. With student standing (grid), observe for: a) high shoulder, b) curved spine, c) uneven shoulder blades, d) uneven hips or waist creases, and

e) unequal distance from arm to side of body

B. Adams forward bend testScoliometer measurement (thoracic,

thoracolumbar, lumbar)-Angle of trunk rotation (ATR) > 7 degree – referral)

33dnbid

Bending position (Adam’s test). Student should stand erect with feet together, knees fully extended, and the palms of both hands touching each other as the student bends forward until the back is horizontal.

Asymmetry of the thoracic or lumbar spine may be detected by using a scoliometer to measure the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) at the thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar areas of the spine

34dnbid

For this test, the patient is asked to lean forward with his or her feet together and bend 90 degrees at the waist. The examiner can then easily view from this angle any asymmetry of the trunk or any abnormal spinal curvatures.

35dnbid

dnbid 36

•The patient bends over, arms dangling and palms pressed together, until a curve can be observed in the upper back (thoracic area).

•The Scoliometer is placed on the back and measures the apex (the highest point) of the upper back curve.

•The patient continues bending until the curve can be seen in the lower back (lumbar area). The apex of this curve is also measured.

An inclinometer (Scoliometer) measures distortions of the torso.

37dnbid

Traditionally, scoliosis has been described as a nonpainful condition, and aggressive workup has been recommended for patients in whom this rule is violated (Hensinger, 1995).

dnbid 38

Physical ExamA. Trunk symmetry (Adams Forward Bend Test)B. Shoulder heightC. Hip, pelvis, breast prominenceD. Leg lengthE. SkinF. ROMG. Neurological exam – upper/lower limbs,

abnormal reflexes

39dnbid

Physical examination should include a baseline assessment of posture and body contour. Shoulder unleveling and protruding scapulae are common. In the most common curve pattern (right thoracic), the right shoulder is consistently rotated forward and the medial border of the right scapula protrudes posteriorly.

Assessment of lower (and often upper) extremity reflexes should be performed. Abdominal reflex patterns should also be assessed. The presence or absence of hamstring tightness should be investigated, and screening should be performed for ataxia and/or poor balance or proprioception (i.e., Romberg test).

Measuring leg length will prove valuable, as a significant percentage of patients with scoliosis have several centimeters of limb-length discrepancy.

dnbid 40

“tip-offs” to scoliosis: Uneven shoulders Prominent

shoulder blade (s)

Uneven waist Elevated hips Leaning to one

side

41dnbid

- Choose the most tilted verterbrae above & below apex of the curve.

- Angle b/t intersecting lines drawn perpendicular to the top of the superior vertebrae and bottom of the inferior vertebrae is the Cobb angle.

42dnbid

dnbid 43

dnbid 44

dnbid 45

dnbid 46

dnbid 47

•PATIENT EVALUATION

48dnbid

HISTORY PHYSICAL EXAM IMAGING LAB TEST DIAGNOSTIC

PROCEDURES TIME LINE

49dnbid

SCHOOL SCREENING

OF SCOLIOSIS

50dnbid

FORWARD BENDING TEST

51dnbid

RIB HUMP

52dnbid

NEED ORTHO EVALUATION

53dnbid

HISTORY OF PAIN NEUROLOGICAL

SYMPTOMS FAMILY HISTORY GROWTH SPURT MENARCHE

54dnbid

REAR VIEW

55dnbid

56dnbid

PLUMB LINE

57dnbid

HAND SUSPENSION

58dnbid

TRACTION XRAY

59dnbid

FRONT VIEW

60dnbid

INEQUALITY

61dnbid

SLR

62dnbid

THOMAS TEST

63dnbid

64dnbid

65dnbid

LIGAMENT LAXITY

66dnbid

67dnbid

68dnbid

SKELETAL MATURITY RISSER SIGN VERTEBRAL RING APOPHYSIS FUSION WRIST X-RAY

69dnbid

70dnbid

ILIAC APOPHYSIS 0 – ABSENT 1- 25% 2- 50% 3- 75% 4- FULL EXCURSION 5- FUSED

71dnbid

The main treatment options for idiopathic scoliosis may be summarized as "the 3 O's": (1) observation, (2) orthosis, and (3) operative intervention.

When to choose each of these treatments is a complicated matter.

The risk of curve progression varies based on the idiopathic scoliosis group in which a patient belongs (i.e., infantile, juvenile, adolescent).

dnbid 72

Although defined by a seemingly arbitrary age limit (<3 year at the time of diagnosis), infantile idiopathic scoliosis demonstrates marked differences that distinguish it from the other 2 categories of idiopathic scoliosis.

Infantile idiopathic scoliosis is the only type of idiopathic scoliosis whose most common curve pattern is left thoracic. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis is the only type of scoliosis that is

more common in boys. with any significant reputation for spontaneous resolution.

dnbid 73

Prediction of curve progression in infantile idiopathic scoliosis has been tied to assessment of the rib vertebral angle difference (RVAD) originally described by Mehta in 1972 (Mehta, 1972).

This measurement is carried out at the apical vertebra of the curve. In instances in which the curves resolved spontaneously, the RVAD was less than 20° in about 80% of cases, and in those instances in which the curves were progressive, the RVAD exceeded 20° in about 80% of cases (Mehta, 1972). dnbid 74

Nonoperative treatment of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis predominates and may involve the use of conventional thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO)–type braces, Milwaukee-type braces, and even intermittent Risser casting.

Some have questioned the value of bracing in infantile idiopathic scoliosis and have stated, "a curve that resolves in a brace would probably have resolved without treatment" (Herring, 2002).

dnbid 76

An underarm thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO).

dnbid 77

dnbid 78

Modified Boston Model underarm brace used for most patients with idiopathic scoliosis

dnbid 79

dnbid 80

If surgical treatment becomes necessary, anterior release and fusion followed by posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation is considered to be the functional treatment.

Every effort should be made to delay such surgical intervention as long as possible to optimize spinal growth, but relentless curve progression should not be accepted or tolerated while awaiting some arbitrary chronologic age.

dnbid 81

Curves less than 25° with an RVAD less than 20° are preferentially observed and monitored with spinal radiographs at regular intervals.

Curves exceeding these parameters are typically braced, with some consideration given to the value of intermittent Risser casting.

Surgery is considered for curves not adequately controlled with nonoperative measures.

dnbid 82

It is more common in females, and its most common curve pattern is a right thoracic curve (Robinson, 1996).

dnbid 83

Observation for curves less than 25° with follow-up radiographs at regular intervals

Bracing for curves that range from 25-40° and at least consideration of bracing (based on curve flexibility) for curves from 40-50°

Bracing for smaller curves that demonstrate rapid progression to the 20-25° range

Surgical intervention for inflexible curves that exceed 40° or virtually any curve that exceeds 50°.

dnbid 84

Most common is Boston brace (aka Thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthosis)

Braces have 74% success rate at halting curve progression (while worn)

Bracing does not correct scoliosis, but may prevent serious progression

Usually worn until patient reaches Risser grade 4 or 5

85dnbid

Of patients with 20 º - 29 º curves, only 40% of those wearing braces ultimately required surgery, compared to 68% of those not wearing back braces

Length of wearing time correlates with outcome (At least 16 hrs per day leads to best chance of preventing curve progression)

86dnbid

dnbid 87

dnbid 88

Bracing and casting may be used outside the above-mentioned parameters in an effort to help control a large curve in a young child for whom the surgeon is attempting to optimize spinal growth.

dnbid 89

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type.

Progressive curvature may be predicted by a combination of physiologic and skeletal maturity factors and curve magnitude.

Small curves in more mature patients have a substantially lower risk of progression (about 2%) than larger curves in more immature patients, in whom the risk is much higher (risk may approach or exceed 70%).

dnbid 90

Treatment recommendations for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are driven almost totally by curve magnitude (the only caveat being that brace treatment is thought to be effective only in patients who are still growing).

It is thus somewhat ironic to note that stated recommendations urge observation for curves less than 30°, bracing of curves that reach the 30-40° range, and consideration of surgery for curves that exceed 40°.

dnbid 91

This amounts to a 10° window between observation and major spinal surgery. It is even more ironic to note that 10° is a commonly discussed margin of error for measuring such scoliotic curves.

Additional patient factors may also influence some orthopedic surgeons to brace patients with curves measuring less than 30° or in excess of 40°. For instance, a rapidly progressive curve in a 12-year-old child that suddenly goes from 16-26° may easily prompt bracing.

dnbid 92

When it comes to surgical considerations, patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be functionally subdivided into those patients in whom significant anterior spinal growth is a concern and those in whom it is not. This amounts to a quantification of risk of development of the complication known as crankshaft phenomenon (Dubousset, 1989).

This can have a major impact on the surgical treatment plan in that a child at significant risk for crankshaft phenomenon will require an anterior spinal fusion procedure.

dnbid 93

Few, if any, absolute contraindications exist regarding scoliosis care, just as few, if any, absolute indications for intervention exist.

Accepted contraindications for bracing include skeletal maturity and excessive curve magnitude.

Thoracic lordosis and certain curve patterns such as double thoracic curves also have been offered as at least relative contraindications to bracing.

The main contraindication to posterior scoliosis surgery would be medical instability and inability to survive surgery.

Anterior scoliosis surgery would also be contraindicated in these patients, as well as in those with a precarious pulmonary status.

dnbid 94

Preoperative assessment of hemoglobin and hematocrit levels.

Autologous blood predonation

dnbid 95

Bending radiographs, including those over a fulcrum (Cheung, 1997).

Klepps and Lenke et al found that thoracic fulcrum bending radiographs worked best for them when dealing with isolated main thoracic curves (Klepps, 2001).

dnbid 96

MRI has been indicated in patients with idiopathic scoliosis with unusual complaints such as: severe unexplained headaches and when clinical findings such as ataxia or cavus feet are present.

dnbid 97

Pulmonary function studies have been used rather extensively in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

dnbid 98

dnbid 99

dnbid 100

Medical therapy: Nonoperative management consists of either mere

observation or orthosis use. Observation is watchful waiting with appropriate intermittent radiographs to check for the presence or absence of curve progression.

Orthosis use for scoliosis is discussed extensively below.

No other treatments, including electrical muscle stimulation, physical therapy, spinal manipulation, and nutritional therapies, have been shown to be effective for managing the spinal deformity associated with idiopathic scoliosis. dnbid 101

The first widely used scoliosis brace with proven effectiveness was the Milwaukee brace. This brace was developed by Walter Blount and Albert Schmitt in 1946 (Moe, 1970).

The brace was originally designed to be used as part of the surgical treatment of scoliosis and only later evolved into a stand-alone nonoperative treatment.

dnbid 102

Milwaukee brace was effective in preventing significant curve progression in patients with 20-39° curves (Lonstein, 1994).

These same authors recommended that adolescents with a curve of 25° and a Risser sign of 0 be braced immediately and not wait for evidence of curve progression (Lonstein, 1994).

dnbid 103

Rowe and his colleagues performed a meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy of nonoperative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis (Rowe, 1997). They calculated the weighted mean proportion of success for 3 nonoperative treatments: observation, electrical stimulation, and bracing.

They were able to successfully combine data on 1910 patients from 20 different studies for purposes of meta-analysis. Their main results are as follows (treatment, success rate):

Treatment Success Rate Observation, 49% Electrical stimulation, 39% Bracing 8 hours per day, 60% Bracing 16 hours per day, 62% Bracing 23 hours per day, 93%

dnbid 104

In part due to the aforementioned psychological and brace wear compliance issues, new approaches to bracing are being developed.

One such approach is that developed by Dr. Christine Coillard and Dr. Charles Rivard of the St. Justine Hospital in Montreal, Canada. Their dynamic bracing approach is referred to as the SpineCor Brace or as the St. Justine Brace.

It involves elastic straps that are anchored on a pelvic corset, and, based on curve morphology, these straps are tensioned to exert corrective forces. The brace is a radical departure from traditional plastic and metal orthoses. Early results with the St. Justine Brace are rather encouraging, with success rates comparable to those of traditional bracing.

dnbid 105

Surgical therapy:

Even in the setting of adequate correction and solid fusion, up to 38% of patients still have occasional back pain (Lenke, 1998).

The primary goal of scoliosis surgery is to achieve a solid bony fusion.

dnbid 106

Modern instrumentation systems have been shown to allow for adequate curve correction but with little or no ability to diminish associated rib humps (Lenke, 1992).

Despite claims of certain instrumentation systems to derotate the spine, little actual derotation has been documented.

Derotation of the instrumented curve also has been shown to possibly occur at the expense of creation of new rotation in uninstrumented portions of the spine (Rajasekaran, 1994).

dnbid 107

Previously, much attention has been paid to the ability of certain spinal instrumentation systems (e.g., Cotrel-Dubousset to derotate the spine during scoliosis correction).

Jarvis and Greene showed that use of the Wisconsin segmental spinal instrumentation (a system traditionally thought to not be associated with significant spinal derotation) was associated with spinal derotation equal to or greater than Cotrel-Dubousset–type systems (Jarvis, 1996). dnbid 108

Posterior correction and instrumentation Anterior correction and instrumentation Anterior release / fusion, plus posterior

instrumentation Posterior release/fusion, plus anterior

instrumentation Combined anterior and posterior

instrumentation and fusion

109dnbid

Postoperative patient management involves close monitoring, which often occurs initially in an intensive care unit setting.

Patients have monitoring devices, such as arterial lines, and closed suction devices, such as chest tubes, that also require special nursing attention.

The use of certain special spine-specific hospital beds, such as the Stryker frame, may also aid in patient care and comfort (change from supine to prone position) during the initial postoperative period.

dnbid 110

The use of postoperative bracing varies from surgeon to surgeon.

The roots of scoliosis surgery involved immobilization in a body cast. Following the development of initial instrumentation systems (eg, Harrington instrumentation), external immobilization was still used routinely. With the advent of large-rod multiple-hook constructs, such as the Cotrel-Dubousset system and its direct decendents, bracing has been de-emphasized a bit.

dnbid 111

Today, it is almost as likely that a patient will not receive a postoperative brace as receive one, whereas previously, bracing was much more widespread.

In certain specific circumstances, postoperative bracing is still almost always used, such as anterior thoracic or thoracolumbar instrumentation procedures or surprisingly weak bone stock.

dnbid 112

When a brace is used, it is typically to be worn full-time for at least 6 weeks, followed by a period in which the brace may be off for bathing with subsequent progressive weaning.

As a rule of thumb, patients may also miss up to 6 weeks of school (if their procedure is done at such time of the year), and up to 6 months may be required before they resume most of their normal activities.

Vigorous sports may be restricted for at least a year, in some instances permanently (based on risk versus benefit discussions between patients, families, and their surgeons). dnbid 113

dnbid 114

dnbid 115

Clinical outcomes following treatment of idiopathic scoliosis are strongly linked to curve magnitude.

dnbid 116

THANK YOU

dnbid 117