16
IMPLEMENTING PARTNERSHIPS IN CALIFORNIA Sacramento Adam Nicolopoulos, Managing Director January 20, 2011

Implementing Partnerships in California

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Implementing Partnerships in California

IMPLEMENTING PARTNERSHIPS IN CALIFORNIA

Sacramento

Adam Nicolopoulos, Managing Director

January 20, 2011

Page 2: Implementing Partnerships in California

Who are we?

1

Project advisory

&

Financial consultancy practice

Energy & Infrastructure

Transport Renewables Ports Power

Page 3: Implementing Partnerships in California

What we do…

2

Advisory

Structuring

Negotiations

Fundraising

Construction

Page 4: Implementing Partnerships in California

3

(800)

(600)

(400)

(200)

0

200

400

600

800

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

year of concession

Mill

ions o

f U

S$ n

om

inal

Opex Capex

Senior debt interest & fees Senior debt repayment

Dividends Tax

Equity subscribed Debt drawdown

Total Revenues

What do the cash flows look like?

Page 5: Implementing Partnerships in California

4

What if?

(800)

(600)

(400)

(200)

0

200

400

600

800

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

year of concessionMillio

ns o

f E

uro

s n

om

inal

Opex Capex

Senior debt interest & fees Senior debt repayment

Dividends Tax

Equity subscribed Debt drawdown

Total Revenues

In structuring a project financing, sponsors optimize their capital structure and:– Take lifecycle approach to costs

– Offer BEST VALUE for MONEY

– Maximize leverage / optimize capital structure

– Continuously review and monitor project’s performance

Funders simply want to ensure repayment of their debt

Project Revenues < Annual Costs

Page 6: Implementing Partnerships in California

5

Hybrid revenue mechanism alternative

– farebox & availability payment

Hybrid Revenue Mechanism Financial Equilibrium

Opex

Debt service

Equity return ?

DSR

replenishment

+

Financial

contribution1

Liquidity

debt service

reserve (DSR)

Intra-year

cash flow shortfall is

covered by the DSR

=

+

+

+

Forecasted

FAREBOX/

USER revenue

(1) operating cashflow

shortfall & “make-

whole”

Property-

retail

revenues

+

Hybrid Revenue Structures – Live project

Costs Revenues

Page 7: Implementing Partnerships in California

6

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027

(€000's

)

Financial cont ribut ion Ucka tunnel revenues

Mirna bridge revenues Other income

FC revenue adjustment O&M, LCC and tax

Debt service + O&M, LCC and tax

Project X - Case Study: The goal is to eliminate the Subsidy

Blue line – O&M + Debt + RoE + tax

Solid Blue – subsidy

Green + Gold – user revenues

Page 8: Implementing Partnerships in California

7

Government Financial Support Options

Government grant

Government funding

as loan

Revenue Subsidy – “make

whole”

Minimum revenue

guarantees

Financial guarantees

• No risk sharing

• Depends on performance

by operator & manager

• Uncertainty (level of

exposure)

• Unfavorable risk transfer?

• Requires complex

arrangements and risk

transfer

: Issues :

Page 9: Implementing Partnerships in California

8

Financial & Commercial Innovation via Optimal Alignment of Risks

Public Private Shared Structural/Comments

Design Depends

Joint effort / timing of design – life cycle approach

Construction No

Construction cost overruns and completion delays

Operation No

Penalties against substandard performance & operational disruption

Maintenance No

Maintenance reserve / equity returns post-funding of maintenance service

Land No

Public sector’s (DOT’s) job

Permits Yes

Construction permits are the responsibility of the Contractor

Revenue/ Traffic

? Key risk -

Varies

Key finance driver / project viability / thorough analysis of traffic and revenue risk

Finance ? Varies

Capital structure / ability to access large parcels of finance on competitive terms

Regulation No Asset Regulation (RAB versus other forms)

Key

Key

Key

Key

Key

Page 10: Implementing Partnerships in California

Project management & timetable (indicative)

Project

structure and

Government

support

Prepare

tender

documents

Call for

tenders and

proposals

submission

Select

preferred

bidder

Cash flow

analysis

2–3 months 2 months 3 months 4 months 3 monthsProposed

timeframe

Tasks Evaluate

specific project assumptions

Analyse impact on financing

quantitative risk analysis

Capital structure

Analyse potential project structures

Select options for public support

Perform market soundings

Risk analysis

Finalise project structure

Formulate bid strategy

Co-ordinate technical and legal advisors

Data room

Issue invitationto tender

Strategy to ensure best firms submit bids

Address any last minute bidder concerns

Pre-qualify bidders

Implement public relations plan

Evaluate bids from financial impact and credibility perspective

Propose preferred bidder that best satisfies client’s objectives

Throughout

remaining

stages

Develop marketing strategy

Contact private sector candidates

Prepare marketing documents

Canvass

Private

Sector

interest &

marketing

Project

stages

Project advisory

Page 11: Implementing Partnerships in California

10

Project phases / risk stages

Phases P

roje

ct’s p

erf

orm

an

ce

Development &

conceptConstruction Operation

Years / term of operation

Ramp-up

l

ll

Risk to investor

Equity [20%]

Debt [80%]

Original

financing

Refinancing

l

Page 12: Implementing Partnerships in California

2100337L

Risk free rate (treasuries)

+

Construction risk

+

Revenue model

+

Operation risk

+

[Seniority]

+

Ownership premium

Risk free rate (treasuries)

+

Project risk premium

+

Swap rate

+

[Premium]

...so how much do I pay for capital?

EQUITY:

Shareholders/financial investors

DEBT:

Lenders / debt capital markets

Expected IRR Margins

Page 13: Implementing Partnerships in California

So what will make these projects successful?

12

Project Benefits

Project Costs Viable

Purpose

Affordable

L/M-Risks

Returns

Page 14: Implementing Partnerships in California

13

Ten key criteria for successful PPPs

Size

Timing

Environmental

Financing

Management

Legal

Technical

Land

Viability

Definition -

Discrete

Success

criteria

for a

project

Page 15: Implementing Partnerships in California

What have I learned along the way?

14

Sound structures (no or little financial engineering)

Experienced advisors

Clear tender process

Price risks properly

Stay close to the market

“Win-Win”

Value time (more important than cash)

Manage timetable

Principle of “financial equilibrium”

Principle of sustainability

Page 16: Implementing Partnerships in California

15

“Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or

present are certain to miss the future” JOHN F. KENNEDY

Phone:

Mobile:

Fax:

E-mail:

+1 415-785-4613

+1 415-246-1765

+1 415-532-2873

[email protected]

AddressSuite 7

810 College Avenue,

Kentfield

California, 94904

Adam Nicolopoulos

Managing Director, ADN Capital Ventures, Inc.

www.adncapitalventures.com

What have I learned along the way?