Upload
emmanuelgillet
View
259
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TheFutureofIntellectualPropertyArbitration?ACaseStudyonIPArbitration:thePortugueseSystem
forSettlementofDisputesDerivedfromIndustrialPropertyRightsWhereReferenceMedicinesand
GenericMedicinesareinQuestion
EmmanuelGILLET,PhDTeachingFellow,TheHongKongPolytechnicUniversity–[email protected]
UNCITRALEmergenceConference30November2015Macau
Genericdrug
“A pharmaceutical product, usually intended to beinterchangeable with an innovator product, that ismanufactured without a licence from the innovatorcompanyandmarketedaftertheexpirydateofthepatentorotherexclusiverights.”(WorldHealthOrganization).Sold under its International Nonproprietary Name (INN):“of\icial generic and nonproprietary name given to apharmaceutical drug or active ingredient” (World HealthOrganization).
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Genericsindustrydynamics
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Genericsindustrydynamics
Trendinshareofgenericsinthepharmaceuticalmarket,selectedcountries,2000to2011
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Genericsindustrydynamics
Trendinshareofgenericsinthepharmaceuticalmarket,selectedcountries,2000to2011
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Law no. 62/2011 of 12th December 2011creating a “system for settlement ofdisputes derived from industrial propertyrights where reference medicines andgenericmedicinesareinquestion”
Legislativeandregulatorybackground
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Article2oftheLawno.62/2011of12thDecember2011
“CompulsoryarbitrationLitigations derived from the claim of industrial propertyrights, including preliminary injunction proceedings,regarding reference medicines (…) and generic medicines,irrespective ofwhether process patents, product patents orpatents of use are at issue, as well as SupplementaryProtection Certi\icates, shall be subject to compulsoryarbitration,whetherornotinstitutionalised.”.”
Legislativeandregulatorybackground
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Compulsoryarbitration
• Parties’autonomy:limited
• However,someprovisionsoftheUNCITRALrulesmayapply(particularlyincaseofanadhocarbitration)
Natureofthearbitralproceedings
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
PublishedonthewebsiteoftheNationalAuthorityofMedicinesandHealthProducts
(Infarmed)Applicant
MarketingApplication(MA)toobtainamarketing
authorization
30daystosubmitanarbitralrequest
PatentOwner
ArbitraltribunalAdhoc
Arbitrationinstitution
PatentOwner 30daystoreplytothearbitralrequest
or
Legislativeandregulatorybackground
ArbitraltribunalAdhoc
Arbitrationinstitution
or
(1)
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
(1) After 30 days: patent holders are prevented fromenforcing their IP rights against generics manufacturers(LisbonCourtofAppeal,30September2014)
/Thelegalprovisionsestablishingacompulsory30daystermto initiate mandatory arbitration procedures for theenforcementofpatents,areunconstitutional,ifinterpretedinthe sense that patent owners are not allowed to initiateprocedures against the MA applicant beyond such deadline(Constitutionalcourt,12February2015)
Proceduralissues:deadlines
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Proceduralissues:designationofarbitrators
LisbonCourtofAppeal,24March2015– Arbitratordesignatedin50arbitrationproceedingsbythesameparty
– LisbonCourtmakingreferencetotheIBARules– Internationalstandards:• Article16UNCITRALRules
• IBAGuidelinesonCon\lictsofInterestinInternationalArbitration,GeneralStandardsRegardingImpartiality,IndependenceandDisclosure.
• A“nichearbitration”issue
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
ReferringaQuestiontotheCJEUforaPreliminaryRuling(CJEU,13February2013,C-555/13,MerckCanada)þ Whichdiffersfromthegeneralrule.
Proceduralissues:powersofthearbitraltribunal
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Decidingonthevalidityofapatent(CourtofAppealofLisbon,13February2014)ý
Substantiveissues
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Confiden'alityissues
• Communicationtothenationalindustrialpropertyof\iceandtoINFARMED
• PublishedintheIndustrialPropertyBulletin
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Lack of power to decide on the validity/existence/opposabilityofapatent(LisbonCourtofAppeal,13February2014)
Powersofthearbitraltribunal
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]
Conclusion
• Auniquemodel– Necessity to imagine new models for IParbitration
• Critics– Limitedpartyautonomy:arbitration?– Limitedresources(numberofquali\iedarbitrators)
– ImpossibilityforthearbitratortoruleonthevalidityorexistenceoftheIPR
UNCITRALEmergenceConference,30Nov.2015,MacauCCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]