Upload
alan-bruce
View
94
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at NCRE Fall Conference in Washington, DC in November 2014. Focus on global dimesnions of rehabilitation education and international disability rights in professional best practice.
Citation preview
Dr. Alan BruceULS Dublin
NCRE Fall ConferenceWashington DC
Global Challenge, International Opportunity: Rehabilitation, Quality, Inclusion and Innovation in an Emerging Europe
Issues and Partnerships in a Changing World
Overview
Rationale International dimensions in disability
Impact Globalization and change
Focus Quality, Innovation and Inclusion
Context European Union
Opportunities Research, Engagement, Funding
Discussion
1. Rationale
Disability is and always has been an international issue
Common humanity/common reactions
Value systems and religious beliefs transcend borders
Role of war and migration Legacies of institutionalization and
control Impact of learning solutions
Good news
Shared insights promote creative collaboration
Rights based approaches assert quality
Learning maximized Creativity enhanced with
international perspective Insights deepened through
comparative analysis Options today radically extended
Bad news
Policy inertia and vested interest Business of rehabilitation usually
operates nationally Inheritance of charitable models Legacies of national laws and
regulations Conceptual confusion: international
or intercultural? Hesitance due to language barriers Arrogance of isolationism
Structures do exist…
Rehabilitation International (1922) Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (2008) World Health Organization Disabled People International (1981) CIRRIE NIDRR European Network on Independent
Living
World Report on Disability (2011) Foundational and critical document Published by WHO State of the art analysis and review Overall aims of Report:
To provide governments and civil society with a comprehensive description of the importance of disability and an analysis of the responses provided, based on the best available scientific information.
Based on this analysis, to make recommendations for action at national and international levels.
International
Always a contested space: different meanings to different stakeholders
Overlap with different perspectives: cultural, ethnic, national
Encountering the Other is not linear Connects with identity and self-
perception Deconstructs mythologies Enlightened self-interest – what’s in it
for me?
2. Impact
A globalized planet demands global approaches
No country is immune from what is happening in others
Rates of change are unprecedented – and accelerating
This is the Age of Uncertainty
The shape of globalization Patterns of constant change Permanent migration/mobility Outsourcing Flexible structures and modalities End of job norms Knowledge economy now pervasive Instant worldwide communications Structural inequalities
Urbanized futures
Planet of Slums (Mike Davis) Informal economies Demographic transformation Hypercities The normalization of brutality
Show me the money….
12 m.: numbers with more than $1m. to invest (9,2% increase since 2011)
$46,2 trillion: aggregate wealth of this group (10% increase since 2011)
Ultrarich (>$30m.) surged 11% (now 35,2% of all millionaires)
World Wealth ReportRBC Wealth Management & Capgemini Financial ServicesJune 2013
What about the rest of us? Decreasing workers’ share in national
income in all countries Labor productivity (up 85% since 1980)
not reflected in wages (up 35%) Declining social mobility Rising income inequality reflected in
declining equality of opportunity
Global Wage Report 2012/13, ILOProf. Miles Corak, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2013
Shaping enterprise dimensions
We are increasingly becoming a winner takes all economy… over recent decades, technological change, globalization and erosion of the institutions and practices that support shared prosperity have put the middle class under increasing stress
Dr. Alan KruegerCouncil of Economic Advisers & Princeton (2013)
Mainstream: nightmare or opportunity?
Mythology of the ‘normal’ Defining the mainstream: what have we
become? Robust probing of social structure required
as a preliminary to defining mainstream Masking power, relationships and inequity Need to avoid cliché and assumptions Learners are immersed in and emerging
into this changed constellation – of which the gatekeepers know little
3.Focus
Innovation and quality are critical factors
How does learning sustain innovation?
Necessary focus on inherited structures and delivery mechanisms
Access and validation of knowledge have become central concerns
What is now the role of the University?
Multidisciplinary focus
A multidisciplinary approach drives innovation in: Adaptive and assistive technologies Vocational evaluation Assessment Counseling Materials design Environmental design Software design Medical supports Legislation Innovative pedagogy
Sustainable Linkage
Strong focus on linkages between: Academic inquiry Practical applications Community benefit
Results in: Culture of quality and excellence Contributions of historically excluded groups
(people with disabilities) to strategies Services considered an investment not cost
Disruptive Innovations in Learning Architecture
eLearning provision Open universities, e-learning
departments, media labs
MOOC phenomenon
Current Challenge: How will rehabilitation education be
impacted by transformed education system?
Policy focus
How can we incubate creativity? How can we develop capacity for
innovation? How can we expand expertise and
competence? How can we access and integrate
cutting edge technologies? Why have we progressed so little in
formal terms?
Innovation imperatives
Transformational learning - the sociology of innovation Educational systems - networks of actors reinforcing
each other in stable configurations Vested interest acts against innovation and inclusion -
seen as threat It is possible to have incremental change Systems react to change even if they do not initiate it The promising path is through disruptive innovation
which produces irreversible change (Christensen, Disrupting Class, 2008)
Innovation contexts
If learning, working and production are controlled
innovation is at best powerless, at worst sinister
At the core of innovation is an ability to assess
critically and express freely
Fundamental to innovation is the ability to ask
questions that challenge existing relations
Innovation re-examines existing reality while
posing viable alternatives
Global Innovation Index 2014 Edition
• Understanding human aspects behind innovation essential to design policies to promote economic development and richer innovation environments.
• Recognizing key role of innovation as a driver of economic growth and prosperity - broad horizontal vision of innovation: GII includes indicators that go beyond the traditional measures of innovation (e.g. R&D)
• Rankings: Switzerland 1Finland 4USA 6Ireland 11Brazil 61
Resourcing Innovation
• Talent management initiatives• Accurate forecasting of future skill needs• Linkage with leading universities• Human Capital• Organizational Capital• Network Capital
Transfers of economically useful scientific knowledge from universities to industry generates substantial economic growth as the experiences of classic high technology regions (e.g. Silicon Valley) and emerging new technology centers around the world demonstrate
• Listening• Linkage• Leading
The triple helix
• Concept: Industry/University/Government• How does learning sustain innovation?• Focus on inherited structures and delivery
mechanisms• Access to and validation of knowledge • Changes in governance: autonomy; budgets;
performance based practice• Shift to external accreditation away from Ministries• Emergence of more complex processes of
innovation and commercialization of research• Triple Helix Systems of Innovation (Ranga &
Etzkowitz 2013)
4. Context
Europe: learning support and linkage Part of integration strategy since outset Designed to address labour market needs EU has no competence in national education Structural funds: imbalances & redistributive financial tool
ESF Priorities:Improving human capitalImproving access to employmentIncreasing adaptabilityImproving social inclusion of disadvantaged people Strengthening institutional capacityAdvancing reforms in regards to employment and inclusion.
Europe: from Club to Union‘I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.’
EU Structures
28 Member States Not a federation –but more than a
free trade area Free movement of labor Free movement of capital Balance between Union and Member
State
EU Challenges
Ethnic demographics/migration National frameworks and policies Interculturalism and diversity Flexibility and adaptability Assessment, diagnosis and
evaluation Economic crisis 2008 Rise of racism
EU Resources
1. EU Funding offers significant opportunities 2. EU funding is not a substitute but a supplement 3. Non-finance resources offer as much if not more 4. Transnational action only viable method in a
globalized world 5. No substitute for professionalism and expertise 6. All rests on vision and passion for community
needs 6. University/corporate partnership based on added
value and CSR
EU Framework Program for RTD
Advanced ICT support Innovation and sustainable research Innovative learning projects history Lifelong Learning Program (2007-13):
€7 bn. Erasmus + Euraxess Budget of FP7 (2007-13): €50,5 bn. Budget of FP8 (2014-20): over €80
bn.
Horizon 2020
• Research and innovation
• Competitiveness for SMEs
• Employment and labour mobility
support
• Social inclusion and combating
poverty
• Education, skills and lifelong learning
• Institutional capacity building.
Europe 2020
The five key priorities now are: Raising the employment rate of adults Improved investment in research and
development Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions Reduction of early school leaving and
increased rates of completed third level education
Reduction of poverty levels by 25%.
EU Themes and priorities
Creativity Motivation Empathy Flexibility Adaptability Equity Intercultural competence
Summary
1. EU Funding significant and available2. Next proposals February 20153. Supported by EU and US4. Transnational action critical in a globalized world5. Rests on vision and passion for community needs6. Open to US partners – universities or agencies
5. Opportunities
Rehabilitation competence linked to wider social needs
Use of advanced technologies as norm Radical and continuous upskilling Facilitating learning Rehabilitation connected to labor market Imperative to avoid being crushed by
accreditation Learning: nimble, relevant, quality driven
Added value in learning
Identity and creativity: eLearning to eMeaning
Learning processes no longer controlled by traditional knowledge institutions
Creativity now facilitated by platforms and infrastructures that encourage large-scale production and challenge old hierarchies
Process of profound institutional re-structuring comparable to European 19th century
E-learning redefines learning
Strategic options
Increased application of new knowledge Open and distance learning technologies
facilitate learners and staff competence Transforming traditional teaching role to
mentoring, guiding and facilitation Development of network of innovative
best practice at international level WHO Report 2011 as benchmark Rehabilitation as a framework for
creativity, not a labyrinth of rules
Asserting Vision
• Stakeholders in universities are wide-ranging, both internal and external
• Pressures on corporate and academic worlds are similar, if different in detail
• Universities to survive must be relevant and visionary• Universities are now expected:
• To be more outward looking• To provide leadership and service• To make efficiency gains• To maintain standards and quality• To obtain new and additional revenue sources
FIESTA Conference: Barcelona October 2014
And further afield: Brazil
Imaginative discourses
• Skillbeck Report (2001)• Challenges and changes are within institutions• Changes are ubiquitous• Changes are systemic• Changes are radical
• Evolving Corporate Universities Forum (Istanbul 2012)• attract, retain and enhance highly skilled employees• invest in developing a culture of learning throughout the organization • spread a common culture as engines of strategic change• ability to promote importance, value and contribution of a learning
culture• ensure integration of HRM systems and policies with learning initiatives • build genuine partnerships with world-class learning institutions
Next steps….
D’ou venons nous? Que sommes nous? Où allons nous?
Thank you!
Dr. Alan BruceULS
DUBLIN – HELSINKI - AMSTERDAM - CHICAGO