10
Data Integrity – the review process Different types of review process

Data integrity - the review process

  • Upload
    pi

  • View
    227

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Data integrity - the review process

Data Integrity – the review processDifferent types of review process

Page 2: Data integrity - the review process

People are still superior to machines when it comes to detecting data integrity issues, because the required level of analysis is too complex for a machine. That is why the review process remains part of the human domain.

• Review processes can be:• Discrete or continuous• One-off or repeated• Scheduled or unscheduled

• They can be performed by• Users• Management• Auditers

General background

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com2 | pi 2016©

Page 3: Data integrity - the review process

• Audit trail review• Result review• Review by exception• Periodic review• Data audit

Index

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com3 | pi 2016©

Page 4: Data integrity - the review process

• Audit trail report functions: • Identify system security issues• Errors in sequencing of activities• Investigate errors and unexpected events• Training issues• Data integrity issues

• Can function both as a deterrent and a tool to aid possible investigation

• Audit trail review initially focuses on configuration:• Configuration is correctly turned on• Correctly configured as predetermined and documented• Ability to change the configuration is subject to proper duty segregation

Audit trail review

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com4 | pi 2016©

Page 5: Data integrity - the review process

• Prior to the acceptance or rejection of product or data quality• In-depth review of individual results

or set of results• Comparison of all data against limits and specifications

• Evaluation of• completeness and correctness of all metadata• accuracy and integrity of manually entered values• all decisions made and actions taken• conformity to both sound scientific practice and documented

procedures• Investigation of

• Manual adjustments or alterations of (meta)data• Changes made to the method versions in the creation of the

result

Data review

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com5 | pi 2016©

AuditTrail

ReviewResultreview

Data review

Resultreview

AuditTrail

Review

Page 6: Data integrity - the review process

• Risk-based approach to data review• Result review is only done on subsets of results, triggered by predetermined

and documented alerts

• Possible alerts:• Within but close to the specification limit• Manually integrated results• Manually entered critical data that has been changed• Reprocessed data• Suspicious sample data / name

Review by exception

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com6 | pi 2016©

Page 7: Data integrity - the review process

• Performed at a defined interval, based on GxP criticality of the system• Review of a longer period of time

• Includes:• Audit trail review• Review of SOPs• System records• SOP records• Change control and system performance• Back-up performance• System access security

• Frequency may be increased where issues have been found in system operation or in previous periodic reviews.

Periodic review

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com7 | pi 2016©

Page 8: Data integrity - the review process

• Data audit can be:• Part of a scheduled review process• Unscheduled as part of an investigation• In preparation for a regulatory inspection or customer audit

• Possible reviews• Inspecting a specific data-handling process• Trace a single result back to the raw data (+ same exercise in opposite

direction)• Data audits based on FDA Compliance Program Guidance Manual

Data audit

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com8 | pi 2016©

Page 9: Data integrity - the review process

pi is the strategic partner of choice to some of the world’s leading life science companies. We offer our clients unique expertise and strategic consultancy of the highest quality.

We dedicate ourselves to bringing excellence to the life sciences industry.

We’ve grown by learning how to be better.

Better resourced to focus our faculty of consultants’ singular experience and knowledge. Better managed to share their depth of understanding.Better prepared to challenge orthodox thinking.And better able to redefine accepted best practice.

To accept no other standard than excellence.

Visit our website Connect with us on LinkedIn

Follow us on Twitter

About pi

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com9 | pi 2016©

Page 10: Data integrity - the review process

The Audit Trail Advantage by Carol Brandt

Pharmaceutical Engineering, March-April 2016, Charlie Wakeham and Thomas Haag

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry March 2015

EudraLex - Volume 4 Good manufacturing practice (GMP) Guidelines

WHO good practices for pharmaceutical quality control laboratories

Sources

pi | [email protected] | www.3-14.com10 | pi 2016©