Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Have your say @brownejacobson
'Arrow' declarationslessons from Fujifilm v AbbVie
Have your say @brownejacobson
'Arrow' declarationslessons from Fujifilm v AbbVie
Connect with Mark
+44 (0)121 237 3993
Have your say @brownejacobson
Thank you forjoining todayFollow us on LinkedIn fornews, legal updates, realopinions and training:https://www.linkedin.com/company/technology---cyber-security
Have your say @brownejacobson
'Arrow' declarationslessons from Fujifilm v AbbVie
Connect with Mark
+44 (0)121 237 3993
Have your say @brownejacobson
The English Patents Court – a forum fordeclaratory relief• an innovative forum• Civil Procedure Rules – CPR
40.20• Messier Dowty v Sabena• Nokia Corp v InterDigital• Arrow Generics v Merck & Co
Ltd
• FSA v Rourke– justice to the Claimant– justice to the Defendant– useful purpose– special reasons
Have your say @brownejacobson
Statutory declarations• non-infringement – section
71 Patents Act 1977• invalidity (+ revocation) -
section 74(2) Patents Act1977
Have your say @brownejacobson
Court’s inherentjurisdiction under CPR40.20• non-essentiality (and
essentiality) to a technicalstandard (Nokia vInterDigital)
• whether licences offered inrespect of SEPs are FRAND(Unwired Planet v Huawei)
Have your say @brownejacobson
Court’s inherentjurisdiction under CPR40.20• that the Defendant’s
product was obvious at thepriority date of a patentapplication (not yetgranted) (Arrow and nowhere for real in FKB)
Have your say @brownejacobson
Fujifilm v AbbVie• the background• why it mattered - the
market and the patents• the proceedings• strike out and AbbVie’s
offer
Have your say @brownejacobson
The FSA v Rourkeconsiderationsapplied• useful purpose• justice to the Claimants and
the Defendants• any special reasons to grant
or not grant
Have your say @brownejacobson
Furtherconsiderations• the opening of floodgates?• expert guidance• the court’s approach to
dosage regimens
Have your say @brownejacobson
Connect with Mark
+44 (0)121 237 3993
Keep your questions comingor get in touch if you have a specific query
Have your say @brownejacobson
Thank you forjoining todayFollow us on LinkedIn fornews, legal updates, realopinions and training:https://www.linkedin.com/company/technology---cyber-security
Have your say @brownejacobson
The cases mentioned today• Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Company Ltd, Samsung Bioepsis UK Ltd
and Biogen Idec Ltd (together “FKB”) v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd[2017] EWHC 395 (Pat)
• Messier Dowty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER (Lord Woolf MR)• Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14 (Neuberger J)• Nokia Corp v InterDigital Technology Corp [2007] EWHC 3077 (Pat)
(Pumfrey J)• Arrow Generics v Merck & Co Ltd [2007] EWHC 1900 (Pat) (Kitchin J)• Unwired Planet v Huawei [2015] EWHC 1029 (Pat)
Have your say @brownejacobson
Connect with Mark
+44 (0)121 237 3993
Keep your questions comingor get in touch if you have a specific query
