21
IP of TPP November 4 th , 2015 Scott Foster, Partner

Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

IP of TPP

November 4th, 2015

Scott Foster, Partner

Page 2: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

2

Background

History/law

• Under the royal prerogative power of the federal

Crown, the Executive Branch of government has the

exclusive power to negotiate and conclude

international treaties, while Parliament has the

exclusive power to enact legislation to implement the

treaties.

• Agreement signed October 5, 2015. Once the treaty

was signed, Canada may not act in a way that would

defeat the treaty’s object and purpose. However, the

treaty is not legally binding until ratified.

Page 3: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

3

Background

History/law

• Canada will not typically ratify an international treaty

until measures are in place to ensure that its terms are

enforceable in domestic law.

• If domestic legislation is necessary, an implementation

bill is to be drafted, which is then tabled in Parliament

and goes through the parliamentary legislative

process.

Page 4: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

4

Background

History/law

• Once the federal government is satisfied that the

treaty’s obligations will be met by domestic legislation,

the Minister of Foreign Affairs is authorized to sign an

“Instrument of Ratification or Accession”. Once this

instrument is deposited with the appropriate authority,

the treaty is officially ratified.

• Treaties come into force either on a specified date or

when specified terms and conditions, such as

ratification by a minimum number of states, have been

met.

Page 5: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

IP rights affected

• Patents

• Trademarks

• Copyright

• Industrial designs

• Geographical Indications

• Enforcement measures

5

Page 6: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Patents

Industrial application (E.1)

“Subject to paragraphs 3 and 4, each Party shall make

patents available for any invention, whether a product

or process, in all fields of technology, provided that the

invention is new, involves an inventive step, and is

capable of industrial application.”

6

Page 7: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Patents

Unreasonable delays (E.12)

“If there are unreasonable delays in a Party’s issuance

of patents, that Party shall provide the means to, and

at the request of the patent owner, shall, adjust the

term of the patent to compensate for such delays.”

7

Page 8: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Patents

Patent term extensions (E.14)

“With respect to a “pharmaceutical product” that is

subject to a patent, each Party shall make available an

adjustment of the patent term to compensate the

patent owner for unreasonable curtailment of the

effective patent term as a result of the marketing

approval process.”

8

Page 9: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Patents

Data/marketing approval (E.16/E.20)

“For the purposes of Article QQ.E.16.1, a new

pharmaceutical product means a pharmaceutical

product that does not contain a chemical entity that

has been previously approved in the Party.”

9

Page 10: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Patents

Biologics (E.18)

(a) with respect to the first marketing approval… of a new

pharmaceutical product that is or contains a biologic, provide

effective market protection …for a period of at least 8 years from

the date of first marketing approval of that product in that Party;

or

(b)… provide effective market protection: …for a period of at

least 5 years from the date of first marketing approval of that

product in that Party; (ii) through other measures; and (iii)

recognizing that market circumstances also contribute to

effective market protection to deliver a comparable outcome in

the market.

10

Page 11: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Trademarks

Non-traditional marks (C.1)

“No Party may require, as a condition of registration,

that a sign be visually perceptible, nor may a Party

deny registration of a trademark solely on the ground

that the sign of which it is composed is a sound.

Additionally, each Party shall make best efforts to

register scent marks. A Party may require a concise

and accurate description, or graphical representation,

or both, as applicable, of the trademark.”

11

Page 12: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Trademarks

Collective marks (C.2)

“Each Party shall provide that trademarks shall include

collective marks and certification marks. A Party is not

obligated to treat certification marks as a separate

category in its domestic law, provided that such marks

are protected. Each Party shall also provide that signs

that may serve as geographical indications are

capable of protection under its trademark system.”

12

Page 13: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Trademarks

Well known marks (C.5)

“Each Party shall provide for appropriate measures to

refuse the application or cancel the registration and

prohibit the use of a trademark that is identical or

similar to a well-known trademark, for identical or

similar goods or services, if the use of that trademark

is likely to cause confusion with the prior well known

trademark.”

13

Page 14: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Trademarks

Nice Classification

“Each Party shall adopt or maintain a trademark

classification system that is consistent with the Nice

Agreement Concerning the International Classification

of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the

Registration of Marks of June 15, 1957, as revised and

amended.”

14

Page 15: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Trademarks

Term of trademarks

“Each Party shall provide that initial registration and

each renewal of registration of a trademark shall be for

a term of no less than 10 years.”

15

Page 16: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Copyright

Duration of copyright protection (G.6)

“Each Party shall provide that, where the term of

protection of a work (including a photographic work),

performance, or phonogram is to be calculated on the

basis of the life of a natural person, the term shall be

not less than the life of the author and 70 years after

the author’s death;

16

Page 17: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Copyright

Marrakesh treaty (G.17)

“Each Party shall endeavor to …facilitat[e] access to

published works for persons who are blind, visually

impaired, or otherwise print disabled.”

17

Page 18: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Industrial designs

Hague Agreement Concerning the International

Registration of Industrial Designs (F.2)

“The Parties recognize the importance of improving

quality and efficiency in their industrial design

registration systems, as well as facilitating the process

of cross border acquisition of rights thereof including

giving due consideration to ratifying or acceding to

Hague Agreement Concerning the International

Registration of Industrial Designs (1999).”

18

Page 19: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Geographical indications

Gis (D.1)

“The Parties recognize that geographical indications

may be protected through a trademark or sui generis

system or other legal means.”

19

Page 20: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Enforcement measures

Combating Counterfeit Products Act

• Criminal sanctions for trademark and copyright

infringement.

• Border measures

20

Page 21: Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty & Intellectual Property

Thank You

montréal ottawa toronto hamilton waterloo region calgary vancouver beijing moscow london

Scott Foster

Tel: 604-891-2294

Email: [email protected]