50
EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 30 th April 2014 Presented by Ben Power, Andrew Peters, Louise Maynard Solicitors, Springhouse Solicitors

Employment Law Update

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Employment Law Update

EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE30th April 2014

Presented byBen Power, Andrew Peters, Louise Maynard

Solicitors, Springhouse Solicitors

Page 2: Employment Law Update

Agenda

• Introduction – Ben Power• New TUPE and Mandatory ACAS Conciliation –

Andrew Peters• New Whistleblowing, Flexible Working and

Changes to Parental Rights – Louise Maynard• Cases Update covering calculation of holiday pay,

collective redundancies, maternity rights and fairness of dismissal – Ben Power• End and refreshments

Page 3: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Andrew Peters

Page 4: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

The Old: Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

The New: The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014

Page 5: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Dismissals following transfer less likely to be unfair• no longer automatically unfair unless the

‘sole or principal reason for their dismissal is the transfer’

Page 6: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Dismissals following transfer less likely to be unfair (continued)• new general defence that the dismissal was

for an ‘economic, technical or organisational reason involving changes in the workforce, including changes in working duties, and numbers of employees’

Page 7: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Changing contracts after transfer will be made easier• changes are invalid only if ‘the sole or

principal reason for the dismissal is the transfer’, with an ETO (economic, technical or organisational) defence

• changes allowed where this is in the contract of employment (now would be a good time to review your contracts)

Page 8: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Changing contracts after transfer will be made easier (continued)• changes allowed where this is in the contract

of employment (now would be a good time to review your contracts)

Page 9: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Employee information must be provided earlier • transferor must provide basic information

about transferring staff and any problems or disputes 28 days before the transfer date

• this used to be 14 days

Page 10: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Service provision contracts are less likely to be caught• new TUPE will only apply where contract

carried out by the new contractor is ‘fundamentally the same’ way as before

Page 11: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Large scale redundancies: consultation will be easier• transferees planning to make more than 20

people redundant are able to carry out their consultation before the transfer takes place, with consent of existing employer

Page 12: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Flexibility for micro businesses• businesses with fewer than 10 employees will

be able to consult with them directly, without the need for the election of representatives

Page 13: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Union negotiated terms will be easier to deal with• collective agreement terms can now be

changed after 1 year provided the changes, when considered alongside the whole employment contract, leave the employee no worse off

Page 14: Employment Law Update

New TUPE

Union negotiated terms will be easier to deal with (Continued)• where there is a union agreement in place,

terms subsequently agreed (such as pay rises) will not affect transferred employees

Page 15: Employment Law Update

MANDATORY ACAS CONCILIATION

Andrew Peters

Page 16: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, Schedules 1 and 2

ACAS Guide – Early Conciliation Explained

New rules in force 6 May 2014

Page 17: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Claimants must notify ACAS about the claim:• before it is commenced• by online/post/telephone• in respect of each respondent

Forms may be rejected if incorrectly filled in

Page 18: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

When notification is not required:• ACAS already contacted• certain types of claim not covered (query

TUPE, counter-claims)

Page 19: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Starting conciliation – ACAS contact with parties:• ACAS contacts claimant for consent to

contact respondent• may be problems contacting right person at

respondent, but National Contacts List• ‘settlement not possible’ if contact not

possible with either party

Page 20: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Conciliation:• for up to 1 month• plus 14 day extension if consent and

reasonable prospect of settlement• COT3 where conciliation successful

Page 21: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Starting a claim:• only possible where EC (Early Conciliation)

Certificate issued (number must be included on ET1)

Page 22: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

• EC Certificate issued if conciliation fails:- settlement not possible- contact not possible- either side refuses- ACAS decides conciliation not possible- time period up

Page 23: Employment Law Update

Mandatory ACAS Conciliation

Extensions of time to bring claims:• clock stops at Day A - date of compliant

contact with ACAS• clock starts at Day B - date of issue of EC

Certificate • but always at least a month to bring claim

after Day B

Page 24: Employment Law Update

NEW WHISTLEBLOWING

Louise Maynard

Page 25: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

The Old:• Whistleblowers protected where

- disclosure of information relating to a ‘relevant failure’ (including criminal offences and failures to comply with legal obligations)- ‘reasonable belief’- ‘good faith’ in most circumstances

Page 26: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

The Old (continued):• Parkins v Sodexho:

- alleged breaches of own contract of employment protected- many employment disputes therefore covered, where no public interest

Page 27: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

The New:• Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013: • The new ‘public interest’ test for protection• in the ‘reasonable belief’ of the worker

Page 28: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

The New (continued):• tending to show

- criminal offence- failure to comply with legal obligation etc

• no need to show ‘good faith’

Page 29: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

How will ‘public interest’ be interpreted?• undefined • potential meanings to be decided by

tribunals and courts

Page 30: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

How will ‘public interest’ be interpreted? (continued)• potential meanings could be very wide

- from: of some interest to the public (favoured by the press!)

- to: demonstrable benefit to the public generally - but easy to satisfy either? i.e. general interest in

employers complying with their contracts, or that discrimination is a pernicious evil?

Page 31: Employment Law Update

New Whistleblowing

Removal of ‘good faith’ requirement• now only relevant to award, which can be

reduced by up to 25%• malicious disclosures permitted• courts may allow detriment due to manner of

disclosure, but this remains to be seen

Page 32: Employment Law Update

NEW FLEXIBLE WORKING Effective from 30 June 2014

Louise Maynard

Page 33: Employment Law Update

New Flexible Working

What changes?• Right to request flexible working extended:

- to all employees with 26 weeks’ continuous service

- irrespective of caring responsibilities

Page 34: Employment Law Update

New Flexible Working

What changes? (continued)• Statutory procedures scrapped• Employer must consider request in a

‘reasonable manner’- new draft ACAS Code of Practice- new ACAS Guidance

Page 35: Employment Law Update

New Flexible Working

What changes? (continued)• Employer must give decision within three

months from date of application• Employee’s failure to attend a meeting and

re-convened meeting can lead to application being treated as withdrawn

Page 36: Employment Law Update

New Flexible Working

What remains the same?• Flexible working request must be made in

writing and include:- date of application- changes being sought and from when- effect on employer and ways to deal with any

such effect - confirm it is a statutory request and the date of

any previous application

Page 37: Employment Law Update

New Flexible Working

What remains the same? (continued) • Eight business reasons to refuse a request• One request in any 12 month period• Decisions must be made objectively avoiding

unlawful discrimination

Page 38: Employment Law Update

CHANGES TO PARENTAL RIGHTS

Louise Maynard

Page 39: Employment Law Update

Changes to Parental Rights

New right to shared parental leave for parents of children expected to be born or placed with them for adoption from 5 April 2015

Page 40: Employment Law Update

Changes to Parental Rights

• Key Rights:- Share maternity leave and 37 weeks SPP- Employee can make three notifications- Parents can take SPL together or separately- Employer not obliged to agree to work pattern- Where employer cannot agree to work pattern

employee entitled to take one continuous block of SPL to start on their chosen date

Page 41: Employment Law Update

Changes to Parental Rights

• Key Rights (continued):- SPL to start on their chosen date - 20 keeping in touch days

• Protection from unfair dismissal or detriment available from 1 October 2014

Page 42: Employment Law Update

Changes to Parental Rights

New right for father and partners (employee and qualifying agency workers) to take time off to attend antenatal appointments• Up to 2 x max 6.5 hour appointments -

unpaid

Page 43: Employment Law Update

Changes to Parental Rights

New right for adoptive parents to take time off to attend adoption appointments• Up to 2 x max 6.5 hour appointments – paid or

unpaid • Employer can require employee to first sign a

declaration• Employer’s unreasonable refusal can lead to

liability for compensation equal to 12 hours’ pay• Effective from 1 October 2014

Page 44: Employment Law Update

Are you ready?

Page 45: Employment Law Update

CASES UPDATE

Ben Power

Page 46: Employment Law Update

Holiday Pay

Lock v British Gas Trading Ltd and others• Comission payments to be taken into account

when calculating statutory holiday pay

Page 47: Employment Law Update

Collective Redundancy Consultation

USDAW v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration) and another case (the ‘Woolworths case’)• Employees of the retail chains Woolworths

and Ethel Austin, who worked in stores where fewer than 20 employees were employed, were entitled to be consulted collectively

Page 48: Employment Law Update

Meetings with Employees

Crime Reduction Initiatives (CRI) v Lawrence• Employer's letter to a disabled employee,

which mistakenly invited her to a disciplinary hearing rather than a capability meeting

Page 49: Employment Law Update

Philosophical Belief

Olivier v Department of Work and Pensions• Was Labour Party member's belief in

‘democratic socialism’ a philosophical belief under Equality Act 2010?

Page 50: Employment Law Update

www.springhouselaw.com

01483 698989

[email protected]