Upload
dickstein-shapiro-llp
View
105
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Alternatives to For-ProfitStatus For Participating inTitle IV Programs
June 21, 2012
Neil Lefkowitz
#3067381
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
General Advantages of Not-for-ProfitStatus
May qualify for exemptions from federal and stateincome taxes
May qualify for exemptions from sales tax
May qualify for exemptionsfrom property tax
May be able to obtaintax-exempt financing
May qualify for tax-exemptU.S. postal rates
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
General Advantages of Not-for-ProfitStatus
Students may be able to obtain stategrants available only to students ofnot-for-profit higher educationinstitutions
May be able to participate in libraryand other programs available only tonot-for-profit education institutions
May receive charitable donations orparticipate in grant programsreserved for not-for-profit institutions
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Regulatory Advantages ofNot-for-Profit Status
Following the first full fiscal year after completion ofthe “conversion” transaction, not subject to 90-10 rule
Degree programs of not-for-profit institution notsubject to GE rule
• Not clear whether DOE will require a transition period
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disadvantages of “Converting” toNot-for-Profit Status
Transaction will constitute adisposition at present for marketvalue, which is generally lowerthan the fair market value offor-profit higher educationinstitutions in 2003-2009.
Very limited amounts payable tomanagement former owners in theevent of a subsequent disposition of the institution
• Any amounts payable to management former ownerswill be taxed at ordinary income rates
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disadvantages of “Converting” toNot-for-Profit Status
Present owners will provide all orsubstantially all of the financing as“seller financing”
• Owners bear the risk ofnonperformance/nonpayment
Compensation payable to owners intransaction is limited by federal incometax laws
Compensation payable to former owners by thenot-for-profit after the transaction closes is limitedby federal income tax laws
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disadvantages of “Converting” toNot-for-Profit Status
Proceeds of transaction will be taxable to owners butinstallment sale treatment should apply to deferredpayments of purchase price
• Tax rates may increase in the future
Owners lose control of institution• Board of directors of not-for-profit
corporation must be independentfrom the former owners
Greater disclosure of financial activities of 501(c)(3)corporations on IRS Form 990, which is publiclyavailable
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disadvantages of “Converting” toNot-for-Profit Status
Activities of not-for-profit afterclosing is limited by federalincome tax laws
• Restrictions on engaging inancillary, for-profit activities
• Restrictions on joint ventureswith for-profit enterprises
• Restrictions on politicalactivities
Generally, more limited financing alternatives fornot-for-profit corporations than for-profit corporations
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Regulatory Disadvantages of“Converting” to a Not-for-Profit Status
Transaction will constitute a change of control forpurposes of participating in federal student aidprograms
• Letter of credit of 25% or more of anticipated federalstudent aid required to be posted with the DOE
• Restrictions in PPA on adding new programs orlocations or substantially modifying existing programs
• PPA will be provisional
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Regulatory Disadvantages of“Converting” to a Not-for-Profit Status
Substantive change for accreditation purposes• Certain accreditors may view negatively and impose
new restrictions
• May take months to obtain accreditor approval as aconsequence of document review and schedule ofcommission meetings
Change of control for state education agencies
May lead to change of state regulatory agency
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Timing of “Conversion” Transaction:Allow 6-8 months to complete
Retention of professionals, includingappraisers
Analysis of transaction structure andtax planning
Selection of independent directors
Preparation of transaction documents
Determination of fair market value
Preparation of application to the IRS
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Timing of “Conversion” Transaction:Allow 6-8 months to complete
Preparation of an application to DOE for pre-acquisition review
Preparation of substantive change or otherapplication for accrediting bodies
Preparation of change of control applications forstate education agencies
Obtain required consents of private parties such asfinancing sources, landlords, equipment lessors andsoftware licensors
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Transaction Structure
Transaction structure is determinedby income tax consequences, taxplanning objectives, financingobjectives, the existence of liabilitiesoutside of the ordinary course ofbusiness and any challenges inobtaining third-party consents, aswell as flexibility in state law
• Generally, recommend Delawarelaw for clarity and flexibilityregarding non-profit, nonstockcorporations
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Transaction Structure
Sale of Assets of For-Profit Entity to Not-for-ProfitCorporation
• Define which assets, liabilities and contracts are transferred orassumed and which are retained
• Importance of paying fair market value for acquired assets and fairrental value for leased assets to the Section 501(c)(3) status ofpurchaser. Fair market value will be determined by independentvaluation expert
• Purchase price will be paid over time and evidenced by loandocuments which include a market rate of interest
• Likely contain subordination provisions for the benefit of present orfuture lenders
• Fewer representations and warranties and indemnification provisionsthan in other sale transactions
• Conditions to closing for regulatory and private party approvals
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Transaction Structure
Merger• Transfer of assets and assumption of liabilities and contracts happens
by operation of merger and minimizes transfer and assumptionlogistics
• If certain asserts, liabilities or contracts will be retained by the for-profitentity, the assets, liabilities and contracts to be transferred can beplaced in a newly-formed subsidiary, which is then merged into thenot-for-profit corporation
• May not be available under all state laws
• Merger consideration must be for fair market value
• Merger consideration will be paid over time and evidenced by loandocuments which include a market rate of interest
• Fewer representations and warranties and indemnification provisionsthan in other sale transactions
• Conditions to closing for regulatory and private party approvals
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Transaction Structure
“Conversion In Place”• Change in organizational documents of for-profit corporation to not-for-
profit corporation which qualify for 501(c)(3) status
• Election of independent board of directors
• Former stockholders surrender stock to the corporation and receivefair market value for shares, which is paid over time and evidenced byloan documents
• Transactional documentation is less than in asset sale and mergerstructures
• There may be lesser requirements for regulatory and private partyapprovals. The transaction will constitute a change of control forpurpose of participating in federal student aid.
• Variety of administrative changes, such as changes to employeebenefit plans
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Other Topics
Charitable contributions may be part of thetransaction
• Deductions arising from contribution may be veryhelpful for owners butcomplexities arise ifassets other than cashare contributed
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Other Topics
Corporate governance• Not-for-profit corporation must be under the control of a
board of directors which is independent of formerowners
• Caution as to persons who serve as directors of otherhigher education institutions participating in federalstudent aid programs serving on not-for-profitcorporation’s board of directors
© 2012 Dickstein Shapiro LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Other Topics
Corporate governance, cont.• Board of directors approve compensation arrangements
for any former owners who continue to serve asemployees. Income tax laws and regulations limit theamount of compensation
• Members of board of directors may be personally liablefor “excess benefit” transactions