21
Forensic psychologists & immigration law June 29 th , 2016 Speaker: Julia McLawsen, PhD

Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Forensic psychologists & immigration law

June 29th, 2016Speaker: Julia McLawsen, PhD

Page 2: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Greg McLawsenManaging AttorneySound Immigration

@mclawsen [email protected] www.soundimmigration.com

Page 3: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Julia McLawsen, PhD

Licensed Psychologist (WA)Registered Psychologist (BC –

inactive)

[email protected] www.lawandpsychology.com

Page 4: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Roadmap

What is a “forensic” psychologist?

01

02 Letter of support v. evaluation

03 Elements of an evaluation

04 Objective testing instruments

05 Hardship waivers

06 VAWA, U-Visas & 751 waivers

07 Drug/alcohol abuse

08

page 4

Self-harm inadmissibility

Page 5: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Therapist/Counselor

• Not always a state-licensed title• Focus: providing treatment

Social Worker• BASW or MSW degree • LICSW, state-licensed• No required legal training •Broad professional focus

“Regular” psychologist

•State license required• PhD or PsyD (MA sometimes)•Focus: behavioral health

1 – What is a forensic psychologist?

page 5

Page 6: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Letter of support vs. evaluation

Summarizes provider’s relationship with client

Opinion based on familiarity with client

No special data collected for letter

Author partisan to client

page 6

“Letter of support”

Responds to legal referral issue

Opinion based on evidence-based clinical assessment

Data collected specifically for the legal referral issue

Author’s goal is to be objective

Evaluation

Page 7: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Psychological testing• Personality/cognition• Symptom inventories • Validity testing

Diagnostic formulation

• Symptoms, impairments• Narrative • DSM-5 diagnosis

Forensic analysis• How does clinical data

relate to the referral question?

• Academic reesarch • Recommendations

3 – Elements of an evaluation

Summary of referral issue

• Relevant legal standard • How is evaluation

helpful?

Clinical interview• Mental status/behavioral

observations• Psycho-social, cultural history

Collateral sources• Records• Consultations

page 7

Page 8: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Objective tests give results independent of the

psychologist’s beliefs, biases or expectations

Objective testing

•PAI (Personality Assessment Inventory) • MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) • MCMI-IV (Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory) • TSI-2 (Trauma Symptom Inventory) • Victoria Symptom Validity Test • M-FAST (Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test) • TOMM (Test of Memory Malingering) • WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale)

Page 9: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Working with a forensic psychologist

help me help you

page 9

Page 10: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Examples of ImmigrationEvaluations

Page 11: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Hardship Waivers

page 11

Whether denial of a waiver application would (1) cause (2) a qualifying relative to (3) experience a magnitude of hardship (4) that substantially exceeds the magnitude of hardship an average individual would be expected to suffer if their ken was denied such a waiver.

Page 12: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

McLawsen, McLawsen & Ruser, A STATISTICAL STUDY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL

EVALUATIONS IN HARDSHIP WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY (Benders 2011)

Findings

1. Appeals with evaluations are more likely to be decided favorably.

2. Diagnosis per se does not predict success.

3. History of mental health problems correlates with success.

4. Number of meetings with evaluator not predictive.

5. Somatization was correlated with positive outcome.

Page 13: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Hardship Waivers

• Who is/are the Qualifying Relative(s)?• How do you think I can help you prove hardship? • Country conditions – not my expertise!• Do you have a theory for why relocation is infeasible? • If you have records, let me see them!

page 13

Page 14: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

VAWAU-VisasI-751 abuse waivers

Page 15: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Domains of trauma symptoms

1. Re-experiencing traumatic events.

2. Avoiding situations that trigger re-experiencing.

3. Emotional reactivity. 4. Problems with

cognition and mood.

Page 16: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

w w w. s o u n d i m i g r a t i o n . c o m

Alcohol/drug abuse

page 16

Understanding drug/alcohol

abuse diagnoses

Page 17: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Factors tending to show remission

1. Evidence based treatment function of abuse?

2. Active participation targeting use patterns?

3. Lifestyle changes? 4. Relapse

prevention plan?5. Accountability?

Page 18: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Self harm

Page 19: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Intake questions for self-harm

1. Have you even been in therapy?

2. Have you ever intentionally hurt yourself?

3. If so, when?4. Get a release of

information for all mental health records.

Page 20: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Referral questions for self-harm

evaluation

1. Does client current meet dX criteria for mental disorder?

2. Describe the nature and severity of self-harmful behavior.

3. What is the likelihood of future self-harmful behavior?

4. Will treatment reduce likelihood of future harm?

Page 21: Forensic psychologists & immigration law

Thank you Julia McLawsen, PhD

(206) [email protected]