13
Spam Law Update: Guidance for Advertisers, Networks, and Mailers Karl Kronenberger Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP

Spam Law Update

  • Upload
    krlaw

  • View
    361

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Spam Law Update

Spam Law Update:Guidance for Advertisers, Networks, and

MailersKarl Kronenberger

Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP

Page 2: Spam Law Update

Overview of the LawCAN-SPAM , 15 USC 7704(a)

Prohibitions:• Deceptive subject lines• Materially false or misleading header information

Requires:• Sender’s postal address• Notice that it is an advertisement / solicitation• Opt-out mechanism

Standing:• “Provider of Internet access service adversely affected” by a violation

of the Act

Damages:• Up to $300 per violation

Page 3: Spam Law Update

Overview of the LawCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17529.5

Unlawful activities relating to commercial e-mail advertisements; additional remedies

(a) It is unlawful for any person or entity to advertise in a commercial e-mail advertisement either sent from California or sent to a California electronic mail address under any of the following circumstances:

(1) The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by a third-party's domain name without the permission of the third party.

(2) The e-mail advertisement contains or is accompanied by falsified, misrepresented, or forged header information. This paragraph does not apply to truthful information used by a third party who has been lawfully authorized by the advertiser to use that information.

(3) The e-mail advertisement has a subject line that a person knows would be likely to mislead a recipient, acting reasonably under the circumstances, about a material fact regarding the contents or subject matter of the message.

Page 4: Spam Law Update

Overview of the LawWash. Rev. Code Ann. § 19.190.020

19.190.020. Unpermitted or misleading electronic mail—Prohibition

(1) No person may initiate the transmission, conspire with another to initiate the transmission, or assist the transmission, of a commercial electronic mail message from a computer located in Washington or to an electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, is held by a Washington resident that:

(a) Uses a third party's internet domain name without permission of the third party, or otherwise misrepresents or obscures any information in identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of a commercial electronic mail message; or

(b) Contains false or misleading information in the subject line.

(2) For purposes of this section, a person knows that the intended recipient of a commercial electronic mail message is a Washington resident if that information is available, upon request, from the registrant of the internet domain name contained in the recipient's electronic mail address.

Page 5: Spam Law Update

What is the State of Spam Law Today?

• CAN-SPAM v. State Spam Laws

• Momentum with Plaintiffs or Defendants?

• California v. Other States

Page 6: Spam Law Update

Notable Cases

• Balsam v. Trancos, Inc.- 203 Cal.App.4th 1083 (2012)

• Rosolowski v. Guthy-Renker, LLC- 230 Cal.App.4th (2014)

Page 7: Spam Law Update

Notable Cases

• Timothy Dewitt v. Devry University, Inc., et al.,

- No. A142444 (First Appellate District – Unpublished)

• Botranger v. Showmark Media, LLC, et al.,

- Case No. CV 14-01144 MMM (District Court for the Central District of California)

Page 8: Spam Law Update

Notable Cases

• Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, Inc.- District Court for District of Maryland, PJM-08-409 (2013)

• Wagner v. Spire Vision, LLC, et al.- District Court for the Northern District of California (2015), 2015 WL 876514

Page 9: Spam Law Update

Current Tactics of Spam Plaintiffs

• Automated Systems to View, Download, Sort Bulk Email

• Aggregating Plaintiffs

• Focus on Advertisers and Networks, NOT the Actual Senders

• Settlements Do Not Exceed Costs of Litigation

Page 10: Spam Law Update

Current Legal Arguments & Strategies of Spam Plaintiffs

• From Domains

• From Names

• Subject Lines

• WHOIS Records

• Venue Selection

• Veil Piercing

• Valuing Violations

• Preparation

• Identifying Affiliates

Page 11: Spam Law Update

Best Practices for Advertisers, Networks and Senders

• From Email Domains: Confirm Permission

• From Names: Use Brands and DBAs

• Subject Lines: Match with Content of Email

• WHOIS Records: No Privacy

• Corporate Structure: Follow Formalities; Elaborate Structures Not Worth the Expense

Page 12: Spam Law Update

What are the Economics of Spam Litigation?

• Early Briefing: Motions to Dismiss, Demurrers

• Discovery Costs

• Class Action Litigation

• Extortion / Shake Down Tactics

Page 13: Spam Law Update

Conclusion

Karl KronenbergerKRONENBERGER ROSENFELD LLP

(415) 955-1155, ext. [email protected]